The Innovation Economy
615 views | +0 today
Follow
 
Scooped by John Muller
onto The Innovation Economy
Scoop.it!

App unbundling, search and discovery

App unbundling, search and discovery | The Innovation Economy | Scoop.it
"There’s only two ways I know of to make money: bundling and unbundling."

-Jim Barksdale

There’s been a pretty clear story for the past couple of years that the
dynamics of smartphone interfaces drive unbundling of services. 

The main reason is that single-purpose applications have an advantage on
smartphone interfaces. On a desktop website, you could always add a feature
as a new tab on your site navigation, and clicking that was easier than
going to another web site. But on mobile, all apps are just two taps away,
while there is very little room for links to more features in any given
app’s home screen - they quickly get shoved into the ‘hamburger’ menu, and
soon after fall into the ‘hamburger basement’, down below the bottom of the
screen. This gives startups scope to unbundle features from larger
companies' products, and also means those companies themselves unbundle
their apps into separate single-function apps. 

This effect is even stronger for social applications, where a lot of the
unbundling conversation focuses, since the smartphone is itself a social
platform quite unlike a desktop web browser. All apps can access the
address book, giving them a ready-made social graph, and the photo library,
reducing the hassle of uploading to different sites, and push
notifications, removing the hassle of checking lots of different sites.
This is why we have dozens of social apps that have passed the 1m, 10m or
even 100m user milestone. 

Finally, of course, driven by all of these dynamics, all smartphone apps by
their nature unbundle services from the web browser itself, 20 year after
Netscape launched. 

All of this seems inevitable and inherent in the nature of the platform.
It’s the reason why Facebook has moved from a de facto monopoly of social
on the desktop to being merely the leader on mobile, buying the occasional
breakout unbundler while experimenting with its own suite (‘constellation’)
of different apps searching for new use cases

However, looking at the Chinese internet market is always a great way to
challenge your belief in what’s inevitable, and in this case both Baidu
Maps and WeChat, amongst others, are thriving on exactly the opposite
approach - bundling multiple services into one app. (WeChat and Baidu Maps
are a bit different, so I'll focus on Baidu)

Hence, in Baidu Maps you can not just find a restaurant but book a table or
order home-delivery. You can find where a film is showing and choose a
seat. You can order a cab, with cabs from all the services in your city
shown together on the map and the order going to be best offer. You can
book a hotel room or a cleaner. Most of of these services are provided
though embedded third-parties - Baidu is doing deals with other Chinese
internet companies to provide this. WeChat (which now has close to 400m
MAUs), is doing much the same, but of course starting from a chat
experience rather than a maps experience.

In both cases, the aggregations make a fair amount of sense on their own
terms - finding a cinema, taxi or restaurant are location-based activities
and they’re also social activities. But the functionality is being flipped
upside-down: in the USA a taxi app or a restaurant app will have an
embedded map, but in China the map has embedded restaurants and taxis - and
lots of other things. Equally, on Yelp you can message friends, but in
WeChat you’re already in the messaging app. 

This changes the layer of aggregation. By default, the iOS and Android
interfaces aggregate at the app launcher level - you have a screen of
different icons for different services, though to some extent notifications
are becoming another OS-level aggregation. Anything that hasn't been
unbundled from the web is in the browser, where it is in turn aggregated by
Google. Apps like WeChat and Baidu Maps move the service aggregation layer
up the stack from the home screen, bundling it within a single app.
Conversely Siri and Google Now (and arguably Microsoft's Live tiles) are in
different ways about moving it down the stack into an OS-level service. But
the interesting thing is that changing the aggregation model also enables
new types of discovery.

In the app launcher layer, any direct service discovery (as opposed to
marketing, word of mouth etc) is limited to the app stores. When they
launched this worked adequately, but with over 1m apps in each of the iOS
and Android app stores this model is clearly now broken. Just as Yahoo’s
hierarchical directory didn’t really scale after 1996 or so, so too app
stores have not scaled as a discovery platform. Further, though there are
lots of ways that the execution of the app stores could be improved, this
still ultimately boils down to saying ‘Yahoo’s home page should be better’
back in 1996. Indeed it should have been, but the answer was still
PageRank. And we have no analogue of PageRank for mobile apps. 

Google Now and Siri, moving down the stack, address discovery by removing
the whole question of ‘which app/site/service addresses this need?’ Now
tries to infer from your general activity what you might want to be told
about, while Siri tries to use natural language to answer your question.
Both are focused on an answer rather than a specific service - ‘sports
scores’ rather than ‘ESPN’ (even if ESPN proves the actual answers). But
the problem with both is that underlying answers are provisioned in an
essentially manual process. Google Now, in particular, looks like Google’s
most automatic and magical product, but in fact it's all editorial. Someone
has to decide that Now will support cricket, and then someone has to sit
down and code the cricket module. And If no-one has done rugby yet, you
won’t get rugby - Now can't work out what rugby is from watching your web
browsing. Siri has similar constraints: HAL 9000 didn’t have a list of
things you could ask him. This does not scale to the whole internet. 

The general issue here is that any aggregator of services that offers a set
of essentially hand-crafted approaches will inevitably run out of room in
the metaphorical hamburger menu, just as the app store home pages can only
showcase a few dozen apps at once and Yahoo's home page could only showcase
a few dozen services. Or, indeed, Apple's Sherlock ran out of tabs. This
doesn't scale to the internet. PageRank did and indeed the web did. 

The Baidu Maps model addresses this problem by narrowing scope to a
specific domain, location, such that the discovery (hopefully) flows out of
a natural pre-existing context. You don’t need to know about restaurant
booking services or download the app, but you also don't need to know if
Baidu Maps has an AI that can do restaurant bookings (as you would need to
know that Siri connects to OpenTable): bookings are an organic extension of
the context you're already in. You'll already be searching for restaurants
on the map, but now ‘make a booking’ will appear.

That is, searches within maps are naturally constrained - there are only so
many use cases (a dozen? two dozen?) where a service integration might make
sense. So Baidu can make a maps app that’s an order of magnitude better
because it contains within itself every possible maps-based use case, and
nothing more. And those use cases can be hidden until you search - you
don't need to find space for a 'cleaners' button - you can just show that
module when people do that search, as they will.

WeChat comes at this discovery issue from the other direction: the social
foundation of the app means that services can come to you thRough friends
or through subscriptions to channels, but the point is the same - you don't
need to find space on the screen for every single service for people to
find them. For Facebook, the model would be to drive traffic out into
stand-alone apps (or a web view), with the partnership being only an
advertising one - for WeChat the dynamic is perhaps closer to the original
Facebook platform on the desktop. 

One way to look at this, I think, is that you trade app discovery
challenges for feature discovery challenges. That is, in an app with only
one or two features it's easy to see what you can do, but hard to discover
that app in the first place. Conversely in an app with hundreds of millions
of users but also lots of integrated features, feature discovery becomes
the challenge, and the opportunity. 

Changing discovery is one thing, but the other interesting thing is how
much happens inside the app. There are two structural things that the
desktop web has that the mobile app ecosystem lacks. On the web:

* You can link to any resource
* That resource will be there - you don't need to install anything.

These aggregator apps are tackling both problems: they have discovery
models to allow you to get to the resource (e.g. social or local context),
and the resources are loaded within the app - no need for a new app
install. This isn't happening on the web, as such, but it has some of the
same dynamics - within, obviously, those limited domains. 

It's interesting to contrast this with the deep linking initiatives from
Facebook and Google. Facebook offers a way to drive traffic to your app
from social and Google from search, and Google is experimenting with, for
example, a link to Uber from within Google Maps. The problem is that if the
app isn't there then you fail back to HTML, and if HTML was good enough
then you wouldn't have bothered deep linking in the first place. But on the
other hand, you can't integrate everything  - we already have a way to do
that. Hence, the Facebook and Google moves (and also Line's) disaggregate
apps, but use identity, deep links and search as an aggregation layer that
is closer to the web and might be more scalable. 

 

That is, you can bundle things into an app that has distribution, but
there's a limit to how many both for practical and discovery reasons. If
you use context (maps, social) you can address the discovery problem but
this works best in constrained contexts. If you don't bundle, your features
are easy to discover (because your app only has one feature) but you give
up those opportunities for discovery and fall back on raw search, social
sharing or the app stores. 

And for all that we talk about the problems with apps and the lack of
PageRank, one cannot really describe the desktop web as a prelapsarian
paradise of simple and easy discovery. The web is a neutral, transparent
and unmediated platform, and smartphones are not, but neither are Google or
Facebook. 

Hence, as Lenin put it, the question is 'Who, whom?' Who has the traffic,
and to whom do they give it? Mobile shuffled the deck, but it doesn't alter
the problem. 

The other interesting comparison here is with Yahoo and AOL. The portal
model failed pretty comprehensively in the 2000s, with category killer
sites springing up and AOL and Yahoo and the other would-be portals falling
far behind. So when smartphone apps came along we already had a dominant
unbounded model that transferred pretty directly: we unbundled services
from the browser, but the services themselves were already unbundled from
Yahoo.

In China, though, we see a model in which the portals didn't disappear. For
a lot of different reasons, the Chinese internet is based on much more
horizontal than vertical competition: where we have vertical category
killers (Google, Amazon, eBay) China has giants that are each leading in
one category but strong in others, and competing aggressively with each
other across every category. On mobile, Baidu Maps and WeChat are showing a
systematic concept of the app as, well, a portal. Is this what Yahoo might
look like on mobile now if it hadn't spent a decade asleep? 
more...
No comment yet.
The Innovation Economy
Articles on innovation and entrepreneurship
Curated by John Muller
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

The end of smartphone innovation

The end of smartphone innovation | The Innovation Economy | Scoop.it
This autumn Apple will release a new iPhone design, and the fact that it
postponed a new design and kept the 6 design for three years instead of two
suggests it has something that will attract attention. However, it will
really still 'just' be another iPhone. Meanwhile, we have some indication
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

Ideo Studied Innovation In 100+ Companies–Here’s What It Found | Co.Design

Ideo Studied Innovation In 100+ Companies–Here’s What It Found | Co.Design | The Innovation Economy | Scoop.it
Innovation is hard to pin down, but with these six insights Ideo says it’s cracking the code.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

The Art Of Building Platforms

The Art Of Building Platforms | The Innovation Economy | Scoop.it
You do not build a product in a vacuum. We build platforms with highly cross-functional teams that include people from partnerships, policy, support, engineering, product marketing, analytics, design, research, and many other groups.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

Second Machine Age or Fifth Technological Revolution? (Part 2) – Beyond the Technological Revolution

Second Machine Age or Fifth Technological Revolution? (Part 2) – Beyond the Technological Revolution | The Innovation Economy | Scoop.it
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

The People’s Internet – Thrive Global

The People’s Internet – Thrive Global | The Innovation Economy | Scoop.it
Though mobile phones have reached the hands of 6 billion people of a global population of 7 billion, and Internet access has reached nearly 4 billion, the new technology revolution is neither global…
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery

Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery | The Innovation Economy | Scoop.it
Machine learning is now so hot that those working in the field must be extra careful to avoid another round of hype and unfulfilled promises, Columnist Irving Wladawsky-Berger explains. They must set realistic expectations for what machine learning can accomplish, and explain its strengths and limitations, including when it’s use is called for and when other AI tools might be more appropriate.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

Innovation was the epic fail of 2016

Innovation was the epic fail of 2016 | The Innovation Economy | Scoop.it
The problem with the ongoing discourse on innovation is that it doesn't answer the fundamental question of what exactly is meant by the term. Rather, we are..
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

Dynamism or stasis: Which will America choose? A Q&A with Virginia Postrel - AEI

It has been nearly twenty years since the prescient publication of “The Future and its Enemies,” in which Virginia Postrel painted a picture of a world riven by clash between “dynamism” and “stasism”. After the 2016 election, it's increasingly relevant. What do we need to do to remain dynamists in an increasingly stasist world?
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

Globalization, Mechanization, & Political Stability

Globalization, Mechanization, & Political Stability | The Innovation Economy | Scoop.it
Economic stresses and changes are tearing apart the social fabric
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

Industrial Revolution Comparisons Aren't Comforting

Industrial Revolution Comparisons Aren't Comforting | The Innovation Economy | Scoop.it
More automation may be good in the long run, but history tells us there'll be turmoil along the way.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

Why Silicon Valley Wouldn’t Work Without Immigrants

Why Silicon Valley Wouldn’t Work Without Immigrants | The Innovation Economy | Scoop.it
To get the very best people in the world, tech companies must look beyond American shores.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

The World Changing Ideas Of 2017 | Fast Company

The World Changing Ideas Of 2017 | Fast Company | The Innovation Economy | Scoop.it
From global democracy to creating a new fish-based food system, nine ideas that could change the world for the better in 2017 and beyond.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

Escape to another world

Escape to another world | The Innovation Economy | Scoop.it
As video games get better and job prospects worse, more young men are dropping out of the job market to spend their time in an alternate reality. Ryan Avent suspects this is the beginning of something big
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

Automation and Employment in the 21st Century

Automation and Employment in the 21st Century | The Innovation Economy | Scoop.it
Ever since the advent of industrialization over 200 years ago, there’ve been periodic fears about the impact of technology-based automation on jobs. In the 1810s, for example, the so-called Luddites smashed the new machines that were threatening their textil
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

Why the day robots pay taxes is the day we become the tools

Why the day robots pay taxes is the day we become the tools | The Innovation Economy | Scoop.it
In a rebuttal to Bill Gates, Larry Summers argues robots are wealth creators which should not be taxed accordingly. He’s right. But only if the driving motivation for robot innovation is enhanced productivity. Not if it’s a Silicon Valley god complex.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

How Can Antitrust Be Used to Protect Competition in the Digital Marketplace? -

How Can Antitrust Be Used to Protect Competition in the Digital Marketplace? - | The Innovation Economy | Scoop.it
In this second part of our two-part interview with Maurice Stucke and Ariel Ezrachi, the two discuss how competition authorities can mitigate tacit collusion in the age of big data and artificial intelligence and how antitrust could adapt to the new dynamic of the market.   Last week, we published the first installment of a two-part interview with Maurice Stucke from the University of Tennessee Knoxville and Ariel Ezrachi of Oxford University, whose research and upcoming book, Virtual Competition, explore the changing nature of competition in the age of big data and algorithms.   While the digital economy is often touted …
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

10 Lessons From 10 Years Of The World's Most Innovative Companies

10 Lessons From 10 Years Of The World's Most Innovative Companies | The Innovation Economy | Scoop.it
What we can learn from the challenges and the triumphs that have defined the last 10 years of innovation in business.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

The Silver Lining Of Anti-Globalism Might Be The Creation Of A True Digital Economy

The Silver Lining Of Anti-Globalism Might Be The Creation Of A True Digital Economy | The Innovation Economy | Scoop.it
Douglas Rushkoff argues that trade wars and closed borders might force us to break with the extractive capitalist system and use technology t
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

Why culture matters when it comes to innovation: South Korea edition - AEI

The British and Germans and French aren't the only ones jealous of American-style innovation. Take South Korea.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

How did Europe become the richest part of the world? – Joel Mokyr | Aeon Essays

In a time of great powers and empires, just one region of the world experienced extraordinary economic growth. How?
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by John Muller
Scoop.it!

Behind the Scenes of Mark Zuckerberg’s Manifesto – Backchannel

Behind the Scenes of Mark Zuckerberg’s Manifesto – Backchannel | The Innovation Economy | Scoop.it
In 1862, Abraham Lincoln addressed Congress. It was grim time for a country newly immersed in a civil war, but he saw opportunity in strife. Lincoln was only weeks away from signing the Emancipation…
more...
No comment yet.