Nationalize Money, Not Banks
Emeritus Professor University of Maryland School of Public Policy
If our present banking system, in addition to fraudulent and corrupt, also seems “screwy” to you, it should.
Why should money, a public utility (serving the public as medium of exchange, store of value, and unit of account), be largely the by-product of private lending and borrowing? Is that really an improvement over being a by-product of private gold mining, as it was under the gold standard?
The best way to sabotage a system is hobble it by tying together two of its separate parts, creating an unnecessary and obstructive connection.
Why should the public pay interest to the private banking sector to provide a medium of exchange that the government can provide at little or no cost? Why should seigniorage (profit to the issuer of fiat money) go largely to the private sector rather than entirely to the government (the commonwealth)?
Via Sepp Hasslberger