Follow
Rescooped by Delicia Worrill from The Middle Ground onto World History and Current Issues
Scoop.it!

George Washington's views on political parties in America

George Washington's views on political parties in America | World History and Current Issues | Scoop.it

BY DENNIS JAMISON, THE WASHINGTON TIMES

 

When George Washington became President of the United States in 1789, there were no political parties.Political parties first emerged during Washington’s first term in office with the Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist Party in 1791 and in the following year, the formation of the Anti-Federalist Party or Democratic-Republicans under the leadership of Thomas Jefferson.

The two political parties formulated their views of how government ought to operate in the new republic.

 

At the end of Washington’s first term, as he was preparing to retire and go back to Mt. Vernon to just be a farmer again, the leaders of the opposing parties both wanted him to reconsider with Hamilton and Jefferson pleading with Washington to stay on for a second term.

Jefferson is credited as stating: “North and South will hang together if they have you to hang on.”

 

Washington finally consented to such sentiments and was again the obvious choice of the Electoral College as they re-elected him in February of 1793.

 

 

[MORE] http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/history-purpose/2012/mar/9/george-washington-warns-against-political-parties/


Via Michael Charney
Tanner Mathews's curator insight, February 27, 12:52 PM

its saying that while george washington was president is when the federalist and antifederalist parties were founded. 

Kaitlyn Joseph's comment, February 28, 9:57 AM
This is a great and interesting article. It covers great history over Washingtons presidency. He had the federalist and the anti-federalist. We still have them today. This article talks about the political parties during Washingtons terms as president.
Eric Olson's curator insight, March 19, 8:59 PM

This article states about how the political parties came about. They were not always Republican and Democratic parites. In Washington's time they were Federalists and Anti-Federalists.

Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Delicia Worrill from History and Social Studies Education
Scoop.it!

The Conflict in Syria

The Conflict in Syria | World History and Current Issues | Scoop.it

Brown University's Choices Program has many excellent resources for social studies teachers including "Teaching with the News."  Many teachers are seeing the importance of Syria, but might lack the regional expertise to put it in context or to the time to link it with the curriculum.  If that is the case (and even if it is not), this is the perfect place to find lesson plans on the ongoing Syrian conflict. 

 

Tags: political, MiddleEast, conflict, war.


Via Seth Dixon
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Delicia Worrill from Geography Education
Scoop.it!

An Annotated Map of Today's Protests and of the 'Muslim World'

An Annotated Map of Today's Protests and of the 'Muslim World' | World History and Current Issues | Scoop.it
The violent backlash against the American film is taking place in Muslim societies, but it doesn't seem to correlate with Islam's reach.


This is a good reminder that the generalizing about "all Muslims" is as inaccurate as generalization about "all Christians" or any other group.  The world and people are much more nuanced than that. 


Tags: MiddleEast, Islam, conflict.


Via Seth Dixon
Martin Daumiller's comment, September 16, 2012 2:53 AM
The map is slightly poor. 100% and more world muslim population? There is a great mix-up between muslims living in a country and percentage of muslims living in a country, therefore turning the U.S., Russia, etc. also into the discussion.
Also there is a distinction between not-protesting and not supporting the protests, which should influence the authers comparision of different mentalities.
The main idea against stereotypes and generalization is a very worthy one, but the way is article shows it is flawed.