Genetically modified food
14 views | +0 today
Follow
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Nicki Davison from News You Can Use - NO PINKSLIME
Scoop.it!

Chile fights GMO in national protest against ‘Monsanto law’

Chile fights GMO in national protest against ‘Monsanto law’ | Genetically modified food | Scoop.it
RT News Thousands of Chileans have rallied against a bill dubbed the “Monsanto law” that would let multinationals patent GMO seeds. Activists say it will not only compromise food sovereignty in Chi...

Via #BBBundyBlog #NOMORELIES Tom Woods #Activist Award #Scoopiteer >20,000 Sources >250K Connections http://goo.gl/ruHO3Q
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Nicki Davison from Messenger for mother Earth
Scoop.it!

Environment Secretary talking 'nonsense' about GM crops, claims Zac Goldsmith - Telegraph #GMO #GM #GE

Environment Secretary talking 'nonsense' about GM crops, claims Zac Goldsmith - Telegraph #GMO #GM #GE | Genetically modified food | Scoop.it
The Environment Secretary is citing “nonsense” to argue for genetically modified crops and acting as a mouthpiece for the GM industry, fellow Conservative MP Zac Goldsmith has claimed.

Via Maria Nunzia @Varvera , CineversityTV
more...
CineversityTV's curator insight, July 6, 2013 4:23 AM

well Zac is right

Alison D. Gilbert's curator insight, July 7, 2013 5:30 PM

What will it take for people to understand the danger of GMO? And will it be too late by then?

Alison D. Gilbert's comment, July 7, 2013 5:41 PM
CineversityTV,
You are keeping me so busy scooping these great articles about the #GMO controversy. Thanks and keep them coming.
Rescooped by Nicki Davison from YOUR FOOD, YOUR ENVIRONMENT, YOUR HEALTH: #Biotech #GMOs #Pesticides #Chemicals #FactoryFarms #CAFOs #BigFood
Scoop.it!

Genetic modification strains old food and drug laws - How a fish becomes a drug and corn a pest

Genetic modification strains old food and drug laws - How a fish becomes a drug and corn a pest | Genetically modified food | Scoop.it

23 March 2013 - Los Angeles Times

When is a fish not a fish but a drug? When government regulators take old laws and twist themselves into knots trying to apply them to new technology...

Atlantic salmon that grow quickly thanks to a growth hormone gene from another salmon species are deemed "new animal drugs" because the Food and Drug Administration decided to regulate genetically engineered animals under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938.

A cotton plant that makes insect-killing proteins with the help of a gene from a soil bacterium is a pesticide in the eyes of the Environmental Protection Agency, which regulates the crop under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act of 1972.

In what some critics deem the biggest contortion, many genetically modified crops are classified as "potential plant pests" so that the U.S. Department of Agriculture may preside over them through the Federal Plant Pest Act of 1957 — even though the key traits added to the plants have nothing to do with pests....

http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-gmo-regulations-20130324,0,7244741.story

 

 

                                             --- WATCH ---

 

                             A Must see VIDEO for all. Dr. David Suzuki 

                                     WHAT IS GENETIC ENGINEERING

 

"WHAT ARE ROUNDUP READY & Bt PESTICIDE GMO CROPS?"  http://sco.lt/5n6cuP

 

August 18, 2013 Care2 Causes
NOW WE'RE TURNING ANIMALS INTO FACTORIES FOR OUR DRUG? http://www.care2.com/causes/now-were-turning-animals-into-factories-for-our-drugs.html

 

GROWING MEDICINES, ARTIFICIAL VITAMINS IN GMO PLANTS REQUIRES NEW, STRICT REGULATIONS AND OVERSIGHT - PATENTING PLANTS http://sco.lt/5H7cZt

 

MONSANTO ENTERS PHARMACEUTICAL BUSINESS, ACQUIRES KEY 'GENE SILENCING' TECHNOLOGY FOR USE IN HUMANS http://sco.lt/8Rrt6v

 

THE FOOD FIGHT OF OUR LIVES = CROSSING PIGS AND BUTTERFLIES WITH WORMS -- NOT OKAY  http://www.scoop.it/t/agriculture-gmos-pesticides/p/1699396402/gmos-and-biotech-the-food-fight-of-our-lives-crossing-roses-with-pigs-and-butterflies-with-worms-not-to-mention-corn-with-a-virulent-bacteria

 

PATENT FOR A PIG:  BIOTECH SCIENTISTS PUH TO PATENT, "IMPROVE" TRANSGENIC GMO 'ENVIROPIGS"  http://sco.lt/8JZpZp

 

BIOTECH IS RE-ENGINEERING, RE-PROGRAMMING AND PATENTING LIFE ITSELF.   THE ETHICS AND LEGALITIES http://sco.lt/9Hu7Tl

 

BIODEMOCRACY OR CORPORATOCRACY http://sco.lt/7696kT

 

THE NEXT GMO BIOTECH WAVE: EXTREME SYNTHETIC GENETICS:  THE IMPLICATIONS, THE ETHICS http://sco.lt/6TyUmv

 

 

WILL SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY BENEFIT OR THREATEN WILD THINGS? http://sco.lt/66LUbR

 

****MONSANTO GMO TREES COULD DEVASTATE FOREST ECO SYSTEMS LEAVING BIOLOGICAL DESERTS  http://sco.lt/51ekyH

 

DO WE NEED A GENETIC BILL OF RIGHTS? http://sco.lt/5D4PTN

 

 

 

KNOWN BIOTECH GENE ALTERING IN THE PIPELINE

http://www.genet-info.org/information-services/genetically-engineered-animals/ge-salmon.html

 

-----  NEW GM BABIES BORN A DECADE AGO http://www.seattleorganicrestaurants.com/vegan-whole-food/genetically-engineered-babies.php

------  GMO PATENTS MAY OWN OUR FORESTS:  MONSANTO GMO TREES COULD DEVASTATE FOREST ECOYSTEMS http://sco.lt/5G9P0L

------  PATENT FOR A PIG:  SCIENTIST "IMPROVE' TRANSGENIC GMO "ENVIROPIGS" http://sco.lt/7hrnF3

------  FIRST GM CAMELS TO BE ENGINEERED FOR DRUG PRODUCTION | @scoopit http://sco.lt/5L5VVB

------ GM COW BRINGS BIOTECH TO A NEW LEVEL OF CREEPY http://sco.lt/62KG6T

------  UNLEASHING GENETICALLY SALMON ONTO YOUR DINNER PLATE = NO REGULATIONS, NO OVERSIGHT  - "FATALLY FLAWED" FDA ASSESSMENT http://sco.lt/8ZDraz

-----    GROWING PHARMACEUTICALS IN GMO PLANT REQUIRES NEW, STRICT REGULATIONS AND OVERSIGHT - PATENT MONOPOLIES http://sco.lt/7KM4qv

 

 

June 17, 2013 Global Research
FDA APPROVES FIRST GMO FLU VACCINE -- CONTAINING REPROGRAMMED DOG KIDNEY CELLS http://www.globalresearch.ca/fda-approves-first-gmo-flu-vaccine-containing-reprogrammed-insect-virus/5338052

 

BLIND, FOOTLESS CHICKENS FOR FUTURE CAFO FACTORY FARMS  http://farmwars.info/?p=7897

 

 

 

GENETICALLY MONETIZED FOOD  - PATENTING LIFE - FOLLOW THE MONEY http://sco.lt/5YZ8vx

 

July 24, 2013 Elle
GENETICALLY MODIFIED CORN - ALLERGIES TO #GMO CORN http://www.elle.com/beauty/health-fitness/allergy-to-genetically-modified-corn

 

UPROAR IN THE USA: DO GLOWING HOUSE PLANTS TAKE GENE TINKERING TOO FAR? http://sco.lt/8p47UH

 

 

 THE GLOBAL CORPORATE MONOPOLY IN SEED PATENTS AND CONTROL OF YOUR FOOD  http://sco.lt/9MJJhZ

 

GENE GIANTS SEEK "PHILANTHROGOPOLY" - SIX MULTINATIONAL GENE GIANTS CONTROL THE DIRECTION OF AGRICULTURE WITH IMPUNITY http://sco.lt/6h3lzt

 

OBAMA QUIETLY DE-REGULATES GMO/ GENETIC BIOTECH INDUSTRY  : Fast-tracking approvals, waiving regulations ... http://sco.lt/5uCx8b

 

DID YOU KNOW? GENE ALTERED FOODS NOW LARGE PART OF AMERICAN DIET http://sco.lt/7oVxQH

 

>>  WHY GENETIC MODIFICATION OF CROPS AND LIVESTOCK IS INHERENTLY UNCONTROLLABLE AND HAZARDOUS http://www.scoop.it/t/agriculture-gmos-pesticides/p/3075683244/why-genetic-modification-of-crops-and-livestock-is-inherently-uncontrollable-and-hazardous

 

 

 

 

 March 28, 2013 VIDEO REPORT RT News
' FRANKENFISH' HEADING TO YOUR DINNER PLATE AS OBAMA SIGNS 'MONSANTO PROTECTION ACT' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ao7ECASd5pc

 

FRANKENFOODS HITCH AN 'ANONYMOUS' RIDE THROUGH US CONGRESS - GMO NOW FREE FROM LIABILITY, REGULATION AND OVERSIGHT This dangerous provision, the Monsanto Protection Act, strips judges of their constitutional mandate to protect consumer and farmer rights and the environment, while opening up the floodgates for the planting of new untested genetically engineered crops, endangering farmers, citizens and the environment http://sco.lt/7cjwu1

 

BIOTECH AGRICHEMICAL INDUSTRY GETS IMMUNITY FROM US CONGRESS, OBAMA - RISES ABOVE COURTS http://sco.lt/8edR3Z

 

June 5, 2013 The Daily Sheeple
NESTLE'S MARK UP WATER 52 MILLION PERCENT

WHILE PATENTING BREAST MILK AND MEDICINAL PLANTS

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/nestles-wet-dream-they-mark-up-water-53-million-percent_062013

 

 

                                                 WATCH:

VIDEO (19:57) 

**** Genetically Engineered Organisms HAVE PERVERTED SCIENCE - GENETICIST -Dr Suman Sahai: Power, Plurality and Uncertainty and The Global Politics of Scientific Advice. A fascinating talk by Dr Suman Sahai of GeneCampaign containing a powerful indictment of the science of GMOs.... http://www.gmwatch.org/gm-videosb/27-gm-in-india/14678

 

 

 

WE ALLOW MULTINATIONAL FOOD CORPORATIONS AND SPECULATORS TO DECIDE EVERYDAY WHO IS EATING AND LIVING, AND WHO IS STARVING AND DYING http://www.scoop.it/t/agriculture-gmos-pesticides/p/2973615009/we-allow-multinational-food-corporations-and-speculators-to-decide-everyday-who-is-eating-and-living-and-who-is-starving-and-dying

 

OBAMA QUIETLY DE-REGULATES GMO/ GENETIC BIOTECH INDUSTRY  : Fast-tracking approvals, waiving regulations ...  http://sco.lt/5uCx8b

 

 

                                                   WATCH

 

 

*****"GENETIC ROULETTE - THE GAMBLE OF OUR LIVES"  - YouTube 1:24:59  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrWRzxMUfDE

 

*******THE WORLD ACCORDING TO MONSANTO: (FULL LENGTH) THE LEADER OF THE BIOTECH CARTEL http://sco.lt/7FFsXZ

 

 

 

ANIMALS RAISED IN CORPORATE CONCENTRATION PENS - DRUGS AND 'AG-GAG' LAWS TO IMPACT BEYOND USA http://sco.lt/4ynuev

 

MONSANTO BUYS OBAMA, THE US SENATE AND THE GLOBAL FARM   http://sco.lt/8xdkYb

 

U.S. GMO FOOD LABELING DRIVE GOES GLOBAL  - May 25, 2013  http://sco.lt/4sEmUD

 

 

 

 

 


Via pdjmoo
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Nicki Davison
Scoop.it!

Genetically modified crops pass benefits to weeds

Genetically modified crops pass benefits to weeds | Genetically modified food | Scoop.it
Herbicide resistance could confer an advantage on plants in the wild. (GM crops can pass on herbicide resistance genes to weeds, making them more competitive-even in absence of herbicide!
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Nicki Davison
Scoop.it!

Is extremism in defense of GM food a vice? - Grist

Is extremism in defense of GM food a vice? - Grist | Genetically modified food | Scoop.it
Is extremism in defense of GM food a vice?
Grist
When a study came out in 2012 associating gruesomely lumpy rats with genetically modified food, critics trashed it so thoroughly that a group of researchers and advocates called foul.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Nicki Davison
Scoop.it!

New Study Reveals GE Crops Inflame Digestive Tract - Mother Earth News

New Study Reveals GE Crops Inflame Digestive Tract - Mother Earth News | Genetically modified food | Scoop.it
New Study Reveals GE Crops Inflame Digestive Tract Mother Earth News The study, “A long-term toxicology study on pigs fed combined genetically modified (GM) soy and GM maize diet,” led by Judy Carman, PhD., associate professor in health and the...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Nicki Davison
Scoop.it!

GMO Database - Authorisation and approval status in the EU

Genetically Modified Food and Feed: Authorisation and approval status in the EU.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Nicki Davison
Scoop.it!

Genetic Modification: the New Zealand Approach - Genetically modified medicines and food | Ministry for the Environment

Genetic Modification: the New Zealand Approach - Genetically modified medicines and food | Ministry for the Environment | Genetically modified food | Scoop.it
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Nicki Davison from Organic Farming
Scoop.it!

India Parliament Recommends a Ban on Genetically Engineered Crops

India Parliament Recommends a Ban on Genetically Engineered Crops | Genetically modified food | Scoop.it
India Parliament Recommends a Ban on Genetically Engineered Crops Contents: THIRD WORLD NETWORK BIOSAFETY INFORMATION SERVICE...

Item 1
GM crops are no way forward
Satyarat Chaturvedi
The Hindu, August 24 2012
http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/article3812825.ece?h...

 

Food security is not about production alone; it is also about bio-safety, and access to food for the poorest We are predominantly an agricultural economy, with the agricultural sector providing employment and subsistence to almost 70 per cent of the workforce. There have been some remarkable contributions from the agriculture sector to food grain production in the last six decades, when from a meagre 50 million tonnes in the 1950s, the country has been able to produce a record 241 million tonnes in 2010-2011. Despite these achievements, the condition of the farming community is pitiable considering that 70 per cent of our farmers are small and marginal, and there is a complete absence of pro-farmer/pro-agriculture policies which has led us to an environment of very severe agrarian distress.

Pros and cons

In this situation, food security has been one of the main agendas of the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance government and also one that the government has been struggling with. There is a strong opinion among policymakers that biotechnology holds a lot of promise in achieving food security and that transgenic crops, especially, are a sustainable way forward. But given the opposition and controversies surrounding Genetically Modified (GM) crops and the differences of opinion among stakeholders, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Agriculture decided to take on the mammoth task of an objective assessment of the pros and cons of introducing GM crops.

We expect the observations in our report to answer the big question on the role of GM crops in achieving food security. We hope the recommendations will be acted upon at the earliest. The committee felt this was all the more necessary in the light of the Prime Minister's exhortation at the Indian Science Congress about the full utilisation of modern biotechnology for ensuring food security but without compromising on safety and regulatory aspects.

The lessons

In India, the only commercialised GM crop is Bt cotton. Industry and the Central government have painted a picture of success about it - saying it has led to an increase in production and that the costs of cultivation have gone down. But the ground reality is starkly different. This was evident during the extensive interactions of the committee with farmers in different cotton growing regions around the country during study visits in March 2012.

Besides analysing the facts and figures provided by government agencies and listening to eminent cotton scientists, the committee's consultation with farmers in Vidharbha helped us conclude that the Bt cotton saga is not as rosy as made out to be. In Vidharbha, the per-acre investment in cultivating traditional varieties, or even pre-Bt hybrids, could be less than Rs. 10,000. That was certainly the case until the first half of the previous decade. But for Bt cotton, even the un-irrigated farmer is spending upwards of Rs. 15,000-18,000 or even more per acre. And irrigated farmers complain of input costs exceeding Rs. 45,000 per acre. While the investment and acreage rose dramatically, the per acre yield and income did not increase in equal measure and actually fell after initial years. Indeed, the Union Agriculture Minister spoke of Vidharbha's dismal yields on December 19, 2011 in the Rajya Sabha.

It was clear that at least for the rain-fed cotton farmers of our country, the introduction of Bt cotton offered no socio-economic benefits. On the contrary, it being a capital intensive practice, the investment of farmers increased manifold thus exposing them to greater risks due to massive indebtedness. It needs to be remembered that rain-fed farmers constitute 85 per cent of all cotton growing farmers.

Added to this, there is desperation among farmers as the introduction of Bt cotton has slowly led to the non-availability of traditional varieties of cotton. The cultivation of GM crops also leads to monoculture and the committee has witnessed its clear disadvantages. The decade of experience has shown that Bt cotton has benefited the seed industry hands down and not benefited the poorest of farmers. It has actually aggravated the agrarian distress and farmer suicides. This should be a clear message to policymakers on the impact of GM crops on farming and livelihoods associated with it.

The risks

From the various deliberations to which the committee was privy, it is clear that the technology of genetic engineering is an evolving one and there is much, especially on its impact on human health and environment, that is yet to be understood properly. The scientific community itself seems uncertain about this. While there are many in this community who feel that the benefits outweigh the risks, others point to the irreversibility of this technology and uncontrollability of the Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) once introduced in the ecosystem. Hence, they advocate a precautionary approach towards any open release of GMOs.

One of the concerns raised strongly by those opposing GM crops in India is that many important crops like rice, brinjal, and mustard, among others, originated here, and introducing genetically modified versions of these crops could be a major threat to the vast number of domestic and wild varieties of these crops. In fact, globally, there is a clear view that GM crops must not be introduced in centres of origin and diversity. India also has mega biodiversity hotspots like the Eastern Himalayas and the Western Ghats which are rich in biodiversity yet ecologically very sensitive. Hence it will only be prudent for us to be careful before we jump on to the bandwagon of any technology.

The committee's findings on the GEAC-led regulatory system for GM crops show that it has a pro-Department of Biotechnology (DBT) and pro-industry tilt. It has also come under the scanner due to its inefficiency at the time of Bt Brinjal approval and for behaving like a promoter of GM crops rather than a regulatory body mandated to protect human health and environment from the risks of biotechnology. The DBT, whose mandate is to promote GM crops and fund various transgenics research, has a nominee as the co-chair of the GEAC, who gives the final approval for environmental and commercial release of GM crops.

The current regulatory system is shameful and calls for a complete makeover. While the government has been toying recently with the idea of a Biotechnology Regulatory Authority, the committee dismisses this and instead recommends an all-encompassing Biosafety Authority. While the committee has also evaluated international regulatory systems on GM crops, it recommends the Norwegian Gene Technology Act whose primary focus is bio-safety and sustainable development without adverse effects on health and environment, as a piece of legislation in the right direction for regulating GM crops in India.

The committee strongly believes that the problem today is in no measure comparable to the ship-to-mouth situation of the early 1960s. Policy and decision-makers must note that the total food grain production rose from 197 million tonnes in 2000-2001 to 241 million tonnes in 2010-11. A major argument by the Department of Agriculture and Cooperation before the committee in favour of GM crops was their potential to ensure the country's food security. But the issue of food security is not about production alone; it also means access to food for the poorest. Moreover, there is no evidence as yet that GM crops can actually increase yields.

The committee, therefore, recommended the government come up with a fresh road map for ensuring food security in the coming years without jeopardising the vast biodiversity of the country and compromising with the safety of human and livestock health.

The committee unanimously feels that the government should take decisive action on the recommendations of this report and rethink its decision of introducing transgenics in agriculture as a sustainable way forward. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Item 2
Bar GM Food Crops, Says Parliamentary Panel
By Gargi Parsai, The Hindu, India
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3747247.ece
10 August 2012

In a major setback to the proponents of genetically modified technology in farm crops, the Parliamentary Committee on Agriculture on Thursday asked the government to stop all field trials and sought a bar on GM food crops (such as Bt. brinjal).

The committee report, tabled in the Lok Sabha, demanded a "thorough probe" into how permission was given to commercialise Bt. brinjal seed when all evaluation tests were not carried out.

It said there were indications of a "collusion of the worst kind from the beginning till the imposition of a moratorium on its commercialisation in February, 2010, by the then Minister for Environment and Forests."

The report came a day after Maharashtra cancelled Mahyco's licence to sell its Bt. cotton seeds.

It flayed the government for not discussing the issue in Parliament and observed that the Ministry failed in its responsibility by introducing such a policy, ignoring the interests of the 70 per cent small and marginal farmers.

The report criticised the composition and regulatory role of the Genetic Engineering Approval (Appraisal) Committee and the Review Committee on Genetic Manipulation (RCGM).

According to Committee chairman Basudeb Acharia, there is not a single note of dissent in the report of the 31-member panel, including nine from the Congress and six from the BJP. Observing that GM crops (such as Bt. cotton) benefited the (seed) industry without a "trickle-down" gain to farmers, it recommended that till all concerns were addressed, further research and development should be done only in contained conditions.

Citing instances of conflict of interest of various stakeholders, the panel said the government must put in place all regulatory, monitoring, oversight and surveillance systems.

Raising the "ethical dimensions" of transgenics in agricultural crops, as well as studies of a long-term environmental and chronic toxicology impact, the panel noted that there were no significant socio-economic benefits to farmers. On the contrary, farmers have incurred huge debts because of this capital-intensive practice. "Today, 93 per cent of the area is under Bt. cotton because no alternative seeds are available," Mr. Acharia said.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Item 3
GM Panel Recommends Halting All Field Trials
By Jacob P. Koshy, Livemint, India
http://www.livemint.com/2012/08/09223326/GM-panel-recomme...
9 September 2012

A parliamentary committee has recommended halting all field trials of genetically modified (GM) seeds and sought an independent probe into how the government had accorded approval to Bt brinjal, a seed that was developed by Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. Ltd (Mahyco).

Though it's not mandatory for the government to accept the parliamentary standing committee's recommendations, the suggestions of several such panels have significantly influenced government policy. Former environment minister Jairam Ramesh in 2010 imposed a moratorium on the sale of Bt brinjal seeds in India.

The recommendations of the panel comes a day after the Maharashtra government cancelled Mahyco's licence to sell Bt cotton seed in the state. This was after allegations that the company had misinformed state agricultural officials on the availability of Bt cotton seeds for farmers.

Mahyco said in a statement that it will wait to hear from the government before addressing issues around the ban.

"In India, where 82% of the agriculture industry is of small farmers and where there is huge biodiversity, we should not go for GM foods. Even if we take the argument that we have to increase our food production according to the demands, we should look into indigenous ways to enhance it," said Basudeb Acharya, chairman of the standing committee on agriculture and a leader of the Communist Party of India (Marxist).

Pointing out that the introduction of Bt cotton was not discussed in Parliament before it was introduced in the country, Acharya said there was neither a study on its impact on cattlefeed made out of the cotton seeds, nor was any specific regulatory body to ensure food safety and standards.

The parliamentary panel, which met around 1,500 farmers in Goregaon in Maharashtra, also found they were left with no other alternatives to Bt cotton seeds in the market.

"The production cost, which was reduced due to less usage of pesticides, has been increasing," Acharya said. "And we found largest number of suicides were reported from the areas where Bt Cotton is grown."

The committee also pointed out that Ayurvedic medical practitioners have complained it had an adverse impact on the medicinal plants grown in the area.

The panel's study on Cultivation of Genetically Modified Food Crops - Prospects and Effects is among the most extensive studies conducted by a parliamentary standing committee. The panel received 467 memorandums, 14,862 documents and reviewed evidences given by 50 organizations during its 27 sittings on the subject.

While Bt cotton is the only GM plant that,s allowed to be cultivated, several private companies have been looking at introducing different kinds of GM seeds, including rice, tomato and wheat.

Following protests from civil society groups and farmers, several state government,s have banned trials of GM crops.

To bring greater transparency in the way crops are tested, the government has proposed an independent regulator, called the Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India. Legislation to set up the authority has been pending for two years.

Earlier this year, the ministry of consumer affairs, food and public distribution ruled that all packaged food that was sourced from GM ingredients had to be labelled so.

The "report vindicates the concerns and positions taken by many state governments in India, such as Bihar, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, etc., which have disallowed GM crops, including field trials. It also vindicates the larger public demand not to allow GM crops into our food and farming systems," Sridhar Radhakrishnan, convener of the Coalition for a GM-Free India, a group that is opposed to the introduction of GM crops, said in a statement.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Item 4
Proper Tests Not Done Before Giving Nod To Bt Brinjal: Parliamentary Panel
The Economic Times, India
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/...
10 August 2012

NEW DELHI: A parliamentary panel has recommended a thorough probe into the controversy surrounding Bt Brinjal and indicated the approval committee was under tremendous pressure from the "industry and a minister" and did not conduct requisite tests properly before granting approval for introduction.

The 31-member parliamentary standing committee on agriculture tabled its report in Parliament on "Cultivation of genetically modified food crops - prospects and effects", on Thursday. The 492-page exhaustive report on the issue has rejected the idea of genetically modified food crops for India, punching holes in the theory of an urgent need to increase food production through bio-technology. The committee had taken up the issue suo moto in 2010, when a debate over Bt Brinjal and Bt Cotton was raging. It has now observed it was convinced that the government did not carry out significant tests properly before giving a go-ahead for commercial production of Bt Brinjal.

The committee said it was indicative of "collusion of a worst kind". Standing committee chairman Basudeb Acharia said the observation was made after testimony of Dr PM Bhargava, the Supreme Court nominee on Genetic Engineering Appraisal committee (GEAC), before the parliamentary panel. Bhargava said co-chairman of GEAC Prof Arjula Reddy confessed that the tests asked by Bhargava for assessing Bt Brinjal had not been carried out and even the tests undertaken were performed badly as Reddy was under pressure with calls from industry, GEAC and the minister to approve Bt Brinjal. Speaking to reporters Acharia refused to divulge the name of the minister. When asked whether the committee was told the name, Acharia replied in the negative. The committee found that GM crops have an impact on health and the environment and these aspects were overlooked while approving Bt Brinjal trials in India.

After examining the issue for two-and-a-half years, the committee felt there was no need to introduce genetically modified food crops in India. Acharia said, "in a country like India, where 82% of farmers are small and marginal we should not go for genetically modified food crops. But if at all the government decides to - because of the argument that the demand for food will increase abnormally by 2020 and existing technology would not be sufficient - then there should be enough safeguards in place. Even then we feel that the government should go for indigenous alternatives. If you see in the past we have been able to increase our food production from 56 million tonnes to 254 million tones, then why do we think in future we won,t be able to achieve such growth in food production?"

The committee has strongly criticised the present regulatory system for genetically modified crops, calling it antiquated and inadequate. It has pointed out serious conflict of interest of various stakeholders involved in the regulatory mechanism as well. Making sharp observations on the issue, the committee has recommended that the government bring an all-encompassing umbrella legislation on bio-safety, which is focused on ensuring the bio-safety, biodiversity, human and livestock health, environmental protection and which specifically describes the extent to which bio-technology, including modern bio-technology, fits in the scheme of things. Acharia said the committee as recommended that the government bring such a legislation "after due consultation with all stakeholders and bring it before Parliament without any further delay."

The panel has also recommended proper labelling of genetically modified food. Acharia said the consumer had the right to know and make an informed choice. He pointed out that other countries which allow GM food, such labeling laws are in place.

"The committee recommends that the government should immediately issue regulation for making labeling of all GM products, including food, feed and food products, so as to ensure the consumer is able to make an informed choice in the matter of what he/she wants to consume," the report says.

The report is significant as it comes at a time when the Centre, especially the Ministry of Science and Technology, is trying hard to introduce a new regulatory system for GM crops by the name Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India.

The committee is dominated by UPA with 11 Congress MPs, two from DMK and one Trinamool Congress member. With one member from Samajwadi Party and two from BSP, the total strength of UPA and supporting parties is 17 on the panel. Left Front has two members, including Acharia and one Forward Bloc MP and NDA has 12 MPs.

Ironically, the stand taken by Acharia-led committee is divergent from the view of CPM, Acharia's party. CPM polit bureau member S Ramachandran Pillai had kicked up a storm in Kerala last year when he had nuanced his party,s view by saying complete opposition to genetically modified crops was superstitious. Pillai also appeared before the standing committee as the president of the All India Kisan Sabha and said: "I am for making use of the achievements of science and technology in agriculture as in the case of other areas... There are possibilities for increasing productivity and production in agriculture by making use of genetically modified crops... Very rigorous bio-diversity tests should be conducted to ensure that the genetically modified crops should not cause any ill effects on human life, other plant and animal life and also on the overall environment."


Via Giri Kumar
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Nicki Davison from YOUR FOOD, YOUR ENVIRONMENT, YOUR HEALTH: #Biotech #GMOs #Pesticides #Chemicals #FactoryFarms #CAFOs #BigFood
Scoop.it!

Monsanto versus the people

Monsanto versus the people | Genetically modified food | Scoop.it

Jan 13, 2013 AL JAZEERA- VIDEO

 

Last week Monsanto announced staggering profits from 2012 to celebratory shareholders while American farmers filed into Washington, DC to challenge the Biotech giant’s right to sue farmers whose fields have become contaminated with Monsanto’s seeds. On January 10 oral arguments began before the U.S. Court of Appeals to decide whether to reverse the cases' dismissal last February.

Exploiting their patent on transgenic corn, soybean and cotton, Monsanto asserts an insidious control of those agricultural industries in the US, effectively squeezing out conventional farmers (those using non-transgenic seeds) and eliminating their capacity to viably participate and compete on the market. (Until the end of 2012, Monsanto was under investigation by the Department of Justice for violating anti-trust laws by practicing anticompetitive activities towards other biotech companies, but that investigation was quietly closed before the year's end.)

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/01/201311071754973439.html

 

>> HUNDREDS PROTEST DEMANDING OBAMA HALT APPROVAL OF GE FOODS AND END INTIMIDATION CAMPAIGN OVER GMOs   http://www.scoop.it/t/agriculture-gmos-pesticides/p/3994922044/hundreds-protest-demanding-obama-halt-approval-of-ge-foods-and-end-intimidation-campaign-over-gmos

 

>>Jan 16, 2013 INSECTICIDE 'UNACCEPTABLE' DANGER TO BEES AND FOOD, REPORT FINDS - The Guardian Environment http://www.scoop.it/t/agriculture-gmos-pesticides/p/3995105472/insecticide-unacceptable-danger-to-bees-and-food-report-finds

 

 

BATTLE FOR THE BEES: Dying Bees Raise Alarm For Humans - Europe Bans Pesticide http://sco.lt/8QOFgv

 

 

 >>>>>THE GLOBAL CHEMICAL BIOTECH CARTEL - AN UNPRECEDENTED POWER OVER WORLD FOOD SUPPLY http://www.scoop.it/t/agriculture-gmos-pesticides/p/1716244040/the-global-chemical-biotech-cartel-an-unprecedented-power-over-world-agriculture-and-human-health

>> OUR CHEMICAL-LADEN WORLD: Are the Bees the Canary in the Coal Mine for Human And Environmental Health? http://www.alternet.org/story/154039/have_bees_become_canaries_in_the_coal_mine_why_massive_bee_dieoffs_may_be_a_warning_about_our_own_health

 

 

OUR POLLINATORS DYING

 

>> IF THEY'RE KILLING OUR BEES, WHAT ARE PESTICIDES DOING TO US?  Farmers Press for Access to Bee-Friendly Corn Seeds http://www.scoop.it/t/biodiversity-is-life/p/1824138698/if-they-re-killing-our-bees-what-are-they-doing-to-us-farmers-press-for-access-to-bee-friendly-corn-seedsBEE-KILLING

>> 81% MONARCH BUTTERFLY DECLINE LINKED TO GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS - Yale Environment  http://e360.yale.edu/digest/us_monarch_butterfly_decline_may_be_linked_to_gm_crop_use_study_says/3380/

 

>> GENETICALLY ENGINEERED CORN AND SICK/DYING HONEY BEES - WHAT'S THE LINK? GM http://www.panna.org/blog/ge-corn-sick-honey-bees-whats-link

 >> NEONICOTINOID PESTICIDES HAVE NO PLACE IN FOOD PRODUCTION - SO MANY HONEYBEES AND OTHER POLLINATORS ARE DYING - http://www.motherearthnews.com/honeybees-beekeeping/neonicotinoid-pesticides-zb0z1204zlon.aspx

 

 

 

MORE ON PESTICIDES AND BEES http://www.scoop.it/t/agriculture-gmos-pesticides?q=BEES+PESTICIDES

 

 


Via pdjmoo
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Nicki Davison from Biodiversity IS Life – #Conservation #Ecosystems #Wildlife #Rivers #Forests #Environment
Scoop.it!

Bio Re-engineering Nature: Peach genome and Poplars, Willow Trees for Patented Biofuels crops

Bio Re-engineering Nature: Peach genome and Poplars, Willow Trees for Patented Biofuels crops | Genetically modified food | Scoop.it

Washington DC (SPX) Mar 26, 2013 -
Rapidly growing trees like poplars and willows are candidate biofuel crops from which it is expected that cellulosic ethanol and higher energy content fuels can be efficiently extracted.... http://www.biofueldaily.com/reports/Peach_genome_offers_insights_into_breeding_strategies_for_biofuels_crops_999.html

 

MONSANTO GMO TREES COULD DEVASTATE FOREST ECOSYSTEMS http://sco.lt/52lFDN

 

 

GMOs AND BIOTECH: THE FOOD FIGHT OF OUR LIVES - CROSSING ROSES WITH PIGS AND BUTTERFLIES WITH WORMS - NOT OKAY http://sco.lt/4olIPJ

 

PATENTING LIFE ITSELF - OUR 21ST CENTURY FACTORY OF LIFE: RE-ENGINEERING, PRORAMMING  - IS BIOTECH OUT OF CONTROL?  http://sco.lt/4thM6j

 

GENE GIANTS STOCKPILING PATENTS ON LIFE
Nagoya, Japan -- Under the guise of developing “climate-ready” crops, the world’s largest seed and agrochemical corporations are filing hundreds of sweeping, multi-genome patents in a bid to control the world’s plant biomass, according to a report released by ETC Group http://www.etcgroup.org/fr/node/5220

 

KNOWN BIOTECH GENE ALTERING IN THE PIPELINE

http://www.genet-info.org/information-services/genetically-engineered-animals/ge-salmon.html

 

-----  NEW GM BABIES BORN A DECADE AGO http://www.seattleorganicrestaurants.com/vegan-whole-food/genetically-engineered-babies.php

------  GMO PATENTS MAY OWN OUR FORESTS:  MONSANTO GMO TREES COULD DEVASTATE FOREST ECOYSTEMS http://sco.lt/5G9P0L

------  PATENT FOR A PIG:  SCIENTIST "IMPROVE' TRANSGENIC GMO "ENVIROPIGS" http://sco.lt/7hrnF3

------  FIRST GM CAMELS TO BE ENGINEERED FOR DRUG PRODUCTION | @scoopit http://sco.lt/5L5VVB

------ GM COW BRINGS BIOTECH TO A NEW LEVEL OF CREEPY http://sco.lt/62KG6T

------  UNLEASHING GENETICALLY SALMON ONTO YOUR DINNER PLATE = NO REGULATIONS, NO OVERSIGHT  - "FATALLY FLAWED" FDA ASSESSMENT http://sco.lt/8ZDraz

-----    GROWING PHARMACEUTICALS IN GMO PLANT REQUIRES NEW, STRICT REGULATIONS AND OVERSIGHT - PATENT MONOPOLIES http://sco.lt/7KM4qv

 

 

MONSANTO BUYS OBAMA, THE US SENATE AND THE GLOBAL FARM   http://sco.lt/8xdkYb

 

 

MORE ON BIOFUELS: http://www.scoop.it/t/biodiversity-is-life?q=BIOFUELS

 


Via pdjmoo
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Nicki Davison from India Biotech & Pharma
Scoop.it!

Indian GM appraisal committee (GEAC) gets new claws - BioSpectrum Asia

Indian GM appraisal committee (GEAC) gets new claws - BioSpectrum Asia | Genetically modified food | Scoop.it

One step forward, two steps back.


Via Amar Bhat
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Nicki Davison
Scoop.it!

Fonterra at Risk from GM Rye-grass - Scoop.co.nz (press release)

Fonterra at Risk from GM Rye-grass - Scoop.co.nz (press release) | Genetically modified food | Scoop.it
Fonterra at Risk from GM Rye-grass
Scoop.co.nz (press release)
... in animals fed GM-crops of similar types to those approved and being imported into New Zealand for animal feed for poultry and for use in dairying (3).
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Nicki Davison
Scoop.it!

Filipino farmers destroy GM crops designed to alleviate malnutrition ...

Filipino farmers destroy GM crops designed to alleviate malnutrition ... | Genetically modified food | Scoop.it
A group of 400 protestors has stormed a field filled with test crops of vitamin A-delivering Golden Rice in the Philippines, in protest at the genetically modified food industry it sees as being driven by foreign interests.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Nicki Davison
Scoop.it!

Say No To GMOs! - Getting Started

Say No To GMOs! - Getting Started | Genetically modified food | Scoop.it
Grassroots education, activities and resources for consumer choice and a genetically viable future
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Nicki Davison
Scoop.it!

Genetically Modified Foods: Harmful or Helpful?

Genetically Modified Foods: Harmful or Helpful? | Genetically modified food | Scoop.it
Recent studies about
genetically-modified foods indicate that GMOs may cause harm to monarch
butterfly caterpillars. Corn plants have been genetically engineered
using B.t. to be resistant to insect pests.
more...
No comment yet.