A remote imaging study has found that the official number of Gulf of Mexico slicks is correct, but the size estimates are not always so
Share ideas that matter on the social web and experience
the benefits of curating the world's best content.
I don't have a Facebook, a Twitter or a LinkedIn account
|
|
Scooped by SustainOurEarth onto Sustain Our Earth |
A remote imaging study has found that the official number of Gulf of Mexico slicks is correct, but the size estimates are not always so
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Oil Limits and Climate Change |
Responsible Growth |
400 PPM: Can Artificial Trees Help Pull CO2 from the Air?: Scientific American |
Your new post is loading...
From
www.nytimes.com
-
April 16, 3:11 PM
Inside the hyperengineered, savagely marketed, addiction-creating battle for American "stomach share."
[Adapted from “Salt Sugar Fat: How the Food Giants Hooked Us,” by Michael Moss, an investigative reporter for The Times.]
The public and the food companies have known for decades now that sugary, salty, fatty foods are not good for us in the quantities that we consume them. So why are the diabetes and obesity and hypertension numbers still spiraling out of control? It’s not just a matter of poor willpower on the part of the consumer and a give-the-people-what-they-want attitude on the part of the food manufacturers. What I found, over four years of research and reporting, was a conscious effort — taking place in labs and marketing meetings and grocery-store aisles — to get people hooked on foods that are convenient and inexpensive.
I talked to more than 300 people in or formerly employed by the processed-food industry, from scientists to marketers to C.E.O.’s. Some were willing whistle-blowers, while others spoke reluctantly when presented with some of the thousands of pages of secret memos that I obtained from inside the food industry’s operations.
What follows is a series of small case studies of a handful of characters whose work then, and perspective now, sheds light on how the foods are created and sold to people who, while not powerless, are extremely vulnerable to the intensity of these companies’ industrial formulations and selling campaigns. Via Pamir Kiciman, The DoctorsPlace
Pamir Kiciman's curator insight,
February 24, 12:47 PM
This is a long and thorough excerpt from the book on newyorktimes.com and is a MUST-READ. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
No
|
When and why did food became an addiction? And is fat consumption or sugar consumption the greater culprit? Jacques Peretti (pictured above) investigates.
"Genetically, human beings haven't changed, but our environment, our access to cheap food has," says Professor Jimmy Bell, obesity specialist at Imperial College, London.
"We're being bombarded every day by the food industry to consume more and more food."
One of the biggest changes in our modern diet stems back to the 1970s when US agriculture embarked on the mass-production of corn and of high-fructose corn syrup, commonly used as a sweetener in processed foods. . . . Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
No
|



Your new post is loading...