Philosophie de Sciences
335 views | +0 today
Follow
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

Truth may not explain predictive success, but truthlikeness does

Publication date: Available online 18 June 2013 Source:Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A Author(s): Gustavo Cevolani , Luca Tambolo In a recent paper entitled “Truth does not explain predictive success” ( Analysis, 2011),...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

A similarity-based approach of Kuhn’s no-overlap principle and anomalies

Publication date: September 2013 Source:Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Volume 44, Issue 3 Author(s): Dragoş Bîgu In their book Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Hanne Andersen, Peter Barker, and Xiang Chen...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

New Challenges to Philosophy of Science

New Challenges to Philosophy of Science | Philosophie de Sciences | Scoop.it
series:The Philosophy of Science in a European PerspectiveThis volume is a serious attempt to open up the subject of European philosophy of science to real thought, and provide the structural basis for the interdisciplinary development of its...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

How to Learn from Theory-Dependent Evidence; or Commutativity and Holism: A Solution for Conditionalizers

How to Learn from Theory-Dependent Evidence; or Commutativity and Holism: A Solution for Conditionalizers | Philosophie de Sciences | Scoop.it
Weisberg ([2009]) provides an argument that neither conditionalization nor Jeffrey conditionalization is capable of accommodating the holist’s claim that beliefs acquired directly from experience can suffer undercutting defeat.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

Hume’s Theorem

Publication date: September 2013 Source:Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Volume 44, Issue 3 Author(s): Colin Howson A common criticism of Hume’s famous anti-induction argument is that it is vitiated because it fails to...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

ISHPSSB

ISHPSSB | Philosophie de Sciences | Scoop.it
Nous vous rappelons que l'ISHPSSB (International Society of History, Philosophy, and Social Studies of Biology) tiendra son congrès bi-annuel à Montpellier : http://www.ishpssb2013.org
PhiloSciences's insight:

À deux pas de Toulouse

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

Science in the Age of Computer Simulation

Science in the Age of Computer Simulation | Philosophie de Sciences | Scoop.it
Computer simulation was first pioneered as a scientific tool in meteorology and nuclear physics in the period following World War II, but it has grown rapidly to become indispensible in a wide variety of scientific disciplines, including...
PhiloSciences's insight:

Volià un livre qu'il faudrait lire pour s'intéresser à la simulation numérique en philosophie des sciences

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

Séminaire "Compact"

Séminaire "Compact" | Philosophie de Sciences | Scoop.it
La prochaine séance du séminaire Compact "Plural Reference and Reference to a Plurality" se tiendra le 20 mai 2013 dans la salle de conférences.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

Classical Mechanics Is Lagrangian; It Is Not Hamiltonian

Classical Mechanics Is Lagrangian; It Is Not Hamiltonian | Philosophie de Sciences | Scoop.it
One can (for the most part) formulate a model of a classical system in either the Lagrangian or the Hamiltonian framework.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

Epistemic Trust in Science

Epistemic Trust in Science | Philosophie de Sciences | Scoop.it
Epistemic trust is crucial for science. This article aims to identify the kinds of assumptions that are involved in epistemic trust as it is required for the successful operation of science as a collective epistemic enterprise.
PhiloSciences's insight:

Article qui semble intéressant! A lire!

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

State of the field: Why novel prediction matters

Publication date: Available online 6 May 2013
Source:Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
Author(s): Heather Douglas , P.D. Magnus
There is considerable disagreement about the epistemic value of novel predictive success, i.e.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

Séminaire "Probabilités, Décision, incertitude"

Séminaire "Probabilités, Décision, incertitude" | Philosophie de Sciences | Scoop.it
La prochaine séance aura lieu le vendredi 17 mai 2013 de 14h00 à 16h00 dans la grande salle de l'IHPST.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

Why do funding agencies favor hypothesis testing?

Why do funding agencies favor hypothesis testing? | Philosophie de Sciences | Scoop.it
Publication date: September 2013 Source:Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Volume 44, Issue 3 Author(s): Chris Haufe Exploratory inquiry has difficulty attracting research funding because funding agencies have little sense...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

Kuhn vs. Popper on criticism and dogmatism in science, part II: How to strike the balance

Publication date: June 2013
Source:Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Volume 44, Issue 2
Author(s): Darrell P. Rowbottom
This paper is a supplement to, and provides a proof of principle of, Kuhn vs.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

Georg Simmel and naturalist interactivist epistemology of science

Publication date: September 2013 Source:Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Volume 44, Issue 3 Author(s): Cliff Hooker In 1895 sociologist and philosopher Georg Simmel published a paper: ‘On a connection of selection theory...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

The epistemology of thought experiments: A non-eliminativist, non-platonic account

Abstract
Several major breakthroughs in the history of physics have been prompted not by new empirical data but by thought experiments.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

The value of epistemic disagreement in scientific practice. The case of Homo floresiensis

Publication date: June 2013 Source:Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Volume 44, Issue 2 Author(s): Helen De Cruz , Johan De Smedt Epistemic peer disagreement raises interesting questions, both in epistemology and in...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

parution d'ouvrage

parution d'ouvrage | Philosophie de Sciences | Scoop.it
Nous avons le plaisir de vous informer que Richard-Emmanuel Eastes (IHPST) et Bastien Lelu viennent de publier un ouvrage intitulé "Les scientifiques jouent-ils aux dés ?" aux éditions Le Cavalier Bleu.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

Georg Simmel and naturalist interactivist epistemology of science

Publication date: September 2013 Source:Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Volume 44, Issue 3 Author(s): Cliff Hooker In 1895 sociologist and philosopher Georg Simmel published a paper: ‘On a connection of selection theory...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

Workshop Plurals and Nominalizations

Workshop Plurals and Nominalizations | Philosophie de Sciences | Scoop.it

Nous avons le plaisir de vous informer que le colloque "Plurals and Nominalizations" se tiendra mercredi 22 mai. Il est organisé dans le cadre du projet ANR-DFG project NOMINAL.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

Moral trust & scientific collaboration

Publication date: September 2013
Source:Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Volume 44, Issue 3
Author(s): Karen Frost-Arnold
Modern scientific knowledge is increasingly collaborative.
PhiloSciences's insight:
Voila un textesur le témoignage ! Alire imperativement
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

Réseau Pro HiPhiSciTech

Réseau Pro HiPhiSciTech | Philosophie de Sciences | Scoop.it
Armelle Thomas, Peggy Tessier et Pierre Edouard Bour (IE, Archives Poincaré, Nancy) sont à l'initiative de la création d'un réseau professionnel qui a vu le jour en avril 2013 sous l'intitulé "HiPhiSciTech".
PhiloSciences's insight:

Intéressant, un groupe de travail. A suivre leurs actions

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by PhiloSciences
Scoop.it!

Photographic Evidence and the Problem of Theory-Ladenness

Photographic Evidence and the Problem of Theory-Ladenness | Philosophie de Sciences | Scoop.it
Abstract
Scientists use visualisations of different kinds in a variety of ways in their scientific work. In the following article, we will take a closer look at the use of photographic pictures as scientific evidence.
PhiloSciences's insight:

Article intéressant 

more...
No comment yet.