Build engaged audiences through publishing by curation.
|Current selected tag: consumption. Clear.|
Your new post is loading...
Daniel LaLiberte's insight:
Well done. Only two errors that I detected:
1. "We can't keep doubling population" but fortunately we are no longer doubling. The growth rate has been declining for 30 years, and it will reach 0 growth in another 60 years, with about 9-10 billion. We *currently* have 7 billion, and it is basically impossible to stop all growth immediately because there would be a severe shortage of children while we wait decades for enough people to die of old age. And furthermore, population is not the main problem anyway - irresponsible use of resources by a small percentage of the population (the so-called "developed" world) is the real problem. Blaming population growth while excusing our excessive waste only compounds the problem.
2. "Adapt to the end of economic growth as we've known it." I agree, actually, but sustainable economic growth that factors in the true and complete cost of things is the answer. We can grow smarter, faster, and more efficiently, while reducing or use of non-renewable resources, and transitioning to 100% renewable energy and 100% recycling of all resources as soon as possible. Doing all that will require lots of effort, which means lots of economic activity.