Human Rights
6 views | +0 today
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Dozzo Giacomo from Drugs, Society, Human Rights & Justice!

Half of young people see their parents drunk - Telegraph

Half of young people see their parents drunk - Telegraph | Human Rights |
Parents are putting children at risk of developing alcohol problems by setting bad examples, suggests research showing nearly half of young people have seen their mother or father drunk.

Via Julian Buchanan
Dozzo Giacomo's insight:

You as well ??

Julian Buchanan's curator insight, October 23, 2013 10:41 AM

If the survey said half  had seen their parents high on cannabis then we'd have a public outcry to remove children from irresponsible parents and dangerous situations that are 'sending out the wrong message'.


We are operating a hypocritical and deluded drug apartheid!

Rescooped by Dozzo Giacomo from Digital-News on today!

The Unconscious Nature of Excluding Women from Workplace Opportunities

The Unconscious Nature of Excluding Women from Workplace Opportunities | Human Rights |
Often, men don't realize that important conversations and collaborations happen without women present. This needs to change.

Via Thomas Faltin
Dozzo Giacomo's insight:

A really interesting article about an issue that is around us but we never mention

No comment yet.
Scooped by Dozzo Giacomo!

Immigration and the EU: BBC bias at its most blatant – Telegraph Blogs

Immigration and the EU: BBC bias at its most blatant – Telegraph Blogs | Human Rights |

Rarely is BBC bias quite so blatant.

A few days ago, a European Commission-funded report was published about the impact of benefit tourism. With the European Commission taking legal action against the UK government over the right of EU citizens’ to claim benefits in Britain, Brussels certainly has a dog in the fight.

And sure enough, EU Commissioner, László Andor, unveiled the report with a declaration that “so called benefit tourism … is neither widespread nor systematic”.

“Nothing to see. Move along”, seemed to be the line from Brussels.

Disgracefully the BBC seemed to swallow it all hook, line and sinker.

“Claims about large-scale benefits tourism in the EU are exaggerated,” Huw Edwards informed us on the Ten O’Clock news. The report “rebuffed” claims about benefit tourism, announced the BBC website.

Really? If the BBC editorial team had read the detail of the report, it is hard to see how they could possibly draw that conclusion.

Worse, the BBC editorial line seemed to ignore entirely the central, thudding issue at stake:  the UK is one of only five EU states (the others being Finland, Germany, Estonia and Ireland) that offer non contributory benefits to the unemployed. In other words, only if you live in one of those countries are you able to claim unemployment benefits without having paid into the system.

If you or I – or the BBC home affairs editor Mark Easton – pitched up in France, Italy or Greece, we could not claim unemployment benefit without having contributed into the system. (There might, as someone in the comment thread will point out, be a million or so Brits living in Spain, but they have no right to claim any Spanish benefits that their taxes have not contributed towards.)

The European Commission is, however, demanding that if Brits can claim non-contributory unemployment benefit in Britain, then so too must every EU citizen. It is the whole reason why they commissioned this report in the first place.  That there are no corresponding non-contributory entitlements for Brits to claim in most of Europe is something they ignore. We must open our system up to all comers, they insist.

Ridiculous? Too absurd to take seriously? Not if we rely on the BBC to report on what is happening and set the parameters of public debate.

Already one in every 25 claimants on Job Seekers Allowance is an EU migrant. I must have missed the bit where the BBC pointed this out.

There has been a 70 percent increase in migration from the EU over the past few years, a rise in the rate of unemployment amongst EU migrants, and a sharp increase in the number coming to the UK without work. Where did the BBC examine the public policy implications of this?

The report concluded that welfare payments were not acting as a magnet, on the basis of something called “stakeholder consultations”. In other words, officials asking other officials. Yet the BBC coverage seemed to take it all at face value.

Nor did the report that the BBC said rebuffed the idea of benefit migration make any effort to assess how many EU migrants were claiming housing benefit (I could find only three uses of the term in the report at all). Or council tax benefit, or indeed, various other non-contributory benefits that Brussels would like us to make available to all EU citizens.

For a public service broadcaster, you’d have thought that the report posed a key question; can the UK’s system of benefits survive if we have completely free movement of people within the EU, and no residency qualifications?

The BBC did not seem to ask it.

With Romanians and Bulgarians soon able to move to Britain, you’d have thought the impact of free movement across the EU on the sustainability of our welfare system merited further questions.

The BBC did not seem to think so.

For years, official opinion in this country – on immigration, the EU and much else – has been formed this way. Lazy, Lefty analysis, with the same tiny pool of “experts”, recycling the same identikit opinions. Thankfully the internet has begun to democratise comment and opinion forming. We can at last start to see how awful and out of touch the opinion forming classes can be.

A final thought. If we had state regulation of the press, the BBC would be free to carry on recycling its establishment clichés. But newspapers would find themselves having to answer to the same sort of grandees that preside over the BBC. Is that really what we want to see?

Dozzo Giacomo's insight:

The topic of the month for European Union, especially for Italy

No comment yet.