Share ideas that matter on the social web and experience
the benefits of curating the world's best content.
I don't have a Facebook, a Twitter or a LinkedIn account
 Your new post is loading...
Scoop.it!
Appthority cast a spotlight on the hidden behaviors of the top free mobile apps. The report reveals the security issues raised by the BYOD movement, app market fragmentation for developers, popular app categories and the sensitive data that apps can access.
Gust MEES: read also my blog about BYOD here http://gustmees.wordpress.com/2012/07/07/bring-your-own-device-advantages-dangers-and-risks/
Read more:
Via Gust MEES No comment yet.
Sign up to comment
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
No
Scoop.it!
While mobile device management will always be in use in the enterprise, thankfully, a better option exists.
In fact, it seems the only group not excited about BYOD is IT – the ones who have to figure out how to keep sensitive corporate information safe. IT's consternation over BYOD is made worse by the fact that many think mobile device management (MDM) is the only tool available to contain the risks associated with BYOD, which is not the case.
MDM will always have a place in the enterprise because BYOD will simply never be the right approach for every employee. However, when it comes to BYOD implementations, MDM is not ideal. Thankfully, a better option exists. Mobile application management (MAM) presents an intriguing option for preparing for and avoiding the hazards of BYOD.
Read more, a MUST: http://www.scmarketscope.com/mdm-and-byod-a-square-peg-for-a-round-hole/article/260623/
Via Gust MEES Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
No
|
Scoop.it!
Does your child bring a handheld device to school to access the Internet?
Read more: http://info.uknowkids.com/blog/bid/234136/BYOD-Bring-Your-Own-Device-School-Policy
Via Gust MEES Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
No
Scoop.it!
The 21st Century Principal
I do not buy into the argument of "no access for anyone until everyone can have it." Instead, I think we must do what Marc Prensky argues which is to find ways to "Bridge and eliminate this digital divide" and provide digital access to our students. As Prensky suggests, we are going to have to accept that there is always going to be some inequality, but there are things we should be doing as educators to mediate the impact of the digital divide, and trying to keep the playing field level by refusing anyone access until all have it is not the ethical thing to do.
As educators we must be concerned with our "students wanting or needing access to a minimal level of digital technology and not being able to get it."
Read more, very interesting...: http://the21stcenturyprincipal.blogspot.com.au/2012/07/digital-divide-is-not-excuse-to.html
Via Gust MEES Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
No
|
