Follow
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

Wellcome Trust supports open access award programme - Europe ...

Wellcome Trust supports open access award programme - Europe ... | Open Access to Scholarly Publishing | Scoop.it
The Wellcome Trust has joined with the Public Library of Science and Google to launch the Accelerating Science Award Program (ASAP) to recognise the use of scientific research, published through open access, that has led ...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

La politique Open Access de l’Université de Liège fait des bébés - MyScienceNews

La politique Open Access de l’Université de Liège fait des bébés - MyScienceNews | Open Access to Scholarly Publishing | Scoop.it
Le 22 avril les Universités de Luxembourg et de Liège annonçaient la naissance de ORBilu, le nouveau serveur d’archivage des publications de l’université luxembourgeoise.
jean-claude Guédon's curator insight, May 19, 11:10 AM

Superbe ! Si seulement l'Université de Montréal en faisait autant.

Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

SciTechSociety: The Sibyl of Cumae

Open Access is not an end point. It is only the first step in the reinvention of scholarly communication.
No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

Ann McKechin MP: Open Access - Breaking the Monopoly of Large Academic Publishers: ePolitix.com

Ann McKechin MP writes about the business, innovation and skills committee inquiry into open access in academic publishing.
No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

The University of Luxembourg has adopted the Liege model of ID/OA Green OpenAccess mandate

The University of Luxembourg has adopted the Liege model of ID/OA Green OpenAccess mandate | Open Access to Scholarly Publishing | Scoop.it
S. Harnad: "The mandate requires all University members to deposit: the full-text electronic copies of all their peer-reviewed journal articles as well as papers from published conference proceedings in the University’s digital repository immediately upon acceptance for publication (maximum delay: 1 month)"
Bernard Rentier's insight:
The new ORBi-Lu institutional repository is now mandatory at the University of Luxembourg, based exactly on the Liege University mandate (2008) that was also adopted at the University of Minho (Portugal) in 2010.
No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

Publications | Free Full-Text | Open Access—Are the Barriers to Change Receding?

The move from subscription only publishing of scholarly articles to open access has been much slower than previously anticipated by many Open Access (OA) advocates.
No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

Open access academia | The Chronicle

No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

Dramatic Growth of Open Access 2013 First Quarter: Comparisons

Dramatic Growth of Open Access 2013 First Quarter: Comparisons | Open Access to Scholarly Publishing | Scoop.it
Highlights This issue features a comparison of open access growth including CC-BY article growth figures supplied by OASPA. In brief: for every CC-BY article addition tracked by OASPA, repositories around the world add ...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

Will Obama's new $100m brain mapping project be open access ?

Will Obama's new $100m brain mapping project be open access ? | Open Access to Scholarly Publishing | Scoop.it
While there has been no explicit announcement about whether or not the BRAIN initiative will be open access (and while there are obviously difficult ethical and privacy issues in this field), we hope that it will follow in the ...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

The price of Gold - Publishers with Paid Options for Open Access

Bernard Rentier's insight:
A clear demonstration on how publishing will soon become unaffordable and how researchers will be caught in the same pricing spiral that generated Open Access. If they don't boycott OA journals requiring 4-digit $ APCs, soon the OA revolution will fail. #3DigitMoratorium
No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

Open Access en SHS : « l’intendance suivra ! »

Open Access en SHS : « l’intendance suivra ! » | Open Access to Scholarly Publishing | Scoop.it
No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

The future of scientific publishing [Nature, March 27, 2013]

The future of scientific publishing [Nature, March 27, 2013] | Open Access to Scholarly Publishing | Scoop.it
A special issue of Nature looks at the transformation taking place in scientific publishing.
Bernard Rentier's insight:
Nature: "After 350 years in the slow-moving world of print, scientific publishing has been thrust into a fast-paced online realm of cloud computing and ubiquitous sharing".
No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

Iniciativa de Ley en México para el Acceso Abierto a resultados de investigaciones financiadas con fondos públicos

Iniciativa de Ley en México para el Acceso Abierto a resultados de investigaciones financiadas con fondos públicos | Open Access to Scholarly Publishing | Scoop.it
Open Access in Mexico
No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

Stevan Harnad's Follow-Up Comments to BIS Select Committee on Open Access

Stevan Harnad's Follow-Up Comments to BIS Select Committee on Open Access | Open Access to Scholarly Publishing | Scoop.it
"The only barrier separating the UK and the rest of the world from Open Access (OA) to its refereed research journal article output in the online era is keystrokes. Once global OA policy has seen to it that those keystrokes are being universally and systematically executed worldwide, not only OA itself, with all its resulting benefits for research productivity and progress, but all the other desiderata sought – the end of Green OA embargoes, a transition to Gold OA publishing at a fair and sustainable price, CC-BY, text-mining, open data – will follow as a natural matter.
No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

WTF? The University of California sides with publishers against the public

WTF? The University of California sides with publishers against the public | Open Access to Scholarly Publishing | Scoop.it
"The University of California system spends nearly $40 million every year to buy access to academic journals, even though many of the articles are written, reviewed, and edited by UC professors. So you’d think the cash-strapped UC system would leap to back any effort to undermine the absurd science publishing system. You’d think. But you’d be wrong".
No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

Open access: four ways it could enhance academic freedom

Open access: four ways it could enhance academic freedom | Open Access to Scholarly Publishing | Scoop.it
The power of funding alone should not be enough to override academic freedom, argues Curt Rice, nor does open access automatically skew the world of scholarship
No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

Publisher's unacceptable statement on fee-based so-called Open Access and interference with institutional scientific management policies

Publisher's unacceptable statement on fee-based so-called Open Access and interference with institutional scientific management policies | Open Access to Scholarly Publishing | Scoop.it
"Alicia Wise, director of universal access at commercial publisher Elsevier, defended the company’s 37 per cent profit margins, attributing them to its efficiency. She said its average article fee was in line with the standard figure estimated by the Finch report on open access of around £1,750. She suggested higher education could save money by avoiding the “duplicate effort” of requiring papers to be deposited in institutional repositories even when they were freely available on publishers’ websites. She described forcing authors to self-archive papers as one administrative hassle too far”.
Bernard Rentier's insight:
Obviously, such a statement needs no further comment: it narrows down to a warm defense of pure greed and irrelevant arguments to justify outrageous pricing for Fee-based Gold OA and to interfere with institutional scientific management policy. Unacceptable.
jean-claude Guédon's curator insight, May 19, 11:18 AM

Elsevier at its worst and Alicia Wise demonstrating once more how unwise she is. I assume Alicia Wise would find words, however outrageous, to justify 100% profit margins.  Compared to this 37% profit rate, which, for many research universities, amount to more than one extra million dollars, how much does a repository cost? Come on, Ms. Wise. Examine your own conscience and decide: are you simply a mercenary or are you blind to reality?

 

 

Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

Disruption Ain’t What It Used to Be

Disruption Ain’t What It Used to Be | Open Access to Scholarly Publishing | Scoop.it
The journals business has not been disrupted and does not appear likely to be disrupted for some time. Journals publishers continue to dominate the institutional market
No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

“Publish or Perish”: On the Teacher-Scholar Balancing Act - The CMC Forum

“Publish or Perish”: On the Teacher-Scholar Balancing Act - The CMC Forum | Open Access to Scholarly Publishing | Scoop.it
The CMC Forum “Publish or Perish”: On the Teacher-Scholar Balancing Act The CMC Forum In class one afternoon, a professor of mine mentioned the publishing expectations CMC professors face.
No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

Journal editors' anonymous reviews criticised by Cope

Journal editors' anonymous reviews criticised by Cope | Open Access to Scholarly Publishing | Scoop.it
Times Higher Education Journal editors' anonymous reviews criticised by Cope Times Higher Education Dr Hames said the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers were drawn up amid increasing scepticism “in the scholarly publishing world and beyond”...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

The Future of Academic Publishing: Ripe With New Possibilities - Digital Book World

The Future of Academic Publishing: Ripe With New Possibilities - Digital Book World | Open Access to Scholarly Publishing | Scoop.it
The Future of Academic Publishing: Ripe With New Possibilities Digital Book World Per-article costs are lower in open access journals.
No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

A misleading survey [pointed out by Peter Suber on Google+]

B. Rentier's comment: "Again and again : - Gold OA refers to a publication made immediately available for free and without technical barriers upon the publisher's initiative. By extension, it may apply to a journal or to a publisher. Whether APCs are requested or not is irrelevant to the definition. - Green OA refers to a publication made immediately available for free and without technical barriers upon the author's initiative on an institutional repository."
No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

Comment prendre le grand virage de l'accès libre et gratuit?

Comment prendre le grand virage de l'accès libre et gratuit? | Open Access to Scholarly Publishing | Scoop.it
Bernard Rentier's insight:

Une mise au point sur les récents méandres de l'Open Access et les dangers de la récupération de la "voie d'or" par les puissances de l'argent.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

Open Access : quel avenir pour la publication scientifique ?

Open Access : quel avenir pour la publication scientifique ? | Open Access to Scholarly Publishing | Scoop.it
Speaking of Science: Un blog sur le journalisme, la communication et la médiation scientifique. :-)
Bernard Rentier's insight:
Mon interview audio lors des Journées Couperin à Paris en janvier dernier
No comment yet.
Scooped by Bernard Rentier
Scoop.it!

The dark side of "Gold"open access publishing [Nature, March 27, 2013]

The dark side of "Gold"open access publishing [Nature, March 27, 2013] | Open Access to Scholarly Publishing | Scoop.it
The explosion in open-access publishing has fuelled the rise of questionable operators.
Bernard Rentier's insight:
Beware of sollicitors... Ask yourself why you are suddenly offered a flattering proposal as a potential author or editor for a new e-journal with an impressive title. And why it is so poorly written. You are likely to be hit by one of Jeffrey Beall's "potential, possible or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers".
No comment yet.