Many educators are looking for ways to include things such as wikis, interest groups, blogs, and second life as part of their curriculum. Does including the latest social networking fad or web 2.0...
Via Ana Cristina Pratas
Share ideas that matter on the social web and experience
the benefits of curating the world's best content.
I don't have a Facebook, a Twitter or a LinkedIn account
Your new post is loading...
Jeff Domansky's curator insight,
Today, 12:08 PM
On first look, this tool is definitely worth exploring. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Martin Debattista's curator insight,
May 24, 7:31 AM
Reminds me of the 'attention economy' in Geert Lovink's book "No Comment" I am reading just now for my research:
"In the attention economy, value is measured in the amount of time you happen to spend with any given media object or person. This can bea web site, watching your favorite show on television, text messaging afriend, talking on the phone, or blogging about the concert you attended-last night. For a long time the attention economy remained a hyped-upconcept, launched during the speculative 1990s to point to the shift fromthe production of tangible goods to immaterial services. The point thatmakes attention such an interesting commodity is the fact that it is soscarce. As Michael Goldhaber Writes in his 1996 Principles of the NewEconomy: "Attention is scarce because each of us has only so much of it to give, and it can come only from us-not machines, computers or anywhere else. Attention is another way of saying "time," as in "Where I choose to spend my time."
Lynn O'Connell for O'Connell Meier's curator insight,
May 24, 9:03 PM
"Associations are positioned to be the ultimate curators." Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Lourense Das's curator insight,
May 21, 3:07 AM
Dedicated website on plagiarism and copyright with videos, links and more Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Joaquín Ballester's comment,
May 19, 5:32 PM
I agree with you, Elke. PPT is more customizable and powerful.
Ivon Prefontaine's curator insight,
May 20, 10:06 AM
This appears to be an effective and practical article.
Marion Mulder's curator insight,
May 22, 6:00 AM
Oke - if you work in the corporate world there is just no escaping from having to create powerpoints at one point or another. You might as well create amzing one's while your at it. Here are some handy tips, do's & don'ts worth looking at Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Josie's curator insight,
May 21, 7:21 PM
Colors seem so innocent but its not as innocent as it seems! The psychology of branding colors! Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Venkatesh Iyer (venkyiyer.com)'s curator insight,
May 14, 5:33 AM
I have yet to make my first infograph, but am eager to get going.
Tanya Smith's curator insight,
May 18, 11:13 PM
I'm so in love with tools that help visualize what you do. This is a great list. I can't wait to try the ones I'm not familiar with.
Jeff Domansky's curator insight,
May 19, 9:21 PM
Liked the list. My personal favorite is Piktochart. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Christelle Bianchi's comment,
May 13, 12:48 AM
oui c'est évident, d'ou, pour ma part plus de libertés à donner et partager si un revenus de base permettrai à chacun d'être plus libre de partager du coup en vivant désâment. Rien ne nous empêche d'avoir plus avec un "travail" (perso déjà signé)
Claudia's comment,
May 13, 7:31 AM
Si c'est si évident, alors pourquoi faut-il toujours expliquer notre démarche éducative ? :-)
Christelle Bianchi's comment,
May 13, 9:35 AM
pardon, quand je parle c'est bien pour moi... mais je pense que ton sourire montre ta compréhension. Un jour la balance basculera de l'autre côté ! :-)
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
|
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Martin Debattista's curator insight,
May 24, 7:31 AM
Reminds me of the 'attention economy' in Geert Lovink's book "No Comment" I am reading just now for my research:
"In the attention economy, value is measured in the amount of time you happen to spend with any given media object or person. This can bea web site, watching your favorite show on television, text messaging afriend, talking on the phone, or blogging about the concert you attended-last night. For a long time the attention economy remained a hyped-upconcept, launched during the speculative 1990s to point to the shift fromthe production of tangible goods to immaterial services. The point thatmakes attention such an interesting commodity is the fact that it is soscarce. As Michael Goldhaber Writes in his 1996 Principles of the NewEconomy: "Attention is scarce because each of us has only so much of it to give, and it can come only from us-not machines, computers or anywhere else. Attention is another way of saying "time," as in "Where I choose to spend my time."
Lynn O'Connell for O'Connell Meier's curator insight,
May 24, 9:03 PM
"Associations are positioned to be the ultimate curators." Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
GoogleLitTrips Reading List's curator insight,
April 17, 1:55 PM
Though this article is not terribly deep, it does strike a bit of gold that I've been giving much thought to recently.
There is a huge elephant in the literary reading classroom. No, it's not in the desks where the kids who are struggling with basic literacy are sitting. No, it's not in the front rows where the future English majors are sitting. It's right there in the middle of the classroom where those kids who can read, but either have never taken a strong enjoyment from reading or who once enjoyed hearing stories and even reading them by choice have somehow, frequently somewhere during middle school, begun to lose that essential element of literary reading called enjoyment.
The gap between the various levels of enjoyment derived from reading and their enjoyment of reading the kinds of assigned stories for which they have not previously developed much appreciation, combined with the requirement to analyze literary devices, to pass quizzes, and write essays may be a fairly obvious set of circumstances connecting the reading of "good" literature to a gradual, and if truth be told, often steep decline in literary reading.
Do we need to "dumb down" expectations for these kids? I don't think so. But, we really ought to keep in mind that if, in our good intentions, we inadvertently kill the enjoyment of just reading a good story about things they like to read about, we may actually be contributing to losing them as life long readers.
As I look back on my own experiences with learning to appreciate the value of quality I clearly recall that in every instance it was a transitionary process.
I loved comic books, Mad Magazine, and junky reads before those interests widened into an appreciation for great satire and great story telling.
I hated Romeo and Juliet as a pimply-faced teen age boy before I came to appreciate Shakespeare. Of course I read R&J as a freshman at a time when romantic love just wasn't anything I was interested in reading about. I never had a girlfriend; never had so much as a sister, a female cousin or even anything like a friendship with a girl that was as rich as my deep friendships with my guy friends. And, like it or not, I truly believe that Shakespeare's language was a barrier that I just wasn't all that interested in overcoming. The language combined with my lack of having discovered any other reason to read the play pretty much made for a miserable experience.
Ironically, because of my wobbly-at-best connection to my Jewish heritage, and a couple of years of maturity, I found myself much more receptive to the storyline in The Merchant of Venice.
It's a pattern that takes some transition time...
I also enjoyed junk food before I enjoyed fine food, and long before I appreciated healthy food.
I enjoyed the Three Stooges before I enjoyed dramatic films. In fact, I still remember the paradigm expanding impact of seeing The Graduate. Funny and thought-provoking! A perfect bridge.
I enjoyed having trendy clothes and cars before I found the shallowness in devoting huge chunks of money and concern to giving a darn about such superficial things.
So what's my point? Instilling, nurturing, and encouraging an ongoing LOVE of reading comes before, and perhaps in the long run is even more important than the development of an appreciation for literature. This may be particularly so if the appreciation for literary reading rests upon experiences that are deadly to pre-existing levels of reading enjoyment derived by many of our struggling and reluctant readers.
And, I wouldn't be surprised to find out that like myself, if my pre-existing enjoyment of reading, junky as it might have been is built upon, we just might find that, as was also true in my case, that we might wind up with far more life long readers than we currently do; and perhaps even far more English majors as well.
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
|