AP Comparative Articles
0 view | +0 today
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Isaac Gonzalez from Welfare News Service (UK) - Newswire

NHS struggle to meet £20bn savings target hits elderly hardest

NHS struggle to meet £20bn savings target hits elderly hardest | AP Comparative Articles | Scoop.it
Knee and hip replacement operations and cataract removals fall to lowest level for five years as patients left longer in pain

Via Steven Preece
No comment yet.
Scooped by Isaac Gonzalez

'Romanians take the jobs Britons on welfare shun': The UK should be grateful says Bucharest minister

'Romanians take the jobs Britons on welfare shun': The UK should be grateful says Bucharest minister | AP Comparative Articles | Scoop.it

Britain should be grateful that Romanians and Bulgarians take jobs shunned by local workers, according to a senior minister in Bucharest.

Mariana Campeanu, Romania’s labour minister, said migrants ‘contribute greatly to GDP’ and should be welcomed for filling vacancies in agriculture and hospitality.

She said Britons living off the welfare state were refusing to take jobs in these sectors.


Mrs Campeanu told the Times her countrymen were already meeting shortfalls in key UK professions such as nursing and social care.

Restrictions on Romanian and Bulgarians working in Britain will be lifted on January 1, raising fears of a massive influx.

And last week David Cameron pledged to restrict welfare benefits on people from the two states if they come to Britain.

But Mrs Campeanu said the majority of Romanians here were economic migrants who did not come to claim benefits.


‘I do not know in depth the British social welfare system, this is an internal issue of the British government how generous it can be in its welfare system toward its citizens,’ Mrs Campeanu said.

‘This should maybe be a reason why many British people do not access the vacancies on the labour market for which Romanian citizens, for example, are going to apply. 

‘If there are any vacancies, somebody will fill them, whether they are from Romania, Italy, Spain or wherever.’

The Romanian prime minister, Victor Ponta, has also demanded his countrymen are not treated as ‘second-rate citizens’ by Mr Cameron’s proposal to delay benefits for three months.

And last month the Bulgarian ambassador Konstantin Dimitrov hit out at ‘anti-Bulgarian propaganda’ from some British politicians which he said served only to agitate ‘social tension’ in the UK. 

Mrs Campeanu said: ‘Taking into account the fact that Romanian citizens in the UK contribute greatly to the GDP and also that many of these people are young and well qualified, the UK should be grateful that these people have come to live there.’


During the Ask Boris programme on LBC Radio yesterday, London Mayor Boris Johnson said the benefits block could continue in the short term because of intense competition for jobs that left ‘many young Londoners who feel they are not getting a fair suck of the sauce bottle’.

Mrs Campeanu said there were staff shortages in some areas because of the EU freedom of movement policy.

‘Many doctors and nurses and other healthcare staff are coming to work in the UK and these are well-qualified personnel that will contribute highly to the welfare of the British people, at the same time depriving Romanian citizens of social assistance here,’ she added.

‘We have a deficit of 10,000 care workers and if we look at the entire medical sector, we are talking of a shortage of over 20,000 people.’

Mrs Campeanu also said Britain should be less suspicious of foreigners.

‘It is unacceptable in the 21st century that expressions of racism and xenophobia are taking place and it is more regretful that they are taking place in Great Britain,’ she insisted.

No comment yet.
Rescooped by Isaac Gonzalez from Welfare News Service (UK) - Newswire

Concern as 50% of people seeking homeless help from councils turned away

Concern as 50% of people seeking homeless help from councils turned away | AP Comparative Articles | Scoop.it
Homeless Link has welcomed a halt to the rising number of people seeking help from councils but raises concerns about the options available to those who are turned away.

Via Steven Preece
David Mcginty's curator insight, December 6, 2013 5:15 PM

So this is Christmas, expect breathtaking displays of hypocrisy from our glorious leaders. Homelessness is partly driven by keeping the housing bubble going, which only benefits those who now regard it as investment, many of which do not live here and pay no council tax, yet  own property which requires the rest of us to support  maintanance of, and office blocks lie empty while people freeze on the streets. I dare say one of the cabinet will soon come out with a gem of wisdom like "There is no proven link between homelessness and poverty" as they have stated about crime, much like the cancer deniers in he Tobacco industry did.

Newcastle Web Consulting's curator insight, December 7, 2013 3:07 PM

The latest government homelessness figures show a 3% fall in the number of households in England who approached their council for help. However, over half of those who seek help (53%) have had their application for help turned down.

Scooped by Isaac Gonzalez

European court is not superior to UK supreme court, says Lord Judge

European court is not superior to UK supreme court, says Lord Judge | AP Comparative Articles | Scoop.it

Former lord chief justice says law should be changed to make it clear British courts do not have to implement Strasbourg rulings.


The law should be changed to make it clear that British courts are not obliged to implement judgments of the European court of human rights (ECHR), according to the former lord chief justice.

Declaring that Strasbourg "is not superior to our supreme court" in London, Lord Judge, who retired in October, said parliamentary sovereignty should not be exported to "a foreign court".

He is the third senior judicial figure in recent weeks to warn about the dangers of an emerging "democratic deficit" if the ECHR continues to evolve into in effect a law-making body and forces the UK government to give prisoners the vote against parliament's expressed will.

Last week Lord Justice Laws, the longest-serving court of appeal judge, called on UK courts to stop deferring to Strasbourg on every issue. The week before, the supreme court justice Lord Sumption criticised the ECHR for exceeding its legitimate powers, and undermining the democratic process.

Their interventions are clear evidence of growing judicial resentment of the absolute authority of the Strasbourg court. Even Lady Hale, a staunch defender of the Human Rights Act, expressed concern in a speech last week that "the current problem facing both Strasbourg and the member states is whether there are any limits to how far the [European convention on human rights] can be developed".

In his wide-ranging speech to the Constitution Unit at University College London, which included a sideswipe at the home secretary, Theresa May, Judge said: "My profound concern about the long-term impact of these issues on our constitutional affairs is the democratic deficit … in our constitutional arrangements parliament is sovereign.

"It would make sense for the [Human Rights Act] to be amended, to express that the obligation to take account of the decisions of the Strasbourg court did not mean that our supreme court was required to follow or apply those decisions, and that in this jurisdiction the supreme court is, at the very least, a court of equal standing with the Strasbourg court.

"Are we … prepared to contemplate the gradual emergence of a court with the equivalent jurisdiction throughout Europe of that enjoyed by the supreme court in the United States of America?"

Judge insisted he was not adopting a pro- or anti-European stance, adding: "You can argue for and against prisoner voting rights … My personal belief is that sovereignty on these issues should not be exported, and we should beware of the danger of even an indirect importation of the slightest obligation on parliament to comply with the orders and directions of any court, let alone a foreign court."

In a separate passage, Judge hit back at May's address to the Conservative party conference criticising the judiciary. He said: "I suspect that I was not the only judge, and I suspect that it was not only judges who were astounded to read the observation of the home secretary at the recent Conservative party conference that some judges chose to ignore parliament and go on putting the law on the side of foreign criminals instead of the public."

The former lord chief justice also warned that the decision to amalgamate the office of justice secretary and lord chancellor, currently held by Chris Grayling, had left the judiciary without an independent voice at the highest level of government.

"The role of the lord chancellor [traditionally the head of the judiciary] has been diminished," Judge said. "Faced with this situation, I asked … to see the prime minister on a more or less regular basis about twice annually to speak to him about matters of concern to the judiciary."

The problem, he suggested, could be partially solved if the lord chief justice, who is currently prohibited from speaking about the administration of justice in parliament, was allowed to address the House of Lords.

Judge also said he had become "increasingly dissatisfied" over new funding arrangements for the courts which were being overshadowed by the financial requirements to sustain the prison service. Future lord chief justices should be given the power to block the justice secretary's demands, although the final decision should be subject to parliament's authority. "If the separation of powers is to mean anything at all, the concurrence of the lord chief justice is required," Judge said, "and … his concurrence to any change affecting the administration of justice should, from now on, automatically be built into any proposals for further change."

No comment yet.