Gov and law presi...
Follow
Find
57 views | +0 today
Rescooped by Brianna Moore from News You Can Use - NO PINKSLIME
onto Gov and law presidents
Scoop.it!

obama releasing 10s thousands of illegal immigrants, blaming budget cuts, called politically motivated -- and dangerous. ...

obama releasing 10s thousands of illegal immigrants, blaming budget cuts, called politically motivated -- and dangerous. ... | Gov and law presidents | Scoop.it
The Department of Homeland Security has started releasing hundreds of illegal immigrants held in local jails in anticipation of automatic budget cuts, in a move one Arizona sheriff called politically motivated -- and dangerous. ...

Via #BBBundyBlog #NOMORELIES Tom Woods #Activist Award #Scoopiteer >20,000 Sources >250K Connections http://goo.gl/ruHO3Q
Brianna Moore's insight:

I am indifferent about this situation that they are placed with. Clearly, they don't have enough money to keep all of the illegal immigrant criminals in jail in Arizona. But than you think about it, and they are putting more American lives in danger, just to help there budget cuts. Lives are more important than budget cuts in my opinion. I don't know how they would do this, but I feel like the savings they are trying to accomplish could be acheived in a much more rational and safe way.  One statement really stood out to me. "Clearly, serious criminals are being released to the streets of our local  communities by this mass budget pardon. These are illegals that even President  Obama wants to deport. This is insane that public safety is sacrificed when it  should be the budget priority that's safeguarded," he said.

Read more:  http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/26/dhs-to-release-thousands-illegal-immigrants-blaming-budget-cuts/#ixzz2M8fpK0uo

more...
Brandon Cole's curator insight, February 28, 2013 9:37 AM

The Department of Homeland Security has started releasing hundreds of illegal immigrants held in local jails. This is all caused due to an anticipation of automatic budget cuts. It is being referred to as politically motivated and dangerous. 

Samantha Iversen's comment, March 2, 2013 7:31 PM
This is something that never really occurred to me. I knew that the United States has a problem with illegal immigration, I just never thought about what happened to them when they are caught. I do not feel like simply releasing them is the right answer, but in the interest of time, Obama had to make a decision.
Gavin Baker's comment, March 7, 2013 9:43 AM
I think he made a smart choice in releasing them, with all the budget cuts on the way I don't think he had much of a choice.
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Brianna Moore
Scoop.it!

Washington state officials to eye rules to ban pot at bars - Fox News

Washington state officials to eye rules to ban pot at bars - Fox News | Gov and law presidents | Scoop.it
New York Daily News
Washington state officials to eye rules to ban pot at bars
Fox News
SEATTLE – Washington state officials said Wednesday it's not OK for bars to allow marijuana use, and they plan to take steps to address that.
Brianna Moore's insight:

Last fall Pot was legalized, all though it is forbidened to be displayed or used in public. Although, now it is starting to be used in bars. This could cause a huge increase in fines and violations for that bar. Many bars have tried to get around the rule of not smoking pot by creating  a "smoke room" for people in the back of bars. Michael Schaef's- owner of a marijuana bar, said "What the board has to understand is that people have always been mixing alcohol  and cannabis," Schaef said. "If they don't allow this, what we are doing is forcing people to break the law by sneaking to some dark area to do it." I agree with this statement, but either way, you will always have people sneaking away to do it."

more...
Brittany Turany's comment, April 7, 2013 10:06 AM
This article really surprised me because it had never occured to me that legalizing pot would involve creating rules and regulations in places such as bars. To me, it really helps point out the extensive legal system we have. One law doesn't just take care of an issue; you need many rules and regulations to have a new law.
Scooped by Brianna Moore
Scoop.it!

Guinea-Bissau military leaders, political parties announce transitional council

Guinea-Bissau military leaders, political parties announce transitional council | Gov and law presidents | Scoop.it
Military leaders and a group of political parties in Guinea-Bissau have announced the formation of a Transitional National Council after a recent coup plunged the African country into deeper...
Brianna Moore's insight:

Military leaders and a group of political parties in Guinea-Bissau have announced the formation of a Transitional National Council after a recent coup plunged the African country into deeper chaos.

more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Brianna Moore from Gov and law current events
Scoop.it!

911 recording in Florida college plot: 'He's there with like some sort of gun'

911 recording in Florida college plot: 'He's there with like some sort of gun' | Gov and law presidents | Scoop.it
The student who planned a massacre at the University of Central Florida before he shot himself to death was going through a checklist for the day, that included “pull fire alarm,” then “give them hell,” police said.

Via Ryan johnson
Brianna Moore's insight:

roomate calls 911 and by doing that, he saved a huge gun shooting. I can't beleive how some peoples minds work. I dont understand it at all. "pull the fire alarm, and than give them hell." That is just scary.

more...
Ryan johnson's curator insight, March 19, 2013 3:37 PM

A massacre was saved as a students roomate called 911, resulting in the man planning the massacre shooting himself before hurting any others.  He was found dead, with nearbye over 1000 rounds of ammunition along with 2 110 round magazines and a handgun.  It is crazy what people think about doing sometimes, and this one jumps out at me.  

Rescooped by Brianna Moore from The 4th amendment
Scoop.it!

Police seizure of text messages violated 4th Amendment, judge rules

Police seizure of text messages violated 4th Amendment, judge rules | Gov and law presidents | Scoop.it
But legality of warrantless cell phone seizures is still unsettled nationwide.

Via August Pittius
Brianna Moore's insight:

 I feel like the officer did violate his 4th amendment right. It wasn't his place to just go and read the messages through the phone without a warrent or anything. But this is a tricky situation because it did help him get evidence for the murder case.

more...
MsHaeussinger's comment, March 17, 2013 2:05 PM
Kaysee, you see this case with some great logic!
Mackenzie Horn's curator insight, February 26, 7:02 AM

I think that the police had every right to look through her cell phone. They found all of the evidence they needed when they looked through the phone. I think it is ridiculous that anyone could do that to their child and then fight against the ruling. What do you think? 

Austin Robertson's comment, April 29, 8:01 PM
I believe that this is very wrong and it does violate our fourth ammendment. As long as you are minding your own business the cops should have no reason to check your phone. I don't care how high up they are. Only time they should be able to check your phone is if your making threats.
Rescooped by Brianna Moore from Gay marriage rights in Utah
Scoop.it!

Pro and con: We can protect gay rights and church rights at the ...

Protect both gay, church rights. Thank you for supporting gay marriage. It means a great deal to me, a gay man. Even more importantly, it means a great deal to my family, children and the close friends supporting me and all ...

Via Marissa Tanner-Dennis
Brianna Moore's insight:

I thought that this was really humble of the man. He is gay, but also understand that some churches can not go against their beliefs of not marrying him. Religious freedom is garenteed by the first amendment. I like how he also proves a point on why gays should be able to marry as well though.

more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Brianna Moore from Surfing the Broadband Bit Stream
Scoop.it!

Spending Cuts May Be Answer to Slow Economic Growth | RealClearPolitics

Spending Cuts May Be Answer to Slow Economic Growth | RealClearPolitics | Gov and law presidents | Scoop.it

The Dow set a new high on Tuesday, but the larger economy is a different story. What if today's sluggish economic growth turns out to be the new normal? That's the unsettling question asked by some of our most creative economic thinkers.

 

And the people asking it are not necessarily partisan opponents of the Obama administration. They argue that economic growth rates were disappointing even before the financial collapse and recession of 2007-09.

 Take Tyler Cowen, author of the e-book (belatedly published in print) "The Great Stagnation." Economic growth is the product of increases in the labor supply and productivity, he argues uncontroversially.

 

But the U.S. labor force -- even assuming we get back to full employment -- is not increasing as rapidly as it did when baby boomers and Gen Xers were reaching their working years.

 

As for productivity, Cowen argues that we simply haven't had the kind of innovations in technology or means of production that we saw in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

 

Advances in information technology, he writes, have produced nothing like the productivity gains produced by the development of electricity, the synthesis of ammonia, the invention of the internal combustion engine and the development of new metal production technologies -- gains documented in Vaclav Smil's book "Creating the Twentieth Century: Technical Innovations of 1867-1914 and Their Lasting Impact."

 

In response to Cowen, Megan McArdle of The Daily Beast writes, "We are not prepared for low growth: culturally, economically or psychologically."

 

In a fast-growth economy, it makes financial sense for young people to borrow and for government to transfer money from current earners to the elderly.

 

That's why we had government policies subsidizing people borrowing to buy homes and pay for college.

 

Unfortunately, those policies produced windfall gains for unscrupulous mortgage originators and university administrators. And they produced the housing bubble that burst in 2007 and the higher education bubble that is in the process of bursting now.

 

Politicians have been searching for policies to restore the status quo ante bubble.


Click headline to read more--


Via Chuck Sherwood, Senior Associate, TeleDimensions, Inc
more...
Samantha Iversen's comment, March 9, 2013 8:18 PM
To me, this seems a little backwards. From what we learned in Econ, shouldn't they be putting money into the economy to stimulate growth? If they take away money, people will have less to spend and therefore cut back.
Rescooped by Brianna Moore from Littlebytesnews Current Events
Scoop.it!

More spin than solutions as spending cuts near--Obama's the spinster&the media repeats his lies

More spin than solutions as spending cuts near--Obama's the spinster&the media repeats his lies | Gov and law presidents | Scoop.it
President Barack Obama and GOP rivals rely on spin versus substance in trying to prod Congress into action to avert forced spending cuts.

Via littlebytesnews
Brianna Moore's insight:

Two more days left until the spending cuts kick in! I think it is crazy that Government officials and Military leaders attempted to warn congress about the consequences that they would face if they did not agree on an alternative. Our economy is already in a bad spot, recovering form recession.

more...
Kaysee Beckstrom's comment, February 27, 2013 8:09 PM
I will be so relieved when the spending cuts and what not are finally agreed upon. Unless they never agree on it, in which case, that will really stink. But at this point, nothing congress does will make the public happy, so just choose the lesser of the evils and be done with it.
Sam Bass's curator insight, February 27, 2013 8:50 PM

I think that this whole spending cut scenario is becoming pretty ridiculous. I don't understand why the officials can't just come to an agreement. It seems like they don't realize that if they don't make a decision they'll be effected by the consequences as well.  I think it's kind of strange too that Obama wants to cut more important things instead of cutting less important things, which wouldn't be so hard on the economy.  Overall, it will be nice when they finally come to an agreement.

Chris Grimm's comment, March 7, 2013 11:25 AM
I think its interesting that we never had any of these spending problems until Obama came into office... and it's largely because of his medicare money and other government funded programs that allow people to get away with milking the system and not having to work. Kaysee, I agree with you. It bothers me that they (congress) is so split and can't make up their mind. They just need to get it over with and come up with something.
Rescooped by Brianna Moore from News You Can Use - NO PINKSLIME
Scoop.it!

obama releasing 10s thousands of illegal immigrants, blaming budget cuts, called politically motivated -- and dangerous. ...

obama releasing 10s thousands of illegal immigrants, blaming budget cuts, called politically motivated -- and dangerous. ... | Gov and law presidents | Scoop.it
The Department of Homeland Security has started releasing hundreds of illegal immigrants held in local jails in anticipation of automatic budget cuts, in a move one Arizona sheriff called politically motivated -- and dangerous. ...

Via #BBBundyBlog #NOMORELIES Tom Woods #Activist Award #Scoopiteer >20,000 Sources >250K Connections http://goo.gl/ruHO3Q
Brianna Moore's insight:

I am indifferent about this situation that they are placed with. Clearly, they don't have enough money to keep all of the illegal immigrant criminals in jail in Arizona. But than you think about it, and they are putting more American lives in danger, just to help there budget cuts. Lives are more important than budget cuts in my opinion. I don't know how they would do this, but I feel like the savings they are trying to accomplish could be acheived in a much more rational and safe way.  One statement really stood out to me. "Clearly, serious criminals are being released to the streets of our local  communities by this mass budget pardon. These are illegals that even President  Obama wants to deport. This is insane that public safety is sacrificed when it  should be the budget priority that's safeguarded," he said.

Read more:  http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/26/dhs-to-release-thousands-illegal-immigrants-blaming-budget-cuts/#ixzz2M8fpK0uo

more...
Brandon Cole's curator insight, February 28, 2013 9:37 AM

The Department of Homeland Security has started releasing hundreds of illegal immigrants held in local jails. This is all caused due to an anticipation of automatic budget cuts. It is being referred to as politically motivated and dangerous. 

Samantha Iversen's comment, March 2, 2013 7:31 PM
This is something that never really occurred to me. I knew that the United States has a problem with illegal immigration, I just never thought about what happened to them when they are caught. I do not feel like simply releasing them is the right answer, but in the interest of time, Obama had to make a decision.
Gavin Baker's comment, March 7, 2013 9:43 AM
I think he made a smart choice in releasing them, with all the budget cuts on the way I don't think he had much of a choice.
Scooped by Brianna Moore
Scoop.it!

US to deploy anti-missile system to Guam - Washington Post

US to deploy anti-missile system to Guam - Washington Post | Gov and law presidents | Scoop.it
Washington Times US to deploy anti-missile system to Guam Washington Post Hagel, in a speech at the National Defense University in Washington, specifically cited “the threats that the North Koreans have leveled directly at the United States...
Brianna Moore's insight:

I'm very glad that we are taking this threat seriously.  

more...
Kaysee Beckstrom's comment, April 9, 2013 7:21 PM
I, too, am glad we are taking this seriously. I saw on the news a few days ago an interview with a woman from South Korea and she said that North Korea wants to scare them and wants them to run and hide, but if that's what they want, South K. won't give it to them. She also said that they get threats from the North all the time and to be prepared, but also don't take it too seriously. I can't imagine living next to a country so long and feeling threatened for so long that I would not take them seriously when talking about nuclear bombs.... incredible.
Brittany Turany's comment, April 27, 2013 1:19 PM
I, too, am glad to see that we have taken this seriously. Even though North Korea has pulled many stunts like this before, they truely don't like us, so it is very possible they could strike against us.
Rescooped by Brianna Moore from Littlebytesnews Abortion Issues
Scoop.it!

Republicans Block Obama Nominee to Appeals Court - Good just say no to proaborts!

Republicans Block Obama Nominee to Appeals Court - Good just say no to proaborts! | Gov and law presidents | Scoop.it
ABC News Republicans Block Obama Nominee to Appeals Court ABC News Senate Republicans on Wednesday blocked the confirmation of federal appeals court nominee Caitlin Halligan for the second time, denying President Barack Obama a key judicial...

Via littlebytesnews
Brianna Moore's insight:

Senate Republicans on Wednesday blocked the confirmation of federal appeals court nominee Caitlin Halligan for the second time, denying President Barack Obama a key judicial appointment.

more...
littlebytesnews's curator insight, March 6, 2013 5:38 PM
I hope they can keep her and others who would destroy human life rather than protect it out!
Kaysee Beckstrom's comment, March 24, 2013 10:55 AM
Sometimes I feel as though President Obama has too much power and he has been too influential in making laws and such. I think it is good that he is being denied.
Brittany Turany's comment, April 20, 2013 6:15 PM
This article really stood out to me. I found it a great current example of the checks and balances we have in place. Sometimes, just discussing a system such as this in class doesn't give the full picture of it. This article really helped me see how it really works and applies.
Rescooped by Brianna Moore from Littlebytesnews Current Events
Scoop.it!

Former Columbine Student Writes Open Letter To Obama Against Gun Control: ‘Whose Side Are You On?’

Former Columbine Student Writes Open Letter To Obama Against Gun Control: ‘Whose Side Are You On?’ | Gov and law presidents | Scoop.it

Columbine survivor Evan Todd released an open letter to President Barack Obama on Wednesday in which he offers a point-by-point analysis of proposed firearms control initiatives, dismissing them as ineffective and dangerous to Americans’ rights.

He recently outlined why he fervently disagrees with the gun control policies that have been proposed in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. TheBlazeinterviewed Todd earlier this week and subsequently detailed how his experience being shot back in 1999 has shaped his views on the issue.

The letter, which speaks directly to the president, covers a number of key facets in the gun control debate. On universal background checks, Todd expresses his fears that “universal registration can easily be used for universal confiscation.” Additionally, he says his belief that assault weapons bans are ineffective and argues that the first law did little to stop violence when it was in effect from 1994 until 2004; he cites Columbine as a prime example.

“It was during this time that I personally witnessed two fellow students murder twelve of my classmates and one teacher,” he writes. “The assault weapons ban did not deter these two murderers, nor did the other thirty-something laws that they broke.”

“Why would you prefer criminals to have the ability to out-gun law-abiding citizens?,” he asks the president in the text. “Whose side are you on?”

Read Todd’s open letter to Obama, below.

Mr. President,

As a student who was shot and wounded during the Columbine massacre, I have a few thoughts on the current gun debate. In regards to your gun control initiatives:

Universal Background Checks

First, a universal background check will have many devastating effects. It will arguably have the opposite impact of what you propose. If adopted, criminals will know that they can not pass a background check legally, so they will resort to other avenues. With the conditions being set by this initiative, it will create a large black market for weapons and will support more criminal activity and funnel additional money into the hands of thugs, criminals, and people who will do harm to American citizens.

Second, universal background checks will create a huge bureaucracy that will cost an enormous amount of tax payers dollars and will straddle us with more debt. We cannot afford it now, let alone create another function of government that will have a huge monthly bill attached to it.

Third, is a universal background check system possible without universal gun registration? If so, please define it for us. Universal registration can easily be used for universal confiscation. I am not at all implying that you, sir, would try such a measure, but we do need to think about our actions through the lens of time.

It is not impossible to think that a tyrant, to the likes of Mao, Castro, Che, Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, and others, could possibly rise to power in America. It could be five, ten, twenty, or one hundred years from now — but future generations have the natural right to protect themselves from tyrannical government just as much as we currently do. It is safe to assume that this liberty that our forefathers secured has been a thorn in the side of would-be tyrants ever since the Second Amendment was adopted.

Ban on Military-Style Assault Weapons

The evidence is very clear pertaining to the inadequacies of the assault weapons ban. It had little to no effect when it was in place from 1994 until 2004. It was during this time that I personally witnessed two fellow students murder twelve of my classmates and one teacher. The assault weapons ban did not deter these two murderers, nor did the other thirty-something laws that they broke.

Gun ownership is at an all time high. And although tragedies like Columbine and Newtown are exploited by ideologues and special-interest lobbying groups, crime is at an all time low. The people have spoken. Gun store shelves have been emptied. Gun shows are breaking attendance records. Gun manufacturers are sold out and back ordered. Shortages on ammo and firearms are countrywide. The American people have spoken and are telling you that our Second Amendment shall not be infringed.

10-Round Limit for Magazines

Virginia Tech was the site of the deadliest school shooting in U.S. history. Seung-Hui Cho used two of the smallest caliber hand guns manufactured and a handful of ten round magazines. There are no substantial facts that prove that limited magazines would make any difference at all.
Second, this is just another law that endangers law-abiding citizens. I’ve heard you ask, “why does someone need 30 bullets to kill a deer?”

Let me ask you this: Why would you prefer criminals to have the ability to out-gun law-abiding citizens? Under this policy, criminals will still have their 30-round magazines, but the average American will not. Whose side are you on?

Lastly, when did they government get into the business of regulating “needs?” This is yet another example of government overreaching and straying from its intended purpose.


Via littlebytesnews
Brianna Moore's insight:

I admire this students courage to write a hand written letter to the president. I believe that if there are more people like this student, Mr. president will start to listen. I truely hope that Obama read the letter, because the student made some thourough points.

more...
littlebytesnews's curator insight, February 20, 2013 2:14 PM

Good letter...think Obama will read it or throw it in the reject waste basket, while he continues to push his gun control legislation down our throats??

Brittany Turany's comment, March 23, 2013 10:32 AM
This student made some very strong points and it is interesting to see the veiw of someone who has lived through a mass shooting.
Amanda Rochelle Yates's curator insight, April 21, 2013 10:56 PM

What I really like about this is the fact that it was written by a Columbine survivor. Not just any survivor, but one who was wounded during the attack. He is not anti-gun, even given his history. I love when he says thatwith proposed gun laws "would you prefer criminals to have the ability to out-gun law-abiding citizens?" And since when have criminals followed the law?

Rescooped by Brianna Moore from Geography3326
Scoop.it!

In China, Signs One-Child Policy May be Coming to an End

In China, Signs One-Child Policy May be Coming to an End | Gov and law presidents | Scoop.it
Country's working-age population fell for first time in 2012

Via SustainOurEarth, Mrs. Dunken, MsHaeussinger
Brianna Moore's insight:

I am rather glad this might be coming to an end. Although this could effect there economy greatly.

more...
Mariah Kieffer's comment, March 15, 2013 8:12 AM
I also am glad. It seems so wrong to kill kids, when they have no say. China may have a huge population issue, but i agree that there should be more options then back-alley abortions. In china, giving birth to a boy is wanted, so sometimes the family will have abortion if they found out the gender was female. Both sexes should be acceptable.
Brittany Turany's comment, March 16, 2013 8:19 AM
I feel this is a positive thing. Many deaths have occured due to this. I know that they do have a population issue, but I don't think limiting the number of children is a good way to solve it. I don't know what would be better, but I feel there must be a better way. I am glad to see it ending because it gives people an opprotunity to have the freedom of having a large family if they want to.
Camille Fawcett's comment, March 16, 2013 10:16 PM
Just like all of you guys have commented, I am relieved that they will be taking this law away as well. Reading about the woman who was forced to abort her baby really angered me. I feel like that is not fair at all to the citizen. It denies her, her natural rights. Obviously, China doesn' t have the same laws as we have, but I believe that they should. People should have the choice of what to do with their own child. An unborn child is so much more than just all the expenses and consequences it would invoke. Unborn children are the hope, the future. We shouldn't be killing them off so easily.
Rescooped by Brianna Moore from Community Village Daily
Scoop.it!

What You Missed in February: State of Mississippi Finally Ratifies Constitutional Amendment Abolishing Slavery

What You Missed in February: State of Mississippi Finally Ratifies Constitutional Amendment Abolishing Slavery | Gov and law presidents | Scoop.it

On February 7, 2013, approximately 150 years to the date when President Abraham Lincoln delivered his 'Emancipation Proclamation", the State of Mississippi at long last joined the rest of the United States..."

...

It is rather interesting to note...that the movie “Lincoln”, which involved a bunch of white people sitting around discussing slavery, should inspire a state to finally see to it that they’re on the record being against slavery, whereas films depicting the actual evils of slavery on African Americans, like “Roots“, “Amistad”, or “A Woman Called Moses”, weren’t able to provoke the same reaction."


Via Community Village
Brianna Moore's insight:

it took mississippi this long to get rid of slavery? What?

more...
Crystal Nickles's curator insight, March 6, 2013 9:00 PM

It is so crazy that this had not happened earlier in time. To think that Mississippi is so behind with this amendment. Why did this not happen 150 years ago? Or even during civil rights times? How did it take until 2013 to do something that could have been done so many years ago?

Brittany Turany's comment, March 9, 2013 3:42 PM
I cannot believe it took so long to ratify something like this. Especially when there was an amendment to the national constitution abolishing slavery. While this is surprising, it really shows how things are put off in government. I realize politicians are busy, but putting things off like this doesn't help. It just creates more work later on. Maybe if they would have done this sooner, they could be using their time to solve current problems. The one thing that confuses me though, is why there has to be state amendments abolishing slavery when there is a constitutional amendment?
Ashley Sanneman's comment, March 17, 2013 7:32 AM
This is crazy!! I understand they are a southern state, but that's no excuse for taking this long to ratify it. There was an amendment to the NATIONAL Constitution abolishing slavery. The government should have stepped in at some point.
Rescooped by Brianna Moore from Gavin- Gov & Law
Scoop.it!

On Monday March 11, 2013, Congress is reportedly beginning impeachment proceedings against Barack Obama. | Blogging/Citizen Journalism

On Monday March 11, 2013, Congress is reportedly beginning impeachment proceedings against Barack Obama. | Blogging/Citizen Journalism | Gov and law presidents | Scoop.it
that or another type of procedings would be fine



On Monday March 11, 2013, Congress is reportedly beginning impeachment proceedings against Barack Obama.

Members of Congress are reportedly beginning impeachment against Barack Obama...

Via Gavin Baker
Brianna Moore's insight:

Congress is slowly beginning to impeach Obama! Obama violated the rules that he must seek  congressional approval before using military, and he did not. A clear violation of article 2, section 4 of the constitution.

more...
Gavin Baker's curator insight, March 7, 2013 9:47 AM

Members of Congress are reportedly beginning impeachment against Barack Obama based on the grounds of unauthorized military use in Libya and Syria.  Obama says it was OK because he had the national support, but he directly violates the constitution.  What do you think?

Scooped by Brianna Moore
Scoop.it!

Gun Violence | Tim Preuss

Gun Violence | Tim Preuss | Gov and law presidents | Scoop.it
We need to pass a law! People who look like you and live where you live are being killed! Voters hear this and vote with their emotions. Something is wrong; we need a law to fix it. The media doesn't cover those Chicago shootings nearly as much.
Brianna Moore's insight:

I really like this article. It talks about how we can't stop or prevent mass shootings and murders, and no law can either.  But we can "excersice" the power of our 2nd ammendment rights and start carrying concealed weapons. The article says "Allow and encourage people to carry concealed. It will create a self-defense mentality and will make criminals think twice about shooting up a movie theater." No, I do not think this will stop all shootings, but it's worth a try.

more...
Brittany Turany's comment, March 2, 2013 3:08 PM
I totally agree with Bri. Shootings and violence are going to happen. However, we can cut down on them by having conceal and carry laws. I feel this will be more effective than limiting guns because it will allow for self-defense. If you ban guns, people will still find a way to get them. Like drugs, for example, most are illegal but drug use is not uncommon because if you want something bad enough you will find a way to get it. So, if people are properly trained for self-defense with guns, it will make those who want to create violence think twice because they will know there may in turn be violence toward them. And just like Bri said it won't stop all the shootings, but its worth a try because if it limits the amount of shootings, it a step in the right direction.
Eric Olson's curator insight, March 11, 2013 6:28 PM

I feel like that we should keep our conceal laws but they should be monitered by people who take the classes and have no weapon abuse background. They also can make any law they want to ban guns but can't stop people from getting guns.