Follow
Rescooped by Brian Nicoll from Geography Education onto Geographyclass
Scoop.it!

Worker safety in China

This is an incredible video because of the shocking footage of blatant disregard for worker safety.  This can lead to an interesting discussion concerning how China has been able to have its economy grow.  What other ways has China (or Chinese companies) been "cutting corners?"  How does that give them a competitive edge on the global industrial market?     


Via Seth Dixon
Brian Nicoll's insight:

This video was certainly disturbing to say the least.  There appears to be absolutely no worker safety whatsoever in China.  This has resulted of course in their economy soaring to new heights.  They don't have to pay these workers anything and they have virtually no safety codes to have them follow.  I am not sure this type of direction can last forever but it has certainly stood up for sometime. 

Derek Ethier's comment, November 15, 2012 1:07 AM
The worker safety in China, or lackthereof, shows why they are allowed to advance to newfound heights economically. They cut corners on workers safety, environmental regulations and other codes to meet capitalist interests. The workers risk their lives daily for meager wages that are often below sustenance levels. Hopefully they will modify their system of codes soon.
Elizabeth Allen's comment, December 7, 2012 12:36 AM
My heart was in my throat watching this video. Is that the procedure for demolishing the entire building? Ironically this was to clear way because the Olympics were being held in Bejing. There is some irony here, representatives from other travelling down that main road would be appalled to see these working conditions. And for little pay on top of risking their lives.
Crissy Borton's curator insight, December 11, 2012 11:13 PM

How long will the government allow and incourage lake of worker safty before they no longer have workers or the people stand up and say enough!

Brian Nicoll is also curating
NorthKorea
Discover Topics Brian Nicoll is following
Geography Education
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Brian Nicoll from Geography Education
Scoop.it!

Martin Luther King Street

Martin Luther King Jr. represented an end to violence and oppression.  So I too would like to know why his name is being placed on street signs in violent neighborhoods.  I understand that he was an African American who pushed for the rights of people like him, but this seems to be the opposite of what he stood for.

 

Tags: historical, culture, landscape, place, race, unit 3 culture, USA, urban, poverty, unit 7 cities, book review. 


Via Seth Dixon
melissa stjean's comment, October 8, 2012 9:49 PM
These streets are the most popular in the country, but they are located mostly located in areas with profoundly poorer incomes. With poorer incomes, leads to increased crime rates, does naming a street after an iconic hero please the people who live here? It seems like the geography of these places is creating a line of segregation by using his name for a street.
Jeff F's comment, October 8, 2012 10:42 PM
Martin Luther King Streets are places into prominently African-American neighborhoods because that is where the dominant white culture says they belong. Martin Luther King jr was a powerful African-American man and a powerful African-American man has no place in white communities according to this philosophy. If a MLK street was to be placed into a white suburb it would likely cause controversy. Cries of myths such as "reverse racism" would likely run rampant. This would be accompanied with the idea that a MLK street should only belong in an area with a heavy African-American population.
Jesse Gauthier's comment, October 14, 2012 3:49 PM
I think Martin Luther King should be memorialized in all parts of the country, and why not with all cultures and races. He did stand for non-violence and non-discrimination, which happens among all types of people.