Fuji X-Pro1
91
Aspects of Digital Photography focusing on the Fuji X-Pro1, X-E1 and X100s - photographer, reviews, samples and more ... | http://www.tomen.de
Curated by Thomas Menk
Follow
Scooped by Thomas Menk onto Fuji X-Pro1
Scoop.it!

Bouncing the Flash - Fuji XE1 | Amy Medina on Digital Photography Review

Bouncing the Flash - Fuji XE1 | Amy Medina on Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it

 

Yes, it's true... you can bounce the little flip up flash on the XE1. The way it pops up seems to lend itself to easily holding it with a finger, pointed at the ceiling... and this is a very welcomed thing. I'm not normally a flash shooter, AT ALL... so I don't even know the best settings for inside flash shots. I just took these quick to show the difference.

 

NOTE: Sorry about the subject - I didn't have a model that would sit still otherwise. ALSO these are straight out of the camera. If the white balance seems a little "cool" it's because the ceiling in this room is painted a light but stylish shade of teal blue.

No comment yet.
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

A hack/tip for Fuji X100(s) users who zone focus | NoSugar on Digital Photography Review

A hack/tip for Fuji X100(s) users who zone focus | NoSugar on Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it

I've owned a Fuji X100 and now a X100s. I shoot street and usually shoot very close to my subjects , So F8 (sunny), Shutter at 500, ISO Auto (6400), manual focus at 7 feet and I am ready for some street photography. So out I go to the streets and I see an interesting subject, whip out my x100s , frame > shoot (sometimes from the hip) in a matter of seconds ! Sometime later, I retire to a nice cafe, order a ice mocha ... and settle down to browse thru my shots. Arrrrggh !!!  Fully half of my shots are not in focus. Only now I've noticed that my manual focus distance has shifted from 7 feet to 15feet instead !!!

So the issue here to me is, the manual focus ring is so damn smooth that it is very easy for me to unintentionally touch it and shift focus distances. It is very irritating when you are zone focused and need too check the evf/lcd every now and then to make sure your distance scale is correct.

 

So I brainstormed a bit and came out with a small (maybe inelegant) solution. I dug out an old inner tube for my mountain bike, cut out a strip that is about the width of the focus rings and wrapped over it. The little bit of friction from the rubber prevents the focusing ring from moving from the lightest of touches but it does not affect anything else and I still can adjust aperture/manual focus (turning the ring or AEL/AFL method) as per normal.
I've attached a pic here ...

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Fujifilm releases XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS and updates lens roadmap | Digital Photography Review

Fujifilm releases XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS and updates lens roadmap | Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it

Fujifilm is committed to the entire X-Series line of advanced digital cameras and FUJINON XF lens, and is issuing an updated XF lens roadmap following the initial XF lens roadmap released in June 2012.

With 10 FUJINON XF lenses and the new three X-Mount lenses that Carl Zeiss announced in September 2012, there will soon be 13 high-performance lenses available for the X-Mount system to meet the needs of every photographer and support a wide range of photography from  ultra-wide-angle at 10-24mm(15-36mm*1) to super-telephoto of 55-200mm (83-300mm*1.) 


End 2013
In late 2013, Fujifilm will deliver the pancake XF27mm (41mm*1) F2.8 high performance single focal length lens. Fujifilm will then launch the super wide zoom XF10mm-24mm (15-36mm*1) F4 lens with optical image stabilization and the single focal length XF23mm (35mm*1) F1.4 lens.


Early 2014
In early 2014, FUJINON will launch its premier prime portrait lens, the XF56mm (84mm*1) F1.2R.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Fujifilm X-series studio comparisons updated with new ACR 7.4 raw process | Digital Photography Review

Fujifilm X-series studio comparisons updated with new ACR 7.4 raw process | Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it


Following the recent public release of Adobe Camera Raw 7.4, we've updated our studio comparison database with new raw conversions of files from the Fujifilm X-Pro 1, X-E1 and X100S. We've been using the release candidate version of ACR 7.4 for some time, which contained significant improvements to Adobe's treatment of files from Fujifilm's X-Trans sensors. The official public release version of ACR 7.4 brings some further (very minor) tweaks. Follow the links below to the studio comparison pages in our X-Pro 1 and X-E1 reviews, and X100S preview, now with final ACR 7.4 raw conversions.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Fujifilm X-E1 Review | Digital Photography Review

Fujifilm X-E1 Review |  Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it

 

Conclusion

 

Pros

- Unique camera design makes you want to take pictures

- Excellent JPEGs, little need to shoot raw most of the time

- Reliable metering and AWB systems, good color (with choice of 'film modes')

- Dials for exposure controls allow for easy check of settings by glancing at the top deck, particularly with prime lenses

- Impressive image quality at all ISO settings - good resolution and low noise

- Built-in flash is handy for fill lighting in a pinch

- Film-simulations offer quick access to different color modes and black and white filters

- Use of electronic viewfinder simplifies interface while maintaining most important features

- Quick menu gives fast access to most digital controls not covered by dials or buttons

- Built-in level helps when capturing landscapes

- Various bracketing modes are easy to set via the Drive button

- Relatively quiet shutter

- Excellent available prime lenses

 

Cons

- Built-in level isn't always as accurate as we'd like

- Relatively slow AF makes photographing children more difficult

- Framerates in continuous shooting mode aren't completely consistent

- Camera disables RAW shooting without warning in some bracketing modes

- Relatively low-resolution rear LCD compared to some peers

- Panorama mode can result in visible banding in plain tonesAuto ISO often chooses too slow a shutter speed (specifically problematic with the longer primes)

- Minimal control available in video mode

- Continuous drive mode saves files with a different name, sorting them to the bottom

- Large and chunky build won't suit everyone 

 

Overall Conclusion

 

There's a lot to be said for form as well as function and there's no question the Fujifilm X-series cameras elicit a certain response from those of us who enjoy both photography and well-built gadgets. What's great about the X-series cameras and lenses is they don't just look like old photographic tools, they integrate digital and analog controls very successfully. Also, the old-style analog dials are really excellent ways of helping conceptualize things like shutter speed and aperture, the two main elements of photography one has to understand to use cameras effectively. Those who already understand the concepts generally have no trouble understanding numbers on an LCD, but those who are learning can benefit from seeing the numbers laid out in a linear fashion; and the truth is I still find it helpful to turn a dial to adjust aperture, as I can do with the X-E1. For beginners, having that dial wrapped around the lens completely differentiates it from the body-bound shutter speed dial. When using one of the XF prime lenses, the main photographic interface elements are right up front and visible, in the form of physical dials. Photography students would do well to secure a prime lens for this reason (as well as others).

Kit lens users will have to pay attention to the numbers on the LCD.

But that's not all Fujifilm did right with the X-series cameras. Their simple button arrangements also make accessing common functions convenient. Important functions like Drive mode, Exposure, and Autofocus are dedicated to three buttons left of the LCD - a good position to adjust each setting. At first having a button for Drive mode seemed unnatural compared to a dial, but Fujifilm's inclusion of fast access to bracketing modes made those even more useful. The Quick Menu allows access to almost all the other important adjustments the average still photographer will want to make, including things like ISO, resolution, and aspect ratio. Only one analog control needs fixing: the somewhat loose Exposure Compensation dial, which can be rotated accidentally, both in the hand and when being carried around or put in and taken out of a camera bag. Of course, the elephant in the room is video. Although the X-E1's design philosophy is based around giving you all the direct manual control you could ever need, this does not apply to video, which overall seems as much of an afterthought as it is in the X-Pro 1 and X100. For now, the X-series is simply not competitive with its peers in terms of video functionality. As impressive as the Hybrid Viewfinder is on the other cameras in the X-series, the X-E1's electronic viewfinder is excellent. Compared to the X-Pro 1's finder in electronic mode, the X-E1 offers a better and higher-resolution image, but of course it can't pull of the X-Pro 1's impressive trick of switching to an optical view for those times when you want a literal 'window' on the world in front of your lens. The X-E1's EVF cannot replace the X-Pro 1's OVF but if you don't really need or want an optical finder, the X-E1 is clearly a better choice than the X-Pro 1, thanks to its superior EVF and lower overall cost.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Hotel New York in Rotterdam, The netherlands | René Mossinkoff

Hotel New York in Rotterdam, The netherlands | René Mossinkoff | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it


Another series, during the same weekend as the China Light event.

This hotel is a beauty and a good place to test the X-E1.....

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Fujifilm X100S Digital Split Image focus - how it works | Digital Photography Review

Fujifilm X100S Digital Split Image focus - how it works | Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it


The Fujifilm X100S is the latest in a recent rush of cameras to include phase-detection elements on its imaging sensor, giving an AF system that is a hybrid of contrast and phase-detection methods. However, Fujifilm also uses this system to provide a unique and incredibly clever manual focus aid - which could finally allow digital cameras to offer the speed and convenience enjoyed by manual-focus SLR and rangefinder users. Fujifilm UK has posted a video showing 'Digital Split Image' focusing and Japanese camera site DCWatch has published details that allow us to show how it works. The X100S's Digital Split Image system splits the central section of the camera's live view into four black-and-white stripes of the scene. These stripes line-up when the camera is in focus - in a similar way to a split prism viewfinder on a manual-focus film SLR. This gives a method of achieving manual focus while retaining a view of the entire scene, making it possible to assess focus and framing at the same time. This speed and convenience is what has helped focus peaking (a feature the X100S also offers) become a highly desirable feature in mirrorless cameras.

 

How it works

 

The best way of understanding how the system works is to understand how on-sensor phase detection works. Because the Digital Split Image focusing system is essentially presenting the camera's phase detection information visually. Fujifilm was the first company to offer on-sensor phase detection in one of its cameras, when it launched its F300 EXR and Z800 EXR compact cameras. When they were launched, we explained how the system works. The key thing is that the light entering the left-hand-side of the lens will only give the same image as the light from the right-hand-side when the lens is in focus. So if you can 'look at' the left- and right-hand sides separately, you can compare the two images and calculate how much you need to move the lens to get them to match up........

 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Fujifilm X-E1 hands-on preview | Digital Photography Review

Fujifilm X-E1 hands-on preview | Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it

When Fujifilm launched the X system in January 2012, it did so with an unusually high-end body - the X-Pro1. With its unique hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder, solid metal body and analogue dial-led control philosophy, it was clearly targeted towards professionals and keen enthusiasts looking for an updated take on the classic rangefinder concept. The X-Pro1 was generally well-received, but its price was always likely to limit its appeal. Fujifilm's new baby, the X-E1, aims to broaden the line's appeal to wider range of enthusiasts, and will compete directly with the likes of the Sony Alpha NEX-7 and Olympus OM-D E-M5.

X-E1 - the more affordable X-Pro1

The X-E1 is in essence a slimmed-down X-Pro1, with the large, complex and expensive hybrid finder replaced by a purely-electronic viewfinder. Not any old EVF though - it uses a 2.36M dot OLED unit, out-speccing the X-Pro1's 1.44M dot LCD finder. In return its rear screen is slightly downgraded in terms of both size and resolution, to a still-respectable 2.8" 460k dot LCD - according to Fujifilm this is necessary to keep the camera's size down. The result is a compact body that's broadly similar in size to both the much-loved FinePix X100, and its most obvious competitors like the E-M5 and NEX-7.

The X-E1 gets a few new features relative to the X-Pro1, commensurate with its class. There's a little built-in pop-up flash, a 2.5mm stereo microphone socket for movie recording, and the ability to use an electronic shutter release cable in addition to the signature threaded shutter release button. But otherwise it's near-identical to the X-Pro1, using the same 16MP X-Trans CMOS sensor and EXR Pro image processor, and almost exactly the same control layout and interface.
No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Breaking the Rules | Thomas Park on Digital Photography Review

Breaking the Rules | Thomas Park on Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it

 

There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs - Ansel Adams

 

In a previous article, I discussed several so-called 'rules of composition'. Compositional rules, however, can be polarizing and divisive. Is this because as artists, we prize independence and don't like to, 'color in between the lines'? Or is it because we've all experienced disappointment when slavish application of the Golden Ratio still produces drab and lifeless images? Certainly, great works of art have been produced throughout history that paid no heed to pre-determined compositional rules. You may ask then, if compelling art is not created by simply following rules, what's the point of learning the rules in the first place? That's a great question.

Now this is not going to be an article suggesting that all compositional rules are 'bad' or 'wrong'. Instead, what follows is a look at the rationale behind some established compositional rules. I'd argue that by understanding the intent behind a rule, we can subvert or break the rule to create drama or focus the viewer's attention in creative and novel ways. Let's begin with an example from another visual medium: drawing. 


A story about eyes

Many years ago, my great-uncle - an accomplished painter and sculptor - was teaching me how to draw portraits. He suggested placing the eyes at the vertical midway point of the head. This 'rule' won't be surprising for anyone with a drawing background, but for many people, the idea that the eyes are halfway down the face is unintuitive - it seems too low! I recently had a conversation with a friend who received the same advice from his father, despite the fact that he and I grew up in different countries. The fact that two artists from opposite sides of the planet were taught the same 'rule of eyes' points to one source of artistic rules: observations about the natural world. In reality, are everybody's eyes exactly halfway down their face? No, but it's a good starting point that is visually pleasing and conforms to our expectations of illustrated portraits. In fact, a distinguishing feature of children's drawings of people is that the eyes are placed 'too high up' on the face. This is a simple rule that helps us to draw a more realistic portrait. Just as importantly, however, understanding this rule allows us to make deliberate choices. We can draw a face with the eyes in the middle of the face for a natural look. We can instead place the eyes above the midway mark to give the drawing a more child-like quality. Or we can place the eyes below the midway mark to make the drawing look furtive or comical.

No comment yet.
Suggested by PeterPrism
Scoop.it!

Fujifilm shows-off zoom lens on X-Pro1 and denies XF lenses allow full frame | Digital Photography Review

Fujifilm shows-off zoom lens on X-Pro1 and denies XF lenses allow full frame | Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it
FUJIFILM has been showing off the way its X-Pro1's hybrid viewfinder will behave when used with zoom lenses - which we demonstrate in a video. It has also moved to quell suggestions that its XF lenses are ready for a full-frame X-mount camera. 'It would not work - XF lenses could not be used with a full-frame sensor,' said Hiroshi Kawahara, operations manager of Fujifilm's product planning division. He also drew our attention to the way X-Pro1 users will be able to use the hybrid viewfinder with zoom lenses - a feature that will be added in a forthcoming firmware update.

Initially it was unclear whether the X-Pro1 would be able to use its hybrid viewfinder with a zoom, or whether it would be restricted to using its electronic viewfinder mode. The good news is that it's not only is it possible, but its implementation is rather elegant.

Zooming the lens causes the viewfinder frame lines to smoothly contract, to represent the new field of view. The clever feature comes when you get to longer focal lengths. As with other long lenses, to avoid the framelines taking up a tiny section of the finder, holding the VF mode selection lever for 2 seconds engages the viewfinder's magnifying lens - giving a larger view of the subject and framing.

As you zoom out, once your view becomes wider than the magnified viewfinder allows, warning arrows appear at the corners of the finder to stress that you aren't seeing the whole frame. Holding the VF mode lever again reverts to the unmagnified view.

This video, shot on the Fujifilm stand at Photokina, shows the viewfinder as the lens is zoomed. At the full extent of the zoom, the magnified view is engaged. The lens is then zoomed-out again, showing the out-of-bound warning arrows at the corner of the finder.
No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Fujifilm launches XF18-55mm F2.8-4.0 OIS and XF14mm F2.8 | Digital Photography Review

Fujifilm launches XF18-55mm F2.8-4.0 OIS and XF14mm F2.8 | Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it

 

The FUJIFILM X-E1 pairs perfectly with the XF18mm-55mm (27-84mm) F2.8-4 lens to deliver super-fast focusing speeds that will capture even the fastest action. The highly responsive linear motor in the XF18-55mm lens combines with the high-speed signal readout of the X-Trans CMOS sensor and the EXR Processor Pro, to achieve a huge leap in AF speed and precision performance. Contrast Detection in the X-E1 brings your subject into sharp focus in as little as 0.1 seconds.

 

FUJINON XF14mm key features list:

21mm equivalent bright F2.8 lens Consists of 10 elements in 7 groups, including 2 aspheric and 3 extra low dispersion elements and a seven-blade rounded diaphragm58mm lens filter size

 

FUJINON XF18mm-55mm key features list:

27-84mm equivalent F2.8-4 lensHighly responsive linear motorContrast Detection brings subject into sharp focus in as little as 0.1 seconds(2)High quality all-glass lens structure consists of 14 elements in 10 groups, including 3 aspherical lenses and 1 extra low dispersion element, as well as a seven-blade rounded diaphragmOIS to provide image stabilization equivalent to 4 stops58mm lens filter size

 

Pricing and Availability

The FUJIFILM X-E1 and XF18mm-55mm (27-84mm) F2.8-4 lens (kit) will be available in November for $1,399.95. The FUJINON XF14mm (21mm) F2.8 single focal length lens and XF18mm-55mm (27-84mm) F2.8-4 lens will be available in November for $899.95 and $699.95, respectively.

 

 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

A few more from the X-Pro1 Road trip to Amarillo | Jim Radcliffe on Digital Photography Review

A few more from the X-Pro1 Road trip to Amarillo | Jim Radcliffe on Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it


Here's a few more I took last weekend while on a road trip to Amarillo. All shots were taken with the X-Pro1 and the 18mm.


Palo Duro Canyon

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Some recent work with the X-Pro1... | Jim Radcliffe - Digital Photography Review

Some recent work with the X-Pro1...  | Jim Radcliffe - Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it

I've been using the X-Pro1 for over a month now and it has become my carry-with-me-all-the-time camera. I continue to be amazed by the capabilities of this camera and the three lenses. I thought I would share some recent work I have done with the X-Pro1. I've been playing quite a bit with the macro function and really enjoy it. You can see more on my website in the Fuji section.... the direct link is

 

http://www.boxedlight.com/xp1/index.htm

 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Canon EF and "L" lenses on Fuji X-Pro1 | Smatty on DPreview

Canon EF and "L" lenses on Fuji X-Pro1 | Smatty on DPreview | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it

Smatty continued his test of the Kipon Canon EF to Fuji XF lens adapter on last weekend.

Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 -
Canon EF 135mm f/2 L and
Canon EF 70-200mm F4 IS L plus TC 1.4x II

 

Question:

How do you adjust the aperture on an EF lens attached to the XP1? I have an FD adapter, and I got it because my FD lens has a manual Aperture ring, I assumed EF wouldn't be compatible since it's an electronically controlled aperture...

 

Answer:

So you can only use the Canon lenses at its wides aperture when connecting to the adapter. If you want to stop down there is a workaround by connecting it to your Canon camera, set the desired aperture, press the DOF preview button and pull the lens off while you still press the DOF preview button.

Smatty's Website http://www.PhotosdeLux.com

 

 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Enclosed: one Fuji x100s review | MotoBloar on Digital Photography Review

Enclosed: one Fuji x100s review | MotoBloar on Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it

......

Overall Conclusion

The Fuji X100s is a photographer's camera. It's also a hipster's camera and a dentist's third or fourth camera that they never use. If you want value, this is not your camera. Get an APS-C DSLR - the companies that make them have competed away all their profit margins and you can get a really great, mature, feature-rich camera for a lot less than the X100s. But your DSLR won't look like the X100s. It won't be silent like the X100s. It won't be as small, light, and portable as the X100s. It won't travel like the x100s. It won't shoot street photography like the X100s. But, then again, you can say all that about the other large-sensor-but-small-body cameras out there right now.....

 

So what are we left with? Well, the Fuji X100s produces as-good-as, or better, images than the majority of those alternatives, and to my eye it's the best looking of the bunch. Add on top of that the most important things: good ergonomics and handling, a good sensor, and a good lens, and you've got a winner. For now. This is a good camera. It takes good pictures. My friends like it. It looks cool. All the cool photographers (some of whom seem to spend more time writing about gear than taking photos) are raving about it. I guess I'd better like it. But is it a DSLR-killer? Hell no. (What are you, high?)  The Fuji Xpro2 or Xpro3 might get there, someday, and until then, I'm waiting in the wings.....

Thomas Menk's insight:

Part 1:
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/51403408

Part 2
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/51403415

Part 3:
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/51403425

Part 4:
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/51403448

Part 5:
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/51403458

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Fujifilm XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS Preview | Digital Photography Review

Fujifilm XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS Preview |  Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it


Over the past few years, the digital camera market has been transformed by the arrival of mirrorless system cameras. Freed from film-era design constraints, these can provide image quality to match SLRs in a much more portable form factor. Entry-level models provide compact-camera like handling and simplicity, while high-end cameras such as the Sony NEX-7, Olympus OM-D E-M5 and Fujifilm X-E1 are able to offer a full set of enthusiast-friendly manual controls in smaller, more discreet systems, and with relatively few compromises. However to persuade buyers to forsake their SLRs, the camera companies also need to offer lens lines that will cover their needs. While most manufacturers have attacked the mirrorless market from the bottom up, Fujifilm's approach has been the opposite, starting with unashamedly top-end X-Pro1 followed up by the more enthusiast-oriented X-E1. The company's lens line reflects this - instead of starting out with entry-level kit zooms, it took the decidedly unusual step of launching with three fixed-focal length primes. The first zoom appeared with the X-E1, but the XF 18-55mm F2.8-4.5 R LM OIS is no ordinary 'kit' lens, offering premium optics and a faster maximum aperture.

The XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS telephoto zoom follows in the same vein - according to Fujifilm the aim is to provide premium optical quality and construction alongside class-leading image stabilization. Like the 18-55mm it features a relatively fast maximum aperture, gathering half a stop more light than most similar zooms for SLRs, and it uses a pair of linear stepper motors for near-silent autofocus. As with the other XF lenses, it also offers all-metal barrel construction and an on-lens aperture control ring. The overall picture is of a decidedly premium lens, that's quite unlike the inexpensive 55-200mm F4-5.6 telezooms for APS-C SLRs.

Headline features55-200mm focal length (83-300mm equivalent)Relatively fast F3.5-4.8 maximum apertureOptical image stabilization; 4.5 stops claimed benefitAperture ring on lensX mount for Fujifilm X system mirrorless cameras

 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Fujifilm XF 14mm F2.8 R review | Digital Photography Review

Fujifilm XF 14mm F2.8 R review | Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it


Overall conclusion

The XF 14mm F2.8 R is a relatively rare example of a genuinely wideangle, high quality prime lens for any camera type other than full frame SLRs. The closest comparisons lie with the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm 1:2 for Micro Four Thirds and Pentax's smc DA 15mm F4 ED AL Limited for its APS-C SLRs, both of which also offer premium metal-barrelled construction and 'proper' manual focus rings with distance and depth of field scales. Indeed the 14mm's push/pull manual focus switchover mechanism bears more than a passing resemblance to Olympus's version. They're not strictly alternatives, of course; they all work on different camera systems. But of the three, the 14mm offers the widest view.

The 14mm is a pretty expensive optic, so needs to perform well to justify its price. Thankfully, it does just that - in fact it turns out to be an exceptionally good lens. At the apertures you'd most often shoot a wideangle it's exceptionally sharp right across the frame, and it's almost perfectly-corrected for distortion and chromatic aberration. Vignetting is quite strong at F2.8, and never quite goes away on stopping down; however it'll only be visible to RAW shooters, as it's corrected automatically by the camera's JPEG processing. The drop-off in brightness across the frame is also quite gradual, rather than abrupt in the extreme corners, which means that visually it's not so objectionable anyway.

Perhaps the nearest the lens has to a real flaw is rather soft edges and corners when shot at F2.8. This could be a real problem for photographers who shoot a lot handheld in low light, especially as there's no image stabilization available. But as sharpness picks up dramatically even at F4, and wideangles can safely be shot at relatively slow shutter speeds without fear of camera shake (allowing use of smaller apertures without having to raise the ISO) we suspect it won't be too much of a concern for the majority of users.

Autofocus isn't especially fast, but it's very accurate, and for many typical uses of a wideangle lens focus speed isn't especially important anyway. Manual focus is extremely well-implemented; the focus ring is well-damped and very responsive, making precise manual focusing very straightforward. Switching from auto to manual focus is very quick, requiring just a quick pull back on the focus ring. This reveals a distance and depth for field scale for zone focusing, which many users will be pleased to hear is calibrated conventionally, as opposed to the very conservative version Fujifilm displays in X-system camera viewfinders.

One point worth knowing, though, is that there's no way of combining auto and manual focus, so you can't use AF to prefocus then make adjustments manually. Instead switching the lens from AF to manual resets it to the last-used manual focus position. But again, this is a function that's arguably rather less useful on a wideangle lens than on a telephoto. Overall the 14mm offers perhaps the most convincing implementation of MF we've yet seen on an 'focus-by-wire lens, and is streets ahead of the existing XF lenses.

Build quality is very good, with the metal-skinned barrel and chunky metal focus ring offering a real feeling of solidity. On our sample this was slightly let down down by rather loose click-stops on the aperture ring, making it too easy to change by accident. Of course with the aperture setting constantly displayed in the viewfinder there's less risk of shooting lots of images at the wrong setting, but this does demand you get into the habit of checking your settings whenever you take the camera out of the bag for shooting.

No comment yet.
Suggested by fxt
Scoop.it!

Adobe's Fujifilm X-Trans sensor processing tested | Digital Photography Review

Adobe's Fujifilm X-Trans sensor processing tested | Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it


With the posting of ACR 7.4 and Lightroom 7.4 'release candidates' (RC), Adobe has updated its raw processing algorithms for Fujifilm's X-Trans sensor cameras, the X-Pro1, X-E1, X100s and X20. This move comes in response to months of online user requests for improved raw processing of the X-Pro1, Fujifilm's flagship mirrorless interchangeable lens model. It is rare that Adobe's Camera Raw team revisits its demosaicing process for previously supported cameras, so we were excited to try out this latest version with some X-Pro1 raw files and compare results to the previous version of ACR, Capture One Pro 7 and Fujifilm's own in-camera conversion. To provide some context, the vast majority of digital cameras ever made perceive color using what's known as a Bayer Color Filter Array, named after the late Kodak engineer Bryce Bayer. For its recent cameras, Fujifilm has developed its own color filter array pattern, which it calls X-Trans. The idea behind X-Trans is that its pattern repeats less often than the Bayer pattern, rendering redundant the low-pass filter that usually protects against moiré. The disadvantage of creating a non-standard color filter array (especially one that took two years to develop the demosaicing algorithm for), is that third-party software makers have to do a lot more work to provide Raw support. Adobe was one of the first third-party software makers to provide Raw support for the Fujifilm X-Pro1, but the results often fell short of the standard set by the camera's own JPEG engine, in terms of rendering fine detail. So let's see what changes Adobe has made.....

Summary:

While it's important to recognize that ACR 7.3 and earlier was certainly very usable for many types of X-Pro1 images - especially if they weren't subjected to 100% view scrutiny - there's no question that with the 7.4 release candidate, Adobe has substantially improved their raw processing for the camera's X-Trans sensor. Our hats are off to Adobe for committing the not-insignificant resources necessary to improve support for X-Trans sensor cameras with relatively limited market share. The results speak for themselves and we feel confident in saying that ACR 7.4 RC is the update that X-Pro1 users have long been waiting for. Default settings offer a useful comparison of a raw engine's demosaicing capabilities but of course you'll want to tweak these parameters to get the most out of any raw file. In re-processing dozens of X-Pro1 images with ACR 7.4 we found that they all benefited from slightly more aggressive than usual sharpening, with a higher radius value than we'd typically use. You can download the original Raw files below to try your hand with your own settings in the raw processor of your choice. Share your findings with the community in the comments section. We'd love to hear what works best for you.

 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Capture One Fujifilm X-Trans Raw support tested | Digital Photography Review

Capture One Fujifilm X-Trans Raw support tested | Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it


Capture One v7.0.2, the latest version of Phase One's image management and Raw conversion software, includes support for Fujifilm's X-Trans cameras. Given the trouble this non-Bayer design has caused for third-party Raw converters (it remains to be seen how many will ever offer support), this has caused a lot of excitement in the Fujifilm community. So, just how well does Capture One do, and how significant is the problem , in the first place? To provide some context, the vast majority of digital cameras ever made perceive color using what's known as a Bayer Color Filter Array, named after the late Kodak engineer Bryce Bayer. For its recent cameras, Fujifilm has developed its own color filter array pattern, which it calls X-Trans. The idea behind X-Trans is that its pattern repeats less often than the Bayer pattern, rendering redundant the low-pass filter that usually protects against moiré. The disadvantage of creating a non-standard color filter array (especially one that took two years to develop the demosaicing algorithm for), is that third-party software makers have to do a lot more work to provide Raw support....

 

"As you can see, Capture One's color response is much closer to the camera's results than Adobe's default profile. The default results are also substantially more sharpened than the JPEGs are. In comparison with the camera JPEGs, there are hints of the same brushstroke effect that Adobe Camera Raw produces, though not to the same degree and mitigated, perhaps, by the better color response."

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Fujifilm X100S First Look | Digital Photography Review

Fujifilm X100S First Look | Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it


Fujifilm says the X100S has fully 70 improvements over the X100, some major (like the sensor), some relatively minor. Here we pick out some of the most important from the list, but in short, it appears that many of the X100's remaining irritations have been addressed. Note though that we haven't seen a working model yet, so don't know how well the camera actually behaves in practice.

Performance improvements

The X100S's new sensor and processor add up to improved performance specs compared to the X100. Here's Fujifilm's own comparison between the two:

 

- Improved AF speed: 0.07 sec in good light (10EV), compared to 0.22 sec for X100

- Quicker startup (0.9 sec vs 2 sec)

- Faster continuous shooting (6 fps vs 5 fps)

- Substantially larger buffer, 31 frames vs 10 frames (JPEG Large/Fine)

- Improved shot-to-shot time in single shot drive mode (0.5 sec vs 0.9 sec)

- Can immediately switch to playback mode after shooting (no need to wait for file to write to card)

- Buttons that were unresponsive immediately after shooting are now fixed

 

Image processing options

The X100S gains the 'Pro Neg' film simulation options previously seen on the X-Pro1 and X-E1, which are particularly aimed at giving neutral results for portrait photographers. At the other end of the scale, it also gets a range of special effects 'Advanced filters'.

 

- 'Pro Neg Std' and 'Pro Neg Hi' film simulation settings

- Customisable film simulation bracketing

- 8 'Advanced Filter' processing options (Toy Photo, Miniature, Pop Colour, Soft Focus, Dynamic Tone, High Key, Low Key, Partial Colour)

 

Enhanced movie functionality

The X100's video mode was basic to say the least, but the X100S boasts much improved specs. Movies are still a bolt-on to what's fundamentally a stills camera, and accessed as a drive mode (there's no 'red button' in sight here). Note there's still no image stabilization, optical or electronic, so hand-held movies will be jittery.

 

- 1080p 60fps Full HD recording, with 24Mbps bitrate (compared to X100's 720p 24fps)

- Phase-detect AF effective for movie shooting

- X-Trans colour filter reduces moiré and false colour

- AF-S focus mode available (only AF-C and MF on X100)

 

Miscellaneous changes

 

- 14bit RAW output

- Max ISO in Auto mode increased to 6400

- Auto ISO moved to shooting menu (from Set-up)

- Protective coating on viewfinder window, to keep OVF clear of fingerprints

- Minimum shooting distance using OVF reduced to 50cm (from 80cm on X100)

- Minimum focus in normal shooting reduced to 21cm (from 40cm)

- Shutter count function (updates every 100 shots, accessed from menu)

- Battery chamber redesigned to prevent wrong-way-round insertion

- 1:1 aspect ratio added (alongside 3:2 and 16:9)

- Camera retains (as opposed to resets) all settings after firmware update

- Eye-Fi card support

- Improved support for SD cards used with Apple computers

- Live histogram adapts to current settings in manual exposure mode

- Strap lugs are double-plated for increased durability

 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

The impressive 18-55 2,8-4,0 | Nathan Wright on Dpreview

The impressive 18-55 2,8-4,0 | Nathan Wright on Dpreview | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it


I was at Yodobashi to pick up a DK-17M for my D800 today and there just happened to be an X-E1 on display. Lo and behold, the 18-55 was there, too. Beautiful combination. The 18-55 is rather large in comparison to other lenses, but is still very light and made tightly with attention paid to high quality workmanship. The zoom portion is mechanical (thank god) and instant. Manually focusing the lens is much more responsive than any of the other lenses. In fact, despite the flly-by-wire delay, responsiveness is similar to a heavily damped manual focus lens. Impressive.Manual focus is extremely accurate, and thanks to the decently-sized viewfinder, easy to focus. In fact, the viewfinder is much better than the OVF of the X-Pro 1 - if you have come from any sort of SLR or rangefinder. It is larger, but not as large/bright as the X100's. The X-Pro 1 was high on my list until I used it time after time at Yodobashi: the viewfinder is simply too small/dim to use. EVF is too slow and the OVF had a hard time. I'm a Nikon FE/FM owner/user. It pales in comparison even to a D200. In fact, I'd take the D5000 over it in terms of light/size. Hardly a modern rangefinder replacement/stand in. But the X-E1 doesn't even pretend to be a rangefinder. It acts just like an SLR. Its viewfinder is smaller than a good SLR, but it is pretty responsive, and thanks to 3x/10x magnification, easy to manually focus. (If you wonder I keep mentioning manual focus, it is because I work with a certain lens base, not a camera base. I use LTM lenses on range finder cameras and F lenses on SLR cameras. Cameras with poor viewfinders or manual focus ability simply aren't a consideration for me.) I spent only 10 minutes with the camera, but was impressed with it. Paired with a Hawk's Factory Adapter, even LTM/M lenses work like SLR lenses with close focus. With the 18-55, the X-E1 is simply perfect. AF is quick - similar to Nikon AFS prime lenses, maybe slightly faster. I'd put its focus speed ahead of the 50/1,4 AFS. With good technique, it is perfectly usable for anything but sport photography, and even then, it may be the EVF response that will cause problems. It is smooth, feels great in the hand, and works. The only thing I don't like is the lack of hard stop for infinity and close focus and of course, the lack of marked aperture ring. It is nice to know what aperture setting you are at prior to turning the camera on. That goes for both SLR's and of course for rangefinder cameras (which don't have programme settings). Well, if I find myself with another 1000-1100$ (prices in japan are quite a bit higher than in the USA), I'll jump. The D800 is for work. For enjoyment, I want something light and easy to use. If Fuji could fix the horrible OVF of the X-Pro 1 and add digital focusing patch in the hybrid OVF, the X-Pro 1 and 18/55 lens combo might be excellent, too. For now, I would put my money and heart behind the X-E1. That is, if I had either one.

 

EDIT:
I forgot to mention: this lens is sharp, and bokeh is generally quite good. I was only at Yodobashi, so the subjects are pretty limited. But overall, damn, for the price and for the performance, this lens leaves its mark. Niggles (no aperture marks, lack of hard stops/DOF scales), this lens is a keeper.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Fuji X-Pro1 Firmware Update | Tristan Crane

Fuji X-Pro1 Firmware Update | Tristan Crane | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it


I’m hip-deep in a lot of retouching, and have some fun stuff to share coming up – including a few amazing weddings. I did want to drop a note about the latest firmware update for the X-Pro1. MUCH faster focus and some nice options -faster write to the card, faster delete, just all around improved performance for the camera. My friend Indra was vending at a club event last week, so I had a chance to test it in some really tricky lighting situations and was extremely impressed at the upgrade! 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Fujifilm improves X-Pro1 focusing with updated Firmware 2.0 | Digital Photography Review

Fujifilm improves X-Pro1 focusing with updated Firmware 2.0 | Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it


We've been impressed by the way Fujifilm has embraced the idea of using firmware updates to improve its X-series cameras after release, fixing bugs and adding new features. With Firmware 2 for the X-Pro1, it's substantially improved the camera's focusing, which we considered to be its Achilles' Heel in our review. Autofocus speeds have undoubtedly been improved (although we've not yet had enough time to properly assess the impact on real-world shooting), and the previously-dysfunctional manual focus has essentially been fixed, and is now far more usable than it was before.The upshot is that an X-Pro1 running firmware v2.0 is a much better camera than it was with v1.x. Fujifilm says the new X-E1 has exactly the same improvements, which means that the outlook for that model looks very positive. Huge credit must go to Fujifilm here - not only has it shown it's prepared to make innovative new products, it's also genuinely listening to criticism of its products and fixing their flaws. This can only be applauded.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Fujifilm X-E1 hands-on preview | Digital Photography Review

Fujifilm X-E1 hands-on preview | Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it

 

X-E1 - the more affordable X-Pro1

 

The X-E1 is in essence a slimmed-down X-Pro1, with the large, complex and expensive hybrid finder replaced by a purely-electronic viewfinder. Not any old EVF though - it uses a 2.36M dot OLED unit, out-speccing the X-Pro1's 1.44M dot LCD finder. In return its rear screen is slightly downgraded in terms of both size and resolution, to a still-respectable 2.8" 460k dot LCD - according to Fujifilm this is necessary to keep the camera's size down. The result is a compact body that's broadly similar in size to both the much-loved FinePix X100, and its most obvious competitors like the E-M5 and NEX-7. The X-E1 gets a few new features relative to the X-Pro1, commensurate with its class. There's a little built-in pop-up flash, a 2.5mm stereo microphone socket for movie recording, and the ability to use an electronic shutter release cable via the USB port (in addition to the signature threaded shutter release button). But otherwise it's near-identical to the X-Pro1, using the same 16MP X-Trans CMOS sensor and EXR Pro image processor, and almost exactly the same control layout and interface....

No comment yet.
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Fujifilm X-Pro1 in-depth review | Digital Photography Review

Fujifilm X-Pro1 in-depth review | Digital Photography Review | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it

The X-Pro1 is the start of an all-new camera system, with a brand new mount and lenses. It's unashamedly targeted at a high-end audience, with analogue control dials and a small set of compact, large-aperture primes available at launch. Fujifilm is keen to stress its future commitment to the system, with a promise of seven more lenses by spring 2013, and further camera models to come too.

Mithunblog's comment, July 3, 2012 9:14 AM
I like this Camera........... :)
Scooped by Thomas Menk
Scoop.it!

Another AF oddity / tip for X-Pro1 | Devwild on DPreview.com

Another AF oddity / tip for X-Pro1 | Devwild on DPreview.com | Fuji X-Pro1 | Scoop.it

 

Try laying the AF point across an area where the only contrast is a horizontal dividing line between two objects - in my case the top of a TV or picture frame vs the wall. The AF will struggle to focus, and depending on the circumstances, fail to lock more often than not. However, tilt the camera by 30-45 degress, or even 90 degrees, and it will lock - every time. Note that 90 degrees - horizontal lines don't seem to cause a problem in portrait mode, only lines parallel to the long edge of the frame.

 

Useful tip?

No comment yet.