Fuji X-Pro1
91
Aspects of Digital Photography focusing on the Fuji X-Pro1, X-E1 and X100s - photographer, reviews, samples and more ... | http://www.tomen.de
Curated by Thomas Menk
Follow
Scooped by Thomas Menk onto Fuji X-Pro1
Scoop.it!

FujiFilm RAF/RAW Process Interactive Comparison | Terrance Lam

FujiFilm RAF/RAW Process Interactive Comparison | Terrance Lam | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it

 

Just a small follow up on all the RAW experimentation I've been doing with the FujiFilm X-Pro1 RAF files. Here's an interactive mouseover table to see the differences. Areas too look for are in the wood grain (you'll see a lot of colour or chroma noise in the different examples), Smearing of details (look at the texture of the walls to see how it gets smeared and creates the water colour effect), Aliasing issues (look on hard contrast edges to see a zipper aliasing effect), and lastly loss of details (in the red brick you'll see the various levels of details in the pores of the brick).

 

Some quick comments:

DCRAW 9.16: Gives the highest details, however has aliasing artifacts. Some chroma noise (even after filtering). Command line prompt only. Requires some technical know how. I use VNG interpolation and 15 pass median filtering.

 

1/2 Median: Is the filtering I apply to DCRAW to combat the aliasing artifacts. Requires a program that has Median filtering, and very process intensive.

 

Raw Photo Processor (RPP 4.7): Utilizes DCRAW and acts as front end. Works very well for details, but aliasing and chroma noise is high. My technique of 15 passes of median averaging in DCRAW clears up more chroma noise than what is produced by this program.

 

Graphic Converter (Patched): Patched with DCRAW 9.16 gives very similar results to RPP however this program is much friendlier to use than RPP and has some real nice post processing options. Could almost be used as an all in one solution.

 

In Camera JPG: The default standard. Still exhibits some detail smearing compared to something like DCRAW output, but has no aliasing or chroma noise artifacts.

 

SilkPix Developer Pro 5: The software that is part of Fuji's RAW processing uses an older SilkyPix engine. This current version is very clean however does show some chroma smearing (look at the green colour that appears under the window ledge and the loss of other colours). Shows very little chroma noise and no real aliasing errors. Very clean output and slightly softer than raw DCRAW output, but lot less aliasing even over the 1/2 Pixel Median filter. I would highly recommend this option if it weren't for the fact that the cost of the software is pretty high.

 

FujiFilm Raw File Converter: This software bundled with the camera uses an older SilkyPix engine. It does a pretty good job, but the interface is very difficult to use and understand. Compared to the latests version of SilkPix it exhibits chroma noise and some detail smearing.

 

Lightroom 4.3: Has low amounts of chroma noise, but very heavy detail smearing. Loss of details but no aliasing artifacts. Even at 100% it's hard to see the 'Watercolour' effect if you don't know what to look for. I suspect a very heavy pre-demosaic median filter and bicubic interpolation algorithm is the cause of the issues. However it's still one of the easiest to use, and if you can handle some of the image quality loss, most likely won't notice the detail loss.

No comment yet.
Thomas Menk is also curating
Kreativitätsdenken MentalBusiness Intuition
Discover Topics Thomas Menk is following
The Billy Pulpit Quite Interesting News HDSLR Where is the love? Content Curation World Science News
and 89 others
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

My Fuji X-Pro2, X-E2 Wish List | CamCrunch

My Fuji X-Pro2, X-E2 Wish List | CamCrunch | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it


I’ve had the Fuji X-E1 for a little over a week now and thought I love the Fuji X system, there are things that I’m not 100% happy with and would like to see an improvement to in their next iterations. Here is my Fuji X-Pro2 and X-E2 wish list.

 

Phase Detection Autofocus on the Fuji X-Pro2 and X-E2

 

With the announcement of the Fuji X100s, we are finally getting phase detection autofocus on Fuji X bodies. The X100s is said to be the fastest Fuji X camera to date. I’m sure that the next camera in the Fuji X-Pro series will definitely be getting phase detection, but it would be awesome to see it implemented better than that of the Fuji X100s. At the moment, the Fuji X100s only have phase detect autofocus built into the sensor on only the center autofocus point. Having phase detection built into more focus point would take the Fuji X-Pro series to the next level and bring it closer to matching semi-pro DSLR cameras.

 

20-24 Megapixels on the Fuji X-Pro2 and X-E2

 

I’m happy with the 16 megapixels of the Fuji X-E1 but having come from the Canon 5D Mark II, I miss those extra pixels and the flexibility that comes with having them. If Fuji can up their megapixel count without sacrificing dynamic range and high ISO performance, I’ll be a very happy man.

More Responsive Electronic Viewfinder on the Fuji X-Pro2 and X-E2

The Electronic viewfinder on the Fuji X-Pro1 is good as it is, and it is even better on the Fuji X-E1. Despite the already outstanding technology that is put into the electronic viewfinder technology, it hasn’t come close to matching the experience of shooting with an optical viewfinder. I’m happy with the X-E1 EVF, but any improvement on the technology behind it will be a plus.....

Thomas Menk's insight:

Part1:

http://www.camcrunch.com/2013/03/my-fuji-x-pro2-x-e2-wish-list/


Part2:

http://www.camcrunch.com/2013/03/my-fuji-x-pro2-x-e2-wish-list-part-2/

 

Part3:

http://www.camcrunch.com/2013/04/my-fuji-x-pro2-x-e2-wish-list-part-3/

 

 

Steinar Knai's comment, May 2, 11:54 AM
Please stick with your Canon. 16MP is more than enough on a APS sensor and if you think you know it all after one week, think again. Fuji, pls don't listen to this fellow.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Fuji X PRO2 to be announced soon? | Fuji Rumors

Fuji X PRO2 to be announced soon? | Fuji Rumors | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it

 

Current Fuji X PRO 1 owners know well the strengths but also the quirks of the camera. And those quirks are a major problem as it seems that they can be fixed by hardware changes only. So “rumors” about a possible new X PRO 2 model are getting bigger. We heard it will be announced within the next 2-3 weeks. The camera will feature a new sensor too. We heard it will be priced above the current X PRO 1. But it has to be really good to convince me to spend more than you have to do for the X PRO1

Keitho's comment, August 24, 2012 2:33 PM
I am in the frame for the XP1 with a 35mm (50) lens and will purchase the 23mm (35mm) when it comes out next year. I will sell my mint 5dMKII and L series lenses to make this purchase as at 69 y.o.a I want to downsize and get back to a RF style camera. Already the cost of the XP1 is more than any sane person should spend on a crop sensor camera, so a dearer XP2 will only be affordable by Leica M types. If the upgrade is to sort out the current model issues I would want it over the XP1. It's a stretch at the current price, so this would be a deal breaker for me and I would stick with what I have already got and work with that. I think Fuji could be overestimating the desire for this camera when it comes to pricing.