Science 2.0 news
6.1K views | +0 today
Follow
Science 2.0 news
News about Science 2.0: scientific networks, digital & web 2.0 tools for researchers, open science, open access
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Julien Hering, PhD from Enseignement Supérieur et Recherche en France
Scoop.it!

Allégations sur les publications d'Olivier Voinnet : le CNRS met en place une commission d'enquête scientifique

[Communiqués et dossiers de presse - CNRS] Au cours de ces derniers mois, de nombreux commentaires, pour la plupart anonymes, ont été publiés sur le site internet PubPeer, rapportant des manipulations effectuées sur des figures concernant une trentaine d'articles signés ou co-signés par Olivier Voinnet, directeur de recherche au CNRS actuellement en détachement à l'Ecole polytechnique fédérale (ETH) de Zürich (Suisse). (...) 09/04/2015

 


Via Collectif PAPERA
Julien Hering, PhD's insight:

La plateforme de #postpublication #peerreviewing PubPeer fait encore parler d'elle ! Les effets de l' #openscience et de l' #openresearch : la transparence de la science. 

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Julien Hering, PhD
Scoop.it!

Science 3.0: Corrections to the Science 2.0 paradigm

[Abstract] The concept of Science 2.0 was introduced almost a decade ago to describe the new generation of online-based tools for researchers allowing easier data sharing, collaboration and publishing. Although technically sound, the concept still does not work as expected. Here we provide a systematic line of arguments to modify the concept of Science 2.0, making it more consistent with the spirit and traditions of science and Internet. Our first correction to the Science 2.0 paradigm concerns the open-access publication models charging fees to the authors. As discussed elsewhere, we show that the monopoly of such publishing models increases biases and inequalities in the representation of scientific ideas based on the author's income. Our second correction concerns post-publication comments online, which are all essentially non-anonymous in the current Science 2.0 paradigm. We conclude that scientific post-publication discussions require special anonymization systems. We further analyze the reasons of the failure of the current post-publication peer-review models and suggest what needs to be changed in Science 3.0 to convert Internet into a large journal club.- by Vladimir B. Teif, arXiv.org, arXiv:1301.2522 [cs.DL]

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Julien Hering, PhD
Scoop.it!

Pseudo-scientific peer review research as Gatekeepingology

Post-publication review of Siler, Lee and Bero’s (2014) ‘Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping’ (...) - Peer Review in Science and Medicine, by Joanne Gaudet, December 25, 2014

more...
No comment yet.