Travel Curators and Curation Tools
1.2K views | +0 today
Travel Curators and Curation Tools
Creative Contributors to Tourism and Travel Curation Methods, Curation Tools, Examples
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Dr. Eckard Ritter!

Guillaume Decugis & Jean-Marie Hullot

Guillaume Decugis & Jean-Marie Hullot | Travel Curators and Curation Tools |

Guillaume Decugis ( & Jean-Marie Hullot @LeWeb:Le Web TV  - on curation, and fotopedia

No comment yet.
Rescooped by Dr. Eckard Ritter from Content Curation Is Not Social Media!

Guillaume De Cugis responds to Robin Good

Guillaume De Cugis responds to Robin Good | Travel Curators and Curation Tools |

Guillaume De Cugis of responds to Curation thought leader, Robin Good in comment thread: 

( ...) Another example: I went to a Picasso exhibition a few ago at the de Young museum in SF: wonderful one. Did the curator spend more time preparing it than Picasso did creating the works? Unlikely. Is this saying that curators have it easy? Absolutely no! Easier doesn't mean it doesn't take any time at all. (...) our vision has always been to create a new form of media publishing, different than blogs or micro-blogging that is based on curation in a topic-centric model.

(Curated by  )


Via themezoom
Robin Good's comment, December 19, 2011 3:00 AM
Thank you Russell for picking this up. I think you could have provided extra value and stronger interest to click through, if, instead of copying and republishing the whole original answer from Guillaume which is accessible on his post, you excerpted the key points from the two sides of the argument, allowing readers to make sense of what is being discussed without having to go and re-read the whole exchange from scratch.

That, to me would have been an act of true help toward who is reading you.
Robin Good's comment, December 19, 2011 3:24 AM
No need to understand or buy into both sides to have a balanced reporting.

Asking is always an available option. When in need, use it! ;-)
Comments are there for this purpose.
If you chose voluntarily to repost without taking the time to uncover and understand what's being discussed and what the two parties are saying, you are just reposting stuff with no additional info or insight.

How does that help your readers make sense of this discussion without having to re-read it from the beginning?

themezoom 's comment, December 19, 2011 3:17 PM
Hello Robin, I also reported additional insight (added value) in a sister piece that also included my additional insight, which is also linked now on this story -

I "un-buried the lead" as I saw fit- which is added value AS CONTEXT (in my opinion).

The lead that I "un-buried" was hidden in the gems of your comments button on this post- because as a micro-celebrity, you yourself, have become newsworthy.

Also, by saying that i do not understand that other side of the story- what I mean is, the pure irony of your post, nullified the argument. It was largely self-expression and expert opinion- and persuasion.

It is not as if I did not take the time to understand both sides, I just don't think your side makes sense- in any context. It is too ironic to make sense.

The very digital context of your argument took place as context within your own personal Thought-Leadership digital magazine (gorgeouos, by the way) on - which is a pure form of self expression.

In your post, you use your own personal brand authority and thought leadership, in order too persuade me to question the very Technology Context (online magazines) being used, is the opposite of curation.

Because I am a subject matter expert on the topic of "contextual influence" and a technologist, I am very sensitive to such matters.

I refuse to submit to the idea that the topics, stories and sources that a curator 'selects' do not have a contextual agenda- driven by both self-expression and desire to persuade (i.e. attract). This nonsense has been floating around long enough.

The underlying agenda of curators (most refuse to admit) is to attract "leads" i.e. interest and clicks, which is the same agenda of any good magazine.

That being said, the traditional journalist reporting style is the "upside down pyramid" approach to writing, where the lead is un-buried in the headline. My post in question, is in this traditional style.

What concerns me about the curation movement, is its lack of HONESTY.

Digital Context Is Opinion. (In my opinion)

The articles chosen by a curator represent a CHOICE about what he/she believes is important - and these choices influences others- by casting certainty or doubt in their minds- and by focusing in on "potential meaning" of large data sets. This adds value. But it is also the subtlest form of persuasion.

Curators ARE persuaders, and we should not pretend otherwise when questioning the 'technical context' or messing with the 'metaphorical marketing campaigns' of any technology platforms we are standing on! (grin) I admit that the very context of your story felt as misplaced and incomplete as you imply that mine is.

I think you are probably the type of person who will (in a friendly way) criticize any Digital Context that is not your own. That is part of what makes you a great curator. (grin)

Have you ever thought about designing your own curation application? Now THAT would be newsworthy. ; - )

Respectfully, Russell Wright, Theme Zoom Developer
Rescooped by Dr. Eckard Ritter from Content curation trends!

Curation: natural form of Mobile Publishing

Curation: natural form of Mobile Publishing | Travel Curators and Curation Tools |

For a long time, Mobile Internet was a “baby internet” as Steve Jobs called it, the day the iPhone was launched. The first smartphones were not very smart as they didn’t support “real” HTML browsing nor many of the Web technologies that made online experiences rich and useful. Obviously, the iPhone changed that (...). But one area that still struggles with mobile is content publishing. (...) Curation is an opportunity to change that. Here's why.


Via Guillaume Decugis
No comment yet.