Littlebytesnews C...
Follow
Find
74.8K views | +28 today
Littlebytesnews Current Events
Conservative politics,News, Commentary, Economy and Current Events
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

Will the Czech government fall next week?

Will the Czech government fall next week? | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
FOR years the Czech Republic has suffered from weak, ineffective governments. They controlled slim majorities in parliament and got bogged down in bickering and...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

Benghazigate:What the Obama Admin does not want you to see - GretaWire

Benghazigate:What the Obama Admin does not want you to see - GretaWire | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
There were many security cameras at the Benghazi US Consulate.

 

There were many security cameras at the Benghazi US Consulate. One camera was positioned to (and did) record Ambassador Stevens, on September 11, saying good night at 8:40pm Libya time to a Turkish Diplomat.

 

The video from this camera – I am told – shows (and proves) there was NO PROTEST outside our Consulate. The Obama Administration had that tape immediately and they knew what it showed and knew it immediately. Anyone who watched the video observed the obvious.

 

Don’t you think the Obama Administration should release that video so that the American people can see for themselves what REALLY happened and not what the Obama Administration tried to feed them in the weeks after the terrorist attack? They won’t release the tape – in fact, they are hiding the video tape from you by classifying it so that it remains out of our reach. Frankly, that is the oldest trick in the book – classify it. They don’t want you to see the tape and they don’t want you to know what THEY KNEW RIGHT AWAY.

 

The Obama Administration doesn’t even have to release the entire tape (although they should) — I just want to see the few minutes before our Ambassador and the Turkish Diplomat walked out of the Consulate….and a few minutes after the Turkish Diplomat leaves and the Ambassador returns insides.

 

If the Obama Administration won’t release the video — how about still frames from the video? How could they deny the American people at least that now?

Releasing the video (or stills from the video) now would in no way jeopardize the Obama Administration’s internal investigation. The video is what the video is. If someone appears in the who might have reason not to have his identity disclosed (security), his of her face can be blurred. That is simple.

 

Release the video would be a good faith showing that the White House is not hiding anything and really does believe in the transparency the President promised when he ran in 2008.

 

My response:

To answer the poll, I believe they flat out lied for political reasons, but also they are incompetent and should be charged with dereliction of duty, the murder of these four Americans and treason! They knew in real time what took place & tried to condemn free speech rights and our freedoms by arresting the film maker of an obscure video insulting Islam. As more evidence comes out we now know they knew within hours about the attack and that it was terrorism and unrelated to the video and a spontaneous protest.

 

There have been so many stories coming out and so many lies being told that the American people feel deceived. At least those who have been following this unfold. Sadly, the mainstream media is not doing their job and keeping all of the people and the world informed of what really took place because they are in the palm of the Democrat party and want to see Obama re-elected. Their negligence to report the truth, investigate further and properly vet Obama in 2008 have led us to the most corrupt, incompetent and divisive administration in history.

 

The bottom line, Obama is the Commander In Chief, everyone from the State Dept, Military/DOD, CIA, etc work under him and his orders. He has the authority to authorize intervention and should have authorized it to save&protect the lives of the Ambassador and his colleagues. Instead of providing proper security to begin with, prior to the 9/11 attack, and after repeated requests for additional security, this administration under the leadership of Obama failed to do so and denied the repeated requests for help. Instead they removed the additional security they had and left the Ambassador with only a few security officers to protect him, some of which were members of Al Qaeda&the Muslim Brotherhood. They were part of the Feb 17 militia that helped remove&kill Gadaffi and Obama, along with NATO armed with weapons.

 

The Obama administration is in deep on this and like fast&furious, they were trafficking weapons to the "rebels"/terrorists in Libya and continuing to do so in Syria.

 

We will be lucky to ever get the truth and see the tapes. This is worse than Watergate, the Iran Contra and Fast&Furious. American lives are gone forever who could have been saved if calls for help were not denied prior to the attacks, but also during the attacks!

 

Today there is news several top Generals and Commanders are being forced to resign, be reassigned or retire, including General Ham, which Panetta and Gen Dempsey mentioned made the call not to send in help while Tyrone Woods&Glen Doherty were pleading for backup before they were killed.

 

See more here: Did the 2nd in command of AFRICOM apprehend Gen Ham who had ppl ready to save Americans in Libya?? http://sco.lt/6ZzYpd

 

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

Navy replaces admiral leading Mideast strike group

Navy replaces admiral leading Mideast strike group | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
The Navy has replaced the admiral in command of an aircraft carrier strike group in the Middle East, pending the outcome of an internal investigation into undisclosed allegations of inappropriate judgment.

 

The Navy said Saturday it is replacing the admiral in command of an aircraft carrier strike group in the Middle East, pending the outcome of an internal investigation into undisclosed allegations of inappropriate judgment.

 

Rear Adm. Charles M. Gaouette is being sent back to the USS John C. Stennis' home port at Bremerton, Wash., in what the Navy called a temporary reassignment. The Navy said he is not formally relieved of his command of the Stennis strike group but will be replaced by Rear Adm. Troy M. Shoemaker, who will assume command until the investigation is completed.

 

It is highly unusual for the Navy to replace a carrier strike group commander during its deployment.

 

LBN:

Did the second in command of AFRICOM apprehend General Ham and tell him that he was now relieved of his command??

 

The plot thickens....Benghazigate: We Know Now Who Gave the Order Not to Protect the Consulate!! http://sco.lt/6ZzYpd

 

It looks like Obama is going after top Generals and Commanders who were ready to provide military backup to Americans killed in Benghazi, but Obama as Commander-in-Chief is the one who really needs to step down!

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

80 top tax dodging,DEM CEOs&bailout recipients call for tax hikes, spending cuts to cut deficit by $4 trillion

80 top tax dodging,DEM CEOs&bailout recipients call for tax hikes, spending cuts to cut deficit by $4 trillion | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
CEOs from more than 80 major U.S. companies are pressing Congress to reduce the federal deficit by raising taxes and cutting spending.

 

Note:

I had trouble viewing the Fox News page, but linked to it anyway, but excerpted most of this from the guardian.co.uk, but felt the information was not much different since it went out on the wire.

 

 

Eighty chief executives, from companies including Microsoft, JP Morgan and GE, have waded into the presidential election campaign with a call on Washington to use tax increases and spending cuts to address the US's $16tn debt.

 

The letter has been signed by many of the biggest names in US business, including Steve Ballmer, CEO of Microsoft, JP Morgan's Jamie Dimon, and Lloyd Blankfein at Goldman Sachs. According to the signatories, any plan has to "include comprehensive and pro-growth tax reform, which broadens the base, lowers rates, raises revenues and reduces the deficit" as well as limiting the growth spending in areas including healthcare.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/oct/25/top-ceos-tax-increases-spending-cuts-debt

Romney and his running mate Paul Ryan have signed a pledge with lobby group Americans for Tax Reform not to increase taxes.

 

Obama has proposed raising the marginal income-tax rates for the top 2% of taxpayers. None of the CEOs endorse that plan either, and have instead called for an overhaul of the tax code that would eliminate or reduce deductions, credits and loopholes.

The CEOs endorsed the bipartisan plan to tackle the deficit drawn up in 2010 by Republican Alan Simpson and Democrat Erskine Bowles. The Simpson-Bowles plan called for roughly $3 in spending cuts for every $1 in tax increases.

 

"When you talk about a $16tn debt, I don't see how you can avoid addressing both sides," said Randall Stephenson, CEO of AT&T.

 

"The recommendations of the bipartisan Simpson-Bowles Commission, which saved $4tn and addressed all parts of the budget, provide an effective framework for such a plan," said the CEOs.

 

LBN:

While cutting spending is essential to stop the deficit and lower the debt, increasing taxes on the job creators will only continue the stagnation and inflation we have been seeing the past four years. Increasing taxes will only cause less investment in American business, less productivity and more unemployment as businesses are forced to cut costs and reduce the number of employees they have and/or reduce their employment to part-time. In addition, the health care tax mandate will kick in in 2013 which will burden employers with paying $2500/employee or providing health insurance for all of their employees in businesses that employ more than 50 people! This is one reason many companies are not hiring and are reducing the number of full-time employees they have now.

 

I am surprised they don't agree with Obama's plan since many are tax dodgers and benefited from the bailout, but they claim to support Simpson-Bowles, a bipartisan effort to cut spending for every $1 in tax increases. I don't know enough about the plan and why it wasn't passed yet but I don't see how  increasing taxes will help as many economists have said increases taxes in a time of high unemployment and inflation will only lead to a continued recession, potential depression and take us off the fiscal-cliff if tax rates go up.


more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

Wonder who he'll vote for! Man tattoos Mitt Romney's campaign logo on his face for $15,000 (and now taking offers for his forehead)

Wonder who he'll vote for! Man tattoos Mitt Romney's campaign logo on his face for $15,000 (and now taking offers for his forehead) | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
No matter who wins the White House in November, Eric Hartsburg just ensured he'll think of Mitt Romney every day he looks in the mirror.

 

The crazy things people will do for money in the Obama economy....

 

I guess if he can live with himself with tattoos all over his face&body he has a right to sell advertising space on his face. However, I think it is a foolish thing to do and think he will one day want to have it removed, along with the earings/studs he has in his lower lip. Eeeek....ick! At least it says he's a registered Republican, so I guess that means he will likely vote for Romney. Hopefully he doesn't sell his forehead space to an Obama fan.

 

'I wish it could be a more noble cause than just saying, 'hey, let's have a good time',' Hartsburg told them in August, before the winning bid for a Romney design. 'But you only live once, and I was born with a forehead, so why not?'


Hartsburg's only specification was that the tattoo not be racist or hateful.
He actually rejected a higher offer because the requested tattoo was 'lewd.'

 

But when the buyer offered $15,000 for a Romney tattoo, Hartsburg said it was something he could live with because he was a registered Republican
Since getting the 'R', Hartsburg has explained on Twitter that he believes the ink serves a greater purpose.


'Tired of the Republican party being packaged as just rich n elderly. I'm neither,' Hartsburg wrote on Twitter. 'The party is not the insensitive boogeyman.'

 

I guess it's better he made money selling advertising space on his body rather than prostituting his virginity like this woman did for $780,000.00  http://www.examiner.com/article/virgin-for-sale-website-auctions-off-virginity-of-college-student-for-780-000 

 

I don't see how she will live with herself after selling her virginity away to someone for money like a prostitute. It is like trafficking your body to the highest bidder. I hope she doesn't end up raped,beaten and abused by whoever she sold her body&soul to.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

Hillary Pulling Out From Under the Bus?Hillary Says Obama Denied Initial Security Requests Prior to The Attacks

Hillary Pulling Out From Under the Bus?Hillary Says Obama Denied Initial Security Requests Prior to The Attacks | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it

Via Fox Nation:

Last night, it was revealed that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had ordered more security at the U.S. mission in Benghazi before it was attacked where four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens were murdered by Al-Qaeda but President Obama denied the request.

 

The news broke on TheBlazeTV’s “Wilkow!” hosted by Andrew Wilkow, by best-selling author, Ed Klein who said the legal counsel to Clinton had informed him of this information.

 

Klein also said that those same sources said that former President Bill Clinton has been “urging” his wife [Hillary] to release official State Department documents that prove she called for additional security at the compound in Libya, which would almost certainly result in President Obama losing the election.

Keep reading…http://nation.foxnews.com/hillary-clinton/2012/10/26/report-hillary-asked-more-security-benghazi-obama-said-no

 

LBN:
So after Hillary threw herself under the bus, she is now revealing, or saying that she did request additional security for Benghazi, but Obama denied it??

 

I wonder if it is true or if this is just another cover-up by Hillary and an attempt to clear her legacy and reputation for a possible political run in 2016?? 

 

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

The Admin Who Denied God Three Times,Denied Military Support Three Times to Americans Under Attack in Libya

The Admin Who Denied God Three Times,Denied Military Support Three Times to Americans Under Attack in Libya | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
Jennifer Griffin reports from Washington, D.C.

 Click image to listen to video report with Fox News&Jennifer Griffin who received detailed information from US sources who survived the attack and were on the ground in Benghazi during the attacks.

 

From Fox News: Fox News has learned from sources who were on the ground in Benghazi that an urgent request from the CIA annex for military back-up during the attack on the U.S. Consulate and subsequent attack several hours later was denied by U.S. officials -- who also told the CIA operators twice to "stand down" rather than help the ambassador's team when shots were heard at approximately 9:40 p.m. in Benghazi on Sept. 11.

Former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods was part of a small team who was at the CIA annex about a mile from the U.S. Consulate where Ambassador Chris Stevens and his team came under attack. When he and others heard the shots fired, they informed their higher-ups at the annex to tell them what they were hearing and requested permission to go to the consulate and help out. They were told to "stand down," according to sources familiar with the exchange. Soon after, they were again told to "stand down." Woods and at least two others ignored those orders and made their way to the Consulate which at that point was on fire. Shots were exchanged. The quick reaction force from the CIA annex evacuated those who remained at the Consulate and Sean Smith, who had been killed in the initial attack. They could not find the ambassador and returned to the CIA annex at about midnight.

At that point, they called again for military support and help because they were taking fire at the CIA safe house, or annex. The request was denied. There were no communications problems at the annex, according those present at the compound. The team was in constant radio contact with their headquarters. In fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Specter gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours -- enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. Fox News has also learned that two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait, among them Delta Force operators.

Read more...

 

More:

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/10/26/SHOCK-REPORT-CIA-Ops-Were-Denied-Request-For-Help-THREE-Times-During-Benghazi-Attack

 

 

LittlebytesNews Reports,Links,Sources:

 

Impeach&Imprison For Murder Obama,Hillary&Panetta:Report Contradicts Panetta's Claim of 'No Real-Time Intel'&Denied Three Requests for Backup During Attack!!

http://sco.lt/4hMtoP

Glen Doherty&Tyrone Woods were not killed until 6 hours from the original attack on the consulate!!

 

 

Video/Audio:Father Of Navy SEAL Killed In Benghazi Says Obama Admin Pushing A "Pack Of Lies" http://sco.lt/5j5qVt

 

 

A Message To Obama From Rand Paul:Obama, Where the H-- Were the Marines? | http://sco.lt/5P0j3p

 

CBS Busts Obama--and Itself--in Benghazi Cover-Up:Obama admits premeditated attack targeted Americans  http://sco.lt/4kqU9h

 

HILLARY GIGGLES AT REPORTERS – Still Not Sure What to Call the Terrorist Attack (Video)  http://sco.lt/5vb1Np

 

 

Related:
State Department emails from day of Libya attack show Al Qaeda-tied group on radar&WH Notified! |http://sco.lt/8GyiiP

 

U.S. Officials Knew Within 24 hrs Libya Attacks Were Work of Al Qaeda Affiliates http://sco.lt/6X3h6v

 

Obama's History of Terrorism Cover-ups:Benghazi in Little Rock,Then Ft Hood Massacre&Now Libya |  http://sco.lt/91NLSz

 

 

Tunisia says it has a 28-year-old Tunisian national in custody who is linked to the attack on the US consulate in Libya that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens, reports the AP. Details are sketchy, but the suspect has been identified as Ali Harzi. It's unclear exactly what role he played, but Eli Lake of the Daily Beast says Harzi posted about the attack on social media shortly after it began, drawing the attention of investigators. He reportedly fled to Turkey afterward, where he got picked up and handed over to Tunisia. One source tells Lake that Harzi belongs to "violent extremist networks."

http://www.newser.com/story/156401/tunisia-we-arrested-suspect-in-benghazi-attack.html

 

What Really Happened in Libya&When Did the US Know?Special Report:'Death and Deceit in Benghazi'http://sco.lt/5vl0TJ

 

Leader Of Libya Attack Linked To Obama Donor;Only Eight Security Hired by State Dept&UK? http://sco.lt/86pN5t

 

Muslim Brotherhood forms political party in Libya based on Islamic Principles! http://sco.lt/8X7WDJ

 

Sept 20:Suspected Killer of US Ambassador Was Leader of US-Backed Libyan Rebel Forces & Former Gitmo Detaineehttp://sco.lt/6wPOGv

 

More:
Report: Obama Can’t Decide Whether Or Not To Attack Benghazi Perpetrators Or Let Them Get Away With Ithttp://sco.lt/4w09U9

 

The security The State Dept did provide was outsourced to UK private security which hired Libyan rebels, armed with weapons supplied by the Obama admin to help remove&kill Gadaffi.

US Relied on Muslim Brotherhood for Benghazi Consulate Security | FrontPage Magazine http://sco.lt/6Cy4gr

 

State Dept has no comment on Sept. 12 CIA report that militants attack consulate http://sco.lt/89Tl8z


34 highly-trained security personnel moved out over a six month period from Libya http://sco.lt/8TQM53


http://www.scoop.it/t/war-against-islam/p/2878166287/libya-fbi-examines-us-consulate-attack-site-three-weeks-later

 

http://www.scoop.it/t/war-against-islam/p/2802195398/two-weeks-later-wh-obama-views-libya-attack-as-terrorism

 

Pentagon Islamic Adviser Reappears as Political Leader for Syrian Muslim Brotherhood-Dominated Group
https://plus.google.com/u/0/103087425533147519173/posts/2X3bdp2PgvP

 

Obama's Rules of Engagement Endangering our Law Enforcement and Military
https://plus.google.com/u/0/103087425533147519173/posts/2EsxDrhNNYH

 

State Department refuses to explain why member of jihad terror group visited White House
https://plus.google.com/u/0/103087425533147519173/posts/QKggZeHBtgT

 


http://www.scoop.it/t/war-against-islam/p/2764654324/anderson-cooper-admits-cnn-found-slain-ambassador-s-journal-secretly-used-it-in-reporting

 

http://www.scoop.it/t/war-against-islam/p/2801330939/ret-general-boykin-confirms-us-govt-infiltration-by-the-muslim-brotherhood-bachmann-was-right

 

http://www.scoop.it/t/war-against-islam/p/2796148243/57-top-u-s-muslim-groups-demanded-government-wide-islamophobia-purge-in-letter-to-white-house

 

http://www.scoop.it/t/war-against-islam/p/2795657750/state-department-calls-cnn-disgusting-for-exposing-that-hillary-clinton-may-be-responsible-for-ambassador-stevens-s-death-pat-dollard

 

 

 

More:
http://www.scoop.it/t/littlebytesnews-election-2012?q=libya

 

Leader of Ansar al-Sharia eludes capture, wanted for inciting unrest in Tunisia - http://sco.lt/60M83d

 

 

 

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

Senator Reid taken to hospital following car crash

Senator Reid taken to hospital following car crash | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has been taken to hospital following a car crash on an interstate highway through Las Vegas.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

Hillary: No, No, I'm Still Planning to Leave-Won't Stay for Some or All of Obama 2nd Term

Hillary: No, No, I'm Still Planning to Leave-Won't Stay for Some or All of Obama 2nd Term | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
Hillary Clinton today rebuffed the notion that she might stay on for some or all of a second term as secretary of state if President Obama wins re-election, the Washington Post reports. "It’s really still my same time frame," she said.

 

LBN:
Benghazi is the end all for Hillary's political future and hopefully will be for Obama's as well. I hope they both get charged with dereliction of duty and the murders of those killed in Libya! They should be charged with treason and at the least lose any federal pension. 

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

Friday Afternoon Roundup - Bumps in the Road | Right Side News

Friday Afternoon Roundup - Bumps in the Road | Right Side News | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
Right Side News stands out among conservative news sites, offering Americans the right news from sources you can trust. Find out what the real news is.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

Impeach&Imprison Obama,Hillary&Panetta:Report Contradicts Panetta's Claim of 'No Real-Time Intel'&Denied Three Requests For Backup During Attack!

Impeach&Imprison Obama,Hillary&Panetta:Report Contradicts Panetta's Claim of 'No Real-Time Intel'&Denied Three Requests For Backup During Attack! | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
This new report is not only horrifying in the details, but it also seems to contradict what we were told by Leon Panetta. Yesterday, the Defense Secretary said he ruled out sending help into Benghazi based on a lack of real-time intelligence.

 

A blockbuster report just released from Fox News proves that Barack Obama has failed in his primary responsibility: Protecting the lives of the American people. According to Fox News' Jennifer Griffin, on three occasions during the seven-hour September 11th anniversary attack on our Libyan consulate that resulted in the murder of four Americans, U.S. officials refused to send reinforcements that most certainly could've arrived in time to make a difference.

This new report is not only horrifying in the details, but it also seems to contradict what we were told by Leon Panetta. Yesterday, the Defense Secretary said he ruled out sending help into Benghazi based on a lack of real-time intelligence:

 

At a Pentagon news briefing, Panetta said there was no "real-time information" to be able to act on, even though the U.S. military was prepared to do so.

"You don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on," Panetta said. "(We) felt we could not put forces at risk in that situation."

But according to Fox News' CIA sources, there was a wealth of "real-time information" coming in, including two military surveillance drones and those who were on the ground. The communication from the CIA annex about a mile away from the consulate was "constant":

 

There were no communications problems at the annex, according those present at the compound. The team was in constant radio contact with their headquarters. In fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound.

 

There was not only constant communication, but we now know that one security officer lasered the terrorist target that was firing mortars, but his requests for a gunship to take the target out were repeatedly turned down by U.S. officials. And yet, there was more than enough time for a gunship based less than 500 miles away to take it out before the annex was eventually overrun and two former Navy SEALs lost their lives.

 

Both Navy SEALs killed in the attack were told to "stand down" twice before ignoring orders. Instead of waiting around for people to die as ordered, these heroes made their way to the consulate and helped get a number of people out to safety.

 

LBN:

The news gets worse by the day on what really happened in Libya. The SEALs who died trying to save as many people as they could until they became victims were denied requests three times during the attack on the consulate. Eventually they escaped the consulate to the CIA Annex/safe house where almost four hours later they came under attack and three hours later were killed!! The entire attack from the consulate to the CIA Annex elapsed a time of seven hours! Yet, the Obama admin claimed they didn't have the real-time intelligence&didn't have proof it was a terror attack for weeks!! This is disgusting, total failure and murder by the incompetence of this administration!!  Who the he** told them to stand down&who denied the requests during the attack?? Bad enough they were denied additional security before these attacks happened, but to find out they had the time and requests were made to send reinforcements during the attacks they were denied!!

 

I can't imagine being the parents of Tyrone Woods&Doherty must feel. I hope they sue this admin and charge them with their murder!! This is treason and complete dereliction of duty by the Obama administration! I'm outraged and the rest of America should be. How anyone could support this administration after these lies, misleading and deception are despicable&outrageous!

 

I feel so bad for the families of the SEALs, the Ambassador&his computer technician. There is no reason any of this should have happened if the US would have provided proper security in the first place&didn't remove the security they had in there. Charlie Woods, father of Tyrone Woods, on America Live said they murdered his son. He says he forgives them, but hopes years from now they change the direction of their life. He feels he's been lied to by the Obama administration. He does not appreciate the lies. He's glad the facts are coming out right now, but after the facts came out in realtime the White House watched my son&denied his pelas for help&my son violated orders to protect the lives of at least 30 people. He wishes the people in the White House had the same level of moral courage as his son had.

 

Justice must prevail and this administration needs to be charged with treason and the murder of these heroic Americans! Obama should resign and suspend his campaign today!!

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

A Message To Obama From Rand Paul:Obama, Where the H-- Were the Marines?

A Message To Obama From Rand Paul:Obama, Where the H-- Were the Marines? | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
Some tough questions for the president that the Senator asked at an appearance in New Hampshire several days ago.  

 

I have some questions and you get presidential candidates up here, so I want you to ask the President this when he comes up here: Where the hell were the Marines?

 

In Libya, where were the Marines?

 

There were no uniformed Marines guarding our ambassador?

 

Where do you think the most dangerous embassy in the world is? It's got to be Libya or Iraq.

 

In Iraq, I think they've got 17,000 people guarding the ambassador. They're not all Marines, but there's probably several hundred Marines, but there's a host of armed people guarding the ambassador. We have a fortress guarding the ambassador there.

 

We didn't have any uniformed Marines? There was personnel, a 16-person security team.

 

If the President comes up here, ask him: Why in the hell did you send them home? They specifically requested to stay.

 

Col. Wood, who is head of the security team, says he sent the cables: I want to stay in Libya because it's unsafe and the ambassador is unsafe.

 

The President says the buck stops here, ask him where in the hell were the Marines? Ask him, where the hell was that 16-person security team?

 

And then finally ask him: What happened to the plane? There was a DC-3 there supposed to be able to help people out of the country or to move about the country, they took their plane.

 

They took their plane on May 4 of this year. You know what happened on May 8 of this year, four days later? The State Department spent $108,000 buying a new electrical charging station to green up the Vienna embassy.

 

So you have to ask yourself, is the green initiative, is the global warming campaign, more important than the security of an embassy?

 

Greening up the Vienna Embassy. You know, the electric car, it's subsidized $250,000 per car. We probably spent $1 million to buy these electric cars to make a political statement in Vienna.

 

We spent $100,000 for an electrical charging station to show off how green we were, but we wouldn't have one Marine guarding our embassy, we wouldn't allow 16 personnel to stay in Libya, we wouldn't allow them a plane, but we've got enough money to make a show of a very politicized agenda by the President.

 

I think it's inexcusable and if he says the buck stops here, someone should be fired.

 

This article also appeared in the Washington Times and on the Senator's blog.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

Calling All American Jews in Swing States -From a CEO based in NY

Calling All American Jews in Swing States -From a CEO based in NY | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
Take this message to heart. Israel is the homeland of the Jewish people, even those in the U.S.A.

 

by

Ronn Torossian, CEO of 5WPR
The author is CEO of 5WPR, 1 of the 25 largest PR Agencies in the US.

Call all American Jews who live In swing states and let them know that if they support Israel, then come Election Day, there is a very easy decision to make.

It truly is amazing that many American Jews are still considering voting for President Obama, considering his record vis a vis the Jewish community.

 

Owning 5WPR, a PR agency, I understand “spin” – and perhaps Obama & the Democrats deserve to have their words analyzed, and not the spin of the election cycle.

 

Obama himself has said “I think there is a strain within the pro-Israel community that says unless you adopt an unwavering pro-Likud approach to Israel that you’re anti-Israel, and that can’t be the measure of our friendship with Israel.”

 

Over the summer, Obama in a meeting with American Jewish Orthodox leaders, described Israel’s elected government as “extreme right.”

Considering that Israeli elections are also upcoming a few months after the American election, and Netanyahu and Likud are expected to continue to win, why would anyone who supports Israel want Obama re-elected since he doesn't like Netanyahu or his government?

 

Undoubtedly a “pro-Likud” government will win (which means strength on national security, and natural settlement growth).

 

Can anyone believe that Obama who told Russian President Dmitry Medvedev “This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility," will be more strongly pro-Israel, as this is his last election and he won’t have to worry about the last election?

 

Democrat or Republican, consider the words of senior Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi who said: “…Republicans are using Israel as an excuse, what they really want are tax cuts for the wealthy. So Israel that can be one reason they put forth.”

 

She then said Jews vote Republican because “they’re being exploited.”

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

Don't End Up Akron's Most Hated Man

http://www.obamaclonebrown.com (@Nikestreetz Barack Obama and Brown are the same! http://t.co/yejKpk0t Do NOT trust this clown Sherrod Brown!
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

U.S. to Sponsor Health Insurance Plans Nationwide Through State Exchanges

U.S. to Sponsor Health Insurance Plans Nationwide Through State Exchanges | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
Two plans, added to President Obama’s health care law as a substitute for a pure government-run health insurance program, will be offered in every state.

 

To be eligible to participate in the multistate program, insurers must be licensed in every state. The Government Employees Health Association recently bought a company that has the licenses it would need.

 

The new health care law stipulates that at least one of the multistate plans must provide insurance without coverage of abortion services. If a plan does cover abortions, it must establish separate accounts, one with money for abortion and one for all other medical services.

 

National insurance plans will be subject to regulation by the federal government, state insurance commissioners and state insurance exchanges. That mix could cause confusion for some consumers who have questions or complaints about their coverage.

The federal standards will pre-empt state rules in at least one respect: the national health plans will automatically be eligible to compete against other private insurers in the new exchanges, regardless of whether they have been certified as meeting the standards of those exchanges.

 

The administration has promised to “work cooperatively with states.” But it is unclear whether the government-sponsored plans will have to comply with all state laws and consumer protection standards; whether they will have to comply with state benefit mandates; and whether they will have to pay state fees and taxes levied on other insurers to finance exchange operations.

 

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners, which represents state regulators, expressed alarm at the prospect of a double standard.

 

“It is absolutely essential that multistate plans compete on a level playing field with other qualified health plans, which are subject to state insurance law,” the association said in a letter to the Office of Personnel Management.

 

Consumer groups expressed similar concerns. The national insurance plans and other carriers must be subject to identical standards, they say, or consumers cannot make valid comparisons.

“Multistate plans have real potential benefits for consumers,” said Ronald F. Pollack, the executive director of Families USA, a liberal-leaning consumer group. “But there is also potential trouble if the multistate plans are exempted from some consumer protection standards.”

 

Robert E. Moffit, a senior fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation, said he worried that “the nationwide health plans, operating under terms and conditions set by the federal government, will become the robust public option that liberals always wanted.”

 

Insurers are pleading with the Office of Personnel Management to provide more detailed guidance.

“We are concerned that O.P.M. has not yet released rules specifying the requirements for the multistate plan,” said Jay A. Warmuth, a lawyer at UnitedHealth Group, one of the nation’s largest insurers.

 

Rules for the new program have been under review by the White House for three months, and officials said they would be issued soon.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

Benghazigate: We Know Now Who Gave the Order Not to Protect the Consulate!!

Benghazigate: We Know Now Who Gave the Order Not to Protect the Consulate!! | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it

Now we know who is taking responsibility for denying support to the consulate and the safe house.

The photo, which is the official one put out by DOD, from the press conference held by Panetta and General Dempsey is horribly eloquent in terms of body language.

 

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta defended the failure to go in by claiming that the issue was a lack of reliable intel, despite the fact that they had multiple distress calls and a drone overhead.

 

Blaming a lack of reliable intel is fine if you want to pull away from intervening in Syria, but not when a US diplomatic facility and its personnel are under sustained attack. And how much intel was really needed to send two jets to buzz the area and possibly scare off some of the attackers, who would not have posed any threat to the aircraft?

 

Although forces were on alert and ready to launch an operation if needed, the US military commander for Africa, General Carter Ham, the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey, and Panetta all decided against any intervention as they had no clear picture of events unfolding in Benghazi, he said.

 

So the buck has been passed to Panetta and Dempsey and Ham. Dempsey is a soulless administration toady and Ham is deeply invested in Libya. Panetta is a Clintonite who is completely expendable, especially if the charges get pinned to Hillary. But Panetta still seems filled with self-loathing and Dempsey looks disgusted with him.

Not doing something because there is no intel is a common excuse in these circles when they don’t want to do something. Just as with Iran, there would never have been enough intel.

 

And how much intel was needed really? Benghazi had an extended profile and was the cause of the entire Libyan war. The consulate had an extensive intelligence apparatus and the declassified cables we’ve seen are a fraction of the actual classified cables that would have been at Panetta, Dempsey and Ham’s disposal.

 

They knew about the Islamist militias and had descriptions of their armament from the RSO’s reports. They didn’t know the exact number of attackers or every single possible detail, but you can never really know everything before going in.

“There’s a basic principle here, and the basic principle is that you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on, without having some real-time information about what’s taking place,” Panetta told a news conference.

 

But there were already forces in harm’s way, who were trying to provide some real time intel from their point of view. What Panetta means is that the decision was made not to send aid to them, and it wasn’t about risking more lives, but about the politics of intervening in Libya and offending the Libyans. It was done for the same reason that US soldiers have at times been abandoned without air support in Afghanistan.

 

“I feel confident that our forces were alert and responsive to what was a very fluid situation,” General Dempsey said, which is one of those strange statements that leaders issue after a complete screw up.

 

The full transcript of the conference was fairly well hidden on the site, but turned up here, it shows the full exchanges.

 

Q: Can I follow up on that? One of the reasons we’ve heard that there wasn’t a more robust response right away is that there wasn’t a clear intelligence picture over Benghazi, to give you the idea of where to put what forces.

 

But when there was, in fact, a drone over the CIA annex and there were intelligence officials fighting inside the annex, I guess the big question is, with those two combined assets, why there wasn’t a clear intelligence picture that would have given you what you needed to make some moves, for instance, flying, you know, F-16s over the area to disperse fighters or — or dropping more special forces in.

 

SEC. PANETTA: You know, let me — let me speak to that, because I’m sure there’s going to be — there’s a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking going on here.

 

We — we quickly responded, as General Dempsey said, in terms of deploying forces to the region. We had FAST platoons in the region. We had ships that we had deployed off of Libya. And we were prepared to respond to any contingency and certainly had forces in place to do that.

 

But — but the basic principle here — basic principle is that you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on; without having some real-time information about what’s taking place. And as a result of not having that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that area, General Ham, General Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation.

 

Q: So the drone, then, and the forces inside the annex weren’t giving enough of a clear picture is what you’re saying.

 

SEC. PANETTA: This — this happened within a few hours and it was really over before, you know, we had the opportunity to really know what was happening.

 

LBN:

So it looks like General Ham and possibly Gen Dempsey are going to take the blame for the attacks in Libya, despite Obama having the full authority to authorize backup support during the attack!

 

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama will nominate Army Gen. David Rodriguez to succeed Gen. Carter Ham as commander of U.S. Africa Command and Marine Lt. Gen. John Paxton to succeed Gen. Joseph Dunford as assistant commandant of the Marine Corps, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced Thursday.

 

Both appointments must be confirmed by the Senate.

 

Rodriguez is the commander of U.S. Army Forces Command and has served in a “variety of key leadership roles on the battlefield,” Panetta said.

He’s “a proven leader” who oversaw coalition and Afghan forces during the surge in Afghanistan, and “was the key architect of the successful campaign plan that we are now implementing,” Panetta said.

(Excerpt) Read more at http://www.stripes.com/news/obama-to-nominate-army-gen-rodriguez-to-lead-africom-1.193564

 

The Obama administration calls this a routine change of command, but freeper,  GreyFriar notes:
[It]Should be a three year tour. He’s about a year and a half in and a week after 9/11 he’s out the door. Doesn’t sound routine.

 

 

According to this article on September 24th, 2012
10:21 AM ET posted by CNN:
A general's warning about militants in Libya
By Barbara Starr

http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/09/24/a-generals-warning-about-militants-in-libya/

 

Just three months ago, the four-star chief of the U.S. Africa Command warned of a growing threat from al Qaeda and other militant groups in Libya.


"There is a real concern in Libya. As Libya is coming out of the revolution and forming its new government, there very clearly are those who wish to undermine the formation of that government," said Gen. Carter Ham in a speech to senior military and civilian officials from Africa, Europe and the U.S.

 

"We see some worrying indicators that al Qaeda and others are seeking to establish a presence in Libya," Ham warned. Ham often worked closely with the late Chris Stevens, the U.S. ambassador to Libya, killed in the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi.

 

Ham has been trying to establish the initial stages of a military relationship with Libya, but the effort has been slowed by the presence and influence of armed militias, such as those suspected of being involved in the attack. Ham noted back in June the problem of bringing even more mainstream groups under the control of the central government.

 

More: Intel chairman doubts Libya attack linked to video

"Now how do you bring those disparate organizations under some degree of central government control? How do you use those organizations to the benefit of the people? How do you transform some of them into border police, into national police, into maritime police and other areas of government where they can continue to be valuable contributors to overall Libyan security?"

 

As commander of U.S. military operations across Africa, Ham would be the senior U.S. officer in charge, if the president were to order a military strike against potential targets believed to be responsible for the attack. He is considered to be extremely knowledgeable about al Qaeda movements in Africa, as was Stevens.

 

Ham has particularly made the case that al Qaeda in the Lands of the Islamic Maghreb poses an increasing concern and that the group is operating unconstrained in a large portion of Mali and coordinating with other extremist elements across North Africa.

 

According to reports: On September 10, General Ham was in Nevada.

Discussing the role of the National Guard in the Middle East and Africa:

Story Highlights
The National Guard played a critical role in the Libya mission, Gen. Carter Ham, AFRICOM commander.


Eight National Guard State Partnership Program partnerships are in AFRICOM.


Almost half AFRICOM's military-to-military exchanges involve the National Guard.

http://www.army.mil/article/87055/Ham__Guard_essential_to_Africa_partnerships/

 

Will General Ham be forced to resign and forced into retirement soon?? Some at FreeRepublic speculate he will. Here is some info on his bio:

Here is a bit from Gen Ham’s bio - Note he took command in Mar 2011, it should be a 3 year tour. He has 36 years in the Army. We’ll need to look out for an announcement of his retirement.

 

Carter F. Ham (born February 16, 1952) is a United States Army general, who serves as the second and current Commander, U.S. Africa Command. In that position, he has been in command of the initial 2011 military intervention in Libya.

 

Ham previously served as Commanding General, U.S. Army Europe and Seventh Army from August 28, 2008 to March 8, 2011. Prior to that, he served as Director for Operations (J-3) at the Joint Staff from August 2007 to August 2008 and the Commanding General, U.S. 1st Infantry Division from August 2006 to August 2007. He assumed his current assignment with the Africa Command on March 8, 2011.

 

However, as one article reveals posted by freeper freeeagle:

General Carter Ham is the guy who was the figure head for the fake ‘queers are fine’ survey that was used as ammo to get rid of DADT. Here are some of his nuggets of wisdom on the queering of the armed forces:

 

Gen. Carter Ham, commander of U.S. forces in Libya, told The Wall Street Journal he would “be astonished if this is a disruptive change.”


“I think it will be pretty unremarkable across the military, and I think that is the way it should be,” said Ham, who helped lead a study of the military’s attitudes toward a change in the law.

Read more: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/09/20/Dont-ask-dont-tell-policy-is-history/UPI-49481316502000/#ixzz2AT8Udjt5

 

It is therefore hard to have a lot of sympathy for him as he was the willing collaborator of the Mahdi's regime and was rewarded with four shiny stars. Finally the Mahdi's boys manged to cross a line even this opportunist couldn't swallow and he found out just how expendable he was.

 

A freeper named TigerClaw reveals much more here:


I heard a story today from someone inside the military that I trust entirely. The story was in reference to General Ham that Panetta referenced in the quote below.

 

quote:
“(The) basic principle is that you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on; without having some real-time information about what’s taking place,” Panetta told Pentagon reporters. “And as a result of not having that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that area, Gen. Ham, Gen. Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation.”

 

The information I heard today was that General Ham as head of Africom received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place. General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready.

General Ham then received the order to stand down. His response was to screw it, he was going to help anyhow. Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command.

 

The story continues that now General Rodiguez would take General Ham’s place as the head of Africon.

 

I found this story [on Stripess.com] when I got home after hearing this story.

 

quote:
President Barack Obama will nominate Army Gen. David Rodriguez to succeed Gen. Carter Ham as commander of U.S. Africa Command and Marine Lt. Gen. John Paxton to succeed Gen. Joseph Dunford as assistant commandant of the Marine Corps, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced.

 

As I was typing this I heard John Bolton on Greta say that there are conflicting reports of General Ham’s comments on this tragedy and why a rapid response unit was not deployed. Bolton says someone needs to find out what Ham was saying on 9/11/12.

 

 

Former Ambassador Bolton was on Greta last night. He said a Congressional fact finding group was told by Ham that “No one asked him to” intervene but he was prepared to do so.[According to reports, this comment was stated by former ambassador Bolton on Greta last night& General Ham supposedly said that to a congressional investigator.]

 

That contradicts SofD Panetta’s comments yesterday that Ham was in on the decision!

“(The) basic principle is that you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on; without having some real-time information about what’s taking place,” Panetta told Pentagon reporters. “And as a result of not having that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that area, Gen. Ham, Gen. Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation.”

 

Panetta was referring to Gen. Carter Ham, the head of U.S. Africa Command, and Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

 

http://www.benningtonbanner.com/nationworldnews/ci_21857756/panetta-u-s-lacked-early-info-benghazi-attack

 

LBN:

Conclusion-

So the bottom line is that Panetta and Gen Dempsey told Gen Ham to stand down or did not request his unit intervene during the attack...therefore Panetta&Gen Dempsey are negligent in providing the proper military backup and Obama, as Commander in Chief, didn't take matters into his own hands and order Panetta, Gen Dempsey and Gen Ham to do whatever was needed to secure the area as he watched in real-time the killing of Americans in Benghazi. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

Exclusive: Dueling Campaign Memos Annotated for Buzzfeed by GOP&DEM Parties

Exclusive: Dueling Campaign Memos Annotated for Buzzfeed by GOP&DEM Parties | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
Republican contests Obama data.Democrat derides "fauxthusiasm" and other "bullshit."...

 

BuzzFeed asked the Republican National Committee to annotate the Obama Campaign memo; and asked a well-informed Democratic operative to annotate the Romney Camapign's memo.
Here they are. Judge for yourself.

 

LBN:
Interesting, but not the best way to get the facts to the people. Buzzfeed leans liberal, but it's good they have both annotated memos posted. People need to do their own research for the truth, but after Benghazigate I don't see how anyone in good conscious could re-elect Obama.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

Klein: Unreleased Documents Show Obama Overruled Clinton to Deny Security to Consulate

Klein: Unreleased Documents Show Obama Overruled Clinton to Deny Security to Consulate | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
Ed Klein stated that the Clinton’s legal team told him that there were documents that showed President Obama denied the requests for additional security at the Benghazi Consulate despite Hillary Clinton’s request for more [...]...

 

Hillary Pulling Out From Under the Bus?Hillary Says Obama Denied Initial Security Requests Prior to The Attack http://sco.lt/5tbYQL

 

So after Hillary threw herself under the bus, she is now revealing, or saying that she did request additional security for Benghazi, but Obama denied it??

 

I wonder if it is true or if this is just another cover-up by Hillary and an attempt to clear her legacy and reputation for a possible political run in 2016??

 

It's hard to believe any of these liberals, but it may be true that the CIA/Patreaus didn't deny help since they did eventually send in a fast response team, even though it was already too late when they arrived. http://patdollard.com/2012/10/breaking-petraeus-issues-statement-throws-obama-under-the-bus/

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

Full Obama interview w/KUSA 9News Colorado 10/26/2012 On Latest Details of Benghazi Attack

Full Obama interview w/KUSA 9News Colorado 10/26/2012 On Latest Details of Benghazi Attack | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
WEB EXTRA: Full Obama interview. 9NEWS.com. 10/26/12.

 

KUSA - President Barack Obama would not directly address questions from 9NEWS on whether Americans under attack in Libya were denied requests for assistance during the September 11th terror attack.

 

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Friday that the military did not send immediate help to the consulate in Benghazi because commanders lacked enough information about the ongoing attack to put troops in harm's way.

President Obama discussed the situation in Libya during a satellite interview Friday afternoon with 9NEWS reporter Kyle Clark, who also asked if it's fair for Americans to be told to wait until after the election to learn what truly happened in Libya.

"The election has nothing to do with four brave Americans getting killed and us wanting to find out exactly what happened," President Obama said. "Nobody wants to find out more what happened than I do."

 

President Obama was directly asked twice whether pleas for help on the ground in Libya were denied during the attack. Both times, he repeated his standard call for a thorough investigation.

 

The President was also asked about the loss of tens of millions of taxpayer dollars in the failure of Abound Solar, a Fort Collins company connected to one of the President's billionaire fundraisers.

 

"These loans that are given out by the Department of Energy for clean energy have created jobs all across the country," President Obama said. "Some of them have failed but the vast majority of them are pushing us forward into a clean energy direction."

"These are decisions, by the way, that are made by the Department of Energy, they have nothing to do with politics," President Obama said.

 

President Obama was asked, in light of his calls for increased civility in politics, why he recently called Governor Mitt Romney a "bullsh-----" in an interview appearing in Rolling Stone magazine.

 

"This was a conversation after an interview in a casual conversation with a reporter," President Obama said. "A major issue in any election is can you count on the person that you're putting into the Oval Office?"

 

 

Excerpts of the full interview appear below:

KYLE CLARK: Were the Americans under attack at the consulate in Benghazi Libya denied requests for help during that attack? And is it fair to tell Americans that what happened is under investigation and we'll all find out after the election?

 

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, the election has nothing to do with four brave Americans getting killed and us wanting to find out exactly what happened. These are folks who served under me who I had sent to some very dangerous places. Nobody wants to find out more what happened than I do. But we want to make sure we get it right, particularly because I have made a commitment to the families impacted as well as to the American people, we're going to bring those folks to justice. So, we're going to gather all the facts, find out exactly what happened, and make sure that it doesn't happen again but we're also going to make sure that we bring to justice those who carried out these attacks.

KYLE CLARK: Were they denied requests for help during the attack?

 

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, we are finding out exactly what happened. I can tell you, as I've said over the last couple of months since this happened, the minute I found out what was happening, I gave three very clear directives. Number one, make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to. Number two, we're going to investigate exactly what happened so that it doesn't happen again. Number three, find out who did this so we can bring them to justice. And I guarantee you that everyone in the state department, our military, the CIA, you name it, had number one priority making sure that people were safe. These were our folks and we're going to find out exactly what happened, but what we're also going to do it make sure that we are identifying those who carried out these terrible attacks.

 

LBN:

Pathetic Obama used the same deflection and spin to avoid answering the question directly as to whether the security requests were denied. He also sad it has nothing to do with the election, while this might be true as far as his campaign goes, it has everything to do with trust in the Commander in Chief and those he appointed to represent,serve &protect the American people and the country. 

 

Obama and his administration have failed to do each of these things and it is utmost dereliction of duty, worse than Watergate, worse than Fast&Furious and worse than the Iran Contra scandal. At least Watergate resigned and nobody was killed and Oliver North took blame for the Iran Contra scandal, but President Reagan also stepped up and took responsilbity and still earned&gained respect of the American people because of his leadership and ability to be honest with the American people. 

 

However, under the Obama administration we have heard nothing but lies, coverups, misleading accusations blaming an unknown video and now denial that the CIA or State Department nor the White House knew about requests for backup security and call the claims inaccurate. 

 

After weeks of lies, over a month of lies&misleading the public, this administration has lost all credibility and if nothing else, this should be the straw that broke the camels back! There is no way anyone should support this administration for the lies and deception they have presented for almost a month. It took them up to two weeks to finally admit it was a terror attack, despite knowing within hours in real time they were under attack. It wasn't until today that we learned that the SEALs were under attack for several hours until they finally lost their battle when they were killed by an IED.

 

The father of Tyrone Woods, one of the former SEALs who was killed, says as a retired lawyer he believes those of authority in the White House are complicit of murder, even though it does not fit the legal definition of murder, as in premeditated. It wasn't until about 4AM that any support came and by then Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were also killed, but thanks to these heroes they saved at least 30 people from the consulate and kept them from harm until the support came to take them to the airport. Tyrone Woods&Glen Doherty are American heroes, who sacrficed their lives after 7 hours passed from the original attack on the consulate.

 

There is real-time video and audio available that proves the events that happened and confirms the WH&State Dept knew about what was happening since 9:40pm and they were not killed until almost seven hours later! It's outrageous and almost unbelievable that there is such a cover-up and so much denial going on and someone in LA was arrested over a film that had nothing to do with the attack! The denial of additional security prior to the attacks, the months of previous attacks and then up to two weeks after the attack they continued to deny it was a terrorist attack proves total dereliction of duty! The Obama administration from Hillary Clinton, Leon Panetta and possibly General Patreaus need to be held accountable for denying the proper security and the requested backup during the attack!!

 

I am so outraged by all this...I can't imagine how the families of those killed feel. We the people MUST demand Obama suspend his campaign&each of them be charged with dereliction of duty, lying to the American people and the families of those killed and for the murder of Tyrone Woods, Glen Doherty, Christopher Stevens and Sean Smith. These were lives lost too early for no reason other than complete dereliction of duty and the failure to perform the job of the President, to protect&defend the American people!!

 

 

Related:

The Admin Who Denied God Three Times,Denied Military Support Three Times to Americans Under Attack in Libya http://sco.lt/8VlBWj

 

Obama rebuts claims he’s lying about attack on US Consulate in Libya http://shar.es/clMw4   audio of Obama on Michael Smerconish show...Obama:"I've always been straight with the American people."

AC-130U Gunship was On-Scene in Benghazi, Obama Admin Refused to Let It Fire

http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/10/26/ac-130u-gunship-was-on-scene-in-benghazi-obama-admin-refused-to-let-it-fire/?singlepage=true

 

Update>>>Recommended Reading:

"Benghazi: Obama's Actions Amount To A Shameful Dereliction Of Duty"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"By the evening of that next day, Commander-in-Chief Barack Obama was jetting off to a campaign fundraiser in Las Vegas, followed by parties with Jay-Z and Beyonce. Chris Stevens was already out of sight, out of mind. Except that Commander Obama could not wash off the stench of dereliction of duty, duty to far more worthy American warriors and servicemen, dereliction in failing to authorize worthy security for those who were sent in harms way under his leadership, and to order a timely rescue when he could. !!! For such failure, any commander serving under the commander-in-chief should be court martialed. But the President expects you to give him four more years of such “leadership.”!!! "

"This spectacle of the President lying about his own lies to a national debate audience is unprecedented in American politics. It shows an absurdly haughty attitude, and an arrogant disrespect for the intelligence and awareness of the American people."

http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012/10/25/benghazi-obamas-actions-amount-to-a-shameful-dereliction-of-duty/

 

 

 

LittlebytesNews Reports,Links,Sources:

 

Impeach&Imprison For Murder Obama,Hillary&Panetta:Report Contradicts Panetta's Claim of 'No Real-Time Intel'&Denied Three Requests for Backup During Attack!!

http://sco.lt/4hMtoP

Glen Doherty&Tyrone Woods were not killed until 6 hours from the original attack on the consulate!!

 

 

Video/Audio:Father Of Navy SEAL Killed In Benghazi Says Obama Admin Pushing A "Pack Of Lies" http://sco.lt/5j5qVt

 

 

A Message To Obama From Rand Paul:Obama, Where the H-- Were the Marines? | http://sco.lt/5P0j3p

 

CBS Busts Obama--and Itself--in Benghazi Cover-Up:Obama admits premeditated attack targeted Americans  http://sco.lt/4kqU9h

 

HILLARY GIGGLES AT REPORTERS – Still Not Sure What to Call the Terrorist Attack (Video)  http://sco.lt/5vb1Np

 

 

More:
State Department emails from day of Libya attack show Al Qaeda-tied group on radar&WH Notified! |http://sco.lt/8GyiiP

 

U.S. Officials Knew Within 24 hrs Libya Attacks Were Work of Al Qaeda Affiliates http://sco.lt/6X3h6v

 

Obama's History of Terrorism Cover-ups:Benghazi in Little Rock,Then Ft Hood Massacre&Now Libya |  http://sco.lt/91NLSz

 

Demand the WH & Media Cover This and Release the Audio and Truth to the American People!

 

http://www.cbscorporation.com/contact.php

http://www.cbs.com/info/user_services/fb_global_form.php

http://abc.go.com/site/contact-us

http://www.cnn.com/feedback/

http://www.nbc.com/contact/general/

http://help.npr.org/npr/includes/customer/npr/custforms/contactus.aspx

 

 

PETITION: Barack HUSSEIN Obama must be held responsible for the MURDERS and cover-up at Benghazi

http://www.causes.com/actions/1696525?recruiter_id=75753715&utm_campaign=invite&utm_medium=wall&utm_source=fb#

 

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

Romney says Obama made US economy worse; president looks ahead ...while moving our country backwards!

Romney says Obama made US economy worse; president looks ahead ...while moving our country backwards! | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
Telegraph.co.ukRomney says Obama made US economy worse; president looks ahead to ...Washington Post(Charles Dharapak/ Associated Press ) - Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

Sen. Harry Reid doing OK after car accident

Sen. Harry Reid doing OK after car accident | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
ABC NewsSen. Harry Reid doing OK after car accidentUSA TODAYSenate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., talks to reporters on Capitol Hill last month. (Photo: J. Scott Applewhite, AP). Story Highlights.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

CO: Early voting shows GOP in lead

CO: Early voting shows GOP in lead | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
By Gayle S.Putrich | Colorado Watchdog DENVER — Election Day is still more than a week away according to the calenda (CO: Early voting shows GOP in lead - http://t.co/PFJX3iTi...)...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

Video/Audio:Father Of Navy SEAL Killed In Benghazi Says Obama Admin Pushing A "Pack Of Lies"

Obama in a radio interview today is still claiming he wasn't personally aware of the requests for security before the Benghazi attacks,yet Carney claimed they're vigilant&POTUS brought up to speed,but these protests were a reaction to a video&we don't know otherwise that Benghazi was pre-planned. Per Fox,Gen Patreaus of the CIA may also be complicit in denying the backup security.


ALL of these morons must go&be tried with treason&the murder/deaths of these Americans!  Impeach&Imprison Obama,Hillary&Panetta:SEALs Denied Backup Three Times During the Attack! http://sco.lt/4hMtoP

 

Former Generals/Active Duty say requests for help would have gone through CIA Channels to the WH, from Langley to the DOD&the WH Situtation Room, per Fox News.

 

Yesterday the father of Tyrone Woods called into the Lars Larson show as well expressing his disgust&thoughts on meeting with Hillary&Obama at the memorial receiving the body of his son from Libya. Listen to audio: http://soundcloud.com/thelarslarsonshow/charles-woods-father-of-former

 

Sadly, Tyrone Woods was only expected to be in Libya for a few more days before the attack happened and he responded to the calls for help, as his father described. "In six more days, he would have been home."

When asked by the host what we can do to honor his son, Mr. Woods replied:

We need to make sure that this does not happen again. Ty isn't the only military person that's willing to lay down his life for his buddies and for the other people that he works with. Every person in the military is willing to do that, and it would just be a matter of just, I don't know, for people to continue to be courageous.  He's gone, he's dead, one of these days I feel I'll see my son in Heaven.  And I'm not mad at anyone, so it's not a matter of revenge or anything like that...but the truth needs to be out so something like this doesn't happen again, so that people like Ty who are out there - principled men and women - that are willing to sacrifice their lives, that they won't be abandoned by their Commander in Chief.  

The show ended with a chilling statement from Ty's father:

We do need to find out who it was that gave the order not to protect our military people there, and whoever it is needs to have the guts to stand up and say, "I was the one that gave the order not to send troops to protect," because they could have, the military would have wanted to.  Someone had to have said don't rescue them.

Tyrone Woods was killed along with US Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens, fellow Navy SEAL Glen Doherty and State Department Information Analyst Sean Smith.

In the words of Mr. Woods, "I hope that the public will not forget this."

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/25/Former-SEAL-s-Dad-I-hope-that-the-public-will-not-forget-this

 

 

more...
Genae Valentine's curator insight, August 13, 5:39 AM

The website can be used a news outlet as well.

Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

Obama Helped the Boycott of Israel-His Actions Speak Louder Than His Empty Words

Obama Helped the Boycott of Israel-His Actions Speak Louder Than His Empty Words | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
Obama's actions have encouraged and emboldened the boycotters in several ways.

 

While many Democrats and Republicans are upset that President Obama snubbed Prime Minister Netanyahu during his visit to the US, President Obama has established a pattern which has hurt far more than feelings.

 

The US Import-Export Act Amendment of 1977 created the Office of Antiboycott Compliance which enforces laws that prohibit individuals from engaging in foreign government sanctioned boycotts to further the foreign policy of those foreign governments. It is also the key topic of my book Boycotting Peace, which details how the Arab boycott of Israel is being pushed, illegally in the United States, with the specific purpose of seeking Israel’s economic destruction and helping Arab governments prevent Middle-East peace. After all, boycotts divide people and therefore prevent people from getting together and creating peace.

 

Despite being signed into law by President Carter who has since been revealed as hating Israel, no US President has furthered the Arab boycott until now. Although President Obama has not actively endorsed the Arab boycott of Israel, his actions have encouraged and emboldened the boycotters in several ways.

 

First, in 2008, then Candidate Obama spoke about visiting Israel in his first term, but failed to do so despite visiting neighboring Egypt. A visit to Israel, even for just a few hours, would have made a statement that visiting Israel is important and that it is a safe country. Instead, by not going he made the de facto statement that not going to Israel is acceptable or even justified.

 

It is not a coincidence that the Israel boycotters do not want people visiting Israel.

 

In January of 2009, President Obama launched a trial balloon, via then peace envoy Senator George Mitchell, threatening to withhold loan guarantees and economic aid to Israel. This would have violated the terms of the Camp David Accords. As demonstrated by the recent military maneuvers by Egypt in the Sinai Desert which also violate the Camp David peace treaty, Israel would unilaterally lose as the world remained silent.

 

It is not a coincidence that Israel boycotters seek an end to financial aid to Israel.

 

Then there was the May 19, 2011 speech where President Obama proposed a Middle East peace plan where Israel would retreat to the 1967 armistice lines, a non-border which Israeli Foreign Minister Abba Eban called the “Auschwitz borders” because it would guarantee Israel’s destruction. It’s the same plan proposed in 2002 by Saudi Arabia to void the 1994 Oslo Accords, which the Palestinian Arabss will never fully implement because it requires them to accept the existence of Israel. One glance at the PA logo shows the P.A. see all of Israel as part of their "Palestine", so the Arab world sees their signing of the Oslo Accords as a mistake and the Saudi plan reiterated by President Obama would nullify Oslo.

 

It is not a coincidence that Israel boycotters seek a Palestinian state with borders that facilitate the eradication of Israel.

 

Then there was the famous incident on July 26, 2012 where White House Press Secretary Jay Carney could not name the capital of Israel. This cannot just be blamed on Obama as none of his predecessors have recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel either, but the dodging of the question empowers Israel boycotters by questioning Israel’s claim to its eternal capital city, not to mention Israel’s sovereign right to name its own capital city.

 

Most recently, President Obama snubbed Prime Minister Netanyahu by refusing to meet, essentially saying Obama felt it was more important to be on the David Letterman Show than to sit down with a foreign leader to discuss preventing Israel from ending up in a war with Iran. In doing so, President Obama sent a message to Israel boycotters that snubbing Israel is acceptable.

 

President Obama’s passive approach to Israel has furthered the Arab boycott. While his emboldening does not rise to a violation of US Antiboycott laws, Israel’s detractors see him as their cheerleader, so much so that an amended statement in the Democrat National Convention stating Jerusalem is the capital of Israel was heavily booed, yet said to have passed out of political expediency.

 

While Israel is facing nuclear annihilation threat from Iran, it cannot afford to have an American President who emboldens Israel’s enemies.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by littlebytesnews
Scoop.it!

NY Jews did not Vote Democrat for Truman in 1948 - Let's hope they wise up in this election too!

NY Jews did not Vote Democrat for Truman in 1948 - Let's hope they wise up in this election too! | Littlebytesnews Current Events | Scoop.it
New research shows that when an incumbent Democratic president is perceived as unfriendly to Israel, there can be a shift in the traditional Democratic Jewish vote. Truman lost NY State for his arms embargo on Israel.

 


Truman's recognition of Israel was appreciated by the Jewish community, but the arms embargo he slapped on the Jewish State was deeply resented. Officially, the embargo applied to both the Arabs and the Israelis--an "even-handed" way of keeping the U.S. from being dragged into the Mideast war. But in practice, the Arabs had plentiful sources of weapons, while the Israelis had to beg, borrow, and steal the guns they needed to fend off the invading Arab armies.


The Arab war against Israel and the damaging impact of the embargo were major issues on the minds of New York Jewish voters in the summer and fall of 1948. Editorials in the New York Post called Truman's Israel policy "hypocritical and spineless" and denounced the embargo as "friendship--Truman-style." The afternoon daily PM it featured news about the Arab-Israeli war on its front page for thirty-two consecutive days at one point.


And Henry Wallace worked hard to turn it into a campaign issue. Not only did the platform of Wallace's Progressive Party call for "lifting the discriminatory arms embargo," but Wallace himself repeatedly brought it up in his campaign speeches. At one rally, he accused Truman of “playing politics with the lives of the people of Israel.” At another, he charged that "Jewish blood lies on the hands of Mr. Truman tonight."


Soon there was open talk about Jewish defections to Wallace in New York. "New York Democrats hope that an American loan to the new state of Israel...will be granted in the next two months," the New York Times reported on September 7. "They believe this would win back into the Democratic column many voters who were estranged by the State Department's coolness to implementing the original United Nations partition decision."


According to the Times, Democratic strategists were focusing not on the threat from Dewey, but on the threat from Wallace and the need "to keep in the Democratic column two groups to whom the Wallace party has been making an open appeal, the Negro and Jewish voters."

 

White House aides noted with alarm that anti-Truman sentiment in the Jewish community had reached such heights that “The Democratic [congressmen] in New York are being booed and heckled...when they appear [before Jewish audiences] to make speeches.”


The New York Star called President Truman's last-minute pre-election statements praising Israel "a direct bid for a sizeable bloc of lukewarm New York City Democrats and independents. Many of the[m]...may even vote for Henry Wallace because of their dissatisfaction with Truman's record, particularly on Palestine."


Not every Jewish vote for Wallace was motivated by anger at Truman over Israel. Some of Wallace's Jewish support undoubtedly came from ideological leftwing partisans who backed him because of other issues. But radical-left sentiment was rapidly diminishing the American Jewish community by the late 1940s. Most Wallace voters were former FDR supporters who would have voted for Truman if Wallace had not been in the race.


These were Jewish voters who were furious that as Israel was fighting for its very existence, Truman refused to supply even a single bullet. As longtime Democrats and New Deal supporters, many could not bring themselves to vote for the Republican, Dewey--but by taking so many traditional Democratic votes away from Truman, they, in effect, gave the state to Dewey.


A Jewish vote for Wallace was a protest vote. They knew he had no chance of winning; they didn't care. They were sending Truman a message. It cost him New York--and nearly cost him the election.
Today, as in the 1940s, polls indicate that the majority of American Jews lean to the left on most domestic issues. But the substantial Jewish vote for Wallace in 1948, like the desertion of President Jimmy Carter by 60% of Jewish voters in 1980, indicates that when an incumbent Democratic president is perceived as unfriendly to Israel, there is a possibility of a significant shift in the Jewish vote. Such a shift was the deciding factor in New York in the 1948 presidential race.


Whether a comparable shift will affect the outcome in states such as Florida and Ohio this year remains to be seen.

more...
No comment yet.