Healthy Vision 2020
2.3K views | +0 today
Healthy Vision 2020
Bringing into focus a clear and distinct view of the rest of this decade in Texas health care. Offering a sharp perception of what lies ahead and what we must change to keep us all healthy.
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Texas Medical Association from Healthy Floridians
Scoop.it!

Physicians have about a 5-10% chance of being audited by CMS before receiving EHR incentive payments.

CMS conducting pre-payment audits before releasing 2013 EHR Incentive Program bonuses

Via Florida Medical Association
Texas Medical Association's insight:

Many times, government agencies and payers put demands on physicians that disrupt workflow. These demands come on top of the already extensive disruptions and intrusions physicians experience.

 

As physicians decide or are required to move from a paper to an electronic health record, Texas must carefully consider the impact of any new regulatory burdens placed on the physician practice, especially when many of these burdens do nothing to improve care quality.

 

For instance, to achieve the goals of “meaningful use,” the federal government requires that physicians have a system that tracks patients’ height, weight, and blood pressure as part of “structured data.” This is required even if the physician practices a specialty where height and weight play little or no role in the medical care they provide to patients. Do patients really want to be weighed at the ophthalmologist when updating their eyeglass prescription? According to the federal government, if a physician “believes that one or two of these vital signs are relevant to their scope of practice, then they must record all three vital signs in order to meet the measure of this objective and successfully demonstrate meaningful use.” Texas should not repeat the mistakes of the federal government.

 

Texas must recognize that not every medical practice will benefit from an EHR. In fact, it could be disruptive to some and could hurt patient care. Requiring a physician to rely on a system that is counter-intuitive to his or her clinical training could result in adverse outcomes for the patient. Even expert users find that EHRs require more physician time than paper records and can interrupt the patient-physician interaction in the exam room. A sizeable portion of patients are concerned about the security of their electronic medical records. A July 2012 survey found "roughly half of Americans still say that they are concerned that their digitized health data could be lost, damaged, or corrupted."

 

In some cases, EHRs are cost-prohibitive regardless of federal incentives. Not all physicians are eligible for the Medicare or Medicaid EHR incentives. The average EHR purchase cost is about $40,000 per physician, not including productivity dips that hurt practice revenues. Some medical practices operate on such thin profit margins that the capital investment of an EHR could lead to bankruptcy.

more...
Florida Medical Association's curator insight, March 29, 2013 10:57 AM

Be sure to check out FMA's Health Information Technology (HIT) Resource Center for all your HealthIT questions. http://www.flmedical.org/HIT.aspx

Scooped by Texas Medical Association
Scoop.it!

AHRQ wants to study health IT's impact on work flow | Modern Healthcare

AHRQ wants to study health IT's impact on work flow | Modern Healthcare | Healthy Vision 2020 | Scoop.it

AHRQ wants to study health IT's impact on work flow | Modern Healthcare...

 

TMA Says:

Many times, government agencies and payers put demands on physicians that disrupt workflow. These demands come on top of the already extensive disruptions and intrusions physicians experience. As they decide or are required to move from a paper to an electronic health record, Texas must carefully consider the impact of any new regulatory burdens placed on the physician practice, especially when many of these burdens do nothing to improve care quality. For instance, to achieve the goals of “meaningful use,” the federal government requires that physicians have a system that tracks patients’ height, weight, and blood pressure as part of “structured data.” This is required even if the physician practices a specialty where height and weight play little or no role in the medical care they provide to patients. Do patients really want to be weighed at the ophthalmologist when updating their eyeglass prescription? According to the federal government, if a physician “believes that one or two of these vital signs are relevant to their scope of practice, then they must record all three vital signs in order to meet the measure of this objective and successfully demonstrate meaningful use.” Texas should not repeat the mistakes of the federal government.

 

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Texas Medical Association
Scoop.it!

Do doctors have to be typists to get meaningful use incentives?

Do doctors have to be typists to get meaningful use incentives? | Healthy Vision 2020 | Scoop.it

"There's a snag in the proposed meaningful use Stage 2 rule, and it concerns whether or not doctors need to be good at typing. Depending on how the final requirements for Stage 2 play out, they might have to be."

 

Many times, government agencies and payers put demands on physicians that disrupt workflow. These demands come on top of the already extensive disruptions and intrusions physicians experience. As they decide or are required to move from a paper to an electronic health record, Texas must carefully consider the impact of any new regulatory burdens placed on the physician practice, especially when many of these burdens do nothing to improve care quality.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Texas Medical Association
Scoop.it!

EHR a Money-Loser for Most Physicians

Federal meaningful use incentives alone are not adequate to ensure that the vast majority of medical practices don’t lose money on electronic h
Texas Medical Association's insight:

As physicians decide or are required to move from a paper to an electronic health record, Texas must carefully consider the impact of any new regulatory burdens placed on the physician practice, especially when many of these burdens do nothing to improve care quality.

 

Many times, government agencies and payers put demands on physicians that disrupt workflow. These demands come on top of the already extensive disruptions and intrusions physicians experience.

 

For instance, to achieve the goals of “meaningful use,” the federal government requires that physicians have a system that tracks patients’ height, weight, and blood pressure as part of “structured data.” This is required even if the physician practices a specialty where height and weight play little or no role in the medical care they provide to patients. Do patients really want to be weighed at the ophthalmologist when updating their eyeglass prescription? According to the federal government, if a physician “believes that one or two of these vital signs are relevant to their scope of practice, then they must record all three vital signs in order to meet the measure of this objective and successfully demonstrate meaningful use.” Texas should not repeat the mistakes of the federal government.

 

Texas must recognize that not every medical practice will benefit from an EHR. In fact, it could be disruptive to some and could hurt patient care. Requiring a physician to rely on a system that is counter-intuitive to his or her clinical training could result in adverse outcomes for the patient. Even expert users find that EHRs require more physician time than paper records and can interrupt the patient-physician interaction in the exam room. A sizeable portion of patients are concerned about the security of their electronic medical records. A July 2012 survey found "roughly half of Americans still say that they are concerned that their digitized health data could be lost, damaged, or corrupted."

 

In some cases, EHRs are cost-prohibitive regardless of federal incentives. Not all physicians are eligible for the Medicare or Medicaid EHR incentives. The average EHR purchase cost is about $40,000 per physician, not including productivity dips that hurt practice revenues. Some medical practices operate on such thin profit margins that the capital investment of an EHR could lead to bankruptcy.

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Texas Medical Association
Scoop.it!

TMA Wants ICD-10 Canned

TMA Wants ICD-10 Canned | Healthy Vision 2020 | Scoop.it
TMA is glad the federal government postponed adoption of the ICD-10 coding system until 2014 but believes it should completely scrap ICD-10 for a more up to date coding system. If officials don' t do that, then they should delay ICD-10 even longer.
more...
No comment yet.