Science 2.0 news
Follow
Find
5.9K views | +0 today
 
Scooped by Julien Hering, PhD
onto Science 2.0 news
Scoop.it!

Researchers opt to limit uses of open-access publications

Researchers opt to limit uses of open-access publications | Science 2.0 news | Scoop.it

Advocates of open publishing fret that misunderstandings lead scientists to choose restrictive licenses.


Academics are — slowly — adopting the view that publicly funded research should be made freely available. But data released yesterday suggest that, given the choice, even researchers who publish in open-access journals want to place restrictions on how their papers can be re-used for example, sold by others for commercial profit. (...) - by Richard Van Noorden, Nature06 February 2013

more...
No comment yet.
Science 2.0 news
News about Science 2.0: scientific networks, digital & web 2.0 tools for researchers, open science, open access
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Julien Hering, PhD from Open Access to Scholarly Publishing
Scoop.it!

Is pre-publication peer review obsolete ?

Is pre-publication peer review obsolete ? | Science 2.0 news | Scoop.it

“Peer review is supposed to be the quality assurance system for science, weeding out the scientifically unreliable and reassuring readers of journals that they can trust what they are reading. In reality, however, it is ineffective, largely a lottery, anti-innovatory, slow, expensive, wasteful of scientific time, inefficient, easily abused, prone to bias, unable to detect fraud" (former British Medical Journal editor Richard Smith) and irrelevant.”


Via Bernard Rentier
more...
Bernard Rentier's curator insight, August 7, 2:48 AM
One of the greatest taboos in science : who will dare to say that the old anonymous pre-publication peer reviewing has simply failed to evolve in harmony with both the growth of research production and the emergence of ICT technologies ?
Scooped by Julien Hering, PhD
Scoop.it!

What makes researchers willing to share their data?

What makes researchers willing to share their data? | Science 2.0 news | Scoop.it

In principle, the benefits of sharing data – by which I mean the digital or analogue sources that underpin research findings – are undeniable, writes Verena Weigert, senior technology manager at Jisc.

Julien Hering, PhD's insight:

Researchers have to think more to open their research for a mutual benefits but also funders have to provide better policies to achieve this.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Julien Hering, PhD
Scoop.it!

Open peer review and its discontents: Criticism is an integral part of science – essential for progress and cohesion.

Open peer review and its discontents: Criticism is an integral part of science – essential for progress and cohesion. | Science 2.0 news | Scoop.it

Discussing specific shortcomings of scientific research is no longer confined to scientific publications and discreet letters, but can be found online in blogs and across social media. This has opened up fruitful discussion, encouraging a more public form of peer review. But not all scientists are happy with public criticism. Sabine Hossenfelder argues that while not all scientific discourse should be conducted in public, the moment you make your paper publicly available, you have to accept that it can be publicly commented on. (...) - Blog of LSE 'Impact of Social Sciences', by Sabine Hossenfelder, 2015/02/03

more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Julien Hering, PhD from Open Science
Scoop.it!

News Release: How to donate your body to science, without having to die: Launch of Open Humans Network

News Release: How to donate your body to science, without having to die: Launch of Open Humans Network | Science 2.0 news | Scoop.it

Open Humans” project backed by Knight and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation invites individuals to share their most personal health information to accelerate medical breakthroughs. (...) - Open Humans, by Jason Bobe, March 24, 2015

 

 


Via Tree of Science
more...
Tree of Science's curator insight, May 18, 5:50 PM

To manage health and medicine, scientists need to handle lots of data. Scientists often have trouble recruiting enough test subjects to do powerful studies. To bridge this gap between citizen scientists and researchers conducting clinical trials an online platform called Open Humans has recently been launched thanks to $1 million in grants from nonprofit organizations. The Open Humans network is created after nearly a decade of work by researchers with the Harvard Personal Genome Project (PGP). The PGP collected DNA from thousands of people for use in studies, and made much of the data available to the public in the process. The platform aims to provide to the participants to learn their results and use their information to sign up for additional studies.

Rescooped by Julien Hering, PhD from Enseignement Supérieur et Recherche en France
Scoop.it!

Allégations sur les publications d'Olivier Voinnet : le CNRS met en place une commission d'enquête scientifique

[Communiqués et dossiers de presse - CNRS] Au cours de ces derniers mois, de nombreux commentaires, pour la plupart anonymes, ont été publiés sur le site internet PubPeer, rapportant des manipulations effectuées sur des figures concernant une trentaine d'articles signés ou co-signés par Olivier Voinnet, directeur de recherche au CNRS actuellement en détachement à l'Ecole polytechnique fédérale (ETH) de Zürich (Suisse). (...) 09/04/2015

 


Via Collectif PAPERA
Julien Hering, PhD's insight:

La plateforme de #postpublication #peerreviewing PubPeer fait encore parler d'elle ! Les effets de l' #openscience et de l' #openresearch : la transparence de la science. 

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Julien Hering, PhD
Scoop.it!

Open Licenses for Science

Data, computer code and manuscripts are the produce of scientific work. It is what we make. Nowadays, people claim that all of it has to be open access or open source. But what is that all about? (...) - by Florian D. Schneider, 01 March 2015

Julien Hering, PhD's insight:

Interesting and useful article about #licencing and #openlicence in science

more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Julien Hering, PhD from Open Access to Scholarly Publishing
Scoop.it!

L’UNESCO se joint à l’ISSN pour créer ROAD, un répertoire des ressources scientifiques et universitaires en libre accès

L’UNESCO se joint à l’ISSN pour créer ROAD, un répertoire des ressources scientifiques et universitaires en libre accès | Science 2.0 news | Scoop.it

L’UNESCO soutient le libre accès (OA), et en particulier l’accès à l’information scientifique (articles, actes de conférences et données de tout type) provenant de la recherche financée par les Etats. L’UNESCO travaille avec ses partenaires pour faire prendre conscience des bénéfices du libre accès aux chercheurs et à ceux qui détiennent l’information ou prennent des décisions. A travers son réseau de bureaux, d’instituts et de centres à l’échelle mondiale, l’UNESCO facilite la mise en place et l’adoption de politiques de libre accès. De plus, l’UNESCO participe au débat mondial sur le libre accès et collabore avec des initiatives locales, régionales et mondiales de défense du libre accès.


Via Bernard Rentier
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Julien Hering, PhD
Scoop.it!

What is the difference between 'doing Digital Humanities' and using digital tools for research?

What is the difference between 'doing Digital Humanities' and using digital tools for research? | Science 2.0 news | Scoop.it

Tara Thomson shares her experience attending a participant-driven ‘unconference’ for digital humanities students and scholars. The event format aims to be democratic, aligned with how the Digital Humanities has aimed to build itself on devolved authority. But disciplinary knowledge is not always equally shared. The discussions highlighted problems of access and exclusion as primary concerns for the field. Some felt excluded from the Digital Humanities as a discipline, but also sometimes feel excluded from their stated disciplines because of their digital work. (...) - LSE Blog 'Impact of Social Sciences, by Tara Thomson, 2015/02/11

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Julien Hering, PhD
Scoop.it!

Antonio Facchetti: I do not make decisions on where to publish only based on the journal Impact Factor

Antonio Facchetti: I do not make decisions on where to publish only based on the journal Impact Factor | Science 2.0 news | Scoop.it

I am pleased to present the interview with Antonio Facchetti, Adjunct Professor of Chemistry at Northwestern University, who was named Highly Cited Scientist by Thomson Reuters in July 2014 and is the editor in chief of ‘Organic Photonics and Photovoltaics’. The journal was established by De Gruyter Open as a part of the Emerging Science Journals project. (...) - Open Science, interview of Antonio Facchetti, January 28, 2015

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Julien Hering, PhD
Scoop.it!

New open-access journal plans to pay peer reviewers

New open-access journal plans to pay peer reviewers | Science 2.0 news | Scoop.it

Collabra will encourage donation of payments to open-access efforts.

 

A new open-access scientific journal hopes that paying peer reviewers a little hard cash will help strengthen efforts to make research results freely available to the public. (...) - Science, by Dalmeet Singh Chawla, 12 January 2015

Julien Hering, PhD's insight:

A new player in the field of #openaccess journals with some new features: a part of the article processing charges (APCs) are placed in a "research community fund". This fund is used to pay reviewers and editors who can keep the cash, donate it to helps some scientists to pay the journal’s publication fee, or contribute it to their own institution’s open-access activities... What's your point of view about this new open access process?

more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Julien Hering, PhD from Digital tools for researchers
Scoop.it!

CrossRef and DataCite announce new initiative to accelerate the adoption of DOIs for data publication and citation

DataCite and CrossRef have agreed to collaborate to:

- Enhance the interoperability of their respective systems in order to make it easier for publishers, data centres, libraries and third parties to integrate with the scholarly DOI ecosystem.

- Provide comprehensive support for interlinking between articles and data.

- Develop open APIs and open source tools to surface citations and other relationships between publications and data sets. 

- Integrate into their services other existing scholarly communications initiatives such as ORCID and CrossRef’s FundRef.

- Develop systems, workflows and best practices for using DOIs to reference large, highly granular and dynamic data. 

(10 November 2014, Oxford, UK)


Via Tree of Science
more...
Tree of Science's curator insight, March 13, 7:59 PM

With the huge increase of data in scientific research (+30% every year), the data management becomes now a critical issue and implies also more links of publications to their data. Moreover the community of researchers is going more and more in the open research process to open data and thus improve their reuse (reproducibility), citations, and sharing. 


In this area, DataCite and CrossRef manage around 75 millions DOIs that identify research objects. In order to accelerate their growth with the adoption of DOIs for data publication and citation, they decide to collaborate and improve their interoperability. Other platforms for researchers integrate DOIs:  for data management like Figshare (1 millions) and for scientific blogging like The Winnover.

Rescooped by Julien Hering, PhD from Digital tools for researchers
Scoop.it!

Anonymous peer-review comments may spark legal battle

Anonymous peer-review comments may spark legal battle | Science 2.0 news | Scoop.it
legal battle embroiling PubPeer, an online forum launched in October 2012 for anonymous, postpublication peer review

Via Tree of Science
more...
Tree of Science's curator insight, March 5, 9:09 AM

PubPeer is an anonymous postpublication peer review platform launched in October 2012. PubPeer has recently entered in a legal battle linked to defamation about several comments that tends to insinuate deliberate misconduct in research. To answer the requests of the identity of the commenters, PubPeer has argued that researchers should defend their papers against online comments without resorting to legal action. PubPeer’s moderators has already remove some because in violation of their posting guidelines. The question remains about the reliability of anonymous postpublication peer review process for research papers. 





Rescooped by Julien Hering, PhD from Digital tools for researchers
Scoop.it!

Arkivum and figshare announce partnership

Arkivum and figshare announce partnership | Science 2.0 news | Scoop.it

Arkivum and figshare have joined forces to provide a solution covering the full spectrum of funder-mandated research data requirements.

 

Arkivum, the provider of large scale, long term, and ultra-safe digital archiving solutions and figshare, the research data management platform that specialises in ‘active data’, have announced a partnership to provide a solution covering the full spectrum of funder-mandated research data requirements for UK academic institutions. (...) - arkivum blog, 9 September 2014


Via Tree of Science
Julien Hering, PhD's insight:

New improvement for Figshare, the collaborative data management platform: partnership 

more...
Tree of Science's curator insight, March 3, 5:57 PM

Figshare manage to offer more safe and long-term digital archiving solution by establishing a partnership with the UK company Arkivum .

 

Image courtesy of renjith krishnan (FreeDigitalPhotos.net)

Scooped by Julien Hering, PhD
Scoop.it!

Les NIH reconnaissent qu’il y a une crise de reproductibilité des résultats des recherches en sciences biomédicales

C’est un changement de culture scientifique auquel convie les NHI (National Health Institutes), le pendant américain des IRSC (Instituts de recherches en santé du Canada).

Que le directeur des NIH, Francis Collins, le dise haut et fort témoigne de la gravité de la situation. Il en va de la confiance dans les recherches des sciences biomédicales. Il en va des risques pour la population lorsque vient le temps de faire des essais sur l’humain. Il en va de l’intégrité en recherche. (...) - L’éveilleur, par Sonia Morin, 18/03/2015

more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Julien Hering, PhD from Science ouverte - Open science
Scoop.it!

Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines for scientific journal

Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines for scientific journal | Science 2.0 news | Scoop.it

Transparency, open sharing, and reproducibility are core features of science, but not always part of daily practice. Journals can increase transparency and reproducibility of research by adopting the TOP Guidelines. TOP includes eight modular standards, each with three levels of increasing stringency. Journals select which of the eight transparency standards they wish to adopt for their journal, and select a level of implementation for the selected standards. These features provide flexibility for adoption depending on disciplinary variation, but simultaneously establish community standards.


Via Florence Piron
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Julien Hering, PhD
Scoop.it!

Why Oliver Sacks was so ambivalent about becoming a bestselling author

Oliver Sacks's new memoir contemplates the pitfalls of mass media engagement.

 

To hear Oliver Sacks tell it, writing books for a mass audience was once considered one of the worst things a doctor could do.

In his new memoir On the Move, Sacks recalls the day his first book was published in 1970. Born in 1933 to two prominent doctors, Sacks happened to be staying in his family's London home at the time. (...) - vox.com, by Julia Belluz, April 30, 2015

Julien Hering, PhD's insight:

Intesting articles about why physicians or scientists have to be more open to outside academia to communicate #scicom #openscience #citizenscience

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Julien Hering, PhD
Scoop.it!

La lente agonie du pdf : l'article du futur est bien supérieur

La lente agonie du pdf : l'article du futur est bien supérieur | Science 2.0 news | Scoop.it

Lors de formation, je suis justement critiqué quand j'explique que le pdf ne représente plus les articles scientifiques et qu'il faut abandonner ce format pour lire un article ! Lisez un article du Guardian le 11 février 2015 intitulé "Researchers: it's time to ditch the pdf". Je cite : 'le pdf, c'est comme le tiroir de votre bureau : un... (...) - Rédaction Médicale et Scientifique, 02/03/2015

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Julien Hering, PhD
Scoop.it!

Reddit prompts citizen scientists to go dig up dirt

Reddit prompts citizen scientists to go dig up dirt | Science 2.0 news | Scoop.it

Soil sample collection project designed to find new drugs explodes in popularity.

 

Thousands of citizen scientists around the country are getting their hands dirty collecting soil samples after the Internet bestowed a recent burst of attention on a soil sampling project. The crowdsourced project, which aims to find new drugs by cultivating fungi from soil samples, drew only moderate interest since it began in 2010. But it caught a lucky break on social media and has now exploded, surpassing researchers' wildest dreams in just a few days. (...) - Science, by Emily Conover, 18 March 2015

more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Julien Hering, PhD from Scientific networks and communities
Scoop.it!

Why I have started to like Academia.edu recently

Why I have started to like Academia.edu recently | Science 2.0 news | Scoop.it

I have been a registered user of Academia.edu for several years now, and to be honest until recently I only used it from time to time, mostly as a place for green copies of my work. I did not see it as being a crucial part of my research workflow. Now this is slowly changing, and I am glad to say that it is a useful tool, which helps me a lot, especially in finding new, open access articles that are really interesting for me. But it seems to me that Academia.edu has the potential to do even more. (...) - Blog "Open Science", by Witold Kienc, March 18, 2015


Via Tree of Science
more...
Tree of Science's curator insight, April 6, 12:46 PM

#scientificsocialnetworks provide #networking advantages to researchers in terms of collaboration, sharing, and #openaccess. 

Scooped by Julien Hering, PhD
Scoop.it!

Mendeley Revisited

A while ago, in a post titled Yet Another Publication List?, I ranted about the proliferation of online reference managers and speculated about their business models. A comment by William Gunn, Head of Academic Outreach for Mendeley, sheds some light on Elsevier’s strategy. (...) - NLP for Historical Texts, 2015/02/04

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Julien Hering, PhD
Scoop.it!

Briefcase Biotec – biohacking your way to the future |

Briefcase Biotec – biohacking your way to the future | | Science 2.0 news | Scoop.it

When we first heard about Briefcase Biotec we didn’t know what exactly to expect. Our attention was caught by their social media presence and their determination to promote biohacktivism. After looking into it, we realized how interesting their story must be, so we emailed Alexander Murer (CEO and co-founder) and invited him to have a short chat with us. That’s how we came to learn about Briefcase Biotec, OLGA and KiloBaser as well as what all these projects have in common: independence. Let us elaborate. (...) - Sciencebite blog, by Irina Botea, February 2, 2015

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Julien Hering, PhD
Scoop.it!

How to Start an Open Access Journal

How to Start an Open Access Journal | Science 2.0 news | Scoop.it

Starting your own journal is not rocket science. To illustrate this, we boiled down our research on the topic and added some insights from David Solomon, Martin Eve, and other experts. And there it is: a poster that allows you to get an idea of the various aspects of Open Access journal publishing at a glance. (...) - by Andreas Kirchner,  July 14, 2014

Julien Hering, PhD's insight:

An #infographic with some tips and idea for creating and manage a #openaccess journal #research #researchpublication #openscience

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Julien Hering, PhD
Scoop.it!

Pseudo-scientific peer review research as Gatekeepingology

Post-publication review of Siler, Lee and Bero’s (2014) ‘Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping’ (...) - Peer Review in Science and Medicine, by Joanne Gaudet, December 25, 2014

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Julien Hering, PhD
Scoop.it!

A flurry of copycats on PubMed

A flurry of copycats on PubMed | Science 2.0 news | Scoop.it

It started with a search for trends on PubMed. I am not sure what I expected to find, but it was nothing like the “CISCOM meta-analyses”. Here is the story of how my colleague Lucas Carey (from Universitat Pompeu Fabra) and myself discovered a collection of disturbingly similar scientific papers, and how we got to the bottom of it. (...) - by Guillaume Filion, Blog The Grand Locus, 04 October 2014

Julien Hering, PhD's insight:

Scientific articles are also suffering from ghost authorship and copycats according to this interesting article #research #sciencepublication

more...
Scooped by Julien Hering, PhD
Scoop.it!

Le rôle de la bioinformatique dans les labos collaboratifs

Le rôle de la bioinformatique dans les labos collaboratifs | Science 2.0 news | Scoop.it

Y a-t-il une place pour la bioinformatique dans les structures du type « Do it yourself biology », « Bio-hackers spaces » et autres FabLabs ? Avant de répondre à cette question, quelques précisions sur ces espaces collaboratifs sont nécessaires. Il s’agit de curieux et de passionnés qui se retrouvent dans des caves… ou des laboratoires pour élaborer des projets créatifs et novateurs, et défendre la philosophie du libre accès à la connaissance. Le poste de Shalf regroupe quelques vidéos et des sources bibliographiques de références dans ce domaine en ébullition. (...) - bioinfo-fr.net, 24/09/2014 par jsobel

more...
No comment yet.