Geography Education
Geography Education
88
Global news with a spatial perspective: Interesting, current supplemental materials for geography students and teachers. http://geographyeducation.org
Curated by Seth Dixon
Follow
Scooped by Seth Dixon onto Geography Education
Scoop.it!

Black Marble: The Earth at Night

Black Marble: The Earth at Night | Geography Education | Scoop.it
“Nothing tells us more about the spread of humans across the Earth than city lights.”...


"For three weeks spread out over April and October of this year, the Suomi NPP satellite (jointly of NASA and NOAA) scanned all the Earth's land as it appeared at night. Scientists then mapped the satellite's data -- 2.5 terabytes of it -- over an earlier Blue Marble image, transforming that picture's daytime blues, browns, and greens into a nightime palette of blues, blacks, and gold." 


This video is a great compliment to the classic Earth at Night composite image as well as the adjusted cartogram for population density.  


Questions to Ponder: What do these lights "tell us" about human geography?  What does the intensity of the lights indicate?

No comment yet.
Seth Dixon is also curating
History and Social Studies Education Regional Geography Social Media Classroom Cultural Geography RIGEA
Discover Topics Seth Dixon is following
The 21st Century Freewares Ductalk Digital Delights for Learners Geoprocessing Curation & The Future of Publishing
and 35 others
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Seth Dixon
Scoop.it!

Monsanto threatens to sue the entire state of Vermont

Monsanto threatens to sue the entire state of Vermont | Geography Education | Scoop.it
Lawmakers in Vermont are looking to regulate food labels so customers can know which products are made from genetically modified crops, but agricultural giants Monsanto say they will sue if the state follows through.
Seth Dixon's insight:

Questions to ponder: Why is Vermont the first state to make some headway in producing this type of legislation?  Will other states follow suit?  What would the economic impacts be if all places required labels on products that contain genetically modified organisms?  How would that change the agricultural industry?  

 

Tags: GMOs, food, agriculture, agribusiness.  

Mary Burke's comment, April 12, 4:21 PM
If this labeling ever gets passed, it might make people think a little more about what they're eating. They might not want to eat genetically modified organisms. That would mean the agrigiant might lose some control over the industry. I don't have much hope of this happening. I try to buy my food from vendors that say they don't use gmo's. I try to grow some veggies in the summer. I know this isn't a guarantee that I'm not eating gmo's but I realize there are some over which we have no control.
Steven McGreevy's curator insight, April 19, 1:36 AM

David and Goliath?  

Suggested by Mike Busarello
Scoop.it!

In A Grain Of Golden Rice, A World Of Controversy Over GMO Foods

In A Grain Of Golden Rice, A World Of Controversy Over GMO Foods | Geography Education | Scoop.it
A rice enriched with beta-carotene promises to boost the health of poor children around the world. But critics say golden rice is also a clever PR move for a biotech industry driven by profits, not humanitarianism.
Seth Dixon's insight:

This is a great podcast that emphasizes various geographic themes including agriculture, development and economics.  This new genetically-modified rice was designed to provide vitamin A (something no natural rice provides) to impoverished diets.  Skeptics point out that the history of the industry shows that the goal is to enrich a select number of corporations while some are hailing this as a major advancement that will benefit the poor.  Where people side on this is often ideological, so those that are firmly against genetically modified foods find the flaw in the plan and vice versa.  What do you think?  How might this change food production and consumption worldwide and at a local scale?  

Tags: GMOs, development, NGOs, Food, agriculture, agribusiness, unit 5 agriculture.   

Alcofribas's curator insight, March 10, 4:03 PM

Juste pour être sûr : GMO n'est pas Giesbert-Marie Oglalat et NGO pas Nicolas-Gabriel Orkozy, hein ?

Zakary Pereira's comment, April 30, 4:43 PM
To me, this golden rice seems like a great idea. Anyway to give more nutrients to starving and malnourished peoples is good to me. Some may argue, and do argue, that this is run for pure profit by GE companies however to me it doesn’t matter as long as it’s helping people who need it. Much of the populations of Asia and Africa eat rice or wheat and don’t get enough Vitamin A as they should. So, this is the perfect solution! I can understand why people are skeptical of it, being a GMO after all, but as long as it is safe, delivers extra nutrients and feeds the hungry then I am on board.
Kevin Cournoyer's comment, May 1, 12:52 AM
As important and widely used crops go, rice is probably the most important and the most widely used in the world. As a diet staple in Asia and Africa, it helps to feed billions of people everyday. Genetically modified race promises not only nourishment, but increased nutrients for the people who consume it as a major part of their diets. The recent test of this genetically modified rice on Chinese children without full disclosure of what the rice was, however, was seen as a huge problem by many.
The ethicality of the situation is what bothered most opponents of the test, but those in favor of the super rice argue that it is good for everyone, because it helps impoverished populations who are otherwise unable to acquire the nutrients they need. This article highlights the importance of rice in a vast physical geographic context, but also deals with the idea of economic and cultural geography because of the modified rice’s impact on a large number of people’s eating habits and standard of living.
Scooped by Seth Dixon
Scoop.it!

EU horse meat scandal exposes dangers of globalism

EU horse meat scandal exposes dangers of globalism | Geography Education | Scoop.it
When horse meat was discovered in beef hamburgers in Ireland last month, governments, corporations and regulators assured a panicked public that it was complete


Tags: food, agriculture, consumption, unit 5 agriculture, globalizationagribusiness.

Seth Dixon's insight:

Just what is in our food anyway?  This scandal reveals how removed comsumers are from the production of the foods that they purchase.  As these commodity chains become longer and more complex, food safety appears to take a back seat to profit margins.   

benj's comment, February 28, 6:37 PM
Some people choose to become vegetarian because they found out various disturbing details about the meats they ate. Some people may even shift toward being vegan because they figure that other animal derived foods such as eggs and dairy products share these nasty details.
chris tobin's comment, February 28, 6:42 PM
I do know people who have become vegetarians because of these reasons you state. Cargill and Tyson are to blame too for taking advantage of the industry....people who work for them have to make a living and have little choices or they get fired....animals do not move around much and its like an assembly line....Recommend YOU TUBE video 'Food Incorporated' ....there are some others
Adrian Bahan (MNPS)'s curator insight, March 7, 8:12 PM

What trends in agribusiness are conveyed in this map?

Scooped by Seth Dixon
Scoop.it!

The Global Food Waste Scandal

TED Talks Western countries throw out nearly half of their food, not because it’s inedible -- but because it doesn’t look appealing. Tristram Stuart delves into the shocking data of wasted food, calling for a more responsible use of global resources.


No one should be surprised that more developed societies are more wasteful societies.  It is not just personal wasting of food at the house and restaurants that are the problem.  Perfectly edible food is thrown out due to size (smaller than standards but perfectly normal), cosmetics (Bananas that are shaped 'funny') and costumer preference (discarded bread crust).  This is an intriguing perpective on our consumptive culture, but it also is helpful in framing issues such as sustainability and human and environmental interactions in a technologically advanced societies that are often removed form the land where the food they eat originates. 


Tags: food, agriculture, consumption, sustainability, TED, video, unit 5 agriculture.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Seth Dixon
Scoop.it!

Industrial Foods, Allergies and Cancers

Robyn shares her personal story and how it inspired her current path as a "Real Food" evangelist. Grounded in a successful Wall Street career that was more i...

 

Robyn authored "The Unhealthy Truth: How Our Food Is Making Us Sick and What We Can Do About It." A former Wall Street food industry analyst, Robyn brings insight, compassion and detailed analysis to her research into the impact that the global food system is having on the health of our children.  As new proteins are engineered into our food supply to maximize profits for the food industry, childhood food allergies are on the rise.  What are the connections between cancer and modern consumption patterns?  The correlation is clearly there; is causation also present?  How have the economics of agriculture shaped this situation?  How will the future economics of agriculture reshape food production? 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Seth Dixon
Scoop.it!

A Nation Of Meat Eaters: See How It All Adds Up

Americans eat more meat than almost anyone else in the world, but habits are starting to change. This may be in part because of health and environmental concerns. We explore some of the meat trends and changes in graphs and charts.

 

Often we hear about the dietary impact of meat consumption at the personal scale, but what are the environmental impacts of heavy meat consumption on a global scale?  Even more telling than the podcast are the charts and infographics that are connected to this article.  Not all meats have the same environmental impact (beef is much less environmentally efficient than chicken, pork or turkey).   As globalization has spread, American cultural preferences have changed worldwide taste preferences.  As the global population rises, the impact of meat consumption is now a major environmental concern. 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Seth Dixon
Scoop.it!

Our Dwindling Food Variety

Our Dwindling Food Variety | Geography Education | Scoop.it

"As we've come to depend on a handful of commercial varieties of fruits and vegetables, thousands of heirloom varieties have disappeared. It's hard to know exactly how many have been lost over the past century, but a study conducted in 1983 by the Rural Advancement Foundation International gave a clue to the scope of the problem. It compared USDA listings of seed varieties sold by commercial U.S. seed houses in 1903 with those in the U.S. National Seed Storage Laboratory in 1983. The survey, which included 66 crops, found that about 93 percent of the varieties had gone extinct. More up-to-date studies are needed." 

 

To show the other side of the issue, include this minor, yet crucial part of the article: "A 30-year-old plant pathologist named Norman Borlaug traveled to Mexico in 1944 to help fight a stem rust epidemic that had caused widespread famine. Crossing different wheat varieties from all over the world, he arrived at a rust-resistant, high-yield hybrid that helped India and Pakistan nearly double their wheat production—and saved a billion people from starvation. This so-called green revolution helped introduce modern industrialized agriculture to the developing world." 

Roland Trudeau Jr.'s comment, July 23, 2012 10:44 AM
This article raises multiple questions like, what has happened to all these different strains of vegetables? Why have the ones that are still around survived? Was this a process of natural selection? It would certainly be interesting to research this and uncover the reasons.
Scooped by Seth Dixon
Scoop.it!

Food Machine

Food Machine | Geography Education | Scoop.it

UPDATE: The PBS episode "Food Machine" premiered on April 11th, 2012 on the series "America Revealed."  Now the episode is available online. 

 

"Over the past century, an American industrial revolution has given rise to the biggest, most productive food machine the world has ever known.  In this episode, host Yul Kwon explores how this machine feeds nearly 300 million Americans every day. He discovers engineering marvels we’ve created by putting nature to work and takes a look at the costs of our insatiable appetite on our health and environment.  For the first time in human history, less than 2% of the population can feed the other 98%." 

Adrian Bahan (MNPS)'s curator insight, March 7, 8:46 PM

This is a great video covering our industrial agricultural complex

Scooped by Seth Dixon
Scoop.it!

The relative merits of Corn Ethanol

The relative merits of Corn Ethanol | Geography Education | Scoop.it

This PBS video segment (2009) is dated, but the issues remain relevant.  Brazil has implemented the first sustainable biofuel economy in the world with their copious amounts of sugar that are converted to ethanol.  Is this a model for the future or just something that would only work in places with the right geographic qualities?  Besides being a topic where the concepts of scale and region matter, the energy, economy environment and geopolitics all play a role in shaping the debate. 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Seth Dixon
Scoop.it!

Dan Barber: How I fell in love with a fish

Chef Dan Barber squares off with a dilemma facing many chefs today: how to keep fish on the menu.

 

This is a compelling analysis of the agricultural food system through the case-study of fish farms.  If we fish the seas like we clear-cut forests, the biodiversity of the world's waters will be seriously depleted.  That has been the economic model for fishing for hundreds of years and it is obviously not sustainable given the growing population and demand for fish.   However, not all "sustainable" fish farming businesses are equal, and this TED talk demonstrates some of the best practices to restructure the food industry for the best food and environmental results.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Seth Dixon
Scoop.it!

Hungary Destroys Monsanto GMO Corn Fields

Hungary Destroys Monsanto GMO Corn Fields | Geography Education | Scoop.it
Hungary has taken a stand against biotech giant Monsanto and genetic modification by destroying 1000 acres of maize grown with genetically modified seeds.

 

Peru and Hungary have both banned GMOs. What are the reasons that many are critical of GMOs? What should the government's role be in agriculture and food systems? Are bio-tech companies too strong?

Courtney Holbert's curator insight, February 3, 10:57 PM

With Monsanto having such a large political power, this is very interesting tat Hungary took a stand. 

Maria Bustamante's comment, February 22, 11:56 AM
This article is about countries that are taking a stand against the company Monsanto. Many people in those countries are critical against the use of GMOs because they're not sure about how the genetic engineering will affect the crops. Already GMOs have had negative effects. The use of GMOs reduces the variety between the seeds. Not only that but the farmers are no longer getting the money the deserve for their hard work and they are not allowed to save their seeds. The government should have little control over the agriculture and what they decide to plant. They should take more precautions against the GMOs and they should make sure that the food system companies in charge of checking the safety food should not have a connection to the very food companies they are supposed to be condemning. Bio-tech companies are getting too strong because they're gaining too much control of the fields due to the patents they hold on their GMOs. This is dangerous because they could end up having a monopoly on the franchise and when they due if something happens to their crops it will happen to all the crops. It will be, for lack of a better word, very bad.
Rescooped by Seth Dixon from Agricultural Biodiversity
Scoop.it!

Investing in Diversity - a view of IRRI's International Rice Genebank

For 10 years I had the great privilege to lead the genetic resources program at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in the Philippines, and work...

 

A lengthy clip (I would only show the first 4 minutes with a class) that demonstrates the vast amount of scientific energy focused on agriculture.  Unspoken is the vast amount of resources invested in genetically modified organism that is leading to a loss of genetic biodiversity that poses some potential risks for our most important crops. 


Via Luigi Guarino
Kara Charboneau's comment, March 11, 7:48 AM
this video link no longer works
Scooped by Seth Dixon
Scoop.it!

McDonald’s® Packaging

McDonald’s® Packaging | Geography Education | Scoop.it
Seth Dixon's insight:

The packaging on the McDonald's fry box states, "Why are our fries the gold standard? Because only a select number of potato varieties make the cut. I'm lovin' it®"  This is a message is primarily aimed at millions of individual consumers.  As geographers who analyze systems, we can look at this message for meaning beyond taste and quality control in how it affect both urban and rural places.  Given that McDonald's is the United States' largest purchaser of potatoes, what are the economic and agricultural implications for their fry selection on the market(s)?  How does this impact farmers, consumers, competitors and other groups?   

Conor McCloskey's comment, April 30, 10:28 AM
According to this article from November 2008, McDonald’s is going to redo their packaging. The packaging will now be designed to provide customers with information “in a fun and easy way.” McDonald’s is a worldwide company and this change in packaging is going to take place in all 118 countries that house McDonald’s restaurants. McDonald’s is proceeding to show off its knowledge of cultures around the world by letting the local changes in packaging differ from region to region. I think this is a great business move to allow more localized parts of the company appeal to their customers because they definitely know the culture and people better.
It is interesting to see what this new packaging will say about different cultures, that eat McDonald’s, around the world. I think, for one, it proves that advertisement techniques are not universal. What draws a person to a product is not human in nature, but rather what draws in the consumer to fulfill their cultural wants and needs. By this train of thought, advertising a global product, like McDonald’s is more of a multi-approached task.
Peter Siner's comment, April 30, 4:12 PM
This is a real classic example of consumer ignorance. However, it really isn’t our fault. Companies like McDonalds spend millions on advertisements, many of the consumers are looking for what they offer “fast food” generally these consumers are on the go, in their car, or looking for a quick bite. With that being said, the larger print almost always drowns out the small print. In this example, McDonalds is essentially trying to convince the consumers that yes, this food is specially selected, as if the potatoes are only the best around! When in reality it doesn’t matter what the packaging looks like, or even where the potatoes come from. Fast food restaurants have a huge impact on the obesity rates of America. However, like in law, ignorance is not an excuse. We need to be more proactive about the choices we make. Just like the article about climate change, Americans don’t generally look into solving long-term problems, instead they focus on things right in front of them. Skyrocketing obesity rates take time. Look around guys, don’t let the ads fool you. I definitely enjoy a burger now and then but its all about moderation.
Zakary Pereira's comment, April 30, 4:35 PM
It is somewhat erroneous that McDonald’s wants to redo their packaging to emphasize on fresh material. First off, I worked in fast food and I can tell you while some things are freshly cut and grown, many aren’t. McDonalds actually doesn’t even cut their own onions like Burger King, they receive them dehydrated and they have to reconstitute them every morning. To me that is just gross. It is crazy to think that this new push for nutrition will actually convince people that what they are eating is healthy, its jut crazy. Just because my fry carton has a potato on it does not mean that I am going to consider that equal to a baked potato I eat at home. I agree with David, just because the packaging shows fresh food does not mean that what you’re getting is fresh just like how Mary said that the food by the time its shipped over is not fresh anymore.
Scooped by Seth Dixon
Scoop.it!

Can Milk Sweetened With Aspartame Still Be Called Milk?

Can Milk Sweetened With Aspartame Still Be Called Milk? | Geography Education | Scoop.it
By adding artificial sweeteners to flavored milk, the dairy industry hopes to boost flagging consumption in schools.
Seth Dixon's insight:

The very definitions of food are being rewritten as modern industries reformulate the products on our shelves and what we put into our bodies.  What cultural and economic forces are driving these changes? 


Tags: Food, agriculture, agribusiness, unit 5 agriculture.

Kev Richards's curator insight, March 8, 2:57 PM

Good example of how a real food turns into an artificial variation of a real food. Shame that kids don't even like milk! That's the parents fault. All kids like milk from birth (of course) so what turns them off?

Scooped by Seth Dixon
Scoop.it!

What You Need to Know About Genetically Engineered Food

What You Need to Know About Genetically Engineered Food | Geography Education | Scoop.it
Myths and facts about health, corruption, and saving the world

Tags: food, agriculture, agribusinesslocavore, unit 5 agriculture.

Seth Dixon's insight:

So many articles about organic or genetically engineered foods are written with someone with a very defined position on the subject (much like abortion, gun control or other controversial topics).  This article is an attempt to separate out the good the bad and the ugly regarding genetically engineered foods.   

Adrian Bahan (MNPS)'s curator insight, March 7, 8:09 PM

This article really cuts through the myths and skewed logic in the GMO debate. I love the Atlantic Monthly, one of the sacred texts of Geo-Scholars everywhere.

David Ricci's comment, April 16, 10:28 AM
As i read this article I tried to keep an open mind and not choose a side. I wanted to take all of the information presented to see the pros and cons that are related to GE foods. After finishing my reading it seems to me that the debate revolves around whether or not these crops and foods are bad for you. If they are bad, then do the pros outway the cons? I can say that after reading the article I dont feel much more educated on the topic. There seems to be a large grey area covering GE crops. The only people who know the full extent of these projects are the people in charge and the government. With the information that i have gained today though, i can say that GE crops have the potential to be extremely benefitial aroud the world. Many places that have trouble growing crops can use GE crops that withstand bugs and even climate. These benefits can help with cost minimalization in areas that need it, potentially creating better and more farming in areas around the world that need it. GE crops if regulated properly can atleast for a time have a global effect on food and agriculture. A jump in production of crops can help economies and help the general wellbeing of countries that have trouble producing even close to the right amount of food for the people living there.
Zakary Pereira's comment, April 30, 4:04 PM
An interesting article to read, it talked about the genetically modified seeds and food that is created by companies and then grown by American and other farmers worldwide. This article relates to the globalization point that we talked about in class. The seeds are genetically modified here or elsewhere in the world and then sent to farmers all over the globe to grow for increased profit typically. Many countries around the world, especially third world countries, have food shortages and by genetically modifying food so that farmers can get a bigger harvest, more people will be fed and less would die to famine and malnutrition. Like David, I tried to keep an open mind and not choose a side while I was reading. The article did seem quite vague regarding argument points however it gave facts left and right which I found to be new to me and fairly interesting, learning that 70% of food that we eat has at least one GE ingredient. Time will tell if this has prolonged pros/cons I suppose.
Scooped by Seth Dixon
Scoop.it!

Does the U.S. need more agricultural diversity?

Does the U.S. need more agricultural diversity? | Geography Education | Scoop.it
The disaster underscores the need to diversify our crops.

 

AAG: The drought that has hammered much of the country has clearly illustrated the dangers that come with limited agricultural diversity, writes Macalester College geography professor William G. Moseley in this opinion piece. Federal subsidies have encouraged the growth of corn, but this crop is quite vulnerable to drought, Moseley writes. "A more diverse cropping landscape would mean viable farms, healthier diets and a steadier food system," he writes.

Ardent Moth's comment, August 18, 2012 2:13 PM
You'd think this would be obvious, you know, ever since the Potato Famine. Monocropping is a failure in design.
Suggested by W. Robert de Jongh
Scoop.it!

The business of US food aid – interactive

The business of US food aid – interactive | Geography Education | Scoop.it
Nearly $1bn was spent last year buying wheat, sorghum and other products for the controversial US 'in-kind' food aid programmes.   Over 40 companies sold food aid last year

But big agribusinesses are not the only ones winning US food aid contracts. Over 40 companies sold nearly 1.8m tonnes, or $1bn worth, of food aid last year.

Some have developed entirely new product lines, specifically to sell as overseas food aid. Others have fought to get their products on the list of eligible commodities, which includes items such as canned pink salmon and dehydrated potato flakes.

Didion, a private, family-owned company headquartered in Wisconsin, has developed a special line of corn-based food aid products. Last year it was the government’s top supplier of corn-soy blend, a fortified food of choice for the UN’s World Food Programme.  What Crops are being donated?  To which countries?  From which companies?  The answers lie in this interactive feature.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Seth Dixon
Scoop.it!

Grocery Store Wars

Not long ago in a supermarket not so far away. Help fight the dark side of the farm. Rate the film, favorite the film, comment the film and subscribe to our ...

 

This is horribly cheesy and from an incredibly biased perspective, but it does embody how many see the organic movement (and is quite entertaining for old Star Wars buffs like me). 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Seth Dixon
Scoop.it!

This little piggy is going to China

This little piggy is going to China | Geography Education | Scoop.it

This photoblog will also link you to a full article and video that explains how the American pork industry is supplying China's demand for protein as globalization forces (among others) has led the Chinese consumers to eat 10% more meat than they did just 5 years ago.  WHat impact will this have on American agriculture?  How to we explain fo the rise in meat demand in China?    

Adrian Bahan (MNPS)'s curator insight, March 7, 8:28 PM

Read the linked article. How is China dealing with its increasing appitite for meat?

Scooped by Seth Dixon
Scoop.it!

Genetically Modified Foods

"93% of Americans want the FDA to label genetically engineered foods. Watch the new video from Food, Inc. Filmmaker Robert Kenner to hear why we have the right to know what's in our food."

 

Clearly this video has a political agenda, but this is a pertinent video to show in an Agriculture unit.  Many countries around the world require the labeling of genetically modified food products, while the United States (currently) does not. 

 

For more on the organization that sponsored this video see: http://justlabelit.org/

 

For a Health blog about how this impacts nutrition, see: http://blogs.prevention.com/inspired-bites/2012/03/14/french-women-dont-eat-what/

 

For more on political action currently underway in the United States, see: http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2012/03/55-congress-members-ask-fda-to-label-genetically-engineered-foods/

Adrian Bahan (MNPS)'s curator insight, March 7, 8:21 PM

Why does the United States not have laws on the books that force companies to list GMO products on labels?

Scooped by Seth Dixon
Scoop.it!

"Pink Slime" - Mechanically Separated Meat

"Pink Slime" - Mechanically Separated Meat | Geography Education | Scoop.it

McDonald's, Burger King, and Taco Bell all agreed last week to promise to stop using ammonia-treated meat as more and more people learn that this "pink slime" is an earlier version of their finished product.  This meat has been treated with Ammonium Hydroxide, is no longer good enough for our fast food restaurants—but it IS still good enough for our schools (they don't need a PR slogan to sell).

Crissy Borton's comment, September 30, 2012 8:35 PM
It is sad and upsetting that our government will okay this type of "meat" and other man made and GMO foods but will not allow the sale of raw milk do to safety concerns. Farmers are not longer run by famers but corporations. After seeing this news report when it originally came out I began to read the labels of everything I was buying at the store and eating and I was shocked to see how much of what I was eating was not real food. Lables that say all natural can and often do contain items we would not consider natural like GMO's. Their is no government regulation on these labels only organic ones contain no GMOs. :-(
Lauren Jacquez's curator insight, January 25, 4:21 PM

This is what yo uare getting at McDonalds HUGGERS!

 

Adrian Bahan (MNPS)'s curator insight, March 7, 8:16 PM

Oh man, I hope that's not the beginnins of my beloved Mexican Pizza from Taco Bell!!!

Scooped by Seth Dixon
Scoop.it!

NYTimes Video: Cultivating Dinner

NYTimes Video: Cultivating Dinner | Geography Education | Scoop.it
Americans ate 475 million pounds of tilapia last year, making this once obscure African native the most popular farmed fish in the United States.

 

Industrial farming, human-introduced species, GMOs, outsourcing and environmental impacts are but some of the relevant themes from this video.  How are global taste buds reshaping the geographic landscape? 

Courtney Holbert's curator insight, February 3, 10:55 PM

Agribusiness and the demands needed to be met to feed the world

Adrian Bahan (MNPS)'s curator insight, March 7, 8:38 PM

How is the concept of agribusiness changing the way we think about food?

Rescooped by Seth Dixon from Ecology
Scoop.it!

Monsanto, Bayer and Dow face trial for 'systematic human rights abuses'

Monsanto, Bayer and Dow face trial for 'systematic human rights abuses' | Geography Education | Scoop.it
Permanent Peoples' Tribunal accuses biotech giants Monsanto, Dow, Bayer, Syngenta, DuPont and BASF of promoting dangerous pesticides including endosulfan, paraquat and neonicotinoids...


The world's major agrochemical companies, Monsanto, Dow, Bayer, Syngenta, DuPont and BASF, will face a public tribunal in early December accused of systematic human rights violations.  As modern agriculture and industry are merging in food production, we need to rethink health and the environment. 


Via Athena Drakou
No comment yet.