|
City administrators are using technology to help them better deliver services, improve planning
processes, and increase public engagement.
Las redes sociales arrojan una nueva imagen de las ciudades Investigadores de la Universidad Carnegie Mellón, en Estados Unidos, están desarrollando una nueva metodología para estudiar la actividad, estructura y perfil de una ciudad a gran escala, valiéndose de las redes sociales y el aprendizaje automático. A través de los check-ins realizados en aplicaciones como Foursquare, los científicos están dando forma a mapas que presentan nuevas áreas urbanas, que no coinciden estrictamente con los barrios tradicionales. Por Patricia Pérez. Reorganizar la ciudad en la “Edad de las Redes Sociales”. Ese es el objetivo del proyecto Livehood, puesto en marcha por investigadores de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Computación (SCS) de la Universidad Carnegie Mellon (CMU) de Pensilvania, Estados Unidos. Aprovechando los millones de registros generados por Foursquare, la red social de localizaciones, los científicos están creando una nueva visión dinámica que mejorará la comprensión del funcionamiento y el perfil de una ciudad. Según publica la CMU en un comunicado, el equipo de investigación ha desarrollado un algoritmo que toma los check-ins generados cuando los miembros de Foursquare visitan una empresa o lugar público, y los agrupa en base a una combinación de la ubicación de dichos espacios y los grupos de personas que más los frecuentan. Esta información es entonces reflejada en un mapa para mostrar un livehood de la ciudad, un término acuñado por los artífices del proyecto. Se trata, en definitiva, de una nueva herramienta enmarcada en el campo de la computación urbana, cuyo estudio se centra en el uso de la tecnología en entornos públicos. En este caso, se aprovecha de la proliferación de teléfonos inteligentes y de los servicios de geolocalización que posibilitan este tipo de dispositivos. Aunque el experimento se ha llevado a cabo analizando los datos de Foursquare, la técnica desarrollada podría aplicarse a muchos otros sistemas de geolocalización. “Nuestro objetivo es entender cómo funcionan las ciudades a través de la lente de las redes sociales”, señala Justin Cranshaw, estudiante de doctorado en el Instituto de Investigación de Software de la SCS. El joven forma parte de un proyecto liderado por Norman Sadeh, profesor del mismo centro, y Jason Hong, profesor asociado en el Instituto de Interacción Hombre-Ordenador, también en la SCS. El equipo presentará sus conclusiones el próximo cinco de junio en la Conferencia Internacional de Weblogs y Medios de Comunicación Social (ICWSM) de la Asociación para el Avance en Inteligencia Artificial (AAAI), cuya sexta edición se celebra en Dublín, Irlanda. Barrios y Livehoods El proyecto Livehood parte de una hipótesis inicial: la idea de que el perfil de una zona urbana no sólo se define por los espacios localizados en el mismo, sino también por las personas que hacen esa área parte de su vida diaria. Para explorar esta hipótesis, tomaron los check-ins de Foursquare que los usuarios comparten públicamente a través de redes sociales como Twiter. El resultado son más de 18 millones de registros que incluyen identificador del usuario, hora, latitud y longitud, así como el nombre y categoría del lugar de cada localización. A través del aprendizaje automático, se introdujo un modelo que agrupa lugares cercanos a determinadas áreas en base a patrones de las personas que se registran en ellos. El resultado son los denominados livehoods, áreas activas que conforman la ciudad y que revelan una nueva visión de la misma. Al igual que los barrios, representan la estructura organizativa de la ciudad, pero “nos dan un punto de vista sobre el terreno, nos ayudan a conceptualizar la dinámica de una ciudad en base al modo en que la gente realmente la utiliza”, subrayan los creadores. Y es que, en contraste con los límites estáticos del concepto tradicional de vecindario o las cifras actualizadas del censo, estos livehoods reflejan los patrones cambiantes de la vida urbana. “Esta herramienta revela cómo las personas y lugares de una ciudad se unen para dar forma a nuevas áreas urbanas locales”, añaden. De momento están disponibles en el sitio web, mapas de Nueva York, San Francisco y Pittsburgh, aunque los usuarios pueden votar en la página por las próximas ciudades que les gustaría agregar. Barcelona, con más de 20 votos, ya se encuentra entre las candidatas. Cada punto en el mapa representa un check-in en el lugar en cuestión. Para asociar los grupos de puntos cercanos se representan en un mismo color, formando un livehood, de momento sin nombre, identificado con un número. Cada uno de ellos incluye una lista con los cinco lugares más populares, según el número de registros que hayan recibido, y cinco actividades que hacer en esa zona, donde tiene cabida desde los transportes públicos, a hoteles, comercios, lugares de ocio y restauración, etc. También se muestran los livehoods relacionados dentro de una misma ciudad, con patrones similares al ser visitados por gente con gustos afines. Asimismo queda constancia del día, hora y tipo de lugar del check-in, lo que revela patrones de uso del programa. De hecho, la mayoría de los registros corresponden a lugares de ocio o de trabajo, rara vez a un hospital, y suelen aumentar en fines de semana. Aplicaciones Con todos estos datos, Livehoods proporciona una nueva y poderosa herramienta que podría utilizarse tanto para abordar problemas en la urbe como para aprovechar sus oportunidades. Los investigadores están estudiando su aplicación a la planificación urbana, el transporte y el desarrollo inmobiliario. El programa también podría ser útil para las empresas en el desarrollo de campañas de marketing o para los responsables sanitarios en el seguimiento de la propagación de una enfermedad. "En los estudios urbanos, los investigadores siempre han tenido que entrevistar a muchas personas para tener una idea del perfil de una comunidad y, aún así, deben extrapolar los resultados a una pequeña muestra de la misma", aseveró Raz Schwartz, doctorando en la Universidad Bar-Ilan de Israel, e investigador visitante en la SCS. “Ahora, mediante el uso de los datos de Forsquare, podemos explotar una gran base de datos que puede ser actualizada continuamente”, añadió. Así lo han comprobado en sus primeras pruebas. En el estudio de la zona metropolitana de Pittsburgh, ciudad donde se ubica la CMU, los investigadores detectaron que los livehoods a veces sobrepasan los límites estrictos de los barrios, o identifican varias comunidades dentro de una misma vecindad. El análisis de Pittsburgh se basó en 42.787 registros de 3.840 usuarios en 5.349 localizaciones. Por ejemplo, encontraron que el barrio de lujo Shadyside tenía en realidad dos livehoods demográficamente distintos –el viejo, una sobria comunidad al oeste, y el joven, una comunidad indie al este. Sin embargo, el de los más jóvenes se extendían hasta East Liberty, un barrio más deteriorado anteriormente, pero que ahora cuenta con algunas urbanizaciones de lujo. Asimismo, en el barrio conocido como South Side Flats, se han generado cuatro livehoods distintos, uno centrado en bares de moda entre los estudiantes universitarios, otro en torno a un nuevo distrito comercial dominado por las grandes cadenas y otro alrededor de un supermercado. también en este caso familiarizaron a los residentes con la zona. En la parte negativa, el estudio también tiene sus limitaciones. Los usuarios de Foursquare tienden a ser jóvenes, profesionales urbanos con teléfonos inteligentes. En consecuencia, las áreas de las ciudades con población más mayor o empobrecida apenas tienen presencia en los mapas de Livehoods. "Se puede, literalmente, ver la brecha digital", dijo Schwartz. Del mismo modo, los miembros de Foursquare no se registran en todos sus destinos, por lo que también se producen vacios en este aspecto. Sin embargo, los investigadores sostienen que esas son las limitaciones de los datos, no de la metodología.
Libelium presented a catalogue of sensor applications in areas such as smart cities, smart environment, smart water, smart energy metering, security, retail, logistics, manufacturing, smart agriculture, smart animal farming, home automation, and e-health. Since 2008, there are more objects connected to the Internet than persons in the world and this figure will hit 50 billion by 2020. Smart cities, full of sensors will help improve lifestyles, machines talking to machines, and people and objects jump into the Internet adding layers of data and complexity. The virtual Internet becomes more physical. We enter the Internet of Things era. Libelium believes that IoT requires an open platform capable of dealing with different technologies, communication protocols, and sensor databases. Libelium released WASPMOTE, The Wiresless Sensor Network Platform as open source, horizontal and modular platform enabling developers design and deploy sensor applications. Hundreds apps have developed over WASPMOTE. 50 of them are presented in the catalogue below. Selected smart city applications are about 01.Smart Parking: Monitoring of parking spaces availability in the city. 02.Structural health: Monitoring of vibrations and material conditions in buildings, bridges and historical monuments. 03.Noise Urban Maps: Sound monitoring in bar areas and centric zones in real time. 04.Traffic Congestion: Monitoring of vehicles and pedestrian levels to optimize driving and walking routes. 05.Smart Lightning: Intelligent and weather adaptive lighting in street lights. 06.Waste Management: Detection of rubbish levels in containers to optimize the trash collection routes. 07.Intelligent Transportation Systems: Smart Roads and Intelligent Highways with warning messages and diversions according to climate conditions and unexpected events like accidents or traffic jams. Source: Libelium – 50 sensor applications for a smarter world Download the Catalogue (11,6 MB): Libelium_50_sensor_applications
Innovation Paris - innovation.paris.fr.Tout savoir sur les Espaces publics numériques et les dispositifs de soutien à l’innovation. Paris Wi-fi et autres actions en matière d’innovation – Paris.fr...
Play the City, City Games voor stedelijke ontwikkeling.. Met deze site kun je meedoen met het maken van je stad! meld je aan en voeg plannen en ideeën over je stad toe. Of kijk rond en lees over onze werkwijzen en projecten.
Acaba de nacer una ciudad big brother. IBM ha elegido a la cobaya de moda, Río de Janeiro, para aplicar su concepto smarter city de control y gestión de datos. La propaganda bidireccional (gobierno local y sector privado) es redonda: la ciudad es smart (inteligente) y controlaremos todos los datos (tráfico, contaminación, temperatura, flujos) de la urbe. Pero las críticas a este concepto de ciudad inteligente burocrática y top down son redondísimas y demoledoras.
Busca y ofrece servicios en tu área y comparte tus valoraciones con los demás usuarios ¿Buscas canguro para esta noche? ¿Eres un manitas? ¿Clases de inglés? ¡Es el momento de probar Nockin!
@CelabEsayt Las ciudades pueden ser consideradas flujos de personas, vehículos e información http://t.co/Bn99NHoN #celab #smartcities... Via Toni Sánchez
El barcamp es un formato de evento en el que los participantes se inscriben sobre un tablero al comenzar el día para presentar sus proyectos, discusiones y demostraciones prácticas. El objetivo del Barcamp es aglutinar y conectar a aquellos colectivos e individuos con propuestas afines a las del grupo de Ciudad y procomún del Laboratorio del procomún. Las presentaciones deben tener una duración de entre 15-30 minutos y se realizarán en simultáneo tantas como sean posibles.
For those who can make sense of the explosion of data, there are job opportunities in fields as diverse as crime, retail and dating.
Whorkshop para el Master de Proyectos de la Unidad Europea de Madrid UEM [dirigido por Néstor Montenegro]...
|
Civic Commons is a marketplace for open innovation in government, tracking 599 apps in 229 cities. Via Comandante Tom
Imagine never having to look for a parking space ever again. Imagine that from here on out, this problem is solved. Fast-forward to 2025. You’re driving from Brooklyn to Manhattan...because driving in New York City, and everywhere else, has become much simpler a task than it was a decade or so before. Or has it? On the surface, yes. While we may not be zooming around in speedy Minority Report-style vehicles in 2025, by we will have full (and fast, convenient, sufficiently cheap) access to data that is in the cloud - either through our vehicles (which will gradually take on new tech features with the same slow evolution as they always do) and more likely, simply because the cloud is anywhere we are - whether its accessible through our smartphones, tablets or embedded in the world around us. These services just might make life easier and more efficient than flying sedans ever would: our daily online calendars will automatically sync with those of our colleagues for meetings, those of our our children for school pickups, and even those of automated parking spaces. The car itself will reserve and pay for a spot on the street or in a garage automatically, just as we pay seamlessly for electronic books and music via our Amazon and iTunes accounts today, without typing in our credit card information over and over again. Our computers handle the admin; we get on with our lives. In 2025, we’ll even be comfortable delegating some of the administrative minutiae of travel to our cars to sort out; in essence, the car and the cloud will act as personal assistants and ‘travel agents’. Your travel agent will know the maximum we want to pay to park or want to walk from our parking spot to our destination. If plans or traffic patterns change while we’re en route, it will automatically off-load the reservation it has, and negotiatie an alternative. If our meeting or meal runs over and we can’t make it back to retrieve our car in time, the car itself will communicate with the next person’s travel agent - that is booked for that spot. Today in situations where someone is inconvenienced a ‘fine’ is levied to punish socially errant behaviour - the rules can be rewritten so that the inconviencer can directly compensate the inconveniencee, peer to peer, no middle man taking a cut. Urban infrastructures are increasingly being equipped with sensors and other means of collecting information and channeling our everyday actions, from energy use to parking patterns, into software and networks that analyze data and act upon it. Cities--and communities-- are becoming “smarter” as “the internet of things” evolves. What this means is that more and more people and things, including parking spaces are becoming connected, allowing for better prediction models of traffic and energy usage thanks to real-time data flows, leading to better awareness of current resource statuses and more practical matters such as more dependable payment mechanisms. The smart-parking scenarios will arrive more quickly than you think--in fact, they’re already nearly here. On the most basic level, anyone can get free driving directions and an instant, estimated time of arrival from Google Maps, when they agree to share where they are at a given moment via GPS. Throughout Europe now, you can reserve public parking spots via SMS messages. In San Francisco, you can time a meeting so that you don’t pay peak-prices for parking, determined by a dynamic market pricing system launched as a pilot program this fall (and running through summer 2012) by the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency to help alleviate congested streets. It uses real-time data tracking to determing the cost of parking at 7,000 of San Francisco’s 28,000 metered spots, as well as 12,250 spaces in three-quarters of the parking garages owned by the cities. And then there are much more intricate examples, on epic scales. In September, the technology company Pegasus Holdings announced it is building a $200 million test city on a city scale in New Mexico--from scratch, where it will try out networked parking and transportation systems among other infrastructure innovations. In Asia and the Middle East, smart cities are being built from scratch: Tianjin Eco City in China; Songdo, South Korea; and Masdar in Abu Dhabi. In each of these examples, developers are working to implement traffic-solutions that will make use of new, networked technologies, all as part of creating more energy-efficient communities. These optimistic visions aren’t just about making parking a more pleasant experience. They’re largely about solving urgent problems in a time of economic and sustainability-related challenges. According to a report by IBM, the economic impact of traffic congestion is $4 billion per year in New York alone, in terms of estimated lost work hours, pollution-related costs, and wasted fuel. In the United States, traffic congestion losses are growing at 8 percent a year, the most recent estimate being $78 billion in 2005. Worldwide, in both developed and developing-world cities, traffic congestion-related expenses represent between 1 percent and 3 percent of most cities’ GDP. And on a larger scale, beyond parking and traffic, a recent report by Ericsson (published earlier this year) found that the more networked, or “smart,” a city is, the more that city sees benefits to its “triple bottom line” (its financial, societal, and sustainability-related successes). For every 10 percentage points increase in broadband penetration, the report found, the isolated economic effect on GDP growth is approximately 1% of GDP. Whilst the pain of finding a parking space will dissipate into the cloud, the cloud will hide other, less apparent costs. The concepts of the “smart” car, “smart” parking and payment systems, and “smart” cities are interesting enough. But all are really just a smoke screen for a much deeper set of political and even philosophical issues that will impact urban dwellers in the near future, especially as more than half’s the world’s population will soon be living in cities. That set of issues centers around the delicate dance between public and private ownership of space, both in the cloud and on the ground. The private sector is heavily involved in developing many of these and other massive urban infrastructure projects that are likely to or already use much of our personal data to create more efficient public services. To give a sense of scale, there are 100 private funds seeking to raise $95 billion for infrastructure investments globally, according to research by San Francisco-based fund adviser Probitas Partners. IBM is working on a smart-parking system with a start-up called Streetline; a consortium of nine companies including Accenture and Panasonic are building a “smart town” in Fujisawa, Japan. The new model of privatized infrastructure is necessary to make up for city budget gaps in an era of economic challenges. And it certainly can cultivate much-needed employment. The New Mexico example, for instance, has been applauded by the state’s governor for possibly creating 4,000 new jobs. But bringing corporations in to help build new traffic and parking and other urban solutions can also raise important questions. That’s because while this model can provide convenience, it could also create new problems for the communities that will use these smart infrastructures as well as the companies and governments that built them. Let’s go back to the parking example. Soon, there could be the possibility of third parties figuring out a way to unofficially buy and sell parking spaces in dynamic parking markets, via peer-to-peer systems of trading spots on the street. Will this become a punishable act, a violation of the rule of paying city authorities? Or will private-sector companies find ways to work with entrepreneurs who might see business opportunities in a once-regulated, government-operated systems, raising prices for parking even higher than the peak costs? This is just one example. I raise these questions not to cast doubt on the new public/private infrastructure--one that blurs the roles of citizens’ public and private lives, as well as the changing balance between the public and the private sectors in numerous cities turning to corporations to upgrade and update urban environments. Instead, I hope to provoke both cities and companies to consider the possible dilemmas that the new models will face: Who has the rights to exploit what happens on your sidewalk? Your neighborhood? Your roads? What are the rules? Who sets them? Who profits? To avoid possible pitfalls will be the following when designing the new public/private infrastructure projects, it will be necessary to - Establish clear policies on how any use of citizens’ data might be used when tracking anything from parking habits, energy use, or any other behavior that is documented and analyzed as part of a smart infrastructure - Consider potential black markets and data or payment security breaches and be prepared for violations of new system rules (as in the parking example) - Create best practices for both corporations and governments, and share information via networks of smart cities, both real and “test” centers - Work with community groups and citizens and all other stakeholders, in terms of involving them from the beginning of infrastructure planning to get feedback Of course the evolving visions of massively networked urban infrastructures are as unique as the evolution as each city itself, and in many ways these nuances are the essence of life -- home, families, businesses, communities coming together. In the big scheme of things, “smart” is interesting but pales in significance to relevance.
YouTube Videos Near Me is a Google Maps, YouTube and Google Feeds mashup that will help you discover YouTube videos captured at any location on our planet...
One of my pieces of “output” from the workshop on Blogjects/Networked Things that Nicolas and I put together is the document contained herein. (BTW, we’re very close to having our more formal workshop “write-up” completed.) It started out as some scribblings on what I learned from the workshop, seeing the groups’ projects, and so forth. It then grew into more of a polemic as I recognized what were some consequential stakes — why things would matter, or help, if Things were networked? Why would I want a world such as that? And how would I design interactions for such a world? I didn’t want to lay low and play the engineer who might just geek out on the technology behind networked Things (I do.) I didn’t want to lay low and play the social scientists and just geek out on theorizing or studying how engineers make and how social beings interact in a world of networked Things (I do that, too). I wanted to start by creating a near-future kind of technology fiction about one particular set of design goals for a world in which networks pervades space and social practice and in which networks are co-occupied by slightly differentiated social beings — us and Things. What would I want from such a pervasively networked world? A better bead on what the state of that world is that is impactful. Hence, my stumbling about trying to describe a world of networked Things that aren’t only around to help track packages, but are around to help create a world-wide accessible register of various real-time “feeds” of macro and micro states of the social and ecological environment. This is not complete and the translation of my ideas to a progression of articulate words sometimes feels like someone who slips on the ice for about 20 minutes and refuses to give up the struggle and just fall down to save themselves the mounting embarassment. Why Things Matter or A Manifesto for Networked Objects — Cohabiting with Pigeons, Arphids and Aibos in the Internet of Things Abstract: The Internet of Things has evolved into a nascent conceptual framework for understanding how physical objects, once networked and imbued with informatic capabilities, will occupy space and occupy themselves in a world in which things were once quite passive. This paper describes the Internet of Things as more than a world of RFID tags and networked sensors. Once “Things” are connected to the Internet, they can only but become enrolled as active, worldly participants by knitting together, facilitating and contributing to networks of social exchange and discourse, and rearranging the rules of occupancy and patterns of mobility within the physical world. “Things” in the pervasive Internet, will become first-class citizens with which we will interact and communicate. Things will have to be taken into account as they assume the role of socially relevant actors and strong-willed agents that create social capital and reconfigure the ways in which we live within and move about physical space.
L'obiettivo di Comuni-Chiamo è creare una città migliore grazie all'utilizzo della saggezza della folla: un gruppo fornisce soluzioni migliori rispetto al singolo.
More data is being created from more places today than ever before. Tweets, clicks, YouTube videos, retailer loyalty cards, cell phones, even sensors on buildings are producing tons of data daily. Trends in public sector data transparency are adding even more valuable data to the mix. Due to the enormity of the volume and variety of the sources, these data are often referred to as ‘Big Data’. A recent New York Times article defined Big Data as ‘shorthand for advancing trends in technology that open the door to a new approach to understanding the world and making decisions.’ The great promise of Big Data is that it can provide us with information that enables us to understand ourselves better, make better decisions and improve our quality of life. The great challenge of Big Data is, of course, that it deprives us of privacy and allows for public and private sector intrusion in our lives. These benefits, if managed well however, are significant and have the potential to make cities much better places:
At certain points in the history of architecture and urban planning, the disciplinary debate on how to apply new technologies surpasses the boundaries of the professions involved. At those times, the hopes and fears found in the disputes between architects, policy makers, engineers and planners are extended to a broader discussion about urban and societal change. Then, the central issue is not merely how to solve a specific spatial problem or improve a construction method with the help of a new technology. Rather, the debate revolves around its possible impact on urban society at large. What does this new technology mean for urban culture, what impact does it have on how we shape our identities and live together in the city?
When Mercedes wanted to promote its new fuel cell vehicle, instead of placing it squarely in front of everyone in the world, the company decided to make the car invisible. We have video.
In yet another TechForum reveal, Microsoft's Applied Sciences Group has demonstrated a new interactive 3D desktop prototype. The system uses a transparent OLED screen made by Samsung along with...
How do we design urban technologies that engage and empower ‘publics’ (groups of people) to act on communally shared issues? That is the main theme of a new study (in Dutch) launched by The Mobile City and Virtueel Platform.
|
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
|
Next |
