Social rejection fuels creativity for people with an independent mindset.
Share ideas that matter on the social web and experience
the benefits of curating the world's best content.
I don't have a Facebook, a Twitter or a LinkedIn account
Your new post is loading...
|
Eileen Cardillo's curator insight,
Today, 8:22 AM
I am surprised that people apparently commonly believe that practice alone might be sufficient to achieve mastery. Such self-flattery! I can only imagine the logic of such individuals: "Oh, if I only put in the hours, I could be just as good as Tiger Woods/Bobby Fischer/Mathieu Riccard/[Insert whoever is way better than you at something here]." Implication: I could achieve greatness, I just am too busy doing other things.
Let's be realistic. We are not [ahem] born blank slates. Our genetics predispose us to different cognitive, physical, and emotional aptitudes and weaknesses. Great teachers matter. So does having a supportive environment (whatever that may be, as its likely to vary between individuals and the particular skill in question). 10,000 hours of practice is certainly going to have a significant impact on performance, but it's only one of the key ingredients.
Evidence that practice is necessary, but not sufficient, is not reason for discouragement though. The author makes this point about interpretation:
"So whether you view the data as suggesting that practice is less important because it only accounts for one-third of the variability in proficiency, or more important because it explains more than any other factor discovered so far, is a matter of perspective."
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Barbara Lond's curator insight,
January 19, 5:43 AM
Hm, true. Do people in the UK really like strange? People are so fearful. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
|