Missing the point. Many technical errors and not supported by historical factsodi.org.uk/publications/7… @odi_development #aid4trade #globaldev
— Africa Climate (@AfricaClimate) January 10, 2013
Join Scoop.it for Free
Share ideas that matter on the social web and experience
the benefits of curating the world's best content.
I don't have a Facebook, a Twitter or a LinkedIn account
Already have an account: Login
The OECD with the Government of Sweden, ODI & the EC to discuss what needs to be done to continue delivering Aid4Trade aid for trade results
Curated by
OECD DAC EvalNet
|
Scooped by OECD DAC EvalNet onto OECD Aid for Trade Policy Dialogue 2013 |
Scoop.it!
No comment yet.
Sign up to comment
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
 Your new post is loading...
Scoop.it!
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
|
Scoop.it!
OECD DAC EvalNet's insight:
Debapriya Bhattacharya, Distinguished Fellow at the Centre for Policy Dialogue, brings up some possible misses in aid for trade programmes. How can we be more inclusive? Check out some relative statistics on the website here: http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?QueryId=7219. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
|
