Abney and Associates
2 views | +0 today
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Gertude Park

Indian Hustle: How Fraudsters Prey on Would-be US Tech Workers

Indian Hustle: How Fraudsters Prey on Would-be US Tech Workers | Abney and Associates | Scoop.it

Article Source: http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/asia-pacific/india/140121/india-H1B-fraud-con-artist


NEW DELHI, India ­— It’s a simple equation: India has millions of tech geeks who would love to work in the US.


But they need visas.


And the US issues just 65,000 of these per year, under its so-called H-1B program for high-skilled workers.


For freelance techies, the temptation is overwhelming.


And that, naturally, has opened up a world of opportunity for fraudsters.


Hundreds of small companies in India and the US claim to be able to arrange an H-1B visa — for the right price. Some Indians hand over money and never see the broker again — a scam similar to the loan brokerage racket featured in the movie “American Hustle.”


True, most H1-B visas go to Indians, but the majority of these are snapped up by big outsourcing firms like Cognizant, Tata Consultancy Services and Infosys.


That only serves to amp up the desperation felt by freelance techies. 


Some are lucky enough to get a visa — only to find that the promised job in the US doesn’t materialize. Then the visa holders are forced to return to India after spending thousands of dollars just surviving.


No official figures are available for the number of frauds in India, but an unclassified document released by Wikileaks showed that in 2009, US consular officials cited H-1B scams as one of the two most common fraud categories in India.


Jaspal Singh, a Delhi-based software professional, told GlobalPost that in 2010 he fell victim to a New York-based company called IT Holdings Inc.


“They took $2,500 from me for visa filing, but they did not file anything,” he said. “After few months they refunded $500.”


Singh was not the only victim. Nitin Mohan, also from Delhi, lost $1,000 to IT Holdings Inc in Jun 2010, he told GlobalPost. After months spent trying to persuade them to refund his money, he eventually posted a thread on Trackitt, an immigration site. Four other people came forward with similar stories.


Although Mohan tried to file a criminal complaint, attempts to contact the New York Police Department from India proved fruitless. He has written off his loss. The IT Holdings Inc website is defunct and a phone number listed as its main contact point is not in service.


“They just disappeared,” Mr Mohan said. “They could be out there acting as a different company and nobody would know.”


Techies use internet forums such as trackitt.com and on Goolti.com to post reviews of working conditions at some of the thousands of IT companies around the world.


Another victim claims to have lost $3,400 to a company that promised to file an H-1B application but vanished instead. Others say they are promised free or cheap training when they arrive in the US, but this was either substandard or never materialize.




Rajiv Dabhadkar, the chief executive of the National Organization for Software and Technology Professionals (NOSTOPS), has been campaigning for better conditions for IT workers for more than a decade.


“Between 25 and 40 people write to me every week saying they would like to get to the US and asking which company we could recommend,” he said. “These companies are a major problem. The main difference now is that it has become so much more expensive to get H-1B visas. The visa process fees have increased a lot.” Immigration officials ask more questions and check documents more thoroughly than in the past, he added.


While there’s little evidence that the Indian government has pursued the matter, in the US federal officers have had some success in fraud investigations over the last few years.


In March 2013, the founders of a Texas-based company called Dibon Solutions were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit visa fraud. Court documents filed by prosecutors claimed the brothers, Atul and Jiten Nanda (and four of their employees), had recruited Indian workers on the pretence they would work at the company headquarters in Carrollton, Texas. Instead, they were hired out to other companies. (Attempts to contact the company were unsuccessful.)


In a separate investigation, Phani Raju Bhima Raju, an Indian national based in Charlotte, North Carolina, pleaded guilty to five federal charges relating to H-1B visa fraud. His company, iFuturistics, made an estimated $13.2 million in six years by persuading Indians to pay for their H-1B visas and work in the US. “On one occasion a foreign national H-1B visa holder had paid $2,500 to iFuturistics as a security deposit for processing her H-1B visa,” according to a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement spokesman in a press release. She was promised a salary of $60,000 but “iFuturistics never provided the worker with any work assignments and failed to pay her any wages.”


Federal investigators arrested 11 people in 2009 on suspicion of a similar scam. Vision Systems, a New Jersey company, faced forfeitures of $7.4 million for placing foreign workers in jobs they weren’t entitled to do, replacing American workers. After a plea bargain, the two brothers who ran the firm were given three years’ probation for unlawfully hiring aliens and paid restitution of $236,250 to the US Citizenship and Immigration Service.


Efforts to deal with the problem in India are limited. Data on attempted visa fraud are not collected by the Indian Government or any of the bodies that represent tech companies.


US officials in India make regular reports about fraudulent attempts to get visas. These are not ordinarily published, but Wikileaks released a 2009 paper titled “India Semi-Annual Fraud Update.”


At the time, according to the report, the vast majority of fraudulent applications came from the southern city of Hyderabad. Officers investigated 150 companies in the city and discovered that 77 percent “turned out to be fraudulent or highly suspect.”


Officials uncovered a scheme where Hyderabadis were claiming to work for made-up companies in Pune so the Mumbai consulate would be less suspicious about their applications. “The Hyderabadis claimed that they had opened shell companies in Bangalore because ‘everyone knows Hyderabad has fraud and Bangalore is reputable,’” according to the internal communiqué.


Ameet Nivsarkar, vice president of global trade development for NASSCOM, the trade association for Indian IT companies, said: “Unfortunately this does cause problems for the industry because of the way they operate. They throw the entire H-1B programme into disrepute. This is a legitimate industry that has a legitimate use of the H-1B program.”


Recommended Reading:





No comment yet.
Scooped by Gertude Park

Abney and Associates PC Speak voor Google exec verse waarschuwingen op gebrek aan Hong Kong hi-tech

Abney and Associates PC Speak voor Google exec verse waarschuwingen op gebrek aan Hong Kong hi-tech | Abney and Associates | Scoop.it
Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt frequently gives sage advice on technology and related matters like privacy and free speech. The words of wisdom he offered during a recent visit to Hong Kong did not seem so startling, though.
Gertude Park's insight:

Google uitvoerend voorzitter Eric Schmidt geeft regelmatig salie advies inzake technologie en aanverwante onderwerpen zoals privacy en vrijheid van meningsuiting. De woorden van wijsheid die hij tijdens een recent bezoek aan Hongkong aangeboden lijken al niet zo verrassend. Hij zei dat onze economie leunde ook zwaar op de financiën en eigendom en had om te diversifiëren om betere kansen en werkgelegenheid. Kleine bedrijven moest vinden een manier rond hoge huurprijzen om te groeien en de regering moet meer technische universiteiten open zodat onze stad haar concurrentievermogen zou kunnen vergroten.


Autoriteiten hebben jarenlang geprobeerd om te bevorderen van nieuwe industrieën om onze economie een nieuwe richting. Het ontbreken van wetenschap, informatietechnologie en engineering graden aan onze universiteiten is waarom zo weinig hi-tech bedrijven hier instelt. We zijn niet langer verbaasd te horen dat de hoge huurprijzen de sluiting van nog een andere favoriet hebben gedwongen winkel of restaurant in onze buurt. Dit zijn de realiteit van het leven in Hong Kong en velen van ons zijn gekomen zonder twijfel overnemen.


Het is daarom dat we naar Schmidt luisteren moeten. Als we de problemen van onze samenleving kunnen weten, vaak het moet een waarschuwing van een buitenstaander te schudden ons van onze zelfgenoegzaamheid. De voormalige Google chief executive officer is geen gewone buitenstaander. Behalve dat het een van's werelds rijkste mensen, ranking van 139th op de meest recente lijst van de Forbes van miljardairs met een persoonlijke rijkdom van US$ 8,3 miljard, hoofd hij ook van de tweede-grootste technologie onderneming.


Hong Kong gemakkelijk omarmt van nieuwe technologieën en heeft een goed opgeleide bevolking. De hoog ontwikkelde infrastructuur en vrije markt maakt het een ideale plek voor startende ondernemingen. Dat was waarom Schmidt, een softwareingenieur van beroep, op bezoek was. Hij kondigde een partnerschapsprogramma met de Chinese Universiteit te stimuleren het aantal ondernemers.


Niet mogelijk schmidts weergaven nieuwe, maar ze zijn opnieuw overwegen waard. Ze zijn een tijdige herinnering dat we nodig hebben om meer vastberadenheid van onze stad uitdagingen.


Verwante inhoud:


No comment yet.
Scooped by Gertude Park

PC Speak: Abney and Associates Internet Technology Review: Norton Internet Security 2014 Review: Polished Security Suite with Excellent Protection

PC Speak: Abney and Associates Internet Technology Review: Norton Internet Security 2014 Review: Polished Security Suite with Excellent Protection | Abney and Associates | Scoop.it

Check my Source: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2089470/norton-internet-security-2014-review-polished-security-suite-with-excellent-protection.html


Norton is a solid choice, thanks to its excellent detection rate and polished, touchscreen-friendly interface.


Norton Internet Security 2014 ($80 for one year of protection on up to three PCs) looks great—and it offers excellent protection against all threats. Internet Security 2014 also provides mobile security, comprehensive parental controls, and system insights, so advanced users can track their PCs’ performance. But Symantec’s suite isn’t perfect: Its menus, settings, and features are geared a little more toward advanced users than toward security newbies.


In our protection tests, Norton Internet Security 2014 was excellent, on a par with Eset Smart Security 7, F-Secure Internet Security 2014, Kaspersky Internet Security 2014, and Trend Micro Titanium Maximum Security 2014. Norton successfully defended our test systems against all zero-day malware attacks and all zoo malware assaults. Norton’s algorithms didn’t block or erroneously warn against any safe websites, nor did it flag any legitimate software as dangerous.


In AV-Test’s performance test, Norton received a mark of 8, tied with Eset Smart Security 7 for the highest mark among the ten suites in in our roundup, and an indication that you can expect to see a significant performance hit—slower startup and shutdown times and lag when opening and installing programs—when the software is running.


Norton Internet Security 2014's interface is easy to navigate.


Installing Norton is a breeze, unless you have other security suites on your system (including trial versions). You must uninstall other antivirus programs before you can proceed with your Norton installation. Fortunately, Norton lets you uninstall incompatible programs from within its installer. The uninstalling process may require a restart, but a straight Norton installation does not.


Norton’s interface blends perfectly with Windows 8, with large buttons and toggles instead of tiny checkboxes. The main screen presents you with four large squares, for status (colored bright green if you’re protected, and red if you’re not), scanning, updating the malware library, and access to advanced settings such as network protection and parental controls. Along the top of the window are text links to other settings and services.


The settings menu is clearly designed for relatively advanced users. When you click the little question-mark boxes next to certain items, you jump to explanations on Symantec’s main support site, but Inline explanations—like those used in Kaspersky’s security suite—would have provided a more seamless experience.


Norton Internet Security offers excellent protection, albeit at some cost to PC performance. Its polished, touchscreen-friendly interface is a plus, but it isn’t especially accessible to novices.


Want more? Try to visit our website at http://abneyassociates.org/

No comment yet.