Sports Facility Management.3041268
8 views | +0 today
Follow
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Kristie Kendrick-Stevens
Scoop.it!

Facilities Management for Sports Organizations - DNS-NFL

Facilities Management for Sports Organizations - DNS-NFL | Sports Facility Management.3041268 | Scoop.it
Wireless connectivity is an issue for Sports Organizations due to the yearly increasing Wi-Fi access need for fans and their mobile devices along with the media. As the need for bandwidth increases, so does the cost for each ...
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Kristie Kendrick-Stevens from Sports Facility Management_4167405
Scoop.it!

Research and Markets: 2013 Worldwide Fitness & Recreational Sports Centers Industry-Industry & Market Report

Research and Markets: 2013 Worldwide Fitness & Recreational Sports Centers Industry-Industry & Market Report | Sports Facility Management.3041268 | Scoop.it
Research and Markets has announced the addition of the "2013 Worldwide Fitness & Recreational Sports Centers (Research and Markets: 2013 Worldwide Fitness & Recreational Sports Centers Industry-Industry & Market Report

Via Nickesha Bailey
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Kristie Kendrick-Stevens
Scoop.it!

Firebird Raceway keeps NHRA event; changes management, name - Arizona Republic

Arizona Republic
Firebird Raceway keeps NHRA event; changes management, name
Arizona Republic
Subscribe Now. By Michael Knight Special for azcentral sports Fri Jun 21, 2013 7:40 AM ...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Kristie Kendrick-Stevens
Scoop.it!

Public funding for new sports stadium? | Atlanta Forward

And a state senator questions public subsidies for privately owned sports teams. Move forward with new stadium. By Ron Stephens. Boasting an NFL-leading record, an MVP candidate and a first-ballot Hall of Famer, the ...
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Kristie Kendrick-Stevens from Sports Facility Management: 4298651
Scoop.it!

Risk Management for Sports Coaches, Teams & Individuals

Sir Clive Woodward, World Cup Winning Head Coach of England Rugby Union and insure4sport Ambassador, discusses risk management in relation to Coaches, Instru...

Via Crystal Szemple, Shannon Jablonka-Cinciripini, Samantha Hirata
more...
Crystal Szemple's curator insight, December 23, 2012 5:34 PM

All Sports Facilities and Stadiums should conduct a risk analysis and have reduction procedures in place.

Rescooped by Kristie Kendrick-Stevens from Performance News - Sports Medicine
Scoop.it!

Emergency Medical Management in Individual/Team Sports

Emergency Medical Management in Individual/Team Sports | Sports Facility Management.3041268 | Scoop.it
Approved by the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine (ACPSM) for their gold level Continuing Professional Development (CPD) pathway and pending approval from Royal College Surgeons Edinburgh, Faculty Pre Hospital care.

Via Man Olimpik
more...
Charles Edwards's curator insight, May 24, 2013 12:42 PM

Injuries are a common occurance during sporting events.  Having a team who is highly trained and on-site helps get an injured player off the field and into the training room in a quick manner.

Rescooped by Kristie Kendrick-Stevens from Sports Fascility Management
Scoop.it!

Risky Marlins | Man, Economy & Sport

Subsidy creates moral hazard. This also applies to sports. Stadium subsidies are often talked about in terms of “economic development,” but really it's a case of paying bad managers to produce even more bad management.

Via Angelica Platisa
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Kristie Kendrick-Stevens from View * Engage * Discuss
Scoop.it!

Should Sports Teams Receive Tax Breaks?

Should Sports Teams Receive Tax Breaks? | Sports Facility Management.3041268 | Scoop.it
Here are some of the costs, pros and cons of sports teams receiving tax breaks. 

 

In a very general sense, the question of tax breaks for sports teams falls under the category of whether or not subsidies are desirable. From an economic perspective on subsidies, some could say that almost all of them create suboptimal outcomes. This is because under normal market conditions market forces move automatically towards allocative efficiency. Subsidies distort the ability of markets to correctly allocate resources because they provide an incentive to continue the subsidized behavior, even when it is not profitable or productive to do so.

 

Why Subsidies Are Useful
The counterargument is that subsidies are useful for this very reason. They allow government to shape economic outcomes toward desired policy objectives. For example, the money used to fund alternative energy sources. So although the subsidy is creating a less than optimal use of resources, people believe that is balanced by the development of technology that might not have otherwise been built until much later, if at all. Another reason people champion subsidies is to protect jobs or create growth. However, the job market is subject to the same economic forces as any other. By creating subsidies in unproductive industries people remain in jobs that are also unproductive; this makes society worse off. In the case of sports teams, the most commonly cited reason for subsidies is that it creates jobs and improves revenues. Yet there have been studies that conclude that this is not always the case.

 

Not All Need Tax Breaks
Most sports teams are actually quite profitable and do not actually require tax breaks to remain competitive. Examples of the types of subsidies sports teams regularly enjoy include: tax-deductible ticket sales (including on luxury suites), reduction of taxes on revenue via direct tax credits and sweet-heart deals on new facilities. What this means is that corporations, and even individuals, can deduct a portion of what they spend on tickets in a similar manner as donating to a charity. In the case of new stadiums, the burden of building and operating arenas gets pushed onto the taxpayer while owners reap the related revenues. Unfortunately, due to the secretive nature of professional teams, most financial information is inaccessible thus preventing the public from accurately gauging the level of financial support these franchises receive.

 

However, let us be fair and consider the case where sports teams are legitimately struggling and only government aid can keep them afloat. This hearkens back to the beginning of this piece and the discussion on whether or not it is believed that subsidies are useful. Insofar as civic pride is concerned, maybe it is considered appropriate to prop up a flailing team. People have an emotional connection to their sports teams. They buy tickets to games, purchase merchandise and follow every story about their chosen champions. Despite this, only a very small portion of the population (20%) thinks that tax breaks for sports teams is good policy.

 

The intuition for this is that if a sports team is failing it is because it is poorly run and is spending itself into a hole, or the fans do not support it with enough revenue to continue. Either way, this is not an enterprise that should be having public money thrown at it. Perhaps the largest segment of government support goes toward the construction of stadiums. Fancy new stadiums attract fans and sports teams alike.

 

Cities often will use the promise of a new stadium to entice teams to relocate. Is this a good investment on behalf of the public? Almost all economists and independent development specialists conclude that the rate of return on these projects is less than what could be had on alternative projects, with some sports contracts failing significantly. Further, those cities that invested heavily in sports stadiums have experienced, on average, slower income growth compared to their peers who chose otherwise.

 

The Bottom Line
There is no silver lining. The public does not support deluxe treatments for sports teams in the form of tax breaks, the data does not support tax breaks for sports teams and commonly accepted economic theory does not support tax breaks for sports teams either. This leaves fans and citizens paying double as both their taxes and discretionary income go towards profitable franchises instead of schools and roads. The only people who benefit from such activity are those who own, operate and work for sports franchises. As Norman Braman, former owner of the NFL's Philadelphia Eagles, put it: "the taxpayers are a bunch of suckers."


Via TheIWC_AJA
more...
Vinnie's curator insight, February 17, 2015 9:08 PM

Basic breakdown of public subsidy benefits for sports teams.

Bryant Tucker's curator insight, July 24, 6:10 PM
This is a great article that gives an understanding of both the good and bad of the tax breaks, as well as the notion that some teams are very profitable and could afford their own building efforts.
Rescooped by Kristie Kendrick-Stevens from Sports Facility Management Class 2013
Scoop.it!

College sports subsidies remain integral part of game

College sports subsidies remain integral part of game | Sports Facility Management.3041268 | Scoop.it
College sports subsidies remain integral part of game, Across the nation, universities are pouring millions of dollars more into their sports programs as they engage in what one independent commission calls a "financial arms race" in collegiate...

Via Rachel
more...
William Corson's curator insight, October 26, 2015 4:05 AM

This is an article that is essentially showing the spread of subsidies in sports in college. In makes me wonder now how much it effects the overall economy. Thinking about a major city that has the big four and now you add the schools and you can be talking about billions of debt. Multiply that by every city that has the same scenario and I will guess that blows away our national debt.