The following article speaks to the numbers of men and women in science and who wins and who doesn't. What it doesn't talk about is how do men get nominated? Because of their network. Women don't have the same network - yet.
But contrary to the quoted "science" not finding a difference the author is missing something that explains why women are so important to boards and teams. There really is a difference in our brains - studies have been done on the physiological differences when in high negotiation mode - men increase levels of testosterone and women increase levels of oxytocin both hormones that impact or heighten our awareness of specific actions and increase certain behaviors by activating specific parts of the brain. Intelligence and how we use it IS NOT impacted but our reactions are heightened to differing levels with each person being specific as to the rise in the hormone levels. Yes there is a difference - and it is proven when we negotiate as a team - it's tough to beat the team of a man and a woman.
MEN ONLY Sex and science Of 441 Nobel prizes only 11 have gone to women. The only two women prize-winners in physics were Marie Curie and Maria Goeppert-Mayer. The American Barbara McClintock, who made the vital discovery that chromosomes shape identity, had to wait till she was 82 before receiving the Nobel prize. Few people remember the importance of the German Emmy Noether to modern algebra, or of Sonia Kovalevskaia, the first woman university professor of mathematics (at Stockholm University). Europe’s resistance (bar the Nordic countries) to women in politics may seem astonishing, as is their near absence in certain fields (science, engineering and new technology) . It has always been fashionable for the media to discuss how the different hemispheres of the brain work. But they have produced no conclusive evidence. So what keeps women away from the "hard" sciences? Why do they not opt for these key fields when they leave school? by Ingrid Carlander "Is science a question of sex? This is a vital question if we want to find out about science, about the balance of forces in our society", maintains Dhavernas-Lévy, philosopher at the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in Paris. In his study of the cultural aspects of science (1), Pierre Thuillier notes that "the clichés about men being better at science have been widely disseminated by university libraries, text books and the popular press".
In France, 24% of physicists and 20% of mathematicians are women. And very few women in this select band hold positions of responsibility. There are more women physicists in Italy, but hardly any in top jobs. In Germany the situation is even worse. And in the United States, where doctors and lawyers have more power than scientists, there are only 5% of women scientists.
This shortage of women in science is a real social problem that goes far beyond questions of principle. In fact it is a major social and economic issue, in a world where technological change is advancing apace. Too many people have no say in the major decisions on the objectives of the future. Women first and foremost.
In France, this year opened with a disturbing finding. Two organisations, Demain la parité (Equality Tomorrow) and Les femmes diplômées des universités (Women Graduates) published a warning report (2). They pointed out that the exclusion of women from such a vital professional field as science risked creating a total imbalance in the exercise of citizenship and power in our country.
The cliché about "innate differences" between the sexes still goes down well with the general public (some women even use this argument as a pretext) and in certain popular scientific journals. "Yet there is no proof of any innate differences between the male and female brain", according to Catherine Vidal, neuro-biologist and head of laboratory at the Institut Pasteur. "Some tests show up differences, for instance that boys are better at solving spatial problems, but these differences could be acquired. Perhaps they are acquired through outdoor games. Then there is the question of hormones: but it has never been proved that hormones make girls nicer and boys naughtier." And the fairly respectable quota of women scientists working in the CNRS (32%) contradicts the argument that men are better at scientific research than women.
Sharing your scoops to your social media accounts is a must to distribute your curated content. Not only will it drive traffic and leads through your content, but it will help show your expertise with your followers.
How to integrate my topics' content to my website?
Integrating your curated content to your website or blog will allow you to increase your website visitors’ engagement, boost SEO and acquire new visitors. By redirecting your social media traffic to your website, Scoop.it will also help you generate more qualified traffic and leads from your curation work.
Distributing your curated content through a newsletter is a great way to nurture and engage your email subscribers will developing your traffic and visibility.
Creating engaging newsletters with your curated content is really easy.