Zero Footprint
2.1K views | +0 today
Follow
 
Rescooped by Daniel LaLiberte from green infographics
onto Zero Footprint
Scoop.it!

The true cost of water

The true cost of water | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it

The market’s perverse water pricing creates opportunities for businesses that look beyond the market and consider the true cost of H20.

The environmental and social costs of global business water use add up to around $1.9 trillion per year, according to new research.

Some of these external water costs already are being internalized and hitting bottom lines: Just last year, the worst drought in the United States in 50 years sent commodity prices skyrocketing. Companies, especially those in the food, beverage and apparel sectors whose margins and supply chains are tightly linked to agricultural commodities, can use the true cost of water to get ahead of the trend of external costs increasingly being internalized through regulations, pricing or shortages...


Via Lauren Moss
Daniel LaLiberte's insight:

Understanding the true costs of resources, and accounting for these costs, is critical to realistically reaching the goal of Zero Footprint.

more...
No comment yet.
Zero Footprint
We absolutely can reduce our ecological footprint all the way down to zero!
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Daniel LaLiberte
Scoop.it!

Renewable Energy Could Fully Power Grid by 2030

Renewable Energy Could Fully Power Grid by 2030 | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it

Renewable energy could fully power a large electric grid 99.9 percent of the time by 2030 at costs comparable to today’s electricity expenses, according to new research by the University of Delaware and Delaware Technical Community College. A well-designed combination of wind power, solar power and storage in batteries and fuel cells would nearly always exceed electricity demands while keeping costs low, the scientists found.


“These results break the conventional wisdom that renewable energy is too unreliable and expensive,” said co-author Willett Kempton, professor in the School of Marine Science and Policy in UD’s College of Earth, Ocean and Environment. “The key is to get the right combination of electricity sources and storage—which we did by an exhaustive search—and to calculate costs correctly.”


Unlike other studies, the model focused on minimizing costs instead of the traditional approach of matching generation to electricity use. The researchers found that generating more electricity than needed during average hours—in order to meet needs on high-demand but low-wind power hours—would be cheaper than storing excess power for later high demand.

 

“Aiming for 90 percent or more renewable energy in 2030, in order to achieve climate change targets of 80 to 90 percent reduction of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide from the power sector, leads to economic savings,” the authors observe.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Daniel LaLiberte
Scoop.it!

Electric cars are greener than gas, literally everywhere

Electric cars are greener than gas, literally everywhere | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it

"A study produced by advocacy group Transport & Environment says electric cars produce fewer emissions everywhere in the European Union, even coal-dependent Poland."  


Another study, "Fuel Sources for Electricity in the Individual Countries of the World and the Consequent Emissions from Driving Electric Vehicles, finds that electric cars produce fewer emissions than their gas powered equivalent in every country in the world, even Botswana and Gibraltar which produce 100% of their electricity from coal and oil respectively." 


"We need a multi-pronged approach that goes something like this: 


 1) Switch all vehicles to electric drivetrains.

 2) Clean up the electrical grid so they on renewables.

 3) Encourage the use of smaller vehicles with only as much range as is realistically needed.

 4) Promote ridesharing and alternatives to car ownership, so manufacturing emissions are spread over a greater number of passenger miles.

 5) Rethink planning and transportation so that cars aren't necessary."

Daniel LaLiberte's insight:
We are crossing the threshold of "electric vehicles are greener" even with dirty (fossil fuel) electric power, so if we factor in health costs, jobs, etc, electric vehicles are not only greener but cheaper.  We should soon be buying nothing but electric vehicles, and plugin hybrids during the transition. 
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Daniel LaLiberte
Scoop.it!

Bright Spots From The Resistance: Why There’s Hope For Climate and Clean Energy Progress

Bright Spots From The Resistance: Why There’s Hope For Climate and Clean Energy Progress | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it

The only question is when clean energy will fully power the country, no longer ‘if.’ And the loud and clear answer we’re pushing forward is: Now.


The challenge before us is awesome. But the path to a clean energy transformation is rapidly emerging. Let’s take stock of the progress we can achieve:


#1: States can and will lead the way—and we’re pushing them at every step.   Much of our nation’s energy policy is crafted at the state level by public utility commissions. Utility commissioners decide whether customers like you will be forced to pay for power from a dirty coal plant, or benefit from money-saving energy efficiency programs, or generate your own electricity affordably with rooftop solar. 


#2: The market momentum of clean energy is on our side—and likely unstoppable.  For power companies, it’s getting harder and harder to justify continued investments in fossil fuels when clean energy solutions are available, affordable and scalable now. Utility-scale wind and solar power are now cheaper per kilowatt-hour than gas, coal, or oil.


#3: People want change—and our movement is gaining power.  Public concern about climate change is at the highest point in three decades, and big majorities of Americans want to see action. Our challenge is to channel this broad support into bold action. But we’re not starting from scratch. In communities across the country, people have been building power to challenge fossil fuel companies and plant the roots of a brighter future.


more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Daniel LaLiberte
Scoop.it!

Energy Emissions Can Be Reduced 70% By 2050, says First-Ever IEA & IRENA Report

Energy Emissions Can Be Reduced 70% By 2050, says First-Ever IEA & IRENA Report | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it

Global energy-related carbon dioxide emissions could be reduced by as much as 70% by 2050, and completely phased out by 2060, all while providing a net positive economic outlook that could benefit up to trillions of dollars in economic benefits and GDP.


Unsurprisingly, energy efficiency measures and renewable energy capacity additions are expected to be the primary drivers of emissions reductions. 


The report also highlighted a larger series of “deep transformation of energy production and consumption” that needs to occur by 2050, including: 


* Nearly 95% of electricity would need to be low-carbon by then, compared with about a third today, led by renewables.


* 7 out of every 10 new cars would need to be electric, compared with 1 in 100 today. 


* The entire existing building stock would need to be retrofitted and the CO2 intensity of the industrial sector would need to drop by 80% below today’s levels. 


* Fossil fuels, in particular natural gas, would still be needed in 2050, and would account for 40% of energy demand, around half of today’s level 


* $3.5 trillion in energy-sector investments would be needed on average each year until 2050, which is around twice current levels of investment

Daniel LaLiberte's insight:
We can do better than this, and we probably need to. Why should renewable energy deployment slow down after 2030? Why not continue the trend and eliminate carbon dioxide emissions 100% by 2050? Why not accelerate the transition and finish in 15 years? Since we save money and lives as we switch over to 100% renewable energy, we should do it as fast as feasible, as soon as possible.
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Daniel LaLiberte from Brainfriendly motivating comprehension resources for ESL EFL learners
Scoop.it!

Re-thinking Progress: The Circular Economy we can re-design the way our economy works Ellen MacArthur Foundation


Today's linear ‘take, make, dispose’ economic model relies on large quantities of cheap, easily accessible materials and energy, and is a model that is reaching its physical limits. A circular economy is an attractive and viable alternative that businesses have already started exploring today. 


A circular economy is restorative and regenerative by design, and aims to keep products, components, and materials at their highest utility and value at all times. The concept distinguishes between technical and biological cycles. As envisioned by the originators, a circular economy is a continuous positive development cycle that preserves and enhances natural capital, optimizes resource yields, and minimizes system risks by managing finite stocks and renewable flows. It works effectively at every scale. 


Re-thinking Progress: The Circular Economy 


There's a world of opportunity to re-think and re-design the way we make stuff. 'Re-Thinking Progress' explores how through a change in perspective we can re-design the way our economy works - designing products that can be 'made to be made again' and powering the system with renewable energy. 


From "https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-economy/overview/concept"


Lots of interesting videos (71 ) on sustainable development on Ellen MacArthur Foundation·youtube channel made2bemade again https://www.youtube.com/user/made2bemadeagain ;


Here is a longer informative presentation on the issues by Ella Jamsin:   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucTiaS7kh2k


Via Aulde de Barbuat
Daniel LaLiberte's insight:
We don't just need to reduce all consumption.  We need to convert bad consumption into good consumption by ultimately recycling all waste into new products, powering it all with 100% renewable energy.  That's what the Circular Economy is all about.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Daniel LaLiberte
Scoop.it!

Generation Z wants more action for a sustainable future, reveals global research from Masdar

Generation Z wants more action for a sustainable future,  reveals global research from Masdar | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it

Climate change will be the world’s biggest challenge over the next decade, according to a global survey of [5000] young people carried out by Masdar, the Abu Dhabi Future Energy Company.


Post-Millennials also made clear their appetite for a stronger say on sustainability, with eight in ten (83%) saying governments need to listen more to young people about the issue. A similar number (80%) believe current leaders have not done enough to protect the environment, and it is up to their generation to build a more sustainable future. 


They think government and the private sector share responsibility for developing clean technology (81%), but they expect more government investment in renewable energy (84%).


Interestingly, Post-Millennials in the frontier states surveyed are the most likely to believe that all countries have a shared responsibility to adopt renewable energy and clean technologies, rather than it being the main duty of wealthy countries, with 73% taking this view. 


Frontier nations are also the most optimistic about the adoption of renewable energy in their country, with 83% saying that their country will have made significant progress during their lifetime.

Daniel LaLiberte's insight:
Young people are the future, and fortunately, they are on our side.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Daniel LaLiberte
Scoop.it!

China’s Citizens Overwhelmingly Want Renewable Energy

China’s Citizens Overwhelmingly Want Renewable Energy | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it

There are many places in China that are “worst-case scenarios” of the Industrial Age and its wastes. It is no wonder that many Chinese citizens are wide awake to solutions.  A new survey (by Ipsos) shows that 96% of Chinese urbanites believe “green power” could help. Of course, it will. Renewable energy can turn cities around.


The good news is that change is possible at this time in China, and it is occurring. An earlier post on CleanTechnica, “The Latest Trends In China’s Continuing Renewable Energy Revolution,” reports that China is working to remedy its many environmental problems. “China has made strategic choices favoring renewable over fossil fuels that are still not widely understood or appreciated,” John A. Mathews wrote.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Daniel LaLiberte
Scoop.it!

Tony Seba: All new vehicles, globally, will be electric by 2030

Tony Seba: All new vehicles, globally, will be electric by 2030 | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it

And they'll mostly be supplied by solar power.


Seba believes that all new road vehicles—buses, cars, vans, trucks etc—will be entirely electric by 2030. [His video says by 2025.] That's a pretty astounding prediction. Made even more astounding because he's not talking about one country—he's talking about the entire world.


But Seba's predictions may not be as crazy as you'd think. Pointing to the much touted example of horses versus cars in New York City, and to the absurd underestimates of cell phone adoption rates in the late eighties, Seba argues that insiders almost always miss technological disruptions of this scale.

Daniel LaLiberte's insight:
Electric vehicles have been doubling every year for several years already.  There were over 1 million electric vehicles in 2016 and there are about 1.2 billion cars in the world total.  So if we double 1 million just 10 times, we will reach 1 billion.  Also note that cars last only about 8 years on average, at least those with internal combustion engines.  So it looks to me that almost ALL cars will be electric within 10 years, because most will be new by then anyway. 
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Daniel LaLiberte
Scoop.it!

Cradle to Cradle Design – So Much More Than Recycling

Cradle to Cradle Design – So Much More Than Recycling | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it
It’s easy for the concepts of Cradle to Cradle design and a circular economy to become shorthand for recycling, but both are much more complex than that. As currency in a circular economy, Cradle to Cradle (C2C) products are sustainably manufactured, with safe ingredients, that can be perpetually recycled – all of which are critical to the approach.

To advance toward a more circular economy, product manufacturers and users must ask not only what happens to a product at the end of its useful life, but what went into that product: technical and biological nutrients, energy, water, labor; it requires a complex, holistic approach.
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Daniel LaLiberte from Cities, urban management and ecosystem services
Scoop.it!

This New Neighborhood Will Grow Its Own Food, Power Itself, And Handle Its Own Waste

This New Neighborhood Will Grow Its Own Food, Power Itself, And Handle Its Own Waste | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it

ADELE PETERS 05.25.16 6:00 AM
"If you live inside one of the houses in a new neighborhood being built in an Amsterdam suburb, your dining room might be next to an indoor vegetable garden. Outside, you'll have another seasonal garden. And down the street, almost everything you eat will be grown in high-tech vertical farms. "

"The neighborhood will be the first ReGen Village, a new type of community designed to be fully self-sufficient, growing its own food, making its own energy, and handling its own waste in a closed loop."


"We're really looking at a global scale," he says. "We are redefining residential real-estate development by creating these regenerative neighborhoods, looking at first these greenfield pieces of farmland where we can produce more organic food, more clean water, more clean energy, and mitigate more waste than if we just left that land to grow organic food or do permaculture there."


Via Mário Carmo
more...
Eben Lenderking's curator insight, December 28, 2016 5:40 AM

Fascinating

Eric Larson's curator insight, December 28, 2016 9:54 AM
Truly sustainable?
Juan Antonio Castán's curator insight, January 3, 3:17 AM
Este nuevo barrio cultivará su propia comida, generará su energía y gestionará sus residups
Rescooped by Daniel LaLiberte from Cities, urban management and ecosystem services
Scoop.it!

This eco-village is designed to be fully self-sufficient, from energy to food to waste

This eco-village is designed to be fully self-sufficient, from energy to food to waste | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it
RegenVillages, which is a spin-off company of Stanford University, is working on a pilot development of 25 homes in Almere, Netherlands, beginning this summer, with the aim of integrating local energy production (using biogas, solar, geothermal, and other modalities), along with intensive food production methods (vertical farming, aquaponics and aeroponics, permaculture, and others) and 'closed-loop' waste-to-resource systems, along with intelligent water and energy management systems. 

"We're really looking at a global scale. We are redefining residential real-estate development by creating these regenerative neighborhoods, looking at first these greenfield pieces of farmland where we can produce more organic food, more clean water, more clean energy, and mitigate more waste than if we just left that land to grow organic food or do permaculture there." - James Ehrlich, CEO of ReGen Villages

Via David Rowing, Alan Yoshioka, THE OFFICIAL ANDREASCY, Marc Kneepkens, Mário Carmo
more...
Marc Kneepkens's curator insight, June 5, 2016 8:17 AM

Getting ready for the #population boom and working with limited #resources.

Scooped by Daniel LaLiberte
Scoop.it!

What Will It Take For America To Go 100 Percent Renewable?

What Will It Take For America To Go 100 Percent Renewable? | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it
Is 2016 the year that switching to 100 percent renewable energy becomes mainstream?

 

It took just three years for three U.S. cities to make the transition to 100 percent clean energy — and experts in the field of renewable energy, as well as several prominent environmental groups, expect that pace only to quicken in the coming years.


In total, 12 U.S. cities — including San Francisco, CA, Georgetown, TX, and Ithaca, NY — have made commitments to transition to 100 percent clean energy, though many have yet to solidify those commitments as law.


But even if cities pledge to make the transition, there are still a number of barriers to overcome before 100 percent renewable energy can become a widespread reality.  While the price of renewables has been falling in recent years — with solar dropping 70 percent since 2009 and wind becoming cost-competitive with natural gas — there are still technological barriers to overcome, especially in the area of energy storage.


The numbers support the economic argument for transforming a city’s energy infrastructure — over the last year, the solar industry added jobs twelve times faster than the rest of the economy. Many experts and elected officials also view the Paris climate agreement reached last December as sending a clear signal to global markets that the world will be moving towards renewable energy.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Daniel LaLiberte
Scoop.it!

How world can go 100% renewables by 2050 – and save money

How world can go 100% renewables by 2050 – and save money | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it
Stanford study says that 139 countries could power their economies with 100% renewable energy - wind, water and sunlight - by 2050, create millions of jobs and save trillions.

 

The Stanford study focuses on what is has dubbed “WWS” – wind, water and sunlight. And it includes not just electricity but transportation, heating and cooling, industry, and agriculture, forestry and fishing.

 

They have even broken now the equipment and installations needed into each country. It appears eye watering, but Stanford says the land use requirements are minimal – just 0.29 per cent of the land area, mostly for solar PV, not including reclaimed fossil fuel plants.

 

Stanford says the major benefits of a conversion to WWS are the near-elimination of air pollution morbidity and mortality and global warming, net job creation, energy-price stability, reduced international conflict over energy because each country will be energy independent.

 
Daniel LaLiberte's insight:

Basically, it would be stupid NOT to switch to 100% renewables ASAP!

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Daniel LaLiberte
Scoop.it!

Study: 100% renewable electricity worldwide is feasible, and cheaper than business-as-usual

Study: 100% renewable electricity worldwide is feasible, and cheaper than business-as-usual | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it

"Solar plus storage could literally change the world."


"The study, entitled Global Energy System Based on 100% Renewable Energy Power Sector, was released at the COP23 UN climate summit in Bonn, and makes the claim that not only is this transition feasible—but would actually end up costing less than business-as-usual too. According to the study's modeling, the total levelized cost of energy would come down to 52 euros per MWh by 2050, compared to 70 euros today. And the transition would create 36 million jobs in the process too."


"This isn't, of course, the first time we've heard claims that 100% renewable energy is possible. But it's yet another data set suggesting a path forward. In fact, with favorable policy support like phasing out fossil fuel subsidies (yes!), promoting research and investment into renewables, and moving from emissions trading to a tax on carbon, the reports' authors claim that the transition could be complete even earlier than 2050."


In another post about this study, at  https://www.commondreams.org/news/2017/11/09/new-study-shows-urgently-needed-100-renewable-transition-more-feasible-ever ; Bill McKibben is quoted:


"If we have any hope of preventing absolute civilization challenge and catastrophe, then we need to be bringing down carbon emissions with incredible rapidity, far faster than it can happen just via normal economic transition," McKibben said. 


While entirely possible from an economic standpoint as the new research shows, the political feasibility of the transition is another story. "That depends entirely on whether we can build movements large enough to break the power of the fossil fuel industry that holds us where we are," said McKibben. "To go further what we need are many people in the streets demanding action and pushing governments to move much, much faster than they're currently contemplating."

Daniel LaLiberte's insight:
Share your insight
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Daniel LaLiberte
Scoop.it!

Regreening The Earth Could Lower Carbon Levels As Much As Ending Use Of Fossil Fuels

Regreening The Earth Could Lower Carbon Levels As Much As Ending Use Of Fossil Fuels | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it

"There’s a new study out which presents a series of 20 steps that can be taken to naturally mitigate the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Taken together, the effect on carbon levels would be equivalent to stopping the use of fossil fuels entirely."


"We show that “natural climate solutions” (NCS) can provide over one-third of the cost-effective climate mitigation needed between now and 2030 to stabilize warming to below 2 °C. Alongside aggressive fossil fuel emissions reductions, NCS offer a powerful set of options for nations to deliver on the Paris Climate Agreement while improving soil productivity, cleaning our air and water, and maintaining biodiversity."

Daniel LaLiberte's insight:
Of course we need to do both: end the burning of fossil fuels and regreen the Earth to lower carbon levels and restore the balance.
more...
Marc Kneepkens's curator insight, October 20, 10:24 AM

More and more creative ideas are coming up in order to safeguard the planet.

Scooped by Daniel LaLiberte
Scoop.it!

Death spiral for cars. By 2030, you probably won’t own one

Death spiral for cars. By 2030, you probably won’t own one | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it

By 2030, you probably won’t own a car, but you may get a free trip with your morning coffee. Transport-As-A-Service will use electric vehicles and will upend two trillion-dollar industries. It’s the death spiral for cars. 


The report, by RethinkX, an independent think tank that focuses on technology-driven disruption and its implications across society, says this stunning and radical [shift] will be driven entirely by economics, and will overcome the current desire for individual car ownership, starting first in the big cities and then spreading to the suburbs and regional areas.  


This disruption will have enormous implications across the transportation and oil industries, decimating entire portions of their value chains, causing oil demand and prices to plummet, and destroying trillions of dollars in investor value, not to mention the value of used cars. At the same time it will create trillions of dollars in new business opportunities, consumer surplus and GDP growth.


Seba admits that his forecasts are hard to digest. But what he sees in the transition to autonomous EVs from privately owned petrol cars is the same he has seen for all other major transitions: what he calls the 10x opportunity cost. It happened with the printing press, it happened with the first Model T – it cost the same as a carriage and two horses, but offered 10x the horsepower. 


 “Every time we have had a ten x change in technology, we had a disruption. This is going to be no different.” And that change, he says, will happen on day one of level 5 autonomous EVs obtaining regulatory approval. “Basically, the day that autonomous vehicles are regulatory accepted, transport-as-a-service will be 10x cheaper than cost of new vehicles,” he says. And four times cheaper than the cost of already owned vehicles.

more...
Scooped by Daniel LaLiberte
Scoop.it!

Dame Ellen MacArthur: food, health and the circular economy

Talk during the 2015 EAT Food Forum. Read more on www.eatforum.org
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Daniel LaLiberte
Scoop.it!

Polydome Sustainable Agriculture

Polydome is a revolutionary approach to greenhouse agriculture that offers the possibility of commercial scale, net-zero-impact food production. 


The Polydome system strategically interweaves a wide variety of crops and animals, taking advantage of every inch of the greenhouse while eliminating the need for synthetic fertilizers and pesticides.


It is estimated that by using Polydome, even cities as densely populated as New York City could provide the majority of their own food supply using available roof space. A less dense city like Rotterdam could provide an estimated 80% of its food needs using only 3% of its surface area. 


For more information on sustainable agriculture and the polydome visit: Except Integrated Sustainability - http://www.except.nl/en/#Home

Daniel LaLiberte's insight:
The key interesting concept is that the majority of our food needs can be met in the same space required for us to live.  

While animals are involved in this ecosystem, I expect it would work fine, perhaps even better, without us having to eat them, if we get our minimal protein needs from plants.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Daniel LaLiberte
Scoop.it!

Survey Results: Acceptance of Renewable Energy Worldwide

Survey Results: Acceptance of Renewable Energy Worldwide | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it

What is the public’s opinion on renewables? 


• In major industrialized countries of the Western World, renewables have a high degree of acceptance with approval ratings well above 80% in most cases.


 • Expansion targets for renewable energies are also strongly supported. This applies to European Union member states, Japan and, depending on the costs, also to the US, Canada and Australia. 


The reasons behind the high acceptance levels are the environmental benefits and perceived sustainability. The acceptance seems to be little influenced by the energy policy of the country and the expansion of renewable energies. So countries with a relatively low level of development have a similarly high level of acceptance as countries with a high share of renewable electricity.

Daniel LaLiberte's insight:
Almost everyone wants renewable energy. So we should be able to move very fast toward the goal of 100% renewable energy, as long as the powers that be don't slow us down?
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Daniel LaLiberte
Scoop.it!

Urban farming utopia in India produces more energy than it uses

Urban farming utopia in India produces more energy than it uses | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it

Vincent Callebaut unveiled designs for a self-sustaining urban utopia in India that not only grows organic food, but also produces more energy than it consumes.


Designed in collaboration with agroecologist Amlankusum, Hyperions was created to achieve two major objectives: energy decentralization and food deindustrialization. The result combines urban agriculture, bio-based materials, and dense mixed-use planning into a self-sufficient development. The project comprises six 36-story connected towers built from cross-laminated timber sourced locally and sustainably from a Delhi forest. Reinforced with steel, the timber towers sit atop a steel and concrete substructure engineered for earthquake resistance and to take advantage of the earth’s thermal inertia for stable natural heating and cooling. The project is designed to achieve a net-zero environmental footprint with a recycling system that takes care of gray water, black water, and food waste on site. Energy for the buildings is generated via wind turbines and photovoltaic systems.

more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Daniel LaLiberte from MishMash
Scoop.it!

Shifting to a Clean Energy Economy Would Bring Billions in Economic Benefits, Shows New Report

Shifting to a Clean Energy Economy Would Bring Billions in Economic Benefits, Shows New Report | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it

We all know the science. The United States and the world as a whole must reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent or more by 2050 in order to significantly reduce the risks posed by unabated climate change. 


We would need to invest an average of about $320 billion a year from 2020 to 2050, but the benefits would far outweigh these costs.


Via André Michel
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Daniel LaLiberte
Scoop.it!

It's Official: Solar Energy Cheaper Than Fossil Fuels

It's Official: Solar Energy Cheaper Than Fossil Fuels | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it

Renewable energy has reached an important milestone. The World Economic Forum (WEF) has determined that in many parts of the world, solar energy is now the same price or even cheaper than fossil fuels for the first time.


The WEF highlighted how the unsubsidized LCOE for utility-scale solar photovoltaic—which was not competitive even five years ago—has declined at a 20 percent compounded annual rate, "making it not only viable but also more attractive than coal in a wide range of countries."

more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Daniel LaLiberte from What we're reading...
Scoop.it!

Our Renewable Future By Richard Heinberg & David Fridley

Our Renewable Future By Richard Heinberg & David Fridley | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it
The next few decades will see a profound and all-encompassing energy transformation throughout the world. Whereas society now derives the great majority of its energy from fossil fuels, by the end of the century we will depend primarily on renewable sources like solar, wind, biomass, and geothermal power.

Fossil fuels are on their way out one way or another, and nuclear energy is a dead end. That leaves renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, and biomass, to shoulder the burden of powering future society. While it is probably an oversimplification to say that people in the not-too-distant-future will inhabit a 100 percent renewably powered world, it is worth exploring what a complete, or nearly complete, shift in our energy systems would actually mean. Because energy is implicit not only in everything we do but also in the built environment around us (which requires energy for its construction, maintenance, and disposal/decommissioning), it is in effect the wellspring of our existence.

Via Share The World's Resources
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Daniel LaLiberte from #Sustainability
Scoop.it!

Here’s How Canada Could Have 100% Renewable Electricity by 2035

Here’s How Canada Could Have 100% Renewable Electricity by 2035 | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it
Canada could become 100 per cent reliant on low-carbon electricity in just 20 years and reduce its emissions by 80 per cent by 2050, a new study shows. The report calls for bold policies to be adopted immediately in order for Canada to transition to a sustainable society. “Twenty years ago Canada was a leader on the climate change file. But today our reputation on this issue is in tatters,” James Meadowcroft, political science professor at Carleton University and one of the report’s authors told DeSmog Canada. “It is time for us to get serious and take vigorous action to move towards a low carbon emission economy.” The report is a collaboration between 60 Canadian scholars and outlines a 10-point policy framework to achieve dramatic emission reductions. At the top of the list is the need to put a price on carbon which was unanimously recommended by the report’s authors.

Via Organic Social Media
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Daniel LaLiberte
Scoop.it!

World’s biggest EV and storage maker predicts annual doubling in market

World’s biggest EV and storage maker predicts annual doubling in market | Zero Footprint | Scoop.it
World's largest EV maker says market will double every year for next three years, and sees strong growth in battery storage for homes.

 

Wang said that the EV market is growing “very fast”, a development that enabled it to become the number one EV maker in the world, outpointing Nissan and Mitsubishi with more than 43,000 units until the end of October.

 

“Every year will double for next three years,” Wang said when asked about the size of the market.

 
“This is not about competition. The market is so huge, it needs more people’s participation in the market. Tesla is targeting high end, there is a bit of an overlap, but we are focusing on electric cars and buses in different markets.
Daniel LaLiberte's insight:

This 100% growth per year is a little faster than recent projections, but still very reasonable.  Elon Musk also projects doubling the number of Teslas this year, and perhaps into the future: "Every year we are doubling our total cumulative production so at the beginning of last year we had fifty thousand cars in total on the roads worldwide and then last year we produced another 50,000 cars so the total fleet of Tesla vehicles doubled last year and will approximately double again this year"    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlidB40aoTI 

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Daniel LaLiberte
Scoop.it!

Fossil fuel subsidies: G20 spends billions to push us close to climate disaster - YouTube

A new report reveals that the G20 spent an average of $452 billion each year in 2013 and 2014 to support fossil fuel production, despite pledging to eliminate inefficient fossil fuel subsidies every year since 2009.

 

(From http://cleantechnica.com/2015/11/13/g20-nations-spending-452-billion-fossil-fuel-subisdies/)

 

“G20 governments are paying fossil fuel producers to undermine their own policies on climate change,” said Shelagh Whitley, of the Overseas Development Institute. “Scrapping these subsidies would rebalance energy markets and allow a level playing field for clean and efficient alternatives.”

 

 A report published in September by the Carbon Tracker Initiative found that not only are governments around the world subsidizing coal production to the hilt, but that some of these subsidies are opening coal reserves that would not have been touched without existing subsidies, therefore heavily distorting the market.


A similar report published again in September, this time by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), revealed more than 800 spending programs and tax breaks currently used by governments throughout the 34 OECD countries, as well as 6 additional emerging G20 nations (Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Russia and South Africa) to subsidize fossil fuel production. 


The absurdity of fossil fuel subsidies, beyond the obvious, was made quite clear in October by another report which showed removing fossil fuel subsidies in 20 countries would reduce national fossil fuel emissions by 11%.

Daniel LaLiberte's insight:

Quite the opposite of a carbon tax, these fossil fuel subsidies amount to a *negative* tax because the government is giving our tax dollars to the fossil fuel companies, thus accelerating our own destruction.  How insane! 

 

How about we, at the very least, eliminate these subsidies, so we end up with a 0 tax?  Or equivalently, tax the producers of fossil fuels exactly the same amount as the subsidies.

 

But as long as we continue to burn fossil fuels, the amount of the carbon tax should be equal to whatever it costs to sequester the emissions that result from the burning. Then we should use those tax dollars to actually sequester the carbon, and we will be carbon neutral, at least regarding future fossil fuels.

 

We still have to find a way to pay for restoring the environment back to the way it was before all this started, a few hundred years ago.

 

more...
No comment yet.