Web 2.0 et société
14.4K views | +0 today
Follow
Web 2.0 et société
La société en mouvement « 2.0 » : quels enjeux, quelles opportunités, quel avenir ?
Curated by BeerBergman
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by BeerBergman from Politique des algorithmes
Scoop.it!

Why You Should Be Skeptical of Most Twitter Maps

Why You Should Be Skeptical of Most Twitter Maps | Web 2.0 et société | Scoop.it
When geographers tried to map social inequality in Louisville, they revealed how deceptive the "science" of social media can be.

Via Dominique Cardon
BeerBergman's insight:

And oh man, the maps are soooo beautiful!

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by BeerBergman
Scoop.it!

#Ttw14 Panel Preview: Streetview » Cyborgology

#Ttw14 Panel Preview: Streetview » Cyborgology | Web 2.0 et société | Scoop.it
BeerBergman's insight:

Excellent article on the geographical non-digital interferences with the digital world. A must read. Excerpts.

***

@timhwang : "What is often missed in the popular discourse is that the web industry has a very real geographic dimension. Insofar as they are corporations requiring offices, employees, and investors to thrive, the popularity of web services in the past decade can be connected to concrete changes in the built landscape of cities throughout the United States. These changes, in turn, have produced important distributive consequences along socioeconomic, gender, and racial lines."

***

@artphilled : "More eccentric than extreme, Instagram has the potential for subversivity, which is defined “as a disruptive attitude that tries to create openings, possibilities in the ‘closedness’ of a sysem. . .as a result, [it] more closely resembles cultural activism than political praxis” (De Cauter, ‘Notes on subversion/Theses on Activism’). My hope for this paper is to provoke a shift in the modality of Instagram (and, in future, apps like it) from photo-sharing social network to counter-cartographic device that can ‘prime’ a resistance to the traditional delineations of border and capital imposed on our social spaces."

***

@mfcrawford : "In spaces that were encoded with particular affordances, Americans could perform modes of sociality that demonstrated and inculcated a particular sense of what it meant to be a post-war democratic citizen: namely, someone with flexible, near-limitless choice, but with very clearly defined standards of what the range of that “limitless choice” would be, and who would be continually adjusting to a world defined by a continuous state of fluidity."

(Since I lived and studied in Los Angeles in arghhh... 1986, this topic is interesting me on more than one level :-)

***

@thejaymo : "This talk will pose the questions: Where are the nexuses of political contestation in this new landscape? Has the discourse of digital dualism been overly focussed on the individual, or is it that only now are the implications of dualism at the geopolitical level being recognised? What are the implications for politics, as nation states evaporate into the clouds, and the Stacks continue to build their own private infrastructures and extend sensing/robotic platforms into the physical world?"



more...
No comment yet.