Network science
Follow
Find
4 views | +0 today
 
Rescooped by Xiaoling from Papers
onto Network science
Scoop.it!

Social Dynamics of Science

Social Dynamics of Science | Network science | Scoop.it

The birth and decline of disciplines are critical to science and society. How do scientific disciplines emerge? No quantitative model to date allows us to validate competing theories on the different roles of endogenous processes, such as social collaborations, and exogenous events, such as scientific discoveries. Here we propose an agent-based model in which the evolution of disciplines is guided mainly by social interactions among agents representing scientists. Disciplines emerge from splitting and merging of social communities in a collaboration network. We find that this social model can account for a number of stylized facts about the relationships between disciplines, scholars, and publications. These results provide strong quantitative support for the key role of social interactions in shaping the dynamics of science. While several “science of science” theories exist, this is the first account for the emergence of disciplines that is validated on the basis of empirical data.

 

Social Dynamics of Science

Xiaoling Sun, Jasleen Kaur, Staša Milojević, Alessandro Flammini & Filippo Menczer

Scientific Reports 3, Article number: 1069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep01069


Via Complexity Digest
more...
No comment yet.
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Xiaoling from Papers
Scoop.it!

Social Dynamics of Science

Social Dynamics of Science | Network science | Scoop.it

The birth and decline of disciplines are critical to science and society. How do scientific disciplines emerge? No quantitative model to date allows us to validate competing theories on the different roles of endogenous processes, such as social collaborations, and exogenous events, such as scientific discoveries. Here we propose an agent-based model in which the evolution of disciplines is guided mainly by social interactions among agents representing scientists. Disciplines emerge from splitting and merging of social communities in a collaboration network. We find that this social model can account for a number of stylized facts about the relationships between disciplines, scholars, and publications. These results provide strong quantitative support for the key role of social interactions in shaping the dynamics of science. While several “science of science” theories exist, this is the first account for the emergence of disciplines that is validated on the basis of empirical data.

 

Social Dynamics of Science

Xiaoling Sun, Jasleen Kaur, Staša Milojević, Alessandro Flammini & Filippo Menczer

Scientific Reports 3, Article number: 1069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep01069


Via Complexity Digest
more...
No comment yet.