0 view | +0 today
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Johnny Boysen from american muscle cars!

American Muscle Car Chevrolet Corvette 1957

American Muscle Car Chevrolet Corvette 1957 | health |
Some cool american muscle diecast cars images: American Muscle Car Chevrolet Corvette 1957 Image by digicla I build myself a macrostudio and these are the (American Muscle Car Chevrolet Corvette 1957 - #diecast #collectible

Via elreydelmundo
No comment yet.
Scooped by Johnny Boysen!

Blood Purity: How a Bizarre Obsession Advanced Science - SPIEGEL ONLINE

Blood Purity: How a Bizarre Obsession Advanced Science - SPIEGEL ONLINE | health |
Already years before the Nazis came to power, German scientists were propagating theories about blood purity. Though this obsession led to bizarre and dangerous theories about superiority and personality traits, it also led to medical breakthroughs.
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Johnny Boysen from Electric Cars!

Is the coal industry gaining a sense of its own mortality at the hands of bankers?

Is the coal industry gaining a sense of its own mortality at the hands of bankers? | health |
It's been a bad week for the thermal coal industry.

Via Electric Car
Electric Car's curator insight, June 8, 2013 11:27 PM

It’s been a bad week for the thermal coal industry.


The commodity’s biggest consumer, China, appears serious about curbing its demand, thermal coal mines are losing money; coal generators are closing down, Queensland has had to introduce a captive buying arrangement to protect its state-owned generation assets, WA’s expensive revamp of an ageing and dirty Muja power station is proving to be a disaster, and the head of Australia’s coal industry has had a scripted meltdown, blaming the industry’s woes almost entirely on “environmental extremists”.


Last Wednesday, at the right-leaning Sydney Institute, the CEO of the Australian Coal Association, Dr Nikki Williams, gave an extraordinary speech in which she accused activists of being purely “anti-development”, claimed the coal industry was more sinned against than sinner, and laid the case for “burnable coal”.


It’s a position that is tied in with the assumption that there is no credible alternative to coal-based technology, and a casual dismissal of the need for urgency on climate change action. “I don’t know about you, but the last time I flew to Europe it was pretty apparent that the Arctic was still there,” Williams told the audience.


Pick up a recent report from any mainstream energy analyst – local and international – and it’s pretty clear what’s going on here: thermal coal prices have slumped because demand is falling. This, in turn, is causing coal mines to lose money, and the economic case for massive new investments in new coal mines and infrastructure – largely based on a widely discredited “business as usual” scenario – is disappearing rapidly.


Deutsche Bank analysts said this suggested that taxes and levies directly on coal, and on other pollutants generated by coal burning , will rise substantially.


It, and other analysts, have predicted that China will cease to be an importer of coal within a few years. “Clean energies, as a result, should replace coal at an accelerated pace,” it said.


For the Australian thermal coal industry – which has based tens of billions of dollars in new mines and associated infrastructure on Williams’ tenet of “burnable” carbon – the loss of its biggest customer is, of course, a devastating blow.


But in the realities of the global energy market, theirs is rapidly becoming a marginal view – the actions of China and other countries simply makes those assumptions uneconomic.


Still, Williams rails at the likes of Greenpeace, Get Up and’s founder Bill McKibben, along with activists like Jonathan Moylan, accusing the anti-coal movement of being anti-development; wanting to dramatically cut the use of energy and to keep billions of people in poverty – not to mention reducing population numbers.


It’s all part of an anti-capitalist plot, Williams says, and cites numerous agencies such as the International Energy Agency, the World Bank, and even Australia’s own energy market operator as defending the primacy of coal, and the lack of any credible alternatives.


The IEA observes, with great regret, that coal-fired generation has continued to dominate the world’s electricity generation but, like many activists, says that this must stop if climate change goals are to be reached.


It laments the lack of effort, urgency and progress in the coal industry’s attempts at making carbon capture and storage technology a viable or even an affordable option. But it says there are alternatives – and most of these centre around renewables. And over the long term, the IEA insists, this would be cheaper than business as usual.


Perhaps she should be reminded of the words of the International Monetary Fund’s chief Christine Lagarde, who said without urgent climate action we’d all be “roasted, toasted and fried .” And the AEMO, did not suggest, as Williams claims, that a 100 per cent renewable energy grid in Australia would need like-for-like back-up by coal and gas – otherwise it wouldn’t be 100 per cent renewable, would it?


Of course, the coal industry is not particularly worried about 100 per cent renewables, because its market will be gone long before then.

Williams played the anti-development line to the limit. “Many anti-coal activists are deluding the public about their real agenda,” she said. “For them, development is the problem.


The EU, frustrated at its low carbon price, which is unable to provide the incentive to take coal-fired power stations off-line, is now looking at a revised energy efficiency target that it says would take the equivalent of 1,000 coal-fired powered stations off-line.


It is not the eco-warriors, which Williams seeks to conflate with “terrorists” and “sociopaths”, that are the real danger to the thermal coal industry – it’s a simple matter of science and economics.


Williams may well have been enraged by a recent anti-coal strategy meeting held by NGOs in the heart of the Hunter Valley, and the upcoming visit of McKibben. But the coal industry is in need of leadership and a little dose of reality, rather than a chief who simply screams from the parapet.



The good news is that the leadership and reality check it needs will come from outside.

It’s called the financial markets.

The pricing of risk already means that new fossil fuel generation is substantially more expensive than renewable alternatives. Soon enough, that assessment of risk and reward will extend to the new mining developments. There is no defence, and no economic or financial justification, for business as usual.

In the end it will not be McKibben or Greenpeace who make that call – although they will lobby for it – it will be the bankers.





Rescooped by Johnny Boysen from Peer2Politics!

Occupy Healthcare -Social media do have the potential to revolutionize medicine - Crikey (blog)

Occupy Healthcare -Social media do have the potential to revolutionize medicine - Crikey (blog) | health |

In many areas of service provision the voice of the consumer is the strongest driver for change and innovation. That voice has been suprisingly subdued with regards to Australia’s public health system, however, as Professor Enrico Coiera from UNSW’s Australian Institute of Health Innovationreports, that that could all be about to change……

Via jean lievens
No comment yet.