Systems Theory
Follow
Find
2.5K views | +0 today
Rescooped by Ben van Lier from Cyborgs_Transhumanism
onto Systems Theory
Scoop.it!

I, Quantum Robot - Scientific American (blog)

I, Quantum Robot - Scientific American (blog) | Systems Theory | Scoop.it
Scientific American (blog)
I, Quantum Robot
Scientific American (blog)
Artificial Intelligence is the ability of a computer system to operate in a manner similar to human intelligence.

Via Alejandro J. Alvarez S., luiy
more...
Alejandro J. Alvarez S.'s curator insight, March 18, 2013 2:50 PM

Very interesting, I enjoyed reading it.

luiy's curator insight, March 19, 2013 3:13 AM

The quantum robot is the idea of combining quantum theory with robot technology. In other words, it is a practical use of the combination of quantum computing and robot technology. Quantum computing involves using quantum systems and quantum states to do computations.

 

A robot is an automated machine that is capable of doing a set of complex tasks. In some applications of robots, the programming used to run the robots may be based on artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence is the ability of a computer system to operate in a manner similar to human intelligence. Think of artificial intelligence as if you were training a machine to act like a human. Essentially, quantum robots are complex quantum systems.They are mobile systems with on board quantum computers that interact with their environments. Several programs would be involved in the operation of the robot. These programs would be quantum searching algorithms and quantum reinforcement learning algorithms.

 

Quantum reinforcement learning is based on superposition of the quantum state and quantum parallelism. A quantum state is a system that is a set of quantum numbers. The four basic quantum numbers represent the energy level, angular momentum, spin, and magnetization. In the superposition of quantum states, the idea is to get one state to look like another.

 

Let’s say I have two dogs. One dog knows how to fetch a bone (energy level), sit up (angular momentum), give a high five (spin), and shake hands (magnetization). Now, let’s apply the superposition of quantum states. Since one dog has been trained and given the commands, the other dog must learn to mimic or copy what the first dog did. Each time a command is achieved, reinforcement is given. The reinforcement for the dog would be a bone (or no bone if the command is not achieved).

 

In quantum reinforcement learning, it is slightly different. The idea would be similar to an “If-Then” statement. An example would be if the quantum state has a certain energy level, then the angular momentum is certain value. This idea of “If-Then” statements in the quantum world leads to an idea which can be a topic of its own; Quantum Logic.

Systems Theory
theoretical aspects of (social) systems theory
Curated by Ben van Lier
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Ben van Lier
Scoop.it!

Schumpeter and the Second Machine Age

Volg de Centric-blog over The Internet of Things, Cloud Computing, Het Nieuwe Werken, interoperabiliteit en Sustainable Architecture.
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Ben van Lier from Nanotechnology News
Scoop.it!

nation.lk ::: - #Nanotechnology in construction industry

nation.lk ::: - #Nanotechnology in construction industry | Systems Theory | Scoop.it
As we have discussed, nanotechnology has its tentacles in many of applications. In the Sri Lankan context, construction is not considered as a field w...

Via Muditha Senarath Yapa
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Ben van Lier from Strategy and Competitive Intelligence by Bonnie Hohhof
Scoop.it!

Google sets up artificial intelligence ethics board to curb the rise of the robots

Google sets up artificial intelligence ethics board to curb the rise of the robots | Systems Theory | Scoop.it

Google has set up an ethics board to oversee its work in artificial intelligence. The search giant has recently bought several robotics companies, along with Deep Mind, a British firm creating software that tries to help computers think like humans. One of its founders warned artificial intelligence is  'number 1 risk for this century,' and believes it could play a part in human extinction.  The ethics board, revealed by web site The Information, is to ensure the projects are not abused.

 


Via Bonnie Hohhof
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Ben van Lier from Papers
Scoop.it!

Enlarging the scope: grasping brain complexity

To further advance our understanding of the brain, new concepts and theories are needed. In particular, the ability of the brain to create information flows must be reconciled with its propensity for synchronization and mass action. The theoretical and empirical framework of Coordination Dynamics, a key aspect of which is metastability, are presented as a starting point to study the interplay of integrative and segregative tendencies that are expressed in space and time during the normal course of brain and behavioral function. Some recent shifts in perspective are emphasized, that may ultimately lead to a better understanding of brain complexity.

 

Front. Syst. Neurosci., 25 June 2014 | http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00122

Enlarging the scope: grasping brain complexity
Emmanuelle Tognoli and J. A. Scott Kelso


Via Complexity Digest
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Ben van Lier
Scoop.it!

A Strange Peanut-Shaped Building Designed by Algorithms | Design | WIRED

A Strange Peanut-Shaped Building Designed by Algorithms | Design | WIRED | Systems Theory | Scoop.it
The hope is that this process can bring out the best in both humans and computers.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Ben van Lier
Scoop.it!

The Transhuman Future: Be More Than You Can Be

The Transhuman Future: Be More Than You Can Be | Systems Theory | Scoop.it
Humanity is slowly transforming, evolving into a new species, growing together with its technology. Marcelo Gleiser asks: How will we maintain our sense of self as we become something else?
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Ben van Lier from Amazing Science
Scoop.it!

Bell’s theorem still reverberates: How entanglement makes the impossible possible

Bell’s theorem still reverberates: How entanglement makes the impossible possible | Systems Theory | Scoop.it

Fifty years ago, John Bell made metaphysics testable, but quantum scientists still dispute the implications.

 

In 1964, Northern Irish physicist John Bell proved mathematically that certain quantum correlations, unlike all other correlations in the Universe, cannot arise from any local cause1. This theorem has become central to both metaphysics and quantum information science. But 50 years on, the experimental verifications of these quantum correlations still have ‘loopholes’, and scientists and philosophers still dispute exactly what the theorem states.


Quantum theory does not predict the outcomes of a single experiment, but rather the statistics of possible outcomes. For experiments on pairs of ‘entangled’ quantum particles, Bell realized that the predicted correlations between outcomes in two well-separated laboratories can be profoundly mysterious (see ‘How entanglement makes the impossible possible’). Correlations of this sort, called Bell correlations,were verified experimentally more than 30 years ago (see, for example, ref. 2). As Bell proved in 1964, this leaves two options for the nature of reality. The first is that reality is irreducibly random, meaning that there are no hidden variables that “determine the results of individual measurements”1. The second option is that reality is ‘non-local’, meaning that “the setting of one measuring device can influence the reading of another instrument, however remote”1.


Most physicists are localists: they recognize the two options but choose the first, because hidden variables are, by definition, empirically inaccessible. Quantum information scientists embrace irreducible randomness as a resource for secure cryptography3. Other physicists and philosophers (the ‘non-localist camp’) dispute that there are two options, and insist that Bell’s theorem mandates non-locality4.


Bell himself was a non-localist, an opinion he first published in 1976 (ref. 6), after introducing a concept, “local causality”, that is subtly different from the locality of the 1964 theorem. Deriving this from Einstein’s principle requires an even stronger notion of causation: if two events are statistically correlated, then either one causes the other, or they have a common cause, which, when taken into account, eliminates the correlation.


In 1976, Bell proved that his new concept of local causality (based implicitly on the principle of common cause), was ruled out by Bell correlations6. In this 1976 theorem there was no second option, as there had been in the 1964 theorem, of giving up hidden variables. Nature violates local causality.


Experiments in 1982 by a team led by French physicist Alain Aspect2, using well-separated detectors with settings changed just before the photons were detected, suffered from an ‘efficiency loophole’ in that most of the photons were not detected. This allows the experimental correlations to be reproduced by (admittedly, very contrived) local hidden variable theories.


In 2013, this loophole was closed in photon-pair experiments using high-efficiency detectors7, 8. But they lacked large separations and fast switching of the settings, opening the ‘separation loophole’: information about the detector setting for one photon could have propagated, at light speed, to the other detector, and affected its outcome.

 

There are several groups worldwide racing to do the first Bell experiment with large separation, efficient detection and fast switching. It will be a landmark achievement in physics. But would such an experiment really close all the loopholes? The answer depends on one’s attitude to causation.



Via Dr. Stefan Gruenwald
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Ben van Lier
Scoop.it!

Polite drones open door for efficient robot armies - tech - 25 June 2014 - New Scientist

Polite drones open door for efficient robot armies - tech - 25 June 2014 - New Scientist | Systems Theory | Scoop.it
Robots that can navigate in unknown spaces have been given manners to help them coordinate their in-flight movements
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Ben van Lier
Scoop.it!

CERN announces LHC restart schedule | CERN

CERN announces LHC restart schedule | CERN | Systems Theory | Scoop.it
The Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the largest and most powerful particle accelerator in the world, has started to get ready for its second three-year run. Cool down of the vast machine has already begun in preparation for research to resume early in 2015 following a long technical stop to prepare the machine for running at almost double the energy of run 1. The last LHC magnet interconnection was closed on 18 June 2014 and one sector of 1/8 of the machine has already been cooled to operating temperature.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Ben van Lier
Scoop.it!

Without Claude Shannon, there would have been no Internet - Raw Story

Without Claude Shannon, there would have been no Internet - Raw Story | Systems Theory | Scoop.it
Raw Story
Without Claude Shannon, there would have been no Internet
Raw Story
It was the start of the science of “information theory”, a set of ideas that has allowed us to build the internet, digital computers and telecommunications systems.
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Ben van Lier from Outbreaks of Futurity
Scoop.it!

'Moral' Robots: the Future of War or Dystopian Fiction?

'Moral' Robots: the Future of War or Dystopian Fiction? | Systems Theory | Scoop.it

The dawn of the 21st century has been called the decade of the drone. Unmanned aerial vehicles, remotely operated by pilots in the United States, rain Hellfire missiles on suspected insurgents in South Asia and the Middle East.

Now a small group of scholars is grappling with what some believe could be the next generation of weaponry: lethal autonomous robots. At the center of the debate is Ronald C. Arkin, a Georgia Tech professor who has hypothesized lethal weapons systems that are ethically superior to human soldiers on the battlefield. A professor of robotics and ethics, he has devised algorithms for an "ethical governor" that he says could one day guide an aerial drone or ground robot to either shoot or hold its fire in accordance with internationally agreed-upon rules of war.


Via Martin Talks, Szabolcs Kósa, Artur Coelho
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Ben van Lier
Scoop.it!

Luhmann insistence on systems theory 1983

読んだ: Niklas Luhmann, "Insistence on Systems Theory: Perspectives from Germany — An Essay" (1983) http://t.co/nml26HmD9P 1981年ASA大会での報告に基づく論文
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Ben van Lier
Scoop.it!

Book Review: Braidotti’s Vital Posthumanism

Book Review: Braidotti’s Vital Posthumanism | Systems Theory | Scoop.it
Contemporary posthumanism comes in two bitter-sweet flavours: speculative and critical.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Ben van Lier
Scoop.it!

Quantum math makes human irrationality more sensible | Science News

Quantum math makes human irrationality more sensible | Science News | Systems Theory | Scoop.it
Vagaries of human decision making make sense if quantum math describes the way the brain works.
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Ben van Lier from artificial intelligence for students
Scoop.it!

Fear of Artificial Intelligence vs. the Ethics and Art of Creative Destruction - Wired

Fear of Artificial Intelligence vs. the Ethics and Art of Creative Destruction - Wired | Systems Theory | Scoop.it
Fear of Artificial Intelligence vs. the Ethics and Art of Creative Destruction Wired While it may be an interesting question whether the seasons are changing in artificial intelligence (AI), or to what extent the entertainment industry is herding...

Via Scott Turner
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Ben van Lier from iMech
Scoop.it!

Do Machines Have Rights? Ethics in the Age of Artificial Intelligence | Kellogg | Aurora

Do Machines Have Rights? Ethics in the Age of Artificial Intelligence | Kellogg | Aurora | Systems Theory | Scoop.it
Do Machines Have Rights? Ethics in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Via NikolaosKourakos
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Ben van Lier
Scoop.it!

Daimler Demonstrates a Self-Driving Truck

Daimler Demonstrates a Self-Driving Truck | Systems Theory | Scoop.it
The Mercedes-Benz Future Truck 2025 shown in eastern Germany is designed to steer itself at highway speeds, but allows a driver to intervene.
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Ben van Lier from Amazing Science
Scoop.it!

Soft-Robotics: The robots of the future won't look anything like the Terminator

Soft-Robotics: The robots of the future won't look anything like the Terminator | Systems Theory | Scoop.it

The field of soft robotics has attracted a rush of attention in the last year. Down the road at Harvard, multiple groups are working on soft robotic hands, jumping legs, exosuits, and quadrupeds that can do the limbo. At Worcester Polytechnic Institute's Soft Robotics Lab, researchers are building a snake. In San Francisco, a startup called Otherlab is buildinginflatable robots that can shake hands, walk, and carry riders. In Italy, a group of researchers built a robotic tentacle modeled after an octopus.

 

Before the 1970s, car companies made cars safer by making them larger and heavier. Then along came the airbag: a lightweight safety device that folded up invisibly into the vehicle until it sensed a crash. Similar revolutions took place with body armor, bridges, and contact lenses, and these researchers believe something similar is happening with robots.

 

"It’s not a part of conventional robotics technologies," says Fumiya Iida, a professor of bio-inspired robotics at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology-Zurich and a member of the IEEE committee on soft robotics. "They have to think completely differently, use different materials, different energy sources. Definitely this is the way we should go in the long run." One of the most impressive rigid robots in the world right now is Boston Dynamics’ 300-pound humanoid Atlas. If Atlas wants to pick up a ball, it needs to sense and compute the precise distance between its digits and the ball and figure out exactly where to place its hand and how much pressure to apply.


Robots like Atlas "are doing a lot of thinking," says Barry Trimmer, PhD, a professor at Tufts and the editor of a new journal, Soft Robotics, which launched last month. "There’s a lot of hesitancy. ‘Where do I put my foot next?’ Animals just don't do that. We need to get away from the idea that you have to control every variable."

 

By contrast, Harvard’s starfish-shaped soft gripper only needs to be told to inflate. As it’s pumped full of air, it conforms to the shape of an object until its "fingers" have enough pressure to lift it. Another example would be a human picking up a glass of water. We don’t have to compute the exact size and shape of the glass with our brains; our hand adapts to the object. Similarly, Bubbles doesn’t calculate the full length of its movement.


There are technological challenges as well. In addition to air and fluid pressure actuators, soft roboticists are experimenting with dielectric elastomers, elastic materials that expand and contract in response to electric voltage; shape-memory alloys, metal alloys that can be programmed to change shape at certain temperatures; and springs that respond to light. These approaches are still rudimentary, as are the control systems that operate the robots. In the case of many of Harvard’s soft robots, it’s simply a syringe of air attached to a tube.


The field is so new, however, that no possibilities have yet been ruled out. Soft robotics technologies could theoretically be used in a wearable pair of human wings.More practically, soft robots could easily pack eggs or pick fruit — traditional hard robots, equipped with superhuman grips, are more likely to break yolks and inadvertently make applesauce. A mass of wormlike "meshworm" robots could be filled with water and dropped over a disaster area, where they would crawl to survivors. A soft robotic sleeve could be worn to eliminate tremors or supplement strength lost with age. Soft robots could be used in space exploration, where weight is hugely important; in prosthetics, where they would provide comfort and lifelikeness; in the home, where they can help out around the house without trampling the dog; and in surgical robots, where operators have inspired a few lawsuits after puncturing patients’ insides.

 



Via Dr. Stefan Gruenwald
more...
Rudolf Kabutz's curator insight, July 3, 3:38 AM

Do robots have to be hard and metallic? Soft spongy robots could have many advantages.

Anne Pascucci, MPA, CRA's curator insight, July 3, 5:44 AM

Very cool!

Scooped by Ben van Lier
Scoop.it!

WWI in historic newspapers: The assassination of Franz Ferdinand | Europeana Newspapers

WWI in historic newspapers: The assassination of Franz Ferdinand | Europeana Newspapers | Systems Theory | Scoop.it
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Ben van Lier
Scoop.it!

Paul McGuire -- Artificial Paradise and the New Man: Mankind at the Final Turning Point

Paul McGuire -- Artificial Paradise and the New Man: Mankind at the Final Turning Point | Systems Theory | Scoop.it
Sarah Foster's column on NewsWithViews.com
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Ben van Lier
Scoop.it!

Microsoft Makes Bet Quantum Computing Is Next Breakthrough

Microsoft Makes Bet Quantum Computing Is Next Breakthrough | Systems Theory | Scoop.it
A Microsoft-funded venture is aimed at designing computers that can solve problems in fields as diverse as chemistry, material science, artificial intelligence and code-breaking.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Ben van Lier
Scoop.it!

Quanundrum

Quanundrum | Systems Theory | Scoop.it
Does reality exist? Fifty years on, Bell’s theorem still divides (and confuses) physicists.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Ben van Lier
Scoop.it!

General Systems Theory

http://t.co/NijW1ms4cj
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Ben van Lier from Ethics
Scoop.it!

The Ethics Of Algorithms: Whom Would You Run Over? › Algoworld

The Ethics Of Algorithms: Whom Would You Run Over? › Algoworld | Systems Theory | Scoop.it
Let's play a thought experiment today, shall we? It is a cold Monday morning in the middle of winter. You are driving to work by car. Even ...

Via NANCY PETERS
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Ben van Lier
Scoop.it!

How much value is there in Big Data, really?

How much value is there in Big Data, really? | Systems Theory | Scoop.it
In this blog, Machina Research addresses the question of “does all data have the same value?” In the Internet of Things, the volume of data is set to surpass previously imagined levels, and monetising this asset is actively explored by many companies.
Does all data have the same value?
Big Data has caught the attention of many executives. Data has been compared to oil and gold, suggesting a ...
more...
No comment yet.