Veettil et al. never imply that GM cotton is a panacea to pesticide overuse, and they conclude both that transgenic seeds must be an element within a broader agricultural development strategy and that many Bt cotton farmers continue to overuse chemical pesticides. However, their comparisons between Bt and non-Bt cotton farmers miss important social dynamics driving farmer pesticide use: namely, the consequences of continued pesticide spraying even when Bt cotton obviates that need, and the risk that this poses to the largely young, poor, and female farm labouring population. Bt cotton is here to stay in India (and globally), and its impacts should be measured in practice, not as a comparison to the few, unrepresentative non-Bt planting holdouts. There is every reason to believe both that Bt cotton has helped reduce the quantity and overall toxicity of cotton agriculture, and that this profession, in practice, remains a precarious one.