"IN-novation"
Follow
Find tag "learning"
794 views | +2 today
"IN-novation"
Just "IN" or has it been around and we've just given it a name?
Curated by Robin Martin
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Robin Martin from Initiate! What is learning design?
Scoop.it!

What Learning will Look Like in the Future ~ Adaptative Tools and Tech #Infographic

What Learning will Look Like in the Future ~ Adaptative Tools and Tech #Infographic | "IN-novation" | Scoop.it

Knowledge Works has taken a look into the future of education and learning ecosystem and prepared for you this awesome graphic via Mindshift. 


Via Deb Nystrom, REVELN, Robin Martin, Peter Bryant
more...
Raquel Oliveira's curator insight, July 31, 2013 10:23 PM

amo a ideia de infografico para traduzir o colorido da aprendizagem futura...

Maria Persson's comment, August 4, 2013 4:03 PM
Muito bom!
Fields Jackson, Jr's comment, August 24, 2013 6:24 PM
Very nice
Rescooped by Robin Martin from Change Management Resources
Scoop.it!

Classic to New: Learning Agility is Change Mastery

Classic to New:  Learning Agility is Change Mastery | "IN-novation" | Scoop.it
“Learning Agility, which has four dimensions—Mental Agility, People Agility, Results Agility and Change Agility—is a key to unlocking our change proficiency.

Via Deb Nystrom, REVELN
more...
Deb Nystrom, REVELN's curator insight, December 27, 2012 4:30 PM

In reading through the change research of a colleague, this approach resonates, especially cultivating the ability to be a combination of a data nerd (listener), synthesizer, developer of self & others and master communicator.  These relate well to change proficiencies touted by this author.  ~  D

Paul Thoresen's curator insight, December 30, 2012 3:59 PM
"Classic to New: Learning Agility is Change Mastery"
Deb Nystrom, REVELN's comment, January 25, 2013 5:43 PM
@Paul, thanks for the share.
Rescooped by Robin Martin from Innovation & Institutions, Will it Blend?
Scoop.it!

Open Innovation & Organizational Boundaries, in Institutions, Will it Blend? — HBS Working Knowledge

Open Innovation & Organizational Boundaries, in Institutions, Will it Blend? — HBS Working Knowledge | "IN-novation" | Scoop.it
Open innovation, enabled by low-cost communication and the decreased costs of memory and computation, has transformed markets and social relations.

 

As the authors illustrate, it will be challenging to manage contrasting modes of innovation, and that is exactly what is needed in organizations that expect to innovate and are systemically, culturally, not set up to help this happen. 

 

 

Excerpts:

Open innovation, in contrast to firm-centered innovation, is radically decentralized, peer based, and includes intrinsic and pro-social motives.

 

The authors of this working paper use in-depth examples from Apple, NASA, and Lego to argue that open innovation will at least complement, if not increasingly substitute for, more traditional innovation modes.

 

This is within the contexts of increasing modularity and decreased communication costs.   (DN:  Just look at digital communication today.  Think ahead 4 months to 1 year of what's next.)

 

Emerging theories must be informed by these contrasting innovation modes and the implications for governance, incentives, intellectual property, managerial choice, professional and organizational identity, and organizational cultures.

 

Key concepts include:

 

Leaders and senior teams can take advantage of contrasting innovation modes, paradoxical organizational requirements, and associated dynamic boundaries.

.

Leaders need to execute strategic choices with the systems, structures, incentives, cultures, and boundaries tailored to open and firm-based innovation modes. . Multiple types of boundaries will increasingly be employed to manage innovation, from traditional to complex intra firm boundaries (such as ambidextrous designs), to webs of interdependence with partners and potentially anonymous communities. . Senior teams must build their capabilities to deal with contradictions as well as their organization's ability to embrance contradictions.  

 

A link to the full working paper, downloadable by Assistant Professor, Karim R. Lakhani & colleague is here.

 

Source:  Karim R. Lakhani is an assistant professor in the Technology and Operations Management unit at Harvard Business School.  

 

This link was also recommended by Jeffrey DeGraff at the University of Michigan Ross School of Business, and I also think it's right on, even if the language is quite academic.  It will make you think about your institutional systems, and refresh your vocabulary.    ~  Deb


Via Deb Nystrom, REVELN
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Robin Martin from Agile Learning
Scoop.it!

The Shifts We Will Barely Feel - Adaptation via Chris Brogan

The Shifts We Will Barely Feel - Adaptation via Chris Brogan | "IN-novation" | Scoop.it

PEOPLE WON’T EVER DO THAT:  The enemy of understanding change and shifts is the mindset that says “no one will give up owning their music.”

More examples from top blogger Chris Brogan:

It’s the mindset that says, “Stay at someone’s house? Too creepy. Hotels only.”

 

The moment you shift your thoughts into “people won’t” territory, you’ll miss what can happen, what might happen, and what will happen.

People won’t want dinners that take 3 minutes to heat up. 

 

  

 

People won’t want food handed to them through windows. 

 

  

 

People won’t want to read blogs from unknowns when they can follow the mainstream. 

 

  

 

People won’t type 140 character messages.

 

 


Via Deb Nystrom, REVELN
more...
Deb Nystrom, REVELN's curator insight, July 24, 2013 10:46 AM

Did  you ever hear about "salad in a bag?"  Now, in the US, it is ubiquitous, along with veggies in a bag, milk in boxes, refried beans in a bag.  ~  D

Rescooped by Robin Martin from Agile Learning
Scoop.it!

WXW Exchange and Open Space, Room for Introverts & Extroverts

WXW Exchange and Open Space, Room for Introverts & Extroverts | "IN-novation" | Scoop.it

"If you count introversion as one of your prize attributes, here's my three cents about introversion & extroversion relevant to an Open Space event I'm facilitating at the Women's Exchange of Washtenaw this September."

  

First of all, extroversion & introversion are oversimplified terms, especially through the lens of work of Carl Jung.  Based on Jung, there are levels of understanding including one version, nicely described using the Myers Briggs Type Indicator,  the MBTI®, a tool to increase access to Jung's work, via Five Levels of Understanding:

  

The Five Levels of Understanding™ was created by Katharine Myers, to share her experience of type as a beckoning path of ever deepening knowledge of human behavior and life itself. This is the depth that MBTI type brings.

  

As I posted on the Reveln Consulting Facebook page in July:

  

...using extrovert, introvert to describe a person is like using our known solar system to explain the universe. It's a way to begin, but there's a lot more out there:     Using an MBTI approach, those using extroversion gain energy from using it as one of their top two mental functions as a 1st or 2ndary strength. We ALL have a balancing introvert side tied to one of our top two mental functions, based on Jungian theory.    One of those two mental functions is dominant and one is auxilary, a helper mental function of either perception or judgment.      

There's much more here on the nuances of introversion & extroversion via the Personality Pathways website that describes the order of preference using the MBTI.

  

A recent post by blogger and self-identified introvert Maria Ogneva lends itself to a feature of an advantage of Open Space:  choosing when, how and what contribute to a group.  You may chooseto observe, listen in on, or join in full dialog.

  
Read the full post and see all the diagrams & photos here.


Via Deb Nystrom, REVELN
more...
No comment yet.