Monitoring
1 view | +0 today
Follow
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Nida Sultan from Evaluation Digest
Scoop.it!

Innovations in Monitoring & Evaluating Results Discussion Paper

Innovations in  Monitoring & Evaluating Results Discussion Paper | Monitoring | Scoop.it

This discussion paper, edited by Jennifer Colville for the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), provides a detailed inventory of innovative practices used for monitoring and evaluation in a development context.

 

Eleven innovations have been identified with key features in most of these being increased frequency of output and broader citizen participation. The innovations examined and discussed are: crowd-sourcing; real-time simple reporting; participatory statistics; mobile data collection, micro-narrative; data exhaust; intelligent infrastructure; remote sensing; data visualisation; multi-level mixed evaluation method; and outcome harvesting.


Via DfID Evaluation Department
more...
Nevermore Sithole's curator insight, May 20, 2014 7:41 AM

Innovations in  Monitoring & Evaluating Results Discussion Paper

Rescooped by Nida Sultan from Evaluation Digest
Scoop.it!

ICAI report: DFID Private Sector Development Work (Amber-Red)

ICAI report: DFID Private Sector Development Work (Amber-Red) | Monitoring | Scoop.it

Key Findings:

 

DFID has been coherent and consistent in its view that developing the private sector in a country is central to its economic development and to poverty reduction. DFID sees its work in this area as helping countries graduate from a dependency on aid. The scale of the challenge, however, is immense and DFID’s approach is highly ambitious. The department plans to spend £1.8 billion on economic development in 2015-16 – more than doubling the amount spent in 2012-13.

 

DFID’s private sector development work encompasses a wide range of different programmes: macro approaches to trade policy and regulatory reform, mid-level development of market systems and micro support to small enterprises and individuals. The impact of individual programmes is positive – particularly at the micro-level – and DFID has demonstrated its ability to assist the poor through a range of interventions.

 

DFID has not, however, turned its high ambitions into clear guidance to develop a realistic, well-balanced and joined-up country-level portfolio of programmes. There is pressure to demonstrate results against measurable targets. In none of the countries we visited did we see a plan for – or assessment of – the cumulative impact of programmes, so it was unclear how well DFID’s work overall is transforming the private sector as a tool for economic growth and poverty reduction.

 

 

Recommendation 1: DFID should clearly define and articulate where it can add most value in private sector development relative to other stakeholders. It should be more realistic in its ambitions and the impact it seeks to achieve.

 

Recommendation 2: DFID should provide clearer guidance to its staff on how to design a coherent and well-balanced private sector development country portfolio that matches its goals for an end to extreme poverty through economic development and transformational change.

 

Recommendation 3: DFID needs better to calibrate and manage the risks associated with private sector development and so innovate in a more informed fashion.

 

Recommendation 4: DFID needs to work harder to understand the barriers and business imperatives faced by the private sector in participating in development. Wherever it operates, DFID needs to be clear how and where its interventions can address these barriers.


Via DfID Evaluation Department
more...
Rescooped by Nida Sultan from Evaluation Digest
Scoop.it!

Monitoring & evaluation for climate change adaptation and resilience: A synthesis of tools, frameworks and approaches

This report provides a synthesis and summary of frameworks for the monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of climate change adaptation and resilience (CCAR) interventions, with a specific focus on international development projects and programmes.

Via DfID Evaluation Department
more...
Rescooped by Nida Sultan from Evaluation Digest
Scoop.it!

Monitoring & evaluation for climate change adaptation and resilience: A synthesis of tools, frameworks and approaches

This report provides a synthesis and summary of frameworks for the monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of climate change adaptation and resilience (CCAR) interventions, with a specific focus on international development projects and programmes.

Via DfID Evaluation Department
more...
Rescooped by Nida Sultan from Evaluation Digest
Scoop.it!

Toolkit for gender sensitive participatory evaluations - Part I (overview)

Toolkit for gender sensitive participatory evaluations - Part I (overview) | Monitoring | Scoop.it
This presentation, given by Ranjani Murthy for the Institute of Social Studies Trust, is the first of a four part series that looks at the various participatory evaluation tools that can be used in gender-sensitive and quality focused evaluations.

Via DfID Evaluation Department
more...
No comment yet.