Learning, Teaching & Leading Today
58
Beyond Time ~ Space ~ Place
Follow
Scooped by Dennis Richards onto Learning, Teaching & Leading Today
Scoop.it!

2012 : What is your favorite deep, elegant, or beautiful explanation?

2012 : What is your favorite deep, elegant, or beautiful explanation? | Learning, Teaching & Leading Today | Scoop.it
"2012 : What is your favorite deep, elegant, or beautiful explanation? Scientists' greatest pleasure comes from theories that derive the solution to some deep puzzle from a small set of simple principles in a surprising way. These explanations are called "beautiful" or "elegant". Historical examples are Kepler's explanation of complex planetary motions as simple ellipses, Bohr's explanation of the periodic table of the elements in terms of electron shells, and Watson and Crick's double helix. Einstein famously said that he did not need experimental confirmation of his general theory of relativity because it "was so beautiful it had to be true." WHAT IS YOUR FAVORITE DEEP, ELEGANT, OR BEAUTIFUL EXPLANATION? Since this question is about explanation, answers may embrace scientific thinking in the broadest sense: as the most reliable way of gaining knowledge about anything, including other fields of inquiry such as philosophy, mathematics, economics, history, political theory, literary theory, or the human spirit. The only requirement is that some simple and non-obvious idea explain some diverse and complicated set of phenomena. [Thanks to Steven Pinker for suggesting this year's Edge Question and to Stewart Brand, Kevin Kelly, and George Dyson for their ongoing advice and support.]"
No comment yet.
Dennis Richards is also curating
Poetry: Searching for Fire in the Trees Keystone XL: Affairs of State China: What kind of dragon? Five Minutes to Midnight Photography: View from a Window Government for the People
Discover Topics Dennis Richards is following
The 21st Century Geography Education Content Curation World Science News iPads in Education Digital Delights for Learners
and 136 others
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Dennis Richards
Scoop.it!

Fact-Checking GOP convention Speakers

Fact-Checking GOP convention Speakers | Learning, Teaching & Leading Today | Scoop.it

"We fact-checked several claims by Romney and the other speakers.

Newt Gingrich said, 'It's striking how President (Jimmy) Carter and President Obama both took our nation down a path that in four years weakened America's confidence in itself and our hope for a better future.'

 

Callista Gingrich continued, 'Both weakened the respect for America abroad.'

 

We compared favorability ratings of the United States from the last year of George W. Bush’s presidency to the most recent figure under Obama. The U.S. on average has higher favorability ratings now, according to surveys. However, America’s favorability has eroded somewhat since Obama’s first year in office, though it’s still above the final levels of the Bush administration. We rated Callista Gingrich’s statement Mostly False."

No comment yet.
Scooped by Dennis Richards
Scoop.it!

Fact-Checkers Howl, but Both Sides Cling to False Ads

Fact-Checkers Howl, but Both Sides Cling to False Ads | Learning, Teaching & Leading Today | Scoop.it

"In his very first television advertisement last year, Mitt Romney highlighted the nation’s dire unemployment crisis, its record number of home foreclosures and the rising national debt, and showed video of President Obama delivering this arresting remark: 'If we keep talking about the economy, we’re going to lose.'

 

There was one problem: the quotation was taken so wildly out of context that it turned Mr. Obama’s actual meaning upside-down. The truncated clip came from a speech Mr. Obama gave in 2008 talking about his opponent, Senator John McCain of Arizona. The full quotation? “Senator McCain’s campaign actually said, and I quote, ‘If we keep talking about the economy, we’re going to lose.’ ”

 

PolitiFact.com, the Pulitzer Prize-winning fact-checking Web site, rated the advertisement “Pants on Fire,” its most deceptive rating possible, but it achieved what the Romney campaign had hoped: people started talking about the sluggish economy and how Mr. Obama’s campaign promises had fallen short. And it set the tone for the campaign that followed, which has often seemed dismissive of fact-checkers.

 

“We’re not going let our campaign be dictated by fact-checkers,” Neil Newhouse, the Romney campaign’s pollster, said this week during a breakfast discussion at the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Fla., that was sponsored by ABC News and Yahoo News. He said that fact-checkers brought their own sets of thoughts and beliefs to their work, and that the campaign stands behind its ads."

No comment yet.