World geography
2 views | +0 today
Follow
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Wendy Molina from Pre-AP World Geography
Scoop.it!

Mexico City Wants to Become the Next Times Square

Mexico City Wants to Become the Next Times Square | World geography | Scoop.it
Mexico City's government is trying to transform one of the world's largest cities by beautifying public spaces, parks and monuments buried beneath a sea of honking cars, street hawkers, billboards and grime following decades of dizzying urban growth.

Via Tony Burton, RobersonWG
Wendy Molina's insight:

Mexico wanting to become the Next Time Square! That's a big deal and I think it's possible even with all the drugs and plaque. As long as were willing to make a change, I believe everything is possible if we put he effort in it. If Mexico wants to become the next time square so be it. But first change the bad things to make good things actually happen and work out. Why would you want to something so good if the bad things are going to ruin it. Yes maybe possibly Mexico can become the next time square but it's going to take time and effort to make the good happen.

more...
Sherryn Kottoor's comment, January 13, 2014 10:00 PM
I agree with @Vivica Juarez. This is a great opportunity to improve Mexico's infrastructure and show the beauty of the city. Although the drug war will continue, hopefully this will help decrease the amount of drug trade.
Isela Lopez's comment, January 13, 2014 10:05 PM
I think this is great for Mexico. After so much time of struggling I think a change is needed. Making the scenery more pretty will definitely attract more tourists which will bring more money to the country, improving the Economy. Although I believe the drug trade really can't be stopped because of how dangerous it is, this could possibly be a new start and a distraction from all the bad things happening in the country.
Rachel Cho's comment, January 14, 2014 12:21 AM
I agree with @Vivica Juarez because of the drug trade issue. People will never stop because they WANT to do it and they're addicted to this process by now, which is sickening.
Rescooped by Wendy Molina from Pre-AP World Geography
Scoop.it!

Missing Girls...

"In India, China and many other parts of the world today, girls are killed, aborted and abandoned simply because they are girls. The United Nations estimates as many as 200 million girls are missing in the world today because of this so-called 'gendercide' or femicide."


Via Seth Dixon, RobersonWG
Wendy Molina's insight:

Why does your gender have to define who you are? It doesn't matter if  your a girl or boy, you're a human being like everybody else. There is no need for discrimination against females. It's not right for girls to be killed or aborted just because they are girls. Females take a huge part in this world. There is no reason at all to kill them especially if the reason is just because they are girls!

more...
Jess Deady's curator insight, May 4, 2014 9:10 PM

Females might be the underdogs of men forever. Hopefully this is not the case but it just seems like it will be sometimes, doesn't it? Women have had issues with rights and equality from the beginning of time. Things need to change on a global scale for horrible situations like this to stop occurring so frequently.

Sreya Ayinala's curator insight, December 2, 2014 9:52 PM

Unit 3 Cultural Processes and Patterns

Amanda Morgan's curator insight, December 15, 2014 3:45 PM

This femicide is extremely disappointing.  Genocide is expected in third world, war torn countries.  The fact that it's 2014 and female babies are murdered for being girls, and parents are scared for their  children's lives, show how much power the government has over the people's lives. It is sad to think the government has the power to dictate how many children families can have and what gender.  On the flip side, these are countries that are extremely overpopulated.  The one child policy in China is what China is currently using (along with this femicide) as population control.  This is an important issue because there needs to be some sort of population control, but to what extent? This is taking away someone's basic human right - to procreate. Parents do not have control over what gender they produce and if they produce a female, their child may be taken and murdered from them. The state takes away what you created, your offspring and there is nothing they can do about it.