Race & Crime UK
68.7K views | +16 today
Race & Crime UK
In association with Nationalist Media Network - Home Page http://britishnationalistreview.tumblr.com
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Nationalist Media Network

How the Government has declared war on white English people.

How the Government has declared war on white English people. | Race & Crime UK | Scoop.it

England is in the middle of a profoundly disturbing social experiment. For the first time in a mature democracy, a Government is waging a campaign of aggressive discrimination against its indigenous population. In the name of cultural diversity, Labour attacks anything that smacks of Englishness. The mainstream public are treated with contempt, their rights ignored, their history trashed. In their own land, the English are being turned into second-class citizens.

This trend was highlighted this week by the case of Abigail Howarth, a bright teenager who applied for a training position with the Environment Agency in East Anglia but was turned down because she was too white and English. The post, which carries a £13,000 grant, was open only to ethnic minorities, including the Scots, Welsh and Irish.

Such social engineering was justified by the Agency on the grounds that minorities were under-represented in its workforce, the parrot cry used by bureaucrats throughout the public sector to justify bias against the English.

Though Abigail’s case rightly caused outrage, it was not unique. This kind of reverse discrimination is now rife across the state machine, underwritten by the very English tax­payers who are the targets of institutional prejudice.

Although it is technically illegal to restrict jobs to certain ethnic groups, the racially fixated commissars have found a way round that problem by developing training schemes open only to minorities. Under the 1976 Race Relations Act it is permissible to use racial considerations in recruitment to trainee positions such as the one to which Abigail applied.

Such practices are dressed up as “positive action” to widen diversity and, in the words of one Labour council, “to overcome past discrimination”. So HM Revenue and Customs offers work experience jobs, worth up to £15,900 a year pro-rata, to ethnic minority graduates, while the Museums Association has two-year ethnic minority apprenticeships.

Similarly, Birmingham City Council gives £16,000 a year to “black and minority ethnic individuals” in its “Positive Action Traineeship Scheme”, and a £10,000 allowance to clerical trainees from “the Bangladeshi and Pakistani communities”.

Discriminatory training schemes can also be found in ITV, the civil service and the NHS, which boasts “a management development programme specifically designed and tail­ored to the needs of black and minority ethnic midwives”.

It was revealed last year that Avon and Somerset Constab-ulary rejected 186 applications from white men on the grounds that they were already “over-represented” in the force. In the same way, London Mayor Ken Livingstone last month refused to endorse a series of nominations for the London Fire Authority because they were dominated by whites.

And whole towns are beginning to suffer state disapproval. Eighty administrative jobs in the Prison Service have recently been transferred from Corby in Northamptonshire to Leicester because, as the Home Office admitted, Corby’s population is predominantly “white British”, a terrible sin in our multicultural society.

It is a bitter irony that the Labour Government, which works itself into such a synthetic rage over racial prejudice, should practise overt discrimination on an epic scale. The remorseless focus on supporting minorities has led to a perverted ideology of anti-white racism.

Almost every interaction with any public service now leads to a detailed analysis of one’s ethnic status. A vast race equality industry has been built up, filled with overpaid paper shufflers, consultants and advisers with little to do except invent new grievances.

There is an air of the Maoist permanent revolution about their activities. Since immigration now runs at probably one million people a year, the make-up of society is changing dramatically. So, in this climate of endless demographic upheaval, the race relations brigade will always be able to invent more work for itself.

Yet anti-English discrimination undermines the central plank of the propaganda for mass immigration. We are constantly told we need vast influxes of foreigners to boost our economy and fill vacancies but unem­ployment levels in immigrant communities are so high and skills so lacking that we need to reserve parts of our economy for them.
So if we have to spend a fortune on training schemes, why are we inviting hundreds of thousands of arrivals from the Third World and Eastern Europe here every year?

Economics have little to do with the issue. The Left in Britain have seized on mass immigration and multiculturalism as a battering ram to destroy the society they despise. They once sought to change our country through economic revolution. That failed with the Winter of Discontent and the downfall of communism. But demographic change through migration has proved far more damaging.

George Orwell once wrote: “England is perhaps the only great country whose intellec­tuals are ashamed of their own nationality. In Left-wing circles it is always felt that there is something slightly disgraceful in being an Englishman and that it is a duty to snigger at every English institution.”

That is now precisely the mentality that predominates within the machinery of the British state. And our country is dying as a result.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Nationalist Media Network

The Home Counties primary school where less than 1% of pupils speak English as their first language

The Home Counties primary school where less than 1% of pupils speak English as their first language | Race & Crime UK | Scoop.it
Of the 630 youngsters at Iqra Slough Islamic Primary School in Berkshire, just ten are non-Muslim and more than 99 per cent class English as an 'additional' language.
No comment yet.
Scooped by Nationalist Media Network

Anti-bigotry law fails to protect England fans

Anti-bigotry law fails to protect England fans | Race & Crime UK | Scoop.it

A CONTROVERSIAL new law designed to tackle bigotry and disorder in football will be powerless against anti-English racism and violence during this summer’s European Championships.
Fans of the Auld Enemy who are abused while watching games in Scotland will not be protected by the Offensive Behaviour at Football Act, which came into force earlier this year.

Instead, police responding to incidents will have to resort to breach of the peace common law, which was deemed insufficient to root sectarianism out of the Scottish game.

The Crown Office always insisted the new law was not just about tackling sectarianism. In his guidelines, issued in February, the Lord Advocate Frank Mulholland said: “The offence is not restricted to behaviour which is ‘sectarian’ but applies to all offensive behaviour related to football that is likely to lead to public disorder.”

However, the act, which he wrote, says the offence has to be attached to a game played in Scotland or involving a Scottish team abroad. That includes fans in the stadium, travelling to a match or watching it in a public place.

But it will not cover the European Championships, which Scotland is neither hosting nor competing in.

In recent years, major tournaments have brought a rise in anti-English sentiments, with attacks on people wearing England shirts in Scotland.

Eddie Bone, chairman of the Campaign for an English Parliament, believes the Offensive Behaviour at Football legislation represents a missed opportunity, as a law is needed to deal with anti-English bigotry. I think new laws are needed to tackle it,” he said.

“Either you produce a piece of legislation to deal with the problem or you don’t bother. I remember an incident in Scotland where a disabled man was dragged out of his car, because it had England flags on, and savagely beaten.

“It seems to me there is a genuine problem and if you have a problem you address it – you don’t just use a sticking plaster.”

Last week, Mulholland was clear that anti-English bigotry in pubs which leads to disorder during the European Championships will not be tolerated, even if it is not covered by the act.

In a message to fans, he said: “Enjoy football in the pub, but bear in mind the law is there to protect everyone.

“People watching and enjoying football in the pub have always got to bear that in mind.”

Opposition politicians said the loophole showed the law is flawed. Lewis Macdonald, Scottish Labour justice spokesman, said: “It exposes to ridicule the nature of the legislation.

“If you go into a pub and it is showing Scotland playing in Paris, for example, and fans in the pub indulge in inappropriate behaviour, then that is covered.

“But if you go in the same pub the next day, and it’s England-Germany, and the same fans indulge in the same behaviour, then it is not. It should be treated in the same way.

“If the SNP has failed to make that the case then it is an even poorer piece of legislation than we thought.

“The anomaly that it does not apply to the same people in the same circumstances, because a different team is playing, is extraordinary.”

Scottish Conservatives justice spokesman David McLetchie added: “I think the legislation is nonsense and it comes as no surprise to me that it should contain such loopholes.

“But I think if we had to have this legislation, then it should cover all types of bigotry at football.”

During the 2006 World Cup there was a spate of anti-English racial attacks by Scots.

The most shocking was on a seven-year-old boy wearing an England shirt, who was punched in the head in an Edinburgh park, by a man who shouted: “This is Scotland, not f***ing England”, before running off.

In 2009, Lucy Newman, 22, who lived in Cheltenham as a child, was assaulted by a male stranger, who said “Get back to England”, before hitting her in the face. She fell and landed so hard that she fractured her left cheekbone when hitting the pavement.

During the last World Cup, police asked Aberdeen kilt-maker firm Slanj to remove “Anyone But England” T-shirts from the shop window due to their “potential to cause disturbance”.

Record chain HMV also removed items with the initials “ABE” from window displays in its Scottish stores.

The Scottish Liberal Democrats argued that common law should be sufficient to deal with all types of football hatred. Justice spokeswoman Alison McInnes said: “We condemn this kind of behaviour, regardless of what team is playing and where.

“People can rest assured that existing legislation fully provides for any act of aggression or violence in relation to football.”

A Scottish Government spokesman said: “We want everyone to enjoy watching football in a safe and friendly environment, but if trouble arises, anyone engaging in threatening or offensive behaviour will be dealt with by the full force of the law – whoever the perpetrators and whoever the victims.”

“With regard to the upcoming European Football Championships, although the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Act 2012 does not apply to football matches which do not involve Scottish teams, there are other criminal provisions which can be utilised to cover disorderly conduct in licensed premises associated with the forthcoming European Championships.”

“COPFS has a zero-tolerance approach to football related violence and disorder and there is a strong presumption in favour of prosecution wherever there is sufficient evidence.”

No comment yet.