Political psychology
3 views | +0 today
Follow
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Karwester
Scoop.it!

Which Emotions Lead To Higher Levels Of Participation?

Which Emotions Lead To Higher Levels Of Participation? | Political psychology | Scoop.it
In political psychology, it's known anger is the strongest emotion for increasing participation. If you can make your audience mad about something, levels of participation increase. The problem is you can't control anger.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Karwester
Scoop.it!

Photo Storage by Personality (Yours) - New York Times

Photo Storage by Personality (Yours) - New York Times | Political psychology | Scoop.it
Photo Storage by Personality (Yours)
New York Times
Find your photo personality below, and you'll be one step closer to at least cleaning out that laptop.
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Karwester from Bounded Rationality and Beyond
Scoop.it!

Cognitive vs. behavioral in psychology, economics, and political science - Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

I’ve been coming across these issues from several different directions lately, and I wanted to get the basic idea down without killing myself in the writing of it. So consider this a sketchy first draft.

The starting point is “behavioral economics,” also known as the “heuristics and biases” subfield of cognitive psychology. It’s associated with various studies of cognitive illusions, settings where people systematically mispredict uncertain events or make decisions. Within psychology, this work is generally accepted but with some controversy which could be summed up in the phrase, “Kahneman versus Gigerenzer,” but it’s my impression that in recent years there’s been a bit of a convergence: for Kahneman the glass is half-empty and for Gigerenzer the glass is half-full, but whether you’re talking about “heuristics and biases” or “fast and frugal decision making,” there’s been a focus on understanding how our brains use contextual cues to decide how to solve a problem.

In economics, this work is more disputed because it seems to be in head-on conflict with models of utility-maximizing rationality from the 1930s-50s associated with the theories of Neumann and others on economic decision making. While some economists have embraced so-called “behavioral” ideas to explain imperfect markets, other economists are (a) skeptical about the relevance to real-world high-stakes behavior of laboratory findings on cognitive illusions and (b) wary of the political implications of social engineers who want to use cognitive biases to “nudge” people toward behavior they otherwise wouldn’t have done.

Within economics, I’d say that the behavioral/classical debate roughly follows left/right lines: on the left are the behaviorists who say that individuals and firms are irrational and thus we should not trust the judgment of the markets, instead we should regulate and protect people from their irrationality. On the right are the classicists who hold that people are rational when it comes to real economic decisions and thus any interference in the market, whether from governments or labor unions, will tend to make things worse.

 

Via Alessandro Cerboni
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Karwester
Scoop.it!

Your Beloved Personality Quizzes Are Generally Full of Crap - Jezebel

Your Beloved Personality Quizzes Are Generally Full of Crap - Jezebel | Political psychology | Scoop.it
Your Beloved Personality Quizzes Are Generally Full of Crap. In this age of identity quizzes and lists that only introverts, extroverts or sex addicts will understand, the basis for many of these qualifications is the Myers-Briggs ...
more...
No comment yet.