While much of the focus on restoring the Chesapeake Bay is on nutrient and sediment pollution, there’s another type of pollution that’s not often discussed: Toxic contaminants.
Join Scoop.it for Free
Share ideas that matter on the social web and experience
the benefits of curating the world's best content.
I don't have a Facebook, a Twitter or a LinkedIn account
Already have an account: Login
SIGN UP
Attract your communities of interest by sharing ideas that matter
58
Scoop.it Score
58
Visitors
Loading...
Updated
May 21
Created
Mar 26, 2012
Created by
Scoops
16404
Reactions
21884
Edit Tag
Follow
|
Scooped by SustainOurEarth onto Sustain Our Earth |
Scoop.it!
No comment yet.
Sign up to comment
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
No
Related Scoops
Going green: Nation equipped to grow serious amounts of pond scum for fuel |
Underwriting Bad Jobs: How Our Tax Dollars Are Funding Low-Wage Work and Fueling Inequality | Demos |
Staggering time-lapse footage of the Oklahoma tornado |
 Your new post is loading...
Scoop.it!
I have a love/hate affair with biofuels and biodiesel, because while they may be cleaner than petro-fuels, and considered a renewable resource, growing the feedstock usually entails a lot of land and a lot of water, both of which are limited resources. But if a new process for making biodiesel from sewage sludge gets commercialized, every flush of the toilet could be helping to fuel some of our energy needs. Via Hans De Keulenaer Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
No
|
