The abstract-seeming images here are not the result of some wacky Photoshopping. Jay Mark Johnson’s photos are actually incredibly precise. The reason they look like this is because he uses a slit camera that emphasizes time over space.
Share ideas that matter on the social web and experience
the benefits of curating the world's best content.
I don't have a Facebook, a Twitter or a LinkedIn account
Your new post is loading...
pdeppisch's comment,
April 22, 11:11 AM
And how do you adopt the new model? Full speed ahead? And if there are rocks, i.e. unintended consequences, then what? Who decides that the new model is workable for humanity and not just the elite read, moneymaker? Making the old model obsolete is being done all the time. Making it work for humanity and sustainable for planet earth is another thing. There ain't no easy answers only complex ones and complexity is not the strong point of humans. Humans seem to be limited by only understanding 7 +/- 2 facts at any given time. We get around that limitation by chunking facts into meta facts. But your understanding of my meta facts and vice versa is rather problematic at all times, especially if money is involved.
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Anne Caspari's comment,
June 14, 6:51 AM
Paul Hawken has his own way with strong polarities in the environmental arena.
The data he comes up with through his extensive experience and research into facts and causes on environmental and societal issues is deeply shocking, disturbing, overwhelming. There is no denial or extenuation. He is looking right into the abyss and he has studied it thoroughly from all angles. Hawken takes the facts, connects the dots and to provides vital perspectives that help to reframe the context(s). With his vast unconventional body of wisdom, he helps re-enriching the global dialogue on climate change that somehow got reduced and flattened to a few polarized and often misinterpreted points. In his talks he puts together facts and trajectories from; history, food, economy, energy, commerce, culture, science, and technology in order to re-install climate change and the state of the environment as the civilization issue that it really is. Funny thing, and so precious for anybody having to deal with pending global issues: after listening to all the dire facts he is able to lead the listener towards a different, inspiring sphere of influence. More subtle, powerful, touching on post-dialectic thinking. New openings. If you allow yourself to follow his lead and listen, you will be positively surprised and uplifted. Paul Hawken comes to Oslo for a public lecture at Oslo University next Wednesday, 17:00 on reframing contexts on climate change - “The Reimagination of Carbon”. Free entry, limited seats. Do not miss it. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Anne Caspari's curator insight,
May 15, 5:45 PM
This is where I want to return to the idea that what we face is a design problem, where answers exist not at an unattainable theoretical level but on the floors of our factories, in the streets of our towns and cities, the classes of our schools, the waiting rooms of our hospitals. These answers will manifest themselves as true acts of creation, originating new ways of getting stuff done, informed by the decisions we collectively take. So in re-designing the world, we need human creativity in the sense of the capacity to ‘make’, we need visionary leadership in the sense of making a difference. And we seek the craftsman’s critical eye, steady hand and creative mind. It is this process of seeing – realising new pathways to success, by bringing two ‘unlikes’ (new information, tools, processes etc.) together in close adjacency – that we create, and make new things. Then we can meaningfully apply that capability. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Deb Nystrom, REVELN Consulting's comment,
April 17, 2:57 PM
Anne, your layering encourages critical nuanced views beyond the book's "shiny new term" idea. Sometimes the first thing to do is "not do," as in, don't just do something, stand there. Doe we need an "intervention?" What are the other perspectives available, thinking systemically? Re: Iatrogenics: From the "Black Swan Report: "...the argument of Chapters 21 and 22 on the convexity of iatrogenics (only treat the VERY ill): Mortality is convex to blood pressure."
Anne Caspari's comment,
April 22, 9:42 AM
Hi Deb, thanks :-). I also reckon there are MANY fresh perspectives on how to handle different systems (or leave them alone), may they be health, financial, socio-political, ecological.... I love it and keep smiling to myself when I see the aha - moments on applied convexity/anti/fragility pop up in daily life, business and otherwise... compliments also on your scoops...
Deb Nystrom, REVELN Consulting's comment,
April 22, 10:16 PM
Thanks Anne. Systems and org. groupies a bit, maybe. ;-)
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Anne Caspari's curator insight,
April 29, 3:52 AM
"Wildness is the earthy, untamed, undomesticated state of things -- open-ended, improvisational, moving according to its own boisterous logic. That which is wild is not really out of control; it is simply out of our control. Wildness is not a state of disorder, but a condition whose order is not imposed from outside. Wild land follows its own order, its own Tao, its own inherent way in the world. " Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Anne Caspari's comment,
April 16, 9:54 AM
nicely done, I do like their stuff, it is honest and authentic, and not flattening transformative processes to become trivia.
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
|
Karen O'Brien's curator insight,
June 12, 6:54 AM
This will be an important talk. As Paul Hawken wrote in his book "Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Social Movement in History is Restoring Grace, Justice, and Beauty to the World," "The term 'solving for pattern' was coined by Wendell Berry, and refers to a solution that addresses multiple problems instead of one. Solving for patterns arises naturally when one perceives problems as symptoms of systemic failure, rather than as random errors requiring anodynes." Is carbon the problem, or are we? Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Anne Caspari's curator insight,
May 13, 5:19 AM
great! with integral colleague Gail Hochachka: deleloping the self, developing community inside out. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Anne Caspari's comment,
March 26, 4:49 AM
So the bottom line for conscious business is life itself. As a generative design principle.
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
|
Beautiful, weird. Time/Space inverted. Changed perspectives, alters reality perception.