Animal Science
6 views | +0 today
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Connor Emmert from Animal Sciences!

Are gassy cattle a bigger problem than US government thought?

Are gassy cattle a bigger problem than US government thought? | Animal Science |
Cattle generate twice as much methane as the EPA supposed, according to a new report. The study's findings may also change assumptions about the safety of extracting natural gas, which consists primarily of methane.

Via Sarah Glauber, Josh Nelson
Connor Emmert's insight:

I think that methane is a problem but if its coming from the cattle then its natural and its sopposed to be there. and the greenhouse effect is actually pretty nice. I mean indiana is 10 degrees right now and well warmness is ok and if its natual then its sopposed to be there. Just learn to cop with it 

Sarah Glauber's curator insight, December 4, 2013 6:08 PM

This sounds lik a problem to me.  There really isn't anything you can do to stop this though.  You can't really stop cows from being gassy.

Josh Nelson's curator insight, December 5, 2013 9:05 PM

Cassie Chriswell: 

I think that the gassy cattle is a big problem.  According to the report, human-caused (anthropogenic) methane emissions account for almost 65% of the global methane budget, most of that comes from cattle.  This report finds that ruminant animals generate twice as much methane than previously thought.  Can you believe that anthropogenic methane emissions for all sources were 2.7 times greater in Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas, making up almost 30% of the atmospheric carbon released by the natural-gas industry.  The hope was that natural gas would help reduce the greenhouse-gas emissions vs. coal! 

Trevor Boyne's curator insight, December 6, 2013 8:34 AM

These cattle are creating double the amount of methane in which we thought was being created. Cattle make up 24 percent of the nations emmisions of methane. With over 90 thousand cattle, that makes up for a lot of methane. In fact they are the leading cause of human caused methane in the nation.

Rescooped by Connor Emmert from Oceans and Wildlife!

The Tragic Story of the Death of Mexican Wolf 1288 at the Hands of USDA Wildlife Services

The Tragic Story of the Death of Mexican Wolf 1288 at the Hands of USDA Wildlife Services | Animal Science |
The USDA Wildlife Services Wildlife Specialist "Mistook" it for a Coyote The Endangered Species Act affords protection against unauthorized take of the Mexican gray wolves, and makes it a criminal ...

Via Wildlife Defence
Connor Emmert's insight:

This kind of thing should never happen. Its just complete and total lack of management. I realize there is numerous people responsable for this kinda stuff but they should seriously consider better maangment and procedure

No comment yet.
Rescooped by Connor Emmert from Animal Health Economics!

Livestock and crop insurance comes to Botswana

Livestock and crop insurance comes to Botswana | Animal Science |

In his 2009 State of the Nation address, President Ian Khama indicated that financial institutions have often been reluctant to offer loans to farmers in the absence of an agricultural insurance scheme. To fill this gap, he said government has encouraged the setting up of such a scheme. “We are also undertaking a Botswana Agricultural Sector Review to develop a consolidated turnaround strategy for the sector. Overall, it is my intention to significantly grow the agricultural sector to greatly improve our food security and self sufficiency and reduce poverty,” he said at the time.

Via Nicolas Antoine-M.
Connor Emmert's insight:

I think having insurance is a great idea. Everyone has troubles along the way and the insurance really helps with all of it. If you have a bad crop then the insurance will cover you so you wont loose your home and farm. Its just all around a better thing to have 

Nicolas Antoine-M.'s curator insight, November 9, 2013 7:30 AM

"...The farmers have to contribute and we have not received any uptake from them,” he said..."

Participatory approaches might be needed in order to achieve correct feasability studies of micro-insurance schemes.

Rescooped by Connor Emmert from Animal Sciences!

Tens of thousands of cattle killed in Friday's blizzard, ranchers say

Tens of thousands of cattle killed in Friday's blizzard, ranchers say | Animal Science |

Tens of thousands of cattle killed in Friday's blizzard, ranchers say October 08, 2013 7:33 am • Daniel Simmons-Ritchie Journal staff Tens of thousands of cattle lie dead across South Dakota on Monday following a blizzard that could become one of the most costly in the history of the state’s agriculture industry. As state officials spent the day calculating the multi-million dollar impact to the regional economy from Friday's storm, ranchers began digging up hundreds of cattle that are still buried beneath feet of snow. "This is absolutely, totally devastating," said Steve Schell, a 52-year-old rancher from Caputa. "This is horrendous. I mean the death loss of these cows in this country is unbelievable." Schell said he estimated he had lost half of his herd, but it could be far more. He was still struggling to find snow-buried cattle and those that had been pushed miles by winds that gusted at 70 miles per hour on Friday night. Martha Wierzbicki, emergency management director for Butte County, said the trail of carcasses was a gruesome sight across the region. “They’re in the fence line, laying alongside the roads,” she said. “It’s really sickening.” Silvia Christen, executive director of the South Dakota Stockgrowers Association, said most ranchers she had spoken to were reporting that 20 to 50 percent of their herds had been killed. "I have never heard of anything like it," she said. "And none of the ranchers I have talked to can remember anything like it." While South Dakota ranchers are no strangers to blizzards, what made Friday's storm so damaging was how early it arrived in the season. Christen said cattle hadn't yet grown their winter coats to insulate them from freezing wind and snow. In addition, Christen said, during the cold months, ranchers tend to move their cattle to pastures that have more trees and gullies to protect them from storms. Because Friday's storm arrived so early in the year, most ranchers were still grazing their herds on summer pasture, which tend to be more exposed and located farther away from ranch homes. Ultimately, Christen said, she believed that more than 5 percent of the roughly 1.5 million cattle in Western South Dakota had been killed. "It's much higher than that," she said. "But I'm not sure where that number is going to land." Jodie Anderson, executive director of the South Dakota Cattlemen's Association, said the pain for ranchers is now compounded by dysfunction within the federal government. While the government has programs to help ranchers who suffer losses from catastrophic weather events, those programs are in limbo because Congress has failed to pass a farm bill. The legislation is normally passed every five years and controls subsidy and insurance programs for the agriculture industry. Making things worse, because the government is currently in a partial shutdown, ranchers are unable to ask federal officials questions about how they might be reimbursed in the future. "A lot of the government agencies that we would normally be turning to for those answers are furloughed,” she said. “So there's this sort of timing issue that's enhancing the frustration out there in cattle country." The shutdown was caused after House Republicans, including U.S. Rep Kristi Noem, R-S.D., refused to pass a resolution to fund the government unless Democrats weakened or delayed parts of President Obama's 2010 health care overhaul. On Monday, Sen. Tim Johnson, D-S.D., pointed to South Dakota's battered ranchers as another example of why House Republicans needed to continue funding the government without preconditions. "Like the snow storm, the government shutdown is causing major disruptions in people’s lives and every day business," he said in a statement. Whether they are eventually reimbursed for their losses or not, however, ranchers are likely to feel the pain for years. David Uhrig, 31, a rancher in Folsom, said he estimated about 25 percent of his herd had been killed, which meant far fewer calves this spring. “We are looking at years of rebuilding to get back to what we lost,” he said. In the short term, however, Uhrig had far more pressing concerns. Like most ranchers, he spent most of Monday searching his land for stray cattle or sorting out cattle that had drifted into neighboring herds. “It’s not uncommon at this point to find cattle that are five miles from where they should be,” he said. “Which doesn't seem like a lot, but to drift five miles in a storm — that’s a lot.” Dustin Oedekoven, South Dakota’s state veterinarian, said that the next immediate challenge for ranchers would be disposal of carcasses. “That can be a significant source of disease spread, so we want to make sure those carcasses are burned, buried or rendered as quickly as possible,” he said. Oedekoven said disposal was primarily be the responsibility of ranchers themselves. However, the state was also helping ranchers get in touch with haulers that would take carcasses away for rendering. He added that, while the federal government was in poor shape to offer assistance because of the shutdown and a lack of a farm bill, ranchers should thoroughly document all cattle deaths. He said that could include taking photos, collecting cattle tags, or bringing in a veterinarian or farm service provider as an eye witness of deaths. “If you don’t keep good records about your losses you won’t be available for indemnity funds should they become available,” he said.

Via Josh Nelson
Connor Emmert's insight:

This kinda of thing really sucks. but theres really nothing anyone can do. I think maybe having more shelter may have helped though. the damage is in the millions , not to mention the farmers that dont have that kind of insurance. this is just a crappy thing all around

Sydney Bolyard's curator insight, December 6, 2013 11:27 AM

This excerpt of an unfortunate event across South Dakota has left several farms without sufficient cattle availability and loss of profit. In not way was this incident the farmer’s fault. This occurrence was completely out of their hands because it was just the weather. 

Summer Rain Reimer's curator insight, December 8, 2013 1:38 PM

There was a blizzard  in South Dakota. They didn't know about the  storm coming .They left the cattles out over night and it snowed  really bad. The cattles got buried in the snow and they can't get out  because the snow was heavy . Over 10,000 cattles got killed by the blizzard. They hadent grown their winter coats to keep them warm because it takes a long time to grow the winter coats. But the blizzard came to South Dakota early then they expected and that why they had died. cause their coats didnt grow all the way in .

Josh Nelson's curator insight, December 9, 2013 5:16 PM

Cassie Chriswell:

This all took place in South Dakota!  It was a big blizard that cost a lot of money due to all the cattle lost.  Officals say that it is going to be a multi-million dollar loss due to the calculations.  That's not good!  Winds gusted up to and at 70 miles per hour on that Friday night.  It was so bad because most of the cattle hadent grown a there winter fur coat yet.  Most of the cattle got blown away or frozen to death due to the cold weather.   Estimates we made that 1.5 million cattle died in South Dakota due to the biggest blizard.