Curation & The Future of Publishing
77
Curation is a hot trend, some say it can change the Web
Curated by gdecugis
Follow
Suggested by axelletess onto Curation & The Future of Publishing
Scoop.it!

It's Not Information Overload. It's Filter Failure. (by Clay Shirky)

Axelle suggested to me that talk by Clay Shirky from the 2008 Web 2.0 Expo NY.

It's quite old but I felt it was still spot on: let's not try to think we can fix this by regulating the amount of information upstream. It's the filtering downstream that needs to evolve.

All the current attempts at building efficient Curation mechanism are following this approach.

As Clay puts it: "We've had information overload in some form or another since the 1500's (he dates it to Gutenberg and print). What's changing is that the filters we've been using for most of the past 500 years stopped to work".

Time to innovate !
No comment yet.
axelletess is also curating
Ideas That Matter From SXSW '13 Design Shock Wave Just For Fun San Francisco's Life Steve Jobs
and 14 others
Discover Topics axelletess is following
Quite Interesting News Where is the love? whats been spotted on etsy today? Art, Design & Technology Curation & The Future of Publishing The NewSpace Daily
and 324 others
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by gdecugis
Scoop.it!

This is the most popular post you’ll read all day.

This is the most popular post you’ll read all day. | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it

In a recent post for The Atlantic, Derek Thompson investigates what drives people to read content online. As a writer for a popular news site, it’s of interest to Thompson to find out what people are clicking on and why when navigating through the endless amount of web content available. Though it sounds like a boring study of analytics at first, his findings and references are actually super interesting.

gdecugis's insight:

This is a guest post Ally wrote for business2community.com where she comes back on what makes the difference between popular and relevant and how we've been forced to make a choice between the two before.


The good news is that with content curation becoming not only mainstream but also interest-based this is no longer the case (as Nick Peachey also recently explained in an interesting comparative analysis).


We can now have our cake and eat it.

Murray McKercher's curator insight, Today, 8:09 AM

This is very interesting...

Judith van Praag's comment, Today, 10:51 AM
Nearly followed the link via Scoop.it Claire's email, thereby depriving you of a re-scoop!
Judith van Praag's curator insight, Today, 10:57 AM

As organizer of the Greater Seattle Women Who Write Meetup for little over a year, I've noticed the Meetup I proclaimed to be Most Popular on our monthly calendar IS indeed the one that attracts the largest number of participants. Chicken, egg, or marketing?

Rescooped by gdecugis from Content marketing curated
Scoop.it!

Consumer Attention - the 'New' Media Currency

Consumer Attention - the 'New' Media Currency | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it

While the task of grabbing a consumer's attention and communicating a brand's proposition has become increasingly difficult, the rewards for the brands that solve the problem are exceedingly high.


Via J-P De Clerck
gdecugis's insight:

Edward Montes makes a very important point in this post: we are not using the right currency to measure what's important for media (readership quality but of course advertising). We're still counting page views and clicks but what matters is attention. 


Content is developing into a new economy where the scarce resource is attention - not content. While some see this shift in the value chain as a threat, it is clearly an opportunity to embrace by becoming the trusted resource in a domain as a content curator.

Brian Yanish - MarketingHits.com's curator insight, June 14, 10:21 AM

Marketers need to interact with their customers via the multiple social platforms available. Yes this does take time and money to do it correctly. Having the right person to interact with your customers via social is very important. Would you put a rude staff member at your front door? 

Angela Ferrari's curator insight, June 14, 12:43 PM

I think this seems to be the trend nowadays...

Martin (Marty) Smith's comment, June 15, 8:02 AM
Great book by a couple of Harvard profs The Attention Economy supports points made here nicely.
Scooped by gdecugis
Scoop.it!

If media is being disrupted like the car industry, then who is the Tesla Motors of media?

If media is being disrupted like the car industry, then who is the Tesla Motors of media? | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it

In an earlier post for paidContent, I looked at the broad similarities between the automotive-manufacturing industry and the media business — specifically newspapers — and how disruption has affected both in some fairly similar ways.

gdecugis's insight:

Mathew Ingram makes an interesting parallel between the car industry and the media industry, naming the HuffPost a clear disruptor and now BuzzFeed poised to be the Telsa he's looking for.


If you've followed the topic for a while, you know I also like to make comparisons with the music industry - the market where I built my previous company, Musiwave. That market was also clearly disrupted not by competing music labels but by platforms:

1. Napster

2. iPod / iTunes 

3. Spotify


Similarly, platforms seems to me to be much more disrupting to the media industry than the HuffPost or BuzzFeed - two companies that are smartly taking advantage of these changes:

1. Google (Search & News)

2. The iPad

3. Social Networks

Murray McKercher's curator insight, June 4, 10:19 PM

The Tesla of the Media Industry...a great thought...

Martin (Marty) Smith's comment, June 7, 11:09 PM
This post is related to your post about should social networks curate their own content. A: No and They Can't. The fire hose is too large, the speed of content development too fast and the old "editorial" stance too dead to play gatekeeper. There won't be any rekindling of the "mother may I past'. All "programed" content is becoming free form and WE are the schedulers, curators, and,l thanks to tools like Scoopit, capable of curating our own lives thank you very much :).
Martin (Marty) Smith's curator insight, June 7, 11:35 PM

Entropy Is Our Content Marketing Future
Guilluame Decugis has some great insights. I wrote about how disruptive platforms were to "websites" and by extension any other for of information aggregation several years ago (platforms vs. websites http://scenttrail.blogspot.com/2011/09/internet-marketing-platforms-vs.html ).

Now I think platforms are in danger. Platforms aggregate User Generated Content. That aggregation creates a virtual cycle - the bigger it gets the bigger it gets and faster and faster.

Entropy is what will undo even the most stalwart platform. When I wrote How Entropy Is Creating Web 3.0 Right Under Our Noses (http://scenttrail.blogspot.com/2012/11/how-entropy-is-creating-web-30-right.html ) I wanted to share a LESS defined and more TAGGED future.

Look at the Huffington Post. As they push the boundaries of content co-opting more and more writers into their fold they also begin to untangle their own web. As any platform reaches some "point of diminishing returns" point it must begin to eat itself.

Once any website is HUGE becoming that much more dominant doesn't make financial sense. Sure there are virtual cycle rewards. The compound interest of the web is LINKS and the bigger you are the easier links are to accrue.

As any content play becomes HUGE its ability to create a relevant relationship with any new or existing customer is under greater stress. The Huffington Post can keep adding writers but then you are just reading my blog with their masthead (makes no sense and adds no value).

Our old friend entropy says Huffington is about to regress to some lesser mean In fact, I think the creation of mega-platforms as a concept (despite my love for it up until TODAY lol) is over.

Let's call our emerging "lean content" trend rich mobile snippets with gamification. By mashing up what is already out there in the water tomorrow's hubs will curate in multiple dimensions: writers, keyword density and rich tagged snippets. All of this curating will create more free-formed "mesh-like" structures (to quote Lisa Gansky).

What is the difference between a mesh and a platform? Platforms aggregate UGC, curation and content creation to a PLACE. Meshes are less proprietary. Meshes will trap anything from anywhere based on the algorithms used.

Being content agnostic but tag specific is a Google-ization of content, a flexible keyword and behavioral (who cares about what content and why) mesh more responsive, open and flexible than even the most aggressive and currently dominant hub (like the Huffington Post).

The future will be as hard on the Huffington Post as it has been on the New York Times. As an aggregator Huffington may have more pivot capacity than their print cousins, but no one ever expects the Spanish Inquisition :).

 

Rescooped by gdecugis from Content Curation World
Scoop.it!

The bankers of the Knowledge economy

The bankers of the Knowledge economy | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it

Curating and sharing stories should be understood as part of a knowledge economy. If stories are tribal currency, then curators are money handlers.


Via Robin Good
gdecugis's insight:

The world has changed and so did the economy. From an agricultural to an industrial world, we've now moved into the post-industrial era where knowledge is the true currency and a lot of us are knowledge workers.


In this great post, Elia Morling explains how he views content curators as playing a key role as a "money handlers, changers and lenders all wrapped into one."

Andrea Walker's comment, May 28, 7:59 PM
I like your framework Ken. I think this is a good way to approach curating with students. Especially like #2 understanding and showing the significance f the piece.
carmen blyth's comment, May 28, 11:55 PM
Watch Thomas Campbell talk about 'Weaving Narratives in Museum Galleries' http://www.ted.com/talks/thomas_p_campbell_weaving_narratives_in_museum_galleries.html
Sergey Yatsenko's curator insight, May 29, 3:42 AM

    Good  day,  M.W.Cartin.                                                                                      Smart  Curator  can analyse the  needful information for good idea  and decision to the Real Way of Development .

Scooped by gdecugis
Scoop.it!

Expertise does not stop at creation: 5 reasons why I love being a content curator by Cendrine Marrouat

Expertise does not stop at creation: 5 reasons why I love being a content curator by Cendrine Marrouat | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it
A few months ago, my introduction to content curation, which I had shared on this blog and Internet Billboards, got noticed by Robin Good. He promoted my slides on his Scoop.it page and website, wi...
gdecugis's insight:

There are a lot of posts now on how and why it's efficient to engage in content curation but Cendrine Marrouat took the angle of why it's great to be a content curator.


That's right: being efficient, having fun and and feeling good are not mutually exclusive objectives.

Cendrine Marrouat - www.cendrinemarrouat.com's comment, May 14, 7:45 PM
Thank you so much, Guillaume! I appreciate the share!
gdecugis's comment, May 15, 12:41 AM
And I the post: I love the angle you've taken to talk about curation.
Cendrine Marrouat - www.cendrinemarrouat.com's comment, May 15, 1:10 AM
I really appreciate that. Curation is awesome. :-)
Scooped by gdecugis
Scoop.it!

Show your enthusiasm by curating engaging content and your customers will show theirs.

Show your enthusiasm by curating engaging content and your customers will show theirs. | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it
Curate Content Like You Mean It!: A Guide to Engaging Content Curation
gdecugis's insight:

Nicely argumented post on why content curation is not a marketing fad in these days of opportunity and challenge created by social media. By reminding us of key facts and data points from surveys showing the importance of content curation in a content marketing strategy, John Bhrel does a great job putting together this guide. 

Lydia Gracia's comment, May 30, 3:26 AM
Great idea James!
Helen Bryant's comment, June 12, 2:48 PM
Sorry Laura - I missed your comment! I think the key is knowing why you are doing it, curating for curating sake I think can lead to disappointment. As we are early on in the use of the technology and curator adoption. Playing a longer game to achieve your purpose, building your voice, finding your tribe I think takes time...thus I do not have any great expectations from which to lose my enthusiasm! My main challenge is finding the time to do it - hence I missed my first opportunity to have a discussion about it!! Thanks for replying.
Laura Brown's comment, June 13, 1:24 AM
I've been a content curator of one kind or another since the days I was working for the Open Directory Project in 1998. Having your passion and liking what you are doing is not enough for the every day grind at times. In some ways it is easier if you are working alone but that also has it's hurdles. I have a tendency to keep taking on too much. Even when I know I am feeling over whelmed or under inspired I will still find some little project. My first instinct is to try something new. (Especially a project someone else has had to give up on). Anyway, it is not so easy to keep going. I think it helps to lighten up on your schedule and give yourself a better balance of online/ work time and offline/ personal time.
Scooped by gdecugis
Scoop.it!

How to Get Eyeballs on Your Business with a Blog [INFOGRAPHIC] | Social Media Today

How to Get Eyeballs on Your Business with a Blog [INFOGRAPHIC] | Social Media Today | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it
According to Hubspot.com, companies who create, optimize and promote their blogs get 55% more traffic and 70% more leads than those who don’t.
gdecugis's insight:

Great summary of the (smart and legit) ways of developing your online visibility by Genevieve Lachance. Content curation is one of them and the post and infographic also touches on repurposing content, commenting and other interesting social media publishing techniques.

Steven Mallach's curator insight, May 9, 9:36 AM

All true, but SEO as it was practiced 10 years ago (even three years ago) is dead. Deader than a Armadillo at a Texas Monstor Truck convention.

 

Try packing in those keywords like it was 2003.

 

This is the post Panda / Penguin world baby, and it's time to wake up and taste the creative content.

 

What do you think good copywriting should look like in this new environment?

 

What do you look for when you read a piece of copy on the web?

 

Humour? Expert opinion? Actionable advice? Do you share infographics more than anything else? Video + copy?

 

Let us know.

Deb Nystrom, REVELN Consulting's curator insight, May 9, 9:54 AM

Optimize and promote >  as it says, with great content, it depends on what you do with that content that matters.  Just ask internet marketing king Brendon Burchard, or look at his free videos (you make get hooked.)  SEO is not dead, however.  Would you agree?  ~  Deb

Paul K Saunders's curator insight, May 9, 10:41 AM

Its really all about the eyballs guys!

Rescooped by gdecugis from Advisor Content Curation
Scoop.it!

How Social Media Impacts SEO [INFOGRAPHIC] | Social Media Today

How Social Media Impacts SEO [INFOGRAPHIC] | Social Media Today | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it
Search engine optimization has not been dependent on a minimal number of factors for a long time now, such as number of times a keyword appeared on a page, and it continues to become a more complex web of on and off-page factors every month.

Via Grant Barger
gdecugis's insight:

There has been a number of high level stories on how Social Media helped SEO, a number of which I've published here.


A common myth is that because social media platforms use no-follow links, they don't have SEO impact. This inforgrpahic is interesting as it describes concretely debunks it by explaining what exactly happens from an SEO standpoint when you share a link on a social network or on a social media platform like Scoop.it.

Grant Barger's curator insight, May 8, 12:41 PM

Interesting...

Scooped by gdecugis
Scoop.it!

What happens when social media is read by robots - and not curated by humans

What happens when social media is read by robots - and not curated by humans | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it
Here in the US, the Dow recently tumbled almost 150 points in a “flash crash” caused by widespread digital panic. What was the cause of this panic? Twitter.
gdecugis's insight:

As Clair tweeted "a single twitter handle (AP's) is hacked and the Dow tumbles 150 points."


Why? As she explains through a combination of automated trading and lack of social media usage by the traders.


Technology is great. But I'm a firm believer that the best way to leverage it is not to let it go on auto-pilot but rather have its output curated by humans - a concept we like to call Humanrithm which we apply at Scoop.it, for instance when our discovery algorithm only makes content suggestions but lets users decide what gets published and what is not.


Did we get lucky this time? Some people probably weren't and lost something in that story. But if we don't want SF movies to become real one day, we have to start educating and empowering everyone to curate social media.

Oïké.coop's comment, April 26, 4:53 AM
A very interesting scoop and comment.
Pierre Scampini's curator insight, April 26, 6:20 AM

Tous les outils quels qu'ils soient doivent être créés pour servir l'humain et non s'auto-gérer au-delà du raisonnable. Gardons cette éthique y compris dans les sytèmes de l'information et leurs processus.

Quelques questions universelles peuvent nous aider à en faire le diagnostique et s'aplliquent à tous les systèmes ou projets:

 

1- Est ce que cela tiens la mer ? Est ce relié au monde des vivants ? (Approche)

 

2- Est ce bien fait ? ( Déploiement)

 

3- la boucle PDCA est elle bouclée et enrichie ? (Evaluation)

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All our tools should be created to serve humans and not to serve themselves. We must keep this ethical idea in mind for IT systems too.

Universal questions should help us. They could be used to make the diagnostic of any system or project:

 

1- Does it stay afloat ? Is it linked with living world and specially human world ? (Approach)

 

2- Is it well done ? ( Deployment)

 

3- PDCA (Prepare, Start, Control, Secure)  is complete ? (Assesment)

 

Rescooped by gdecugis from Online Business Models
Scoop.it!

Is Google the Killer of Newspaper Print Ad Sales?

Is Google the Killer of Newspaper Print Ad Sales? | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it
The U.S. newspaper industry has lost more than $40 billion in ad revenue in the past decade — over half of that in the last four years alone — and Google’s ad revenues are now more than twice what the industry pulls in.

Via Robin Good
gdecugis's insight:

That one graph summarizes very nicely the recent history of the media industry. And if you add Facebook's digital ad sales to the graph (a few billions and probably already bigger than the whole newspaper digital sales or soon to be), you see how newspapers are heavily challenged for readers attention.

gdecugis's comment, April 22, 11:33 AM
@Jalp: good point and an essential reason that drove this change. Not just attention but lowering the barrier to entry. Thanks!
Kitty A. Smith's comment, May 6, 2:37 PM
People are always looking to place fault. Things change when something better comes along. Just because newspapers were first doesn't mean they are best. Tobacco knows time is limited, that would explain why they bought Kraft Foods!
Louise Montgrain 's curator insight, May 7, 10:00 PM

Realtors are also turning to Internet, Google with their ads...

Suggested by Nick Cicero
Scoop.it!

How journalists can measure engagement

How journalists can measure engagement | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it

Most journalists now understand they need to engage with audiences, whether online or in person.

gdecugis's insight:

This article by Meena Thiruvengadam is interestingly describing how sharing and adding value with new insights are the best form of engagement journalists can have.  “At the end of the day a successful result for us is when people somehow added to the journalism we’re doing.” she concludes by quoting one of the editors she interviewed.


Isn't that a definition of content curation?

Robin Carlisle's comment, May 5, 10:05 PM
"Bag" in 1998? Hmmmm... well... if the bag fits, then I think they should wear it, lol!
Robin Carlisle's comment, May 5, 10:09 PM
BTW, this is what women have been doing since the beginning of time... adding value... offering insights... commenting (be nice... no hen-pecking here, lol)...Now if only I could think of a way to discretely quote one of the editors I just read.... Hmmmmmm...
Robin Carlisle's curator insight, May 5, 10:12 PM

My insight? Today, I feel like I'm just commenting on the comments about commenting on comments regarding the curation of comments on curation. But, alas, I'm all out of pithy comments for the day... curated or otherwise. :).

Scooped by gdecugis
Scoop.it!

Google Reader, Tech Darwinism and the Gatekeeper syndrome

Google Reader, Tech Darwinism and the Gatekeeper syndrome | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it

"By killing Reader, Google is likely to harm a lot of publishers, large and small, by eliminating a larger source of traffic."

gdecugis's insight:

MG Siegler did the math: some traffic will be missing when Google shuts down Reader this coming July. 


Is that bad?


Obviously the perspective of losing traffic isn't great news to Web site publishers. But for news consumers, what is really happening here? Some will replace Google Reader with other RSS-based services like Feedly. But some others will trust other sources of content like social networks or content curators and discover their benefits. Will it be bad for them? They will decide: they have an open choice (Google was by no means a monopoly on this crowded market) so they won't be harmed.


I understand his concern but what's striking to me in this argument is that it looks a lot like the concern traditional media publishers have always been expressing at the thought of a changing distribution model and innovation. When confronted with change, the reaction of a lot of established players (and yes, TechCrunch is one - not the disrupting startup it was once) is fear - instead of embracing it.


If I were a publisher (oh but wait: I'm one, if only for my Scoop.it topics), I'd care less about the loss of RSS traffic from Google Reader than making sure my content is worth sharing, worth curating and engaging. Digg, Stumble Upon and now Google Reader: a lot of historical traffic drivers are declining or disappearing to the benefit of social content & curation. And all sorts of tools and platforms will either adapt, evolve or die: it's innovation darwinism and the gatekeepers of today won't prevent it from happening any more than the gatekeepers of yesterday were able to.

ghbrett's curator insight, March 30, 7:53 AM

gdecugis's insight and comments below provide a very good insight into the article listed above. Please have a look at his comments below. Thank you gdecugis.

Yann André Gourvennec's curator insight, April 4, 8:58 AM

My main issue and question is about feedburner, which will certainly be done with too. This means a lot of traffic will go away from blogs and will minimise the interest of keeping a blog alive, be it personal or professional.

Rescooped by gdecugis from New Age Information Consumption
Scoop.it!

The Glory Days of Information Abundance.

The Glory Days of Information Abundance. | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it

The recent improvements in news distribution are astonishing. You don’t need to go to a specialty shop to find out-of-town newspapers or foreign magazines. Just open a browser. You can check on Israeli news sites when a new government is formed or during an American presidential visit and ignore them the rest of the year. The Internet also brings the enormous back catalog of journalism to life. That five-year-old Anderson essay on Cyprus is still relevant today. Recalling that he wrote a book on the island, I looked up an old Christopher Hitchens column on Cyprus yesterday evening.


Via Ally Greer
gdecugis's insight:

White we keep talking about information overload and it's problems (some even suggesting an information diet - a very Malthusian concept to me), we forget all the good things that come with it and this insightful article makes excellent points highlighting them. The financial problems of media publishers don't mean news consumers are worse off: they're actually better off. Not only because they enjoy more supply hence more choice, but also because consumers benefit more and more from new distribution models such as social networking but also content curation platforms which brings different context and perspectives from various people adding their own expertise to news.


So shouldn't we maybe refer to information overload as information abundance to give it the more positive spin it deserves?

Marc Woltering's comment, March 21, 4:57 AM
If you are a profesional who needs and can afford to spend hours a week or even a day collecting and evaluating stuff on the internet, information abundance is something useful. If you just want to keep up with what's going on in the world you (or at least I) want newspapers or online equivaltents to do the collecting and evaluating for you. Without these filters you get information overload.
A. Brian Dengler's comment, March 22, 7:57 AM
The "abundance" of information is helpful. This abundance begs the next task of analyzing it, checking its veracity, and putting it into context.
clapp's curator insight, April 9, 5:51 AM

for how long?

Scooped by gdecugis
Scoop.it!

Why Facebook isn't the right company to create a Google Reader replacement

Why Facebook isn't the right company to create a Google Reader replacement | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it
With speculation that Facebook might be launching an RSS reader at its press event next week, it’s important to think about why users loved the Google Reader experience. Hint: it wasn’t because Google Reader was social.
gdecugis's insight:

Pretty good summary by Eliza Kern on why Facebook is not the right place to have a Google reader replacement.


While social news make sense, there's a different between the social graph (that Facebook is based on) and the interest graph (relevant personalized stories). As I once wrote here, we need to combine social and interests in a topic-centric social media to combine discovery and relevance.


But what do you think? Would you like Facebook to come out with an RSS reader?

ICTPHMS's curator insight, June 18, 7:41 AM

A very interesting read....

Barlay Industries, Andrew Barlay's curator insight, June 18, 11:22 AM

Facebook has been inundated with infectious clutter and is a hackers delight. Perhaps the old cob webs should be wiped away to satisfie the current support base before trodding off into an even more sofisticated ploy.

 

Andrew Federici's comment, June 18, 3:24 PM
Agree there's a difference. RSS on Facebook feels like a portal-type move that may not catch on or be relevant to the mental model...
Rescooped by gdecugis from Website Pages Advice
Scoop.it!

You Won’t Finish This Article

You Won’t Finish This Article | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it
I’m going to keep this brief, because you’re not going to stick around for long. I’ve already lost a bunch of you. For every 161 people who landed on this page, about 61 of you—38 percent—are already gone.

Via Peg Corwin
Ally Greer's insight:

Interesting analysis shows very few people read articles completely online (but maybe it's the same offline and we just don't measure it). We scan, we skip, we browse but we rarely read.


Of course this means a lot with regards to content and web page design. But it also means that we as curators have a responsibility to bring enough context and meaning to convince our readers that a curated article or video is worth 1-3 minutes of their time. We live in the attention economy and our readers' minutes are precious. 


Kudos to Brian Yanish for made me discover that great analysis as well as another great curator - Peg Corwin - in the process. Thanks!

PlasmaBorneElectric's comment, June 13, 11:06 AM
Many times articles contain filler to make the article longer so there can be more side ads...
Constance Jones Collier's comment, June 14, 7:57 PM
Oh is that what that is about?
Gerg Anidem's curator insight, June 18, 8:44 AM

With so many people with a blog these days, it is most difficult to post mind captivating articles that will capture the rearder's minds in such a fast paced society!

Scooped by gdecugis
Scoop.it!

The Social Media Editor is Dead

The Social Media Editor is Dead | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it
Every reporter works for Twitter now.
gdecugis's insight:
Brilliant analysis by BuzzFeed's Rob Fishman, also a former social media editor at the Huffington Post. Developing the idea that social media is now too important to be handled by a single person, Fishman also gives a detailed description of the complex relationship between the Media and Social Media.
Ally Greer's curator insight, May 30, 4:09 PM

How much longer before we remove the "social" distinction from social media and just start calling it media?

Martin (Marty) Smith's comment, June 15, 8:03 AM
Social media editor is dead, long live the sentient mob.
Scooped by gdecugis
Scoop.it!

Curation and the display of information by Laura Brown

Curation and the display of information by Laura Brown | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it
Being a content curator is all about displaying information. We don't create the content, we display it. We share it - and people read it. But, first you have to display it. There are several skills involved in displaying content.
gdecugis's insight:

When it comes to content, the form has always mattered: from what makes a book or a movie not just interesting but great to the implicit or explicit reasons we favor this or that news site.


As Laura Brown explaines in this post, this doesn't apply just to content creation but perhaps more importantly to content curation as well.

Mbigidde Victoria's comment, May 22, 5:59 AM
Great article, i love the different insights and will make good use of the content.
Laura Brown's comment, May 30, 2:25 AM
Thank you Ursula and Victoria.
Thomas B Hansen's curator insight, Today, 11:52 AM

In the future, this will be one of the most effective ways of finding and sharing valuable content......externally as well as internally...

Scooped by gdecugis
Scoop.it!

Back to the future: What if the 'mass media' era was just an accident of history?

Back to the future: What if the 'mass media' era was just an accident of history? | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it
We are used to thinking of a “mass media” market made up of large newspapers and TV networks as the normal state of affairs in media, but what if that was just a historical anomaly?
gdecugis's insight:

Interesting post by Mathew Ingram. It reminds me of a similar observation Mick Jagger made about recorded music. He noted that artists only made money from records from roughly 1970 to 1997: in the 60's and before, mass consumption hadn't developed enough for artists to get enough leverage against their record labels while after 1997, piracy and digital music dramtically change the whole recorded music model.


For all Content Industries including Music, Movies and Media, the anormal situation might therefore not as much be what technology did in the last few years than what it did a century ago.


When it comes to media content, technology improvements have known 2 distinct eras, one of which very recent:


- from the invention of writing until the Web 2.0, progresses have primarily focused on offering greater and greater distribution : the book, the printing press, the rotary printing press, radio, TV and event the Web 1.0 all gave access to a wider audience to a small group of content creators;


- but from the social Web's beginning, we started to talk about user-generated content and everyone could potentially become a publisher: with blogs and social media, content creation and then even content curation itself are being democratized.


So I don't know if I agree with Ingram's point that historically mass media didn't exist (if the Bible isn't mass media, what is?) but we're certainly not coming back to a 1-to-many broadcast model.

Digital Gloss's curator insight, May 12, 4:42 AM

Most of what Ingram describes makes good sense: the era of "mass media" as a historical anomaly; the notion that writers in the 18th and 19th centuries who shared their journals or commonplace books were bloggers of sorts. Standage's point of view is a little less intriguing -- that we will get our news from social media, which are the modern taverns and coffeehouses. In my opinion, when large journalistic enterprises are undermined and can no longer afford to pay trained journalists and fact-checkers who generate the content so many bloggers use as food for thought, we will no longer be able to keep up with what's going on in the world -- to our detriment.

Martin Debattista's curator insight, May 13, 3:34 PM

Social media, personal as it is, still depends on global companies doing business on a global level. Facebook with its almost 1,000 million users? Twitter? Google? Aren't they in the field to make a profit?

Scooped by gdecugis
Scoop.it!

Should Social Networks curate their own content? Or should users do it?

Should Social Networks curate their own content? Or should users do it? | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it

The challenge [for social networks] is to create something of permanent value for the community, to offer more than a temporary spotlight.

gdecugis's insight:

Austin Powell comes back on the recent announcement by Tumblr to shut down Sotryboard and lay off the editorial team that was highlighting and curating Tumblr's best content.


He makes a point that it's been extremely hard for most social networks - with the notable exception of LinkedIn with its influencer program - to add value by curating its users' best content.


I wonder whether that's actually such a big deal. Yes, it's hard and maybe impossible to curate Facebook's, YouTube's or Tumblr's content in a way that makes sense for all. But isn't the point of the Web 2.0 in general and social networking in particular to offer personalized streams?


We're now seeing the rise of user-driven content curation through platforms like Scoop.it that enable anyone to add value to their own social network publishing activities. Let's put them to good use!


Of course we need curated media: we had that with newspapers and TV and we still need it. I'm glad more and more people realize that now. But we don't need to replicate the old 1-to-many 20th-century-broadcast-media model where a small number of gatekeepers decide what's good to consume for everyone.


Isn't it time social networks trusted their users to become their best content curators?

Teachinginthe21st's curator insight, May 13, 4:29 PM

What I might be trying to investigate through inquiry...

Sandrine Delage (Borgé)'s curator insight, May 19, 4:19 AM

Tanks. Show the importance of the strategy and the implementations in LinkedIn, Facebook ... I agree about the accurency of LinkedIn in this matter.

Laura Brown's comment, May 30, 2:23 AM
I thought the users were the curators.
Scooped by gdecugis
Scoop.it!

30 years of Content Curation summarized in 1 tweet?

gdecugis's insight:

Thanks Grant: you made our day ;-)

gdecugis's comment, May 9, 11:30 AM
@Larry: isn't that what our "create a newsletters" function does? To see it go to one of your topics and click on Manage.
Emmanuel Gigante's curator insight, May 9, 3:39 PM

6this just says it alll

Gilbert Faure au nom de l'ASSIM's curator insight, May 25, 3:08 AM

from current contents and reprint requests to now!

eugene garfield, what do you think of changes of scientific virtual networking?

Scooped by gdecugis
Scoop.it!

The death of RSS in a single graph

The death of RSS in a single graph | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it
Google Trend graph for "rss" - bad news. I recently wrote a blog post about moving all my RSS readers to email subscriptions, and I immediately got 30+ negative comments on it. Obviously it struck ...
gdecugis's insight:

Interesting post by Andrew Chen on the demise of RSS and what we can expect to see after that. As a blogger, he decided to move all his RSS subscribers to email (as yes, email is alive and kicking). 


Beyond observing this trend, he also makes interesting comments on why this is ultimately good for content creators (though he also got angry comments for his move): alternatives like social curation, integrated readers and email offer better feedback loops for content creators helping them iterate their content based on measured engagement.

Martin Debattista's curator insight, May 5, 7:55 AM

Who needs RSS when you can Scoop.it (and others)? Will RSS fall victim to the law of the supply and demand?

Laura Brown's comment, May 30, 2:33 AM
I don't want anything else coming in my email. I don't have time to weed through it all let alone actually read any of it.
gdecugis's comment, May 30, 5:21 PM
I understand Laura but I happen to be suprised by how resilient email is. Even though my inbox is crowded too, I still like to read some of the daily digests I subscribed to. But I also make sure to unsubscribe when they stop being relevant.
Scooped by gdecugis
Scoop.it!

Why Email Is Still Alive [Infographic] - SocialTimes

Why Email Is Still Alive [Infographic] - SocialTimes | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it

This infographic shows how email marketing campaigns have benefitted from new technology and have also found a niche among media outlets and small business owners.

gdecugis's insight:

Devon Glenn from the Social Times picked up our infographic on the role email plays as part of a content marketing strategy, specifically for small businesses. Just like email is one of the secret weapons of social networks and media outlets, it can and should be leveraged to engage and develop an audience.

Susan Daniels's comment, May 9, 3:19 PM
Yes, Kathy and Paul, I have finally relented and am growing an "email" list with MailChimp. Doing everything through Social Media alone was just not working for me. Thanks for your comments. Here is a link to my website: http://crazydreamersdo.com if you care to visit. That would be nice :) Thank you for your comments
Minna Kilpeläinen's comment, June 9, 3:57 PM
Thank you, Susan Daniels, for your insight. It was interesting.
Kathy Lenard's comment, June 9, 4:55 PM
Thank you for your comments Susan, Paul and Minna. I will visit your website Susan Daniels.
Scooped by gdecugis
Scoop.it!

Clash of the Titans - the battle to organize the Web's content

Clash of the Titans - the battle to organize the Web's content | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it

Curation is an irreplaceable part of the new content consumption and knowledge-sharing cycle just as passive readers are becoming an irreplaceable part of the curation cycle. This union is the ideal environment for smart, immensely valuable, and educational content on the web to proliferate and spread like wildfire, which ultimately what we want. A smarter world is a better world.

gdecugis's insight:

As Google shuts down Google Reader, Flipboard introduces user curation to its App and we see our own Read.it App being immeditately picked up and featured by Apple upon launch, we can definitely say content aggregation is losing battles against social curation in the fight between robots/algorithms and people to organize the Web's content.


The vision we had for what we call humanrithm is taking shape. And as Clair asked in this article, are you up to it as readers need you? 

MrCute Anny's comment, April 17, 1:20 PM
Yes, it is about helpers. But what all the other tweets and video clips show is only the beginning of the story. There is an even more important message that Mister Rogers conveys!!
UNN http://www.unn.edu.ng
Robin Carlisle's comment, May 5, 10:22 PM
I'm getting a rather inflated, bloated, pop-worthy vision of the self-importance all our commenting leads us to each day now. I'm thinking I'm going to start wearing hats again... with a big hatpin... just in case I need to burst someone's self-inflated ego bubble lest they go pop on their own in a maniacal commenting frenzy. Hey! Sorry! That's just where all the tangenting eventually leads me, lol. Uhhh... to the point where my brain can grasp only a little lol... And to think... I used to be sooooo enthralled with "the meeting of the minds" when I sat down with my favorite authors... to read them... and I heard only their voice speaking directly to me. Nowadays, it seems I can't get a thought in edgewise, much less a personally acknowledged comments, with the author I use to have all to myself. Kinda takes the fun out of the old one-on-one author-reader mind-melds we use to have.
Kang Yangkook's curator insight, May 14, 10:36 PM
222
Suggested by Yvan Boudillet
Scoop.it!

Intelligent Content: Soon your media will know you better than you know yourself

Intelligent Content: Soon your media will know you better than you know yourself | Curation & The Future of Publishing | Scoop.it
Though tablets and ebook readers are now mainstream, the revolution in the way they display content – and how that content will be generated dynamically – is yet to come.
jspellos's curator insight, April 10, 12:45 PM

The content curation movement keeps growing.

Cees Franke's curator insight, April 11, 3:29 AM

Het algoritme wordt (en is het soms al enigszins)  de nieuwe curator ...

clapp's curator insight, April 12, 8:57 AM

cervelle ou mathematiques?

Scooped by gdecugis
Scoop.it!

NYU professor Jay Rosen on news curation in the digital age.

From a "Adapting Journalism to the Web," a conversation between Jay Rosen and Ethan Zuckerman held April 5, 2012. Full video at http://techtv.mit.edu/collect...
gdecugis's insight:

Great insightful points on what curators should bring to their audience by one of modern journalism's gurus. Beyond the points themselves, it's great to see journalist of the caliber of Jay Rosen recognize independant non-journalist curators as a meaningful community that matters.


Discovered via Brian Yanish.

Graham Mulligan's curator insight, April 10, 11:37 AM

Curation and connectivity intersect.

BroadbandBreakfast's curator insight, April 13, 12:07 AM

Jay Rosen has always been ahead of his time. Before the web become big, it was community journalism. That struck me as silly...but know I realize that it was just a nascent form of Web 2.0 curation.

Alison Gilbert's curator insight, April 27, 8:41 AM

I love curation.