'U.S. Sustainability Efforts: Modest Progress but an Increasingly Distant Goal' blog post by John C. Dernbach.
Share ideas that matter on the social web and experience
the benefits of curating the world's best content.
I don't have a Facebook, a Twitter or a LinkedIn account
|
|
Scooped by SustainOurEarth onto Sustain Our Earth |
'U.S. Sustainability Efforts: Modest Progress but an Increasingly Distant Goal' blog post by John C. Dernbach.
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Your new post is loading...
A philosopher, a scientist and a software engineer have come together to propose a new centre at Cambridge to address developments in human technologies that might pose “extinction-level” risks to our species, from biotechnology to artificial intelligence. “At some point, this century or next, we may well be facing one of the major shifts in human history – perhaps even cosmic history – when intelligence escapes the constraints of biology,” says Huw Price, the Bertrand Russell Professor of Philosophy and one of CSER’s three founders, speaking about the possible impact of Good’s ultra-intelligent machine, or artificial general intelligence (AGI) as we call it today. “Nature didn’t anticipate us, and we in our turn shouldn’t take AGI for granted. We need to take seriously the possibility that there might be a ‘Pandora’s box’ moment with AGI that, if missed, could be disastrous. I don’t mean that we can predict this with certainty, no one is presently in a position to do that, but that’s the point! With so much at stake, we need to do a better job of understanding the risks of potentially catastrophic technologies.” Via Szabolcs Kósa Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
No
|
From
io9.com
-
August 31, 2012 9:10 PM
Physicist Stephen Hawking suggests that our ongoing efforts to colonize space could ultimately save humanity from extinction. As it stands, Earth is our only biosphere — all our eggs are currently in one basket. If something were to happen to either our planet or our civilization, it would be vital to know that we could sustain a colony somewhere else. And the threats are real. The possibility of an asteroid impact, nuclear war, a nanotechnological disaster, or severe environmental degradation make the need for off-planet habitation extremely urgent. And given our ambitious future prospects, including the potential for ongoing population growth, we may very well have no choice but to leave the cradle. We're obviously not going to get there overnight — but here's how we could do it. Via Szabolcs Kósa Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
No
|



Your new post is loading...