Business change
18.5K views | +2 today
Follow
 
Scooped by David Hain
onto Business change
Scoop.it!

Three Rules for Innovation Teams

Three Rules for Innovation Teams | Business change | Scoop.it
Our business at Continuum is design and innovation (if you've used a Swiffer or pushed a new Target shopping cart, you've encountered us), so naturally we are always looking for ways to innovate how we innovate.
more...
No comment yet.
Business change
Getting ahead of the curve in business
Curated by David Hain
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

The 25% Revolution--How Big Does a Minority Have to Be to Reshape Society?

The 25% Revolution--How Big Does a Minority Have to Be to Reshape Society? | Business change | Scoop.it
Social change—from evolving attitudes toward gender and marijuana to the rise of Donald Trump to the emergence of the Black Lives Matter and #MeToo movements—is a constant. It is also mysterious, or so it can seem. For example, “How exactly did we get here?” might be asked by anyone who lived through decades of fierce prohibition and now buys pot at one of the more than 2,000 licensed dispensaries across the U.S.
A new study about the power of committed minorities to shift conventional thinking offers some surprising possible answers. Published this week in Science, the paper describes an online experiment in which researchers sought to determine what percentage of total population a minority needs to reach the critical mass necessary to reverse a majority viewpoint. The tipping point, they found, is just 25 percent. At and slightly above that level, contrarians were able to “convert” anywhere from 72 to 100 percent of the population of their respective groups. Prior to the efforts of the minority, the population had been in 100 percent agreement about their original position.
David Hain's insight:

The critical mass for change? should we beware of small extremist groups, or using this insight to build alliances for positive change?

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

Success Spotlight: Leader of Change Management at Microsoft

Success Spotlight: Leader of Change Management at Microsoft | Business change | Scoop.it
The people in Microsoft have been doing change management for a long while, but it hasn’t been very public. The original group that drove change management started in 2005 and was known as the Business Strategy Consulting Team. This team of 25 individuals focused on helping customers who had bought large amounts of technology get the best use that they could out of it. They worked directly with customers and CXOs at the executive level, helping customers adopt new ways of working with the technology that they had purchased. It was only around 2009 or 2010 that Microsoft realized that change management could be a competitive advantage as a strategic capability, and that this would require a more comprehensive and scalable change management methodology than what we had been using. Microsoft now has a dedicated team of around 100 people who focus all of their time on Adoption and Change Management, helping customers and partners grow their own capabilities in change management and gain real business value from the products and services that they purchase.
David Hain's insight:

How Microsoft manages change.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

Delivering for citizens: How to triple the success rate of government transformations

Delivering for citizens: How to triple the success rate of government transformations | Business change | Scoop.it

The failure rate of government transformations is far too high. It represents a huge missed opportunity to tackle society’s greatest challenges more effectively, to give citizens better experiences with government, and to make more productive use of limited public resources. If governments around the world matched their most improved counterparts, they could save as much as $3.5 trillion a year by 2021 while maintaining today’s levels of service quality. Alternatively, they could release substantial funds for the services citizens most care about, while keeping overall government expenditure constant.

Of course, this is easier said than done. Government leaders often have limited political capital, particularly in sensitive services such as education and healthcare, and in instances where ministers serve in a minority or coalition government. The public sector often has too many priorities: leaders try to reform too much, across too broad a waterfront. Another challenge is a lack of leadership longevity. For example, a review of ministers of health across 23 countries from 1990 to 2009 found that half of them served for less than two years in office.

To grasp the prize, governments can learn from the 20 percent of transformations that do achieve their goals. Our study not only shows what that involves but also highlights dozens of real-world success stories. It identifies five disciplines that, together, can more than triple the success rate of government transformations (exhibit). These disciplines may seem obvious, but our research shows that they are extremely difficult to get right.

David Hain's insight:

McKinsey report on how governments can up their pretty poor success rate in making transformations work. And boy, do they need to...

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

The Power of Listening in Helping People Change

The Power of Listening in Helping People Change | Business change | Scoop.it
One reason that giving feedback (even when it’s positive) often backfires is because it signals that the boss is in charge and the boss is judgmental. This can make employees stressed and defensive, which makes it harder for them to see another person’s perspective. For example, employees can handle negative feedback by downplaying the importance of the person providing the feedback or the feedback itself. People may even reshape their social networks to avoid the feedback source in order to restore their self-esteem. In other words, they defend themselves by bolstering their attitudes against the person giving feedback.

We wanted to explore whether a more subtle intervention, namely asking questions and listening, could prevent these consequences. Whereas feedback is about telling employees that they need to change, listening to employees and asking them questions might make them want to change. In a recent paper, we consistently demonstrated that experiencing high quality (attentive, empathic, and non-judgmental) listening can positively shape speakers’ emotions and attitudes.

David Hain's insight:

Seek first to understand - the power of listening to elicit change readiness.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

How management can prevent the downside of change

How management can prevent the downside of change | Business change | Scoop.it
The researchers, from universities in China and the US, found it is the perceptions of the change coupled with the perceptions of management which increase role stress and have a negative impact on role performance and job satisfaction. Together these two factors often exacerbate an already bad situation.

 

Drive their staff harder

What the researchers also found was that senior management seeking cost efficiencies will inevitably drive their staff harder. This is often as a direct result of the fact that fewer people have to do the same job as a larger team once did.

In many sectors such as healthcare, the passenger airline industry etc. there are definite minimum ratios between staff and clients that cannot be reduced without compromising safety.
David Hain's insight:

Staff perceptions are critical to change receptiveness. this implies a need for continuous dialogue, not simply when change is coming!

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

Mapping and Managing Stakeholders: A Practical Guide

Mapping and Managing Stakeholders: A Practical Guide | Business change | Scoop.it
As counterintuitive as this might sound, in corporate context, building a product that customers want is not enough to keep the project going. Managing stakeholders is equally important.
There’s loads of content out there on this topic. And understandably so, for a topic relevant for project managers and product owners in many roles, not just in innovation. A simple Google search of the query ‘managing stakeholders’ returns about 10,600,000 results. By comparison, searching for ‘lean startup’ returns ‘only’ 4,400,000 results.
In The Corporate Startup we present a workshop activity dedicated to stakeholder management. This post wishes to be an addition to that activity, looking at specific actions that you can take when managing stakeholders.
David Hain's insight:

Useful technique from Innov8rs for stakeholder mapping - never done enough at the outset in my experience. Use for diagnostic or planning purposes.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

What It Takes to Think Deeply About Complex Problems

What It Takes to Think Deeply About Complex Problems | Business change | Scoop.it
Simple answers make us feel safer, especially in disruptive and tumultuous times. But rather than certainty, modern leaders need to consciously cultivate the capacity to see more ­— to deepen, widen, and lengthen their perspectives. Deepening depends on our willingness to challenge our blind spots, deeply held assumptions, and fixed beliefs. Widening means taking into account more perspectives ­— and stakeholders — in order to address any given problem from multiple vantage points. Lengthening requires focusing on not just the immediate consequences of a decision but also its likely impact over time.

David Hain's insight:

Don't fall for the 'we make the complex more simple' spiel - good decision making requires a grasp of complexity.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

Strategic Plans Are Less Important than Strategic Planning

Strategic Plans Are Less Important than Strategic Planning | Business change | Scoop.it
Think of the plan as a guidance tool. The problem for many managers is that their expectations are all skewed from what can be realistically achieved via a strategic plan. Their image is more of the house-plan type or travel itinerary. They anticipate that by doing the necessary analysis and writing down how their business will succeed the world will be converted from uncertain to certain. In their eyes the strategic plan becomes a device for control rather than one of guidance. They’re not comfortable with the fluid and uncertain Moltke-the-Elder concept. This can manifest itself as “we’ve given up on strategic planning.” This emanated from a CEO whose experience in writing “it” all down was that he got it all “wrong” as things changed rapidly. In other similar situations executive teams find themselves simply ignoring any document that is produced.
David Hain's insight:

When it comes to strategic planning, the journey is more important than the destination - and the journey never ends!

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

Change Management is Dead

Change Management is Dead | Business change | Scoop.it
First of all, organizations don’t change. People in organizations try something differently and then a movement is either created, or it isn’t. When that movement happens, it tends to evolve the way that it evolves. In the 1930s American sociologist Herbert Blumer described how social change happens and over the coming decades, his work inspired a number of people who shaped his ideas into these stages:
Emergence: Someone is unhappy with the status quo and does something. There is little to no organization, and a pockets of “doers” emerge who disrupt the status quo.
Coalescence: Small successes happen, and in the context of Agile transformation, “unofficial Agile people” emerge. Some internal “unofficial” meetups may happen and a little more structure emerges in the organizational network. A shared purpose, or goals start to develop.
Bureaucratization: The Eye of Sauron is upon thee! At this point, someone high enough in the organization notices people are colouring outside the lines and they either support it, put a stop to it, or formalize it into the hierarchy. This may be the point when a VP of Agile/Innovation is hired.
David Hain's insight:

A savvy and perceptive assessment from the Happy Melly blog of traditional change management processes,  and what potential change agents really need to know.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

Eight shifts that will take your strategy into high gear | McKinsey

Many strategy planning processes begin with a memo like the one below. Such missives lead managers to spend months gathering inputs, mining data, scanning the marketplace for opportunities and threats, and formulating responses. In the strategy meetings that follow, the CEO leads discussions, executives jockey for resources, and a strategy emerges that confidently projects future growth. The budget is set—and then nothing much happens.
David Hain's insight:

This analysis of the shortcomings of strategic planning is on the money, imho! The solutions are good too, if challenging for many organisations.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

The 7 Habits Of Highly Effective Transformation Leaders

The 7 Habits Of Highly Effective Transformation Leaders | Business change | Scoop.it
Ten years ago, businesses were racing to understand and capitalize on concepts such as data mining, search technology, and virtual collaboration.

Today, digital transformation—which describes how digital technology is fundamentally changing the ways businesses operate and deliver value to customers—rules the roost and is disrupting companies everywhere, from their operating models to their infrastructures.

But that’s only part of the equation. “Digital transformation is actually a human transformation,” said Brian Solis, principal analyst at consulting and research company Altimeter. “We’ve learned that people have mistakenly overemphasized the role of technology in change. What this comes down to is leadership.”

With that in mind, we spoke with nine executives and thought leaders about what makes good leaders great, the habits that inform success, and specific skills they must hone to realize this transformation.
David Hain's insight:

Technology enables transformation - but leadership makes it happen! All of these habits are behavioural...

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

Data Can Enhance Creative Projects — Just Look at Netflix

Data Can Enhance Creative Projects — Just Look at Netflix | Business change | Scoop.it
Traditionally, power in the entertainment industry came from the ability to control the creation and distribution of content, but new technologies have made this process easier. The scarce resource now is audience attention, and the power of digital entertainment platforms lies in having the data to manage and direct this attention. Today that data is primarily owned by Netflix and Amazon, but it may soon come from new platforms enabled by the mergers of NBCUniversal and Comcast, AT&T and Time Warner, and Walt Disney and Fox.

People may fear the trend of more media content coming from data-driven platform companies instead of industry insiders, from eggheads rather than creators. But the truth is that it lets the creators shine by finding an audience for their work, however esoteric it may be. Rather than killing creativity, perhaps big data is fostering a new golden age of creativity.
David Hain's insight:

The creative power of using data effectively - interesting story of Netflix.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

'Nowconomics' And The Change Pandemic: Why You Need A Better Framework For Decision Making

'Nowconomics' And The Change Pandemic: Why You Need A Better Framework For Decision Making | Business change | Scoop.it

Never before has it been so important for the C-suite to keep an eye on the macro and micro environment. Blink and you might have missed a seismic shift that could be cataclysmic. However, it’s not just the ability to maintain a forensic appreciation of the latest trends that are needed -- it’s the capability to adapt. But organizational change takes time -- particularly the decision making process behind the change. Therefore, a decision making framework through which all opportunities are assessed relative to the organization and external factors is probably the one essential business process in today’s fast-paced landscape.

David Hain's insight:

Some useful models for strategic decision making in a 'blink and you've missed it' environment.

more...
Jose Luis Yañez's curator insight, February 22, 4:43 AM
'Nowconomics' And The Change Pandemic: Why You Need A Better Framework For Decision Making
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

Have you tested your strategy lately? | McKinsey 

Have you tested your strategy lately? | McKinsey  | Business change | Scoop.it
Let’s face it: the basic principles that make for good strategy often get obscured. Sometimes the explanation is a quest for the next new thing—natural in a field that emerged through the steady accumulation of frameworks promising to unlock the secret of competitive advantage.2 In other cases, the culprit is torrents of data, reams of analysis, and piles of documents that can be more distracting than enlightening.

Ultimately, strategy is a way of thinking, not a procedural exercise or a set of frameworks. To stimulate that thinking and the dialogue that goes along with it, we developed a set of tests aimed at helping executives assess the strength of their strategies. We focused on testing the strategy itself (in other words, the output of the strategy-development process), rather than the frameworks, tools, and approaches that generate strategies, for two reasons. First, companies develop strategy in many different ways, often idiosyncratic to their organizations, people, and markets. Second, many strategies emerge over time rather than from a process of deliberate formulation.3
There are ten tests on our list, and not all are created equal. The first—“will it beat the market?”—is comprehensive. The remaining nine disaggregate the picture of a market-beating strategy, though it’s certainly possible for a strategy to succeed without “passing” all nine of them. This list may sound more complicated than the three Cs or the five forces of strategy.4 But detailed pressure testing, in our experience, helps pinpoint more precisely where the strategy needs work, while generating a deeper and more fruitful strategic dialogue.
David Hain's insight:

Useful strategy audit or diagnostic.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

Coming of Age Digitally

Based on a global survey of more than 4,300 managers, executives, and analysts and 17 interviews with executives and thought leaders, MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte’s1 fourth annual study of digital business shows that the digital business environment is fundamentally different from the traditional one. Digitally maturing companies recognize the differences and are evolving how they learn and lead in order to adapt and succeed in a rapidly changing market. This year’s research provides some important insights into how companies are adapting to a digital business environment:
David Hain's insight:

The digital leadership landscape, as reported by MIT/Deloitte.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

Thinking about "transformation" beyond the digital

Thinking about "transformation" beyond the digital | Business change | Scoop.it
It's time to step beyond the digital in order to succeed in the rapid state of innovation we're all experiencing.

It's time, that is, to change the way we think about the value of the people in our organizational ecosystems by empowering them to rapidly respond to this change—and by providing the necessary skills and tools for becoming fluent in the critical task of engaging with change. Last November, when interviewed on CNBC's Squawk box, Red Hat president and CEO Jim Whitehurst said: "We found that when projects typically fail, it is usually not the technology, but has much more to do with the way companies operate." Jim went on to say that companies looking to transform the ways they work must examine their cultures, processes, and systems.
David Hain's insight:

The future may be digital, but people are the operating system that will determine its success!

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

Don Tapscott: smart contracts will change the nature of firms —

Don Tapscott: smart contracts will change the nature of firms — | Business change | Scoop.it

We think blockchain is leading to a change in the nature of the firm, in its deep architecture: by moving assets around in this decentralized way, companies and industries are going to look more like networks, and that has profound implications or this audience,” said Tapscott. Even the nature of corporate competition may change, as enterprises realize they have more to gain from distributing data and encouraging the flow of digital assets than siloing and hoarding them.

But to truly realize the potential of blockchain, corporate leaders will have to rise to the occasion. “Paradigm shifts involve dislocation, conflict, confusion, uncertainty. New paradigms are nearly always received with coolness, even mockery or hostility. Those with vested interests fight the change. The shift demands such a different view of things that established leaders are often last to be won over, if at all,” Tapscott concluded.

David Hain's insight:

Blockchain is coming - and it's going to make a big difference...

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

3 steps to creating participative strategy processes in organizations

3 steps to creating participative strategy processes in organizations | Business change | Scoop.it
Some of my most interesting work in in helping clients create effective processes for participative strategy. The traditional approach to strategy is that it is generated in the executive suite or by highly-paid consultants, then it is communicated to staff, usually rather ineffectively.

There is an increasing recognition that many people across the organization have invaluable insights into industry change, competition, client requirements, innovation and other issues that will help shape strategy. The challenge is in establishing processes that enable broad-based participation in a useful way, tapping ideas and generating positive energy for change.

In some cases, for example as I helped a global real-estate development company to implement, this can be framed in a fun competition format, assisting teams to generate visions of where the company can go. In other cases, a formal process can be created to expose staff across the company to strategic issues, then generating, capturing, filtering, and applying their insights to corporate strategy, as I did for a large financial services company.

Here is an excerpt from Chapter 7 of my book Living Networks providing some of the broader issues to address in implementing participative strategy.
David Hain's insight:

So many so-called strategies are top-down, mostly completely ignored by everyone else. But it doesn't have to be that way, says futurist Ross Dawson...

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

Why sensemaking will save agile?

Complex environments represent a continuous challenge for sensemaking in organizations. Continuous ambiguity exerts continuous pressures on organizations to modify their patterns of interaction, information flow and decision making. Organizations struggle to address situations that are precarious, explanations that are equivocal and paradoxical, and cognitive dilemmas of all kinds. This creates a demand for innovative approaches in sensemaking. Since agility is what is required in navigating complexity, we can call these new approaches “agile sensemaking.”
David Hain's insight:

This plea for a new way for organisations to organise makes sense to me, although I'm not surety agile branding will help to take root.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

Infographic: The Changing Landscape of Business Risk

Infographic: The Changing Landscape of Business Risk | Business change | Scoop.it
In the modern era, the pace of business is fast – but the pace of technological change is even faster.

As a result, the landscape of business risks is constantly shifting and changing, and both entrepreneurs and investors need to be on top of the potential factors that could disrupt their chances of success. At the same time, they also need to be prepared to address and mitigate new risks as they crop up.
David Hain's insight:

Interesting, and somewhat scary, analysis of mutations in the business risk environment. HT Trevor Lee.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

Digging deep for organizational innovation | McKinsey & Company

Digging deep for organizational innovation | McKinsey & Company | Business change | Scoop.it

Innovative organizations come in all shapes and sizes. Consider Hilcorp Energy, a privately owned oil and gas company, founded in 1989. It has more than 1,800 employees and operates assets producing over 300,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boe/day), all located in the United States. For the last six years, Hilcorp has been named among the top 100 best places to work by Fortune magazine and the Great Place to Work Institute; it is the highest ranked player in its sector on such lists.

What’s more, as CEO Greg Lalicker describes in this interview with McKinsey’s Peter Lambert, Hilcorp began embracing agile practices long before they were buzzwords, has put in place an innovative compensation system emphasizing fairness and shared rewards, and is comfortable that only half of the goals emerging from its planning process will be met. Hilcorp’s approach to strategy and the unique culture it has built since its founding by owner Jeff Hildebrand are thought provoking for leaders in any industry.

David Hain's insight:

How one Ceo puts the tail never wagging the dog into practice.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

3 Types of Change-Resistant Employees and How to Engage them

3 Types of Change-Resistant Employees and How to Engage them | Business change | Scoop.it
Employees fall into three groups when faced with change. Group 1 is open and willing to change and is often called the early adopters. Group 2 is uncertain and hesitant about change. Group 3 becomes entrenched and often will not change.

Depending on your organization and the type of change taking place, the distribution of employees in each group will vary. For simple changes with little impact, you may find that 90% of your employees fall into Group 1, 10% fall into Group 2 and no employees fall into Group 3. For complex changes that have a significant impact on individuals, the distribution may be much different, with a small fraction falling into Groups 1 and 3, and a large fraction into Group 2. Regardless of the distribution of employees into each group, the approach for managing resistance to change is similar.
David Hain's insight:

Decent advice on spotting the possible blockers to your change initiative.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

Company organization in the age of urgency | McKinsey 

Company organization in the age of urgency | McKinsey  | Business change | Scoop.it

Technology is changing everything. As digitization, advanced analytics, and artificial intelligence (AI) sweep across industries and geographies, they aren’t just reshaping the competitive landscape; they’re redefining the organizational imperative: adapt or die. The average large firm reorganizes every two to three years, and the average reorganization takes more than 18 months to implement. Wait and see is not an option; it’s a death sentence.

As a result, companies are beginning to experiment with increasingly radical approaches. We’re struck by a commonality among those who get it right: they create adaptive, fast-moving organizations that can respond quickly and flexibly to new opportunities and challenges as they arise. In doing so, they’re moving intelligent decision making to the front lines. That’s in sharp contrast to the standard, “safer” modus operandi of capturing data, sending it up a hierarchal chain, centrally analyzing it, and sending guidance back. Several of these forward-thinking organizations now starkly describe their decision making as being pushed to the “edges”—to and beyond employees, past the organization’s four walls, and out to consumers and partners. The process functions more like a network and less like a chain of command.

In this article, we’ll share these emerging elements of the organization of the future. While there is no set formula for success, we’ve seen versions of these elements at so many companies that we think they provide at least the organizational outline to win. Along the way, we’ll try to dispel some common misconceptions (too risky! too inefficient! too time consuming to set up!) of what such an organization really means. We know you don’t want your company to undergo yet another reorg—and another one a few years after that. Consider this a road map out.

David Hain's insight:

Could this really be the start of the end for endless reorganisation? I doubt it, but it's worth  thinking about...

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

A roadmap for AI: 10 ways governments will change (and what they risk getting wrong) | Nesta

A roadmap for AI: 10 ways governments will change (and what they risk getting wrong) | Nesta | Business change | Scoop.it
A useful starting point is to recognise that there are many different types of AI technology relevant to governments. These include machine learning, which essentially means making sense of patterns in data to better make predictions, and deep learning, the more recent form of machine learning that allows for more complex tasks to be performed. This part of AI has received the lion’s share of attention in recent years. But others that are relevant include computer vision, speech recognition and natural language processing, various data analytic tools (like model clustering, principal components analysis etc) and robotics (and this list is quite a helpful guide to AI functions that are already available in reality as opposed to blockbuster movies).

The promise

The promise of these various tools is to help governments make better informed decisions, whether at the level of policy, implementation or use of public services. They may make it easier to personalise services, particularly in medicine and healthcare; to predict and prevent problems such as water shortages; to enhance interactions through chatbots and cognitive assistants; and to augment human capabilities, for example of a fire officer entering a burning building. What follows is a list of ten major areas of likely change.
David Hain's insight:

Nesta on how artificial intelligence might change our relationship with governments.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Hain
Scoop.it!

Us versus Them: Reframing Resistance to Change

Us versus Them: Reframing Resistance to Change | Business change | Scoop.it

Anyone attempting to lead change in an organization knows to expect some resistance. Change is not a rational process; no matter how positive the future you are creating, it’s natural for humans to struggle with it.

Such resistance is no less frustrating for being predictable. At times, it can seem that all that stands between you and your goals are a few naysayers and whiners. And to those on a mission, such reactions can seem like putting one’s head in the sand. “The old business is not coming back,” one CEO told me. “We have to innovate or we will die.” Faced with negative remarks, critical questions, or stony silence, change champions naturally begin to interact more with those already on board, consciously or unconsciously distancing themselves from those who “don’t get it.

Gradually, a wall begins to form between “us” and “them” — champions who support the change, and resisters who openly or quietly oppose it. Unfortunately, approaching change with an “us versus them” mind-set actually increases pushback. When we think of people as resisters, we don’t truly engage with them. We tend to discount their perspective, assuming that if we are right, they must be wrong.

David Hain's insight:

People who resist change initiatives may be Luddites - or they may be Guardians, hold continue to see value in the way things are done. How you regard them will likely determine your approach, and your success rate!

more...
Jose Luis Yañez's curator insight, February 22, 4:41 AM
Us versus Them: Reframing Resistance to Change