A mon sens, comparer deux équipes dans leur performance de prise de décision ne fait aucun sens pour au moins quatre raisons. 
In this article http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120425093938.htm research supported by the National Science Foundation has presented evidence that runs contrary to establish economic t... 
interesting.. i wonder if my everyday decision making is different from what it would be if i lived home.. 
Wer positiv gestimmt ist, entscheidet nicht optimal. 
Teaching others to employ effective decision-making processes is one of the most important and often ignored responsibilities of those in leadership roles. Via claire butterworth 
Qu'est-ce qu'une bonne décision ?La qualité d'un décideur ne peut être jugée au seul vu des résulta... 
Décider, voilà bien la responsabilité d’un dirigeant… du moins, c’est ce qu’il croît. Daniel Goleman talks about brain activity and good decision-making. The cognitive subconscious, otherwise known as the "felt sense" or gut feeling, is activated when strategizing decisions. Learn more about the brain science of decision making in Daniel Goleman's latest book The Brain and Emotional Intelligence: Via Alessandro Cerboni 
Life shrouds most choices in mystery. Some people inch toward a comfortable enough spot and stick close to that rewarding status quo. Out to dinner, they order the usual. Others consider their options systematically or randomly. Via BrainHealth, Sandeep Gautam When you lead a group of people, a team, a busines, a family, there are times when you need to make decisions as a group. Learning to lead an effective decision making meeting is an important skill for any leader. 
Effective strategic decision-making is critical to the ongoing survival of any corporation or small business enterprise. However, contemporary decision-making seems to have been over-taken by social inclusion, that is, defensive adherence to prevailing thought. 
Die Frage, wie sich effektive Entscheidungen in einer komplexen Welt treffen lassen, ist bereits seit Jahrzehnten Gegenstand der wissenschaftlichen Diskussion. Via Thomas Menk |
Whatever we do, we deal with risks.Despite our best laid plans and intentions, there are always those uncertain and unwanted events that happen which... 
Much of the discussion in my book, Thinking Fast and Slow, is about biases of intuition. However, the focus on error does not denigrate human intelligence, any more than the attention to diseases in medical texts denies good health. Most of us are healthy most of the time, and most of our judgments and actions are appropriate most of the time. Via Thomas Menk 
"Traditional decision-making in the military — with the hierarchy where you go down — does not work."... 
Ob zwei Menschen besser entscheiden als einer allein, hängt von der Art der Aufgabe ab. 
Hirnscans zeigen, wie wir bei Entscheidungen abwägen. 
"The results provide evidence that the human executive system favors creativity for compensating its limited monitoring capacity" explained Dr. Via Thomas Menk 
When faced with a tough choice, we already have the cognitive tools we need to make the right decision, Daniel Gilbert, professor of psychology, told a Harvard Law School audience on Feb. 16. 
This article introduces and discusses from a philosophical point of view the nascent field of neuroeconomics, which is the study of neural mechanisms involved in decision-making and their economic significance. Following a survey of the ways in which decision-making is usually construed in philosophy, economics and psychology, I review many important findings in neuroeconomics to show that they suggest a revised picture of decision-making and ourselves as choosing agents. Finally, I outline a neuroeconomic account of irrationality. Via Alessandro Cerboni 
Think or blink? The debate continues with new research on quick, emotion-based decision-making. Via Thomas Menk Sauf si vous travaillez dans une entreprise du Nord de l’Europe ou du Japon, vous prenez, en dernière instance vos décisions seul. 
« En politique, quand la raison et l’émotion s’opposent, l’émotion gagne invariablement » 
Heuristics – a knack for cutting corners mentally to solve problems quickly and efficiently – is one of many things that sets successful entrepreneurs apart. 
Traditional psychological theory describes the decision-making process as an action often based on intuition rather than logic. That is, people will ignore facts and go with the gut. A new research hypothesis blends the objective and subjective as Wim De Neys, Ph.D., a psychological scientist at the University of Toulouse in France, suggests thinking about logic is also intuitive. Via Alessandro Cerboni |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  |
6 |
|
Next |
