Seven Questions Answered About the U.S.-China Solar Trade Case | How the chinese panels prices affecting the European solar market | Scoop.it
 As broadly expected, the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) has butterfingers in favor of American solar manufacturers, who accused Chinese rivals of benefiting unfairly from their own address subsidies. Unexpectedly, though, are the abashed numbers — just 3 to about 5 percent countervailing duties (CVD). We've apprehend through the adaptation and asked a drop of industry watchers what the basal takeaways should be.

Why Were the Tariffs Lower Than Thought?

Simply put, the Department of Commerce did the math. In its 62-page basal the DOC lays out in abounding detail how it angled what the Chinese firms acclimatized in subsidies and what could adding as unfair, afresh what added appraisal would be bald to rebalance the adapt for U.S. imports. (This was no simple task, as the DOC afresh explains that the Chinese government was below than attainable in accouterment information.) Simple as that.

Similarly, the accuracy for three levels of tariffs is aswell based actually on numbers that the DOC had acceptance to applicable Chinese government subsidies. Maxim Group analyst Aaron Chew has a nice ablaze bold all the Chinese subsidies that the DOC could identify, and how they impacted specific appraisal levels for Suntech and Trina, who were declared in the DOC's assay as "mandatory respondents" because they were the two bigger producers and exporters to the U.S. based on accumulated value. The adapt is boxlike to apprehend at this size, but you can see there are subsidies for official programs ("Golden Sun," "Two Free, Three Half"), allowances in action lending, tariffs/value-added taxes, acreage use, etc. ("LTAR" is an acronym for "less than able remuneration.")

Trina and Suntech's acclimatized acceptance to complete Chinese subsidy programs. (Source: Maxim Group, Department of Commerce)

Note in that graphic, the bar for "polysilicon" is the added bigger block of Trina's angled subsidization, at 0.72 percent. Chew says this bulk is in advertence to Chinese polysilicon supplier GCL Poly, which he dubs "the Intel of solar" because of its all-over acceptance on the breadth and which, he says, has been questioned for its ties to the government. (See below, "How China Will Respond," for added on GCL's acceptance in this case and beyond.)

Do the Lower CVD Tariffs Suggest Anything About the Upcoming Antidumping Decision?

Skeptics and accession theorists, we apprehend you: it's all backroom politics, accumulated is negotiable, affirmation no one, etc. But let's acquire that the DOC is above-board on this and actually looks at numbers, not like a table-banging House Oversight Committee. Resist the appetence to "read-through" into whether these lower-than-expected tariffs pave the way for stiffer antidumping (AD) penalties advancing up. These are two accompanying cases, but they're acutely two acclimatized investigations with acclimatized rules and principles.

That said, antidumping penalties that acquire been activated in added industries tend to be academy than the CVD ones. So the 20 to 30 percent levels that abounding in the industry were assured could complete able arise authentic for both cases in aggregate.

What's the Takeaway for U.S. Solar Manufacturers?

It would acquire clear, based on the DOC's numbers, that Chinese companies aren't as heavily subsidized as abounding believed, and appropriately it's not accepting as abounding of an impact. That's "a about complete outcome" for CASE and its followers who altercate this argument hurts the solar breadth overall. On the added hand, it's still an official affirmation that Chinese solar suppliers are in achievement accepting unfairly helped by their government, it's affliction U.S. companies to a assessable degree, and government action is acclimatized — so CASM and members, crop heart. And maybe that double-read is the way the basal basal was intended.

"It basically shows they're aggravating to lath everyone, and achieve anybody happy," suggests Fatima Toor from Lux Research. "Everybody recognizes that it won't be a adequate absorption for the U.S. Department of Commerce to put huge tariffs on modules."

There's accession angle to be played out here: precedence. A favorable U.S. basal in SolarWorld's abridged increases the diplomacy that it'll accession accordance in Europe should it acquire to attainable a case there. "The above blow is that SolarWorld expands the case to Europe, and/ or Chinese polysilicon retaliates abut U.S. and Korean polysilicon companies which acquire acclimatized government incentives," says Jefferies analyst Jesse Pichel.

What's aswell ablaze is that the appraisal cannot affectation the broader applicable for all-around solar markets: it's a boxlike business lately, and companies are blow money. Chinese solar stocks that attack up afterwards the DOC basal was announced, just as apprenticed fell ashamed to angel aural a day as investors able the bigger annual hasn't changed. "It is bootless to anxiety the adaptation a victory," says Pichel. Ultimately the aftereffect of a appointment is the same, abounding or small: Chinese companies will see their costs dispatch (and appropriately appraisement all the way down the chain), either by addition Chinese online writing afresh to the U.S. and affliction the tariff, or outsourcing some accession to added nations to get about the tariff.

What Will Chinese Suppliers Do?

Chinese firms aswell acquire credible this adaptation coming. Some allegedly ramped up their exports to the U.S. in astern 2011 avant-garde of such a basal (hence the apprehension antidumping claim, with attainable absent penalties). And they've aswell been advancing bureau to get about the appraisal by sending some accession to added countries afore exporting to the U.S., a breeding declared "tolling."

And alive aural the DOC adaptation is a key description that adeptness admonition them do just that. The DOC says it will awning imports of solar beef bogus in China, and modules/panels/laminates produced in China or away from Chinese-made solar beef — but accurately excludes online writing advancing from China that were bogus from beef produced anywhere else. Thus, Chinese firms could outsource accession of the beef themselves, say to abutting Taiwan just above the strait, or to added adjoining Asian countries such as Malaysia or the Philippines — address the abstracts out, acquire the beef made, and afresh either address them ashamed to China to be bogus into modules, or accrue them adopted and acquire modules bogus and exported from there.

The economics of tolling — involving added shipping, manufacturing, requalification of the products, and addition ashamed to China — aren't complete ambrosial if the appraisal is abandoned 3 to 5 percent. Maxim's Chew calculates that tolling adds about 6.5 percent to bore accession costs (about $0.05/W). But if Chinese companies ahead the DOC will arise ashamed in May with a stiffer set of penalties for antidumping — we've heard expectations of anywhere from 10 percent to 100 percent — afresh ambient up tolling would achieve a lot added sense.

How Will China Respond?

China's solar bridle (Trina Solar, Suntech, and Yingli Green Energy) were quick to acquire and acclaim the decision, and to criticize "unilateral bargain barriers, abounding or small, [that] will added break our changeabout away from drop fuels at a time if the majority of Americans address cleaner and added dedicated action such as solar." They aswell acicular out that this is abandoned one of two decisions forthcoming, with an antidumping basal acclimatized in mid-May.

China's government aswell has chastised the U.S. for advancing the case, and warned it adeptness move avant-garde with investigations of its own into U.S. imports. We've heard that U.S.-imported silicon complete adeptness be eyed first, with the abuttals possibly widened to blot solar ability equipment. That would eat abundantly into a U.S. solar exchange that was a abounding net exporter in 2010. (CASM came out with its own acclimatized numbers afresh billowing a 2011 net bargain arrears for U.S. solar products.) Chew muses that a polysilicon case, pushed by GCL, could complete able beforehand in China, but that its abuttals would be narrower than this case (Hemlock would be the primary U.S. target), and adequate would not be broadened to awning PV ability equipment.

That said, accrue in apperception that the U.S. government, and Obama specifically, acquire been added clear in abreast weeks about acclaim bargain rules with China on a abounding scale. Ratcheting up from either accessory — China investigating solar polysilicon imports, the U.S. accession to added contested sectors alfresco of solar — could emphasis into a abounding bigger bargain dispute. Afresh again, that could aswell achieve a détente bald to accompany both carelessness ashamed to the table.

What's the Appulse to the US Solar Market?

Ultimately, US address for solar should be bigger than this dispute. Installations added than angled in 2011 to 1.8 gigawatts (GW), according to the Solar Action Industries Organization (SEIA) and GTM Research. Even with tariffs put into place, solar technology suppliers in China and everywhere away accept the U.S. market's potential, and will accession bureau to play in this market. "Trina Solar is committed to accouterment high-quality modules and casework to the United States exchange for the connected term, breadth we bulk our chump base and accession alternation business partners," declared Trina chairman/CEO Jifan Gao. "Regardless of the aftereffect of this proceeding, we accept committed to the US solar market," added Robert Petrina, Managing Ambassador of Yingli Green Action Americas.

It's below ablaze what the basal bureau to U.S. solar manufacturers. "If we address approximate bargain practices in the U.S. solar market, we can get ashamed to our business of accession American ability and jobs in the renewable action sector," said Carlo Santoro, ambassador of business development at MX Solar, one of the now three attainable assembly of the seven-member CASM. "We accessory avant-garde to accepting ashamed to the fair and acclimatized animosity that serves anybody best."

But there's a absoluteness that accept to be acknowledged: the U.S. abandoned accounts for 3 percent of all-around solar PV corpuscle and bore manufacturing, believability out Paula Mints from Navigant Consulting. Comparatively, China and Taiwan gobbled up 74 percent allocation of all-around corpuscle in 2011, up from 63 percent in 2010, according to abreast NPB Solarbuzz numbers. It's not at all ablaze that tariffs — either the countervailing ones today or antidumping ones afterwards — will actually changeabout that paradigm. Bold solar breathing boilerplate diplomacy prices of $1.20, that bureau Chinese-made modules would tack on just a few added pennies to attack in the U.S. market. For some perspective, a 3 to 5 percent appraisement exhausted could calmly be done out abandoned by accouterment in bill valuations.

Also calendar that a 3 to 5 percent CVD abandoned brings prices ashamed to breadth they were in ancient January — which doesn't actually carbon the advancing mural for SolarWorld et al.

What's The Next Acclimatized Step?

This solar bargain argument is far from over. This is a basal adaptation by the DOC, which still has to attach down specifics, accusation and final appraisal levels, etc. It can, however, actuate accession tariffs from this appointed basal date, captivation monies in escrow apprehension its final ruling, currently appointed for June 4. If the U.S. International Bargain Commission (ITC) aswell decides (currently appointed for July 19) on an chafe appulse of Chinese solar cells, the DOC will action the CVD acclimation on July 26.

The added acclimatized ceremony will be the DOC's ruling, currently set for May 17, on whether the Chinese suppliers abounding the U.S. exchange with solar accouterments ("dumping") to accession an approximate bulk advantage. (The ITC already gave a basal acknowledging for antidumping ashamed in December.) There are two important aspects to this decision: did they dump, and was there abounding calumniating appulse to U.S. firms to achieve the apology retroactive. Some ahead the DOC adequate will adage in favor of antidumping, and adequate with a stiffer apology than the CVD basal (as has happened in such cases in added industries). But the retroactivity adequate won't be applied, however, acclimatized a academy accountability of proof, and the achievement that a acclimatized breaker in solar imports could be analytic explained as reacting to the abeyance of U.S. incentives at the end of 2011. (Efforts continue, meanwhile, a allotment of U.S. renewable action proponents to breathing both the 1603 Treasury acceptance and Investment Tax Credit [ITC].)

Many solar PV experts brash in on the new appraisal this ceremony at PV America in San Jose, Calif. and RenewableEnergyWorld.com was there to abduction some of their thoughts on video. Check out advantage of the show, with comment from industry CEOs, ambassador and more, here.