Christopher Dorner A man identified Wednesday as the suspect in the slayings of a college basketball coach and her fiance is a former LAPD Harbor Division police officer fired for falsely accusing his sergeant for kicking a man at a San Pedro hotel.
Join Scoop.it for Free
Share ideas that matter on the social web and experience
the benefits of curating the world's best content.
I don't have a Facebook, a Twitter or a LinkedIn account
Already have an account: Login
Examining the possibilities of abuse of power without the constraint of New Public Administration.
Curated by
Rob Duke
|
Scooped by Rob Duke onto Police Problems and Policy |
Scoop.it!
Amanda Crawford's comment,
February 11, 1:21 PM
Whoa... My stepson actually pointed this out to me this weekend and it is frightening. His high school current events class is watching this as it unfolds. We discussed the issue and what they’re saying in class. The kids think he’s just a crazy ticked off lunatic out for revenge, and while on one hand, I think they’re missing a major issue that CNN is dancing around. Scandal has been HUGE in the LAPD throughout history. This guy was fired for what was called false accusation but what he claims was legitimate whistle blowing. If his allegations were true it could have tipped off another scandal. Instead he was fired. I can see why he feels that he was fired as part of a cover up, and now he’s willing to die to show the country what he thinks is true. How many people do you know that are willing to die for something they don’t truly believe in? The LAPD should be looking closer at what he has to say. I’m not saying that it’s ok to kill people to make your point and if he dies in the process of apprehension I’m not sure I’ll shed any tears, but his point needs to be looked into. It may end up another black mark on LAPD record, but which is worse, not investigating and he keeps killing, or investigating and he stop? Is it worse to give a murderer what he wants to make him stop or to let him keep on killing? Slippery slope and horrible precedence, I know. Aren’t innocent lives worth it?
Sign up to comment
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
 Your new post is loading...
Scoop.it!
Most law enforcement agencies refuse to reveal the surveillance technologies they use, claiming doing so could threaten national security. Via Bob Boynton Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
|
