Fuji X-Pro1
91
Aspects of Digital Photography focusing on the Fuji X-Pro1, X-E1 and X100s - photographer, reviews, samples and more ... | http://www.tomen.de
Curated by Thomas Menk
Follow
Scooped by Thomas Menk onto Fuji X-Pro1
Scoop.it!

Diopters for the Fuji X-Pro1 | The Online Photographer

Diopters for the Fuji X-Pro1 | The Online Photographer | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it

 

Several readers have mentioned the Fuji X-Pro1's lack of built-in diopter correction. A commenter named peter [sic—I always reproduce commenter names just as they come in] mentioned this morning that Nikon FM-style diopters fit the Fuji's eyepiece. That's fortunate, because those are the most common aftermarket diopters (well, they're not aftermarket, but they might as well be), and they're widely available. At B&H Photo, they'll be labeled "Diopter for FM3A, FM2, FM, FE2, FE & FA" and they cost $21.95 each. Admittedly, that doesn't help if you don't know what diopter you need, but maybe your optician could help you there. Or perhaps you have another camera on which the diopter correction dial or slider is marked with actual values....

 

Doug: "Some technical notes on dioptric correction lenses.

"Nikon, like Canon and maybe other manufacturers, labels their correction lenses by the total effect when mounted on a camera with the standard –1 diopter viewfinder, so a '–2' lens has an additional –1. There is no '–1' correction lens, because that'd be plain glass. There is, however, a '0' (Nikon seems to call it 'neutral') correction lens that has a +1 correction.


"Dioptric numbers for viewfinders are straightforward. They determine the apparent distance (for eye-focusing) of the viewscreen. They're numbered in –1/meters.


0/neutral: infinity
–0.5: 2 meters
–1 (standard viewfinder): 1 meter
–2: 1/2 meter
–3: 1/3 meter
+anything: Buzz Lightyear territory (infinity and beyond)

 

Lars Bøgvad Jeppesen's comment, November 1, 2012 5:23 PM
Why not just get the original Fuji diopter, it's only $14.95 from the same sellers?
Thomas Menk is also curating
Kreativitätsdenken MentalBusiness Intuition
Discover Topics Thomas Menk is following
The Billy Pulpit Quite Interesting News HDSLR Where is the love? Content Curation World Science News
and 89 others
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Fuji X-Pro 1 file - ACR compared to RPP | David Taylor-Hughes

Fuji X-Pro 1 file - ACR compared to RPP | David Taylor-Hughes | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it

I've done a comparison on a Fuji X-Pro 1 file using The new Photoshop ACR 7.4 and Raw Photo Processor 64, the excellent Mac platform raw converter. Different software but I processed each with no sharpening added and only added a slight amount in Photoshop later. I used the same values for each file. Click on the link for the full-size high-res file. As many who have tried the new ACR are saying, the files are slightly softer than they were before, but unlike the previous ACR conversion, it is now possible to add sharpening to these X-Trans files without creating unpleasant artefacts. RPP still produces slightly sharper results to my eyes, but there isn't a lot in it. 
After waiting a long time to see this, I spent yesterday working on some X-Pro 1 files and it was pleasing to see the results. I have been so frustrated by the fact that I knew that there was more in the files, but was unable to get to it. RPP is great and I recommend it, but Photoshop is the cornerstone of my processing workflow and I know it well and how to get what I want from it. So for any camera I use, proper support is essential. It is now finally available.
So what went on? Was this a spat between Fuji and Adobe? Did Adobe just take their time to get round to this? We will never know the whole story, but it has been a long wait. As you know I baled out on the X-Pro 1 early when it looked like there wasn't going to be decent ACR support and I've had lots of files sitting on my hard drives that I haven't done much with, since I wasn't keen to upload what I considered to be sub-standard versions to my picture libraries. I can now get some really nice files from my original raws and they do have a different 'look' to conventional bayer sensor files.  With the ACR conversions and indeed with the RPP ones as well, there isn't that classic non-AA filter look. But then with the different sensor array I'm not sure that there would be. What is extraordinary is the ability to produce 'clean' files at high(er) ISO's. I believe it would be perfectly feasible to shoot high-quality landscape at ISO 400 and even ISO 800 with an x-trans sensor and I'm seeing a 2-stop improvement in noise levels over virtually everything else I use. This has all sorts of advantages in terms of narrower apertures and higher shutter speeds when shooting in good light, which for what I do is a good thing.
I've been very critical of this whole raw conversion saga and indeed seem to have developed somewhat of a reputation as a 'Fuji basher', but my only concern was to see a realisation of the FULL potential of these files. We do now have that and I'm glad to become a Fuji X-Trans enthusiast at long last. But lets be honest, its been a long and unnecessary wait and thats not really good enough.  For those who had the patience to stick with it, welcome to your new camera!
No comment yet.
Suggested by PeterPrism
Scoop.it!

FUJI X-PRO1 - Raw file conversion using Raw Photo Processor | SoundImagePlus

FUJI X-PRO1 - Raw file conversion using Raw Photo Processor | SoundImagePlus | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it

 

As you can clearly see, processing raw files from the X-Pro 1 in Raw Photo Processor 64 is much better at reproducing the fine detail that gets lost in Adobe Camera Raw. I've tried this myself and it does in fact work very well.

However you should be aware that Raw Photo Processor 64 is dcraw based software and takes a while to get used to. I also found that it does increase the amount of work needed to process files, and I personally find it very difficult to get the colour right. The beta version that supports the X-Pro 1 is also Mac only.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Fuji Xpro1 Raw Conversion Samples | Matt Wilson on Digital Photography Review

Fuji Xpro1 Raw Conversion Samples | Matt Wilson on Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it


Here are some 100% crops comparing various raw converters. The image I used was a test image from a Contax G 21mm (I was hoping some software could work miracles for the corners). That's the reason for the diagonal orientation and the very poor corner performance. Anyway, I did this for me, but figured others would appreciate it as well. The one that says CF-CR was converted to dng, processed in cornerfix, and converted in Adobe camera raw.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Raw Photo Processor (RPP) supports Fuji X-pro1 (only Mac) | developing by Andrey Tverdokhleb

Raw Photo Processor (RPP) supports Fuji X-pro1 (only Mac) | developing by Andrey Tverdokhleb | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it

There is a new beta version of RPP that supports raw processing of Fuji X-Pro1 files.

RPP is a Universal application that works on all G4 and higher PowerPC and all Intel based Macs with Mac OS 10.4, 10.5, 10.6 and 10.7. RPP is easy to integrate with other tool though, f.e. it has Adobe Lightroom version 2,3 and 4 plugin and can work directly with Photoshop.

 

http://www.raw-photo-processor.com/RPP/RPP_Uni_880Beta.zip

No comment yet.